Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

Options
16496506526546551067

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11,199 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    That's a separate issue though Blanch. If it was left to me, such designated urban areas would include most of Dublin county, parts of North Wicklow and East Kildare etc and likewise around other urban areas. Car bans/ heavy costs.

    You point about unsustainable rural living is not something we just arrived at - it's largely due to the policies pursued by successive governments over decades. A choice has been made to concentrate development in Dublin and other urban areas thus enabling a decline in rural population. This has then been combined with a policy to reduce public services in rural areas as population declines - a vicious and self fulfilling circle.

    Take schools - was a time when most if not all national school children could walk/ cycle to school in rural areas. What did the state do? It started a process of closing smaller rural schools, amalgamating them and promised a school bus service as the distances were now considerably greater. Ditto for all manner of other services - the state solution for decades has been to say to rural people to get in their car and drive to xyz as they'll get a better service there. So the state itself has taken on these costs over the decades by virtue of it's own policies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,593 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    I don't think you appreciate the level of industrialisation both farming and fishing have gone through over the lifetime of the Irish state (i.e. 1920s) and especially since the post world war II green revolution. Like every other industry mechanization, specialisation and automation have displaced a lot of manual labour that did menial tasks. Consider the number of people needed to milk cows. 1 person now does the work 10 people once did and without the risk of the cow kicking over the bucket. This is a massive productivity gain and is a principle reason that food takes up a lower percentages of peoples income today than in did back in the 1960s.

    The price of food has risen recently mainly in line with fuel transport costs, disruption of supply lines due to Covid lockdowns has been a factor. A big issue that is slowly taking effect is the price and scarcity of fertiliser. The effect will be to take more marginal land and crops out of production, reducing consumer choice, increasing prices and reduced global food supply.


    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,199 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Ah no, commercial vehicles and business vehicles would be exempted/ facilitated. Any policy like this would be targeted at private vehicle ownership and use.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,888 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Yes, let's take schools. A two-teacher school needs to have 13 pupils to remain open (see relevant circulars from the Department of Education, I am using Appendix A of Circular 19/2022). That is a ratio of 1 teacher to 6.5 pupils.

    A large urban school with 30 teachers needs 727 pupils, that is a ratio of 1 teacher to 24.33 pupils.

    That remains unsustainable with the climate change problems facing the world. Living in villages and towns is the only solution. An immediate ban on one-off housing outside of designated villages and town centres is required.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,888 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I do understand and appreciate that. It explains why so many people don't need to live in rural locations anymore.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,993 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    There's absolutely no reason for the excessive car journey's to school's. There are 3 primary and 2 secondary schools in my area and the number of people who drive their kids to school is criminal. I cycle with mine every morning, except when it was too icy and then we just walked. Yet the amount of parents in the area who drive is nuts. I'm all for these types of proposals being honest.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    Many live there because of cost.

    The vast majority of people cannot pay and will not pay the prices Dublin houses are selling for, large provincial towns are now also almost as expensive in to purchase a house.

    The cheapest option for most is to build a home to a much higher standard than any developer will ever provide on a cheap site down a side road three miles outside of a village or town.

    Add in the gradual shift to working from home and it's a very appealing situation for many newly weds wanting to settle down and start a family.

    One-off house applications have increased YoY.

    You can hate it all you like, but its the result of mass immigration amongst a few other reasons in pushing up demand for housing in our urban centres.

    It's the Irish "White Flight"

    We are following a very similar model most other EU states + UK have done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    Fantastic to see those mild temperatures bring much needed relief to European households in terms of lower heating costs.

    More of this please. 👏



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Be careful which you wish for, as I said, later in the year this is going to bite in the form of droughts as there will be little to no snow melt.

    We already saw this in 2022 which many rivers fell below historic levels which also had a massive impact of the power generation sector in France and logistics for the continent as barges could no longer move freely and became trapped due to low water levels



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,888 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Well then, in order to discourage rural living, which is bad for the climate, we need to discourage it. This is similar to discouraging private vehicle ownership in urban areas, sauce for the goose, etc.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Would that be the 6.5GW of wind you claimed existed?

    Here's a handy Eirgrid table showing the all Ireland numbers, its handy




  • Registered Users Posts: 9,780 ✭✭✭buried


    You definitely need to discourage it for sure, especially when you are importing thousands of migrants and basing them in rural living areas.

    "You have disgraced yourselves again" - W. B. Yeats



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,888 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Actually, they are not being based in rural living areas, they are being put into village and town centres, in places where the locals have refused to live. They are not being housed in one-off rural houses.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,780 ✭✭✭buried


    Doesn't matter B, you are still putting them into rural areas, thousands of them, which are a further carbon footprint drain, which is bad for the environment.

    "You have disgraced yourselves again" - W. B. Yeats



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Not to worry, we'll have offshore wind, more onshore and solar by 2030, we'll have so much excess power the interconnectors will be going like the clappers



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    What are you shyting on about ?

    Banks have been closing branches for decades, hell they have been doing it even in Dublin and other major cities.

    Likewise with post offices.

    The amount of shyte you spout one would think there is a bank and hospital in every village, a bank machine at the end of every boreen and a school at every crossroads.

    Tell you what stay to fook in your town or city and spend your time watching the junkies and the kids ram the garda cars and give us a break.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If you want exact numbers refer to the SEAI or other govt dept reports on the topic. I'll give you what I know off the top of my head

    Solar - 5GW is planned for 2025, can't recall what the 2030 target is but I think I saw 9GW mentioned somewhere but I could be wrong on that. Either way, with the volume of commercial and residential installations kicking off, we're going to blow past the 5GW by 2025 figure so that bodes well for whatever the 2030 figure is

    Offshore - 7GW planned for 2030. You'll have to dig out the info on the type yourself, I don't have that. Please share here if you come across it

    Onshore - Bumping us to 9GW for 2030

    Interconnector - Its something like 2.2GW planned for 2030

    As I said, thats off the top of my head. Note, that doesn't include whatever NI are going to bring to the table either.

    So yeah, we'll be grand



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,888 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Villages and towns are better than one-of housing, and with population growth, can be relatively sustainable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    Why are they not being housed in one-off rural houses? We often hear from every bleeding heart NGO on the airwaves that there are around 160,000~220,000 vacant houses, many in rural areas. They'd have DaCors excellent bus service to use too. A win-win!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,993 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Ah yeah, that shows poor planning as usual. I'm all for this type of thing and if more buses are required they should be prioritized IMO.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,780 ✭✭✭buried


    Hold up man, you want a "lesser carbon footprint" in non urban areas in order to create a better environment for our islands "climate", right? How is importing thousands of people from outside our environment and island with no limits on their number going to accomplish that when you also want rural areas defunct of a population, that in your own view, totally impacts the lesser carbon footprint climate damage scenario you also want to accomplish?

    Where is the sense in this?

    "You have disgraced yourselves again" - W. B. Yeats



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    Or how about we put real and meaningful restrictions on inward immigration to help take away the endless upward demand on housing and public services. Also ban the vulture funds from buying up property. We then need a policy on making sites available in prime areas to young couples to build their own and fcuk the developers getting within an asses roar of these sites. Reform justice too to keep the scummers off the streets and you might not believe the results - young families will return to living in affordable housing in built up areas where services can be delivered.

    The current model allows for:

    • creation of ghettos in our urban centres as properties are held in the hands of a few investors intent on maximising rental incomes
    • outflow of young professionals to the commuter belt
    • further outflow of young families to the rural areas where they can get away from the constraints of tiny houses/apartments with even smaller gardens.

    The greens have no interest in breaking these problems and think these problems will go away with more taxes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,115 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    I was very clear as what I was talking about in the post you are supposedly replying too. But like any others who support this mad offshore "plan", (or indeed any question on assertions), when asked questions on, the reply is nothing other than "look over there" attempts rather than answers.


    For such self appointed experts on any energy source that they do not approve off, the inability to answer even the most basic questions on their own favored "plan" does not say a lot for their self appointed levels of expertise.


    You appeared to have a problem understanding how the marginal pricing policy operates in relation to the wholesale price of electricity I told you how it does, and your I-SEM since 2018 has not change that. Under the marginal pricing policy renewables have not reduced the wholesale price of electricity by a single cent, and never will in. As far as the price is concerned with renewables being paid the same as gas, the only components in the generation mix that lower the price is the level of the other fossil fuels used. .



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,787 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    We were actually discussing the retail price of electricity. There is a lot more to the price consumers pay apart from the wholesale price.

    I thought you were the self appointed expert on this thread?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,115 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    We were actually discussing your apparent from your posts, expertise on nuclear which you oppose, and a few assertions that have not stood up in the real world, as well as like any others on this thread your total inability to answer the most basic of questions on a so called plan you are in favor off.


    You appeared not to understand how the marginal pricing policy determines the wholesale price of electricity and I have explained it to you on a number of occasions now.Your 2018 I-SEM does not make a blind bit of difference as regards the wholesale price of electricity.


    I have never claimed to be an expert on nuclear, but unlike some who seem to regard themselves as experts in all areas of electricity generation, I, like others here have posted verifiable data on a so called plan they favor which they have no answers too resulting in them either running for the hill or attempting to distract whenever questioned on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,787 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    I favor nuclear. I just don't see any viable plan being put forward for it to play a role in Ireland between now and at the earliest 2035.

    I-SEM post 2018 arrangements are radically different from the older arrangements you describe. They most certainly do make a difference.

    You said the IAEA guidance was wrong I took it that this was from your own knowledge and experience, and so assumed that you had some electrical engineering expertise.

    You keep asking me all questions that have nothing to do with me and when I don't answer them you act like it proves something.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Seems like a smart move to me

    Environment Minister Eamon Ryan is to seek Cabinet approval to publish legislation giving him the power to manage the country’s oil supply in the event of a major shortage.


    Mr Ryan will bring a memo before his colleagues outlining how he will be able to take control of the supply of petrol and diesel should the country be thrown into a supply crisis.


    The minister will set out how the laws will work in practice and how quickly they can be deployed in the case of an oil emergency.


    The legislation will give the minister the authority to control the supply and distribution of oil if there is national crisis due to dwindling resources.


    This will include the minister being able to determine how much diesel or petrol people can be given at service stations.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    News on the Codling Bank offshore plans. They are looking to drop from 140 turbines to 100 as the advances in wind turbine tech mean they don't need as many. They had planned for between 900MW and 1.5GW. The new plans will see the farm at 1.4GW. Construction due to start in 2026 and to take 2-3 years




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,607 ✭✭✭ps200306


    If Eamon Ryan is worried about an oil supply shortage should he not be expediting the approval of the Barryroe pertroleum lease undertaking which he has been sitting on for the best part of two years now? After doing nothing for 18 months he fired out an ultimatum to come up with funding withing 3 weeks, and when BEY came up with that he has just gone incommunicado for another four months.



Advertisement