Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

Options
16516526546566571067

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 12,993 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    The first ever trial for using hydrogen in existing gas pipes just started in the Netherlands. It's only supplying a small number of homes and is a three year experiment to see if it is actually feasible. So very early days and nowhere near ready for mass rollouts but it may be an option.

    I've yet to see a gas turbine that can take 100% hydrogen and most manufacturers at putting a date towards the end of this decade for it. They are also saying they will have retrofit kits available for existing gas turbines that will allow them to go fully hydrogen. Again there's a tradeoff as they will need to be derated by around 30% when running on hydrogen so it's no small matter either but definitely a step in the right direction.

    How we produce all the green hydrogen is the million dollar question. As yet a cost point of 150m / 100MW is a non runner at grid scale.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    I think you are on the ball with this one.

    In ER's world he thinks that would finally force people over to busses on crappy timetables.

    All stick with the GP.

    ER's probably itching to restore the 15c diesel and the 20c petrol excise duty cuts announced last summer too. With diesel trending back towards 159c/l he'll be along soon enough to order a review of said cuts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    Some NOX good, some NOX bad.

    Not surprising.

    So much for the "clean air" these guys bang their little drum about.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,386 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...if we played a significant role in regards financing, building and running of, yes we would effectively own them, but since our current more dominant political ideologies is about trying to privatise major infrastructure.....

    we ve tried the largely privatised approach, and it has lead to our current situation, it clearly hasnt worked!

    even though private entities, including financing, is required for our future energy needs, we have to pull this back more so towards a more democratic approach, which means more state involvement, but of course this approach to will have its problems and shortfalls....



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,993 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    NOX isn't CO2...

    We'll all be killed by cancer long before the CO2 induced global heating burns us all to death when the planets temperature rises to a hundred gazillion ballizion degrees.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 29,386 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...or maybe we ll start starving to death due to significant disruption to food supplies, due to co2!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,993 ✭✭✭spaceHopper


    I live nearby it too and live very near where the cable is due to come ashore. It's not ideal but there are worse things that could happen. Fumes from the trash to power plant, rolling blackouts... I'd say do it. If you look at the turbines from Mahgermore or Brittas Bay the visual impact is very small. I know these are much bigger but it's something we need to do.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,200 ✭✭✭crisco10


    In reality, it will look quite like this image of Gunfleet sands wind farm in the UK. Those turbines are about 50% smaller, but also about 40% closer than Kish. So the difference to the casual observer will be minimal.


    As a resident of the area also, I wouldn't be too disturbed by that view. Especially given the greater context.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,459 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    I notice the acolytes haven’t disagreed with my suspicions either………..



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,993 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Plants love a bit of CO2 and without natural gas I've no idea how we produce enough nitrogen to feed the planet. Comes down to a known problem (reduced nitrogen production) versus a possibly maybe one with CO2.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 29,386 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    yes, but we re clearly over producing it, so if we dont solve this, we re fcuked, its a very simple case, but we dont truly know what to do about it....

    ...it also looks like we re creating a phosphorus problem, we re starting to run out of it, without it, we dont exist....



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,386 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,199 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Roll them out... that's what we have to put up with. So that the Dublin Greens can charge their Teslas and run their heating systems.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,559 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    There's no 1.4GW wind turbines in existence. There's only a handful of combined cycle gas turbines and nuclear capable of that output. Best case is 0.014GW.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,607 ✭✭✭ps200306


    Thanks for the correction. No idea what I was thinking, must have had nukes on my mind 😁. I meant the 14 MW Haliade-X of course.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    New powers for Eamonn Ryan approved

    The Minister for the Environment, Climate and Communications, Eamon Ryan TD, has today welcomed Cabinet approval to publish the Oil Emergency Contingency and Transfer of Renewable Transport Fuels Functions Bill 2022. The main purpose of this Bill is to strengthen the Government’s ability to manage stocks in the unlikely event of a curtailment of oil supplies.

    The Government’s approach is in keeping with that of other EU Member States, where emergency preparedness plans have been sharpened in response to the ongoing energy implications of the war in Ukraine.

    The key measures that are being introduced in the Bill include:

    • more clarity around the powers of the Minister, and how quickly they can be deployed, to control the supply and distribution of fuel in an emergency
    • putting all aspects of oil emergency planning on a statutory footing
    • establishing a register of oil suppliers to ensure fast communication to retailers
    • allowing Revenue to share data on oil movements to enhance the responsiveness of the State in an emergency

    Minister Ryan said:

    "This Bill is part of a suite of initiatives being developed by my Department to ensure the security of Ireland’s energy supply in the near future. Our long-term priority, however, and the best approach for Ireland, is to insulate consumers from volatility on international wholesale energy markets by investing in energy efficiency and renewable energy, expanding interconnection with European markets and deepening internal market integration.

    "Climate Action Plan 2023, published before Christmas, sets out how Ireland will accelerate the transition to renewable energy sources. This shift brings with it many rewards, not least greater energy security and stable prices.

    "At the same time, my Department continues to closely monitor the security of energy supplies to Ireland, particularly since Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine. The Government is strengthening the State’s contingency planning measures to ensure that we can respond quickly and effectively should oil supplies be constrained."



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,115 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Yet one poser here believes that at €170m / 100MW is a bargain and that pumping hydrogen through existing gas pipelines would not be a problem.

    A July 2022 report by the California Public Utilities Commission findings were that :

    Hydrogen blends of up to 5% in the natural gas stream are generally safe. However, blending more hydrogen in gas pipelines overall in a greater chance of pipeline leas and the embrittlement of steel pipelines.

    Hydrogen blends of more than 20% present a higher likelihood of permeating plastic pipes, which can increase the risk of gas igniting outside the pipeline.

    Due to the lower energy content of hydrogen, more hydrogen-blended natural gas will be needed to deliver the same amount of energy to users compared to pure natural gas.

    The study concludes that additional examination is needed in blending hydrogen into the the gas system to insure its safety and that it is critical to conduct real-world demonstrations of hydrogen under safe and controlled conditions to determine the appropriate blend percentage suitable to mitigate operational risks such as ignition.


    Even disregarding the risk of a 20% blend and burning hydrogen creating nitrogen oxides, with the higher volume of hydrogen required to provide the same energy you are not going to become CO2 neutral by doing so, and the difference from just using natural gas would be so negligible they would not be worth it in comparison to the risks of piping it through existing natural gas pipelines.


    Yet here some believe that would not be a problem and that w should invest 100s of billions on a system where there is no idea how or if it would work to the scale required. Even less of an idea as to how 100% hydrogen usage would work where the volume required would be much higher than natural gas, where it burns at a much higher temperature, which leaves us back at the hopium merry-go-round of turbines being able to burn hydrogen safely without any idea as to how it can be distributed safely from offshore storage to those turbines and burn it without just trading CO2 for NOX.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,115 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Never a great idea, even for a pet fox that you are fond of, to allow it free range to play in a hen house.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    1. doing everything to get LNG facilities built
      1. The application is with ABP and pending their decision. Outside of making a submission, any interference in the decision making process would be illegal afaik.
    2. helping the 20+ years of gas within Ireland both on land and on see
      1. This does not exist in any commercially viable field that I'm aware of. There are gas pockets, but few that are viable and none that will provide 20+ years supply. As an example, Barryroe, has about 1/3 the amount of Corrib and Corrib looks set to have a lifetime of 11-12 years though they might be able to extend that if their lucky by accessing deeper pockets
    3. building strategic gas and oil storage facilities
      1. We have oil storage already. Gas storage is being considered as part of the energy security review

    All 3 points fall under the energy security review which is ongoing with consultation completed back in Oct. Of note for #1 above is ABP won't be issuing a decision until after the energy security review is completed



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If you're going to reference a report, common courtesy is to link to it to allow others to review

    The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), in ongoing actions to assess the feasibility and safety implications of injecting hydrogen into the natural gas system, and in order to advance its deployment, has issued for comment a Study that represents a critical step in considering renewable hydrogen as a component in California’s statewide decarbonization strategy.

    ....The Study assesses the operational and safety concerns associated with injecting hydrogen into the existing natural gas pipeline system at various percentages to help California establish the standards and interconnection protocols for possibly injecting renewable hydrogen into natural gas pipelines.

    Makes sense to do a study on something like this to figure out what you know, don't know and need more info on.

    The Study concludes that additional examination is needed into blending hydrogen into the gas system to ensure its safety in California. The Study finds that it is critical to conduct real-world demonstrations of hydrogen under safe and controlled conditions to build on the Study’s findings and determine the appropriate blend percentage suitable to mitigate operational risks such as ignition. 

    “This Study provides additional insight into the possibilities and limits of California’s pipeline infrastructure as we explore options for supplying zero-carbon energy to hard to decarbonize applications,” said Commissioner Clifford Rechtschaffen, who is assigned to the Renewable Gas Rulemaking. 

    So some questions answered but additional ones identified that still need to be figured out. No big deal and expected. I look forward to reading future reports and studies on the topic.

    The study in question is here should anyone wish to review it



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    From the study:

    Hydrogen blends of more than 20% present a higher likelihood of permeating plastic pipes, which can increase the risk of gas igniting outside the pipeline.

    Yet you say:

    So some questions answered but additional ones identified that still need to be figured out. No big deal and expected. I look forward to reading future reports and studies on the topic.

    Come on, man!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So the study highlighted risks that need to be addressed. Pretty standard stuff as that was the intention behind it. Here's the quote again in case you missed it

    The Study assesses the operational and safety concerns associated with injecting hydrogen into the existing natural gas pipeline system at various percentages to help California establish the standards and interconnection protocols for possibly injecting renewable hydrogen into natural gas pipelines

    I'd be more concerned if they came back and said there was no risks



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,780 ✭✭✭buried


    More powers for Minister Ryan approved. That's mighty. Can't wait to see him enjoy the fruits of this new power.

    "You have disgraced yourselves again" - W. B. Yeats



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Speaking of oil companies, have you seen the latest on the ecological damage done by oil spills?

    One report from a recent one in Peru resulted in 16 million in fines so far

    But its the latest in a LOOOOONG line of spills just in this one country

    Between 1991 and 2021 there were 1,002 oil spills in the country - 556 in the Amazon region and 404 on the coast



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,566 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    https://www.ge.com/gas-power/future-of-energy/hydrogen-fueled-gas-turbines

    The 9HA's are big power turbines , up to 571MW, that can be upgraded to 100% H2 in the future and have NOX reduction today.

    The DLN 2.6e maintains many of the elements of GE’s DLN 2.6+ combustion system and introduces advanced premixing for reduced NOx emissions while enabling high plant efficiency. Its advanced premixer enables expanded fuel flexibility to operate on both “rich” and “lean” gaseous fuels, a 50% hydrogen (H2) capability with a technology pathway to 100%, a gas turbine turndown to 30% load, and an optional park mode at 7-15% load, further reducing customers’ operating costs.

    If you need 80% hydrogen today (and we don't) you'd have to settle for the smaller 9F's at 288MW

    a GE 6B gas turbine (~44 megawatts) that has operated for more than 20 years on a refinery waste gas with a hydrogen content that has varied from 70 percent to 95 percent (by volume). This isn't new tech.


    You claim that £150/100MW is a non runner at grid scale but there will be economies in scale. More importantly Hinkley C increased in cost by £100/100MW in 2022 and also in 2019. Other cost increases at that one plant would pay for conversion of a gas field to storage. (or use the cost increases at Vogtle for a different supplier on a different continent)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Speaking of rain, MET Eireann released their 2022 climate report which showed rainfall was below typical levels at most stations. Lots of other interesting points to note

    On rainfall

    On temperature, above average everywhere, warmest year on record overall

    On climate change they have this to say

    Ireland’s warming trend continued in 2022, and we are warming in line with the global average. Other countries are warming at a greater rate than Ireland and the summer of 2022 saw multiple heatwaves and record-breaking temperatures across Europe and around the world. The spring and summer of 2022 were drier than average in Ireland, which had negative consequences for agriculture and wider society.


    The latest Irish climate change projections indicate further warming in the future, drier summers on average and an increased chance of heatwaves and periods of drought. The Irish summer of 2022 is broadly consistent with projected future trends. While climate change projections also indicate a trend toward warmer winters, cold periods like those experienced this December cannot be ruled out in any particular year.


    Keith Lambkin, the Head of Met Éireann’s Climate Services Division said: “Climate change has changed the odds of getting more frequent, more extreme heat related events. Thanks to over a century of dedicated weather observations here in Ireland, we know that 2022 brought us record-breaking extremes as well as what is likely to be the warmest year on Irish record. It is essential that we must continue to adapt to ensure our national infrastructures and planning are best suited to both current and future warming.”

    Have you seen their monthly reports? Very interesting stuff. Take for example, December where rainfall was way down on the average as was temperature



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Reducing emissions faster will mean reduced climate change so we'll be fine. Allowing emissions to keep going up and we'll have problems, lots of them.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,566 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    UK strike price for offshore wind is £37.35/MWh and other technologies are in the same ballpark it so it's not an outlier. Average is £41/MWh


    Offshore wind at £37.35/MWh is 40.4% of the Strike price for nuclear of £92.50/MWh. Electricity from stored hydrogen is within half a % of nuclear.

    But you'd only use stored hydrogen for peaking , the rest of the time you'd be using wind or solar or (gas within 20% limit) which are way cheaper than nuclear.


    The £150m/100MW is total project cost. So treat it as a maximum cost for early adaption.

    What is this obsession with desalination ? The output of the generators (turbine or fuel cell) is pure water , which last time I heard was reusable. In Ireland water isn't that expensive and it literally falls from the sky so you could be able to harvest a tonne per m2 per year.

    Again even in a desert mechanical vapour recompression reduces the thermal input needed to distil water by 99% and ultrafiltration is a thing.


    Hydrogen molecules are easier to store than helium atoms. Almost all of our helium comes from gas wells where it's been stored for hundreds of millions of years.


    For the Nth time many of our gas lines used to run on 50% hydrogen in city centres so it's been done. BTW only certain metals suffer embrittlement and it's not softer cheaper kinds like used in pipes. Pipes can also have linings installed.


    The capex is for the investors to pay not the customer. (unless it's nuclear where the government has to offer additional financing guarantees)

    The strike price is the contracted price of the electricity. (When you buy an airline ticket you care about the cost of the ticket, not who paid for the plane)

    After 15 years it's whatever the market pays for renewables. Nuclear will still command over twice the price of renewables for 35 years.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Are you referring to the tech that is not permitted by current legislation?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,566 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Meanwhile large scale hydrogen pipelines are thing in Germany

    https://www.tuev-nord.de/en/company/energy/hydrogen/hydrogen-pipelines-grids/

    In the Ruhr area and in the Central German chemical triangle, large hydrogen pipelines have already existed for decades and are used by industry. The corresponding know-how is therefore available. The hydrogen pipeline in the Ruhr area is the longest dedicated hydrogen pipeline in Germany. This 240 km long hydrogen pipeline stretches from the Marl Chemical Park to Castrop-Rauxel and Leverkusen.


    In the Central German chemical triangle (around Bitterfeld, Schkopau and Leuna), 3.6 billion m³ of hydrogen are needed annually. Here, various hydrogen pipelines have a combined length of 150 km.

    And they will be building one to Norway.



Advertisement