Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Post pics of your watches Part II

1107108110112113152

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭micks_address


    Sla037 on Erika's NATO I picked up in the black Friday sale




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 647 ✭✭✭fulladapipes


    Looks really well there.

    Are those MN straps elasticy or non-stretchy? I'm tempted to get one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭micks_address


    they are stretchy elastic.. ive had to many of them at this stage... very comfortable - they are not the same as the marine nationale straps (which i think are made from parachute straps).. ive had one of them from ndc straps in the uk.. they are a heavier material than the erika orginals



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    Had hankering for a Sub homage. Not interested in a Rolex.

    Saw this one on Adverts, from a brand that has a nice heritage.

    I didn't want to spend much, as I recently had a very good Cosmograph homage, right down to the automatic movement, and was very disappointed at the poor legibility and sold it.

    A good deal was done and it arrived as a 90s tool watch should - with a few scars, a bit of wear, and the general charm of use.

    It is a 16610 homage, so the general specs are the same. It runs a Miyota 21 jewel 8215 movement, so 21,600 compared to 28,800, but that's no gripe.

    I have given the bracelet, clasp and ends links a good brush with Scotchbrite and it has come up nicely (not done in the pics).

    I also managed to do a half-link bodge with a spare link from another bracelet, as it was a bit tight (visible in the clasp pic).

    Generally, I'd say it is much the same quality overall as a 1990s TAG Heuer, or the like.

    The movement is clean, but rough enough. It doesn't look as well finished as a Seiko, as was in my SKX.

    Not sure what the contamination is on the rotor, but it is stable so I'm leaving it alone.

    On the timegrapher, it was running OK, but a beat error of 1.6ms and + 16s per day.

    With the beat error down to zero, it was reading +27s per day!

    Adjustment was tough as the mechanism is less than smooth, but eventually I got it down to this:

    The amplitude could be a bit better, but I'd say it is on the original mainspring.

    Still, for such a simple, robust movement, if it manages to run at +1- +3s per day on the wrist, I'd more than happy with that.

    Overall, it was a very cheap way of scratching the Sub homage itch with a brand that has some heritage of its own (however modernised the current incarnation might be :) ).

    Still don't want a Rolex, mind.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24 Allwheelsgood


    Nobody wants a Real Rolex until they get one!

    And then they never want another one... OR... it starts to fuel the need for more and different models......

    But it all starts with Homage....... enjoy!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    Dont want a Rolex just want a watch that looks exactly like one.....sounds legit.

    You dont scratch the Rolex itch with a homage, no more than you loose your virginity with masturbation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    I knew that would be like a rag red to a bull for ya!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,042 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Some take any negative comments about Rolex a bit too personally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    To be fair Fitz, you do have a point.

    Over the Christmas I was having a convo with a chap who had a Tudor Black Bay and we kinda came around to a similar point. Now this chap would not be short of a bob or three, or four, but he picked the Black Bay rather than a Sub. And he was "offered to buy" either from a jeweller in the UK. He simply just liked the Tudor more.

    Now over the years he's sort of gotten into watches, without going full nutter, but in me he has a tame nutter he occasionally asks about the madness and he pointed out that I have suggested a Sub to him more than once, but yet don't have one myself. The plain fact is they just never personally appealed to me, save for the sell your house and your extended family's houses 70's MilSub. I did have a few very early Oysters/Bubblebacks in the 90's, but they don't count even to Rolex fans as their values show. It would certainly be a cost factor for me these days, but I've been a watch nutter in the days when you could pick up Subs for 800-1200 quid used and still didn't appeal(now if I had a time machine set to 95 to come back in 2020...).

    More to the/your point(finally😁) I also realised I've never owned any watch that came close to looking like a Sub, or a general "Rolex" for that matter. If I liked the look, I'd have either bought one back in the day, or today got a homage, but the latter would probably not sate my need.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 156 ✭✭Dev1234


    King Samurai with a red/orange strap, not fully sure what colour it is!!

    Love the watch and the strap is comfortable.

    I've a dark blue/navy strap that I need to take for a spin soon

    (Those with an OCD mindset please avert your gaze away from the date!!)



  • Registered Users Posts: 381 ✭✭Ian OB


    I'll just presume you're prolonging Christmas 🎅🥳🎅



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    You see, this is the issue.

    IMHO, some watches have become icons in themselves, transcending the brand from which they grew.

    The Submariner, the Cosmograph, the Speedmaster, the Pogue, the Astronaut, the Monaco - all, it could be argued, have gone beyond their makers to become design icons.

    As such, all of these watches, to a greater or lesser extent, have become the subject of homage treatments, some successfully, some not.

    If you think about the Submariner, when it came out, it was not a luxury item. Indeed, some of the best and most highly prized examples are the military or industrial ones, such as the Comex branded tool watches issued to actual divers. Or, the fact that Omegas and Rolex were made available to service people via surplus or base stores at heavily discounted prices, usually because they were robust and reliable.

    While today's Subs are vastly superior to their forebears, they are not 10, 20 or 30k watches in their utility sense.

    There are probably homages, such as the Steinharts, that are closer to the spirit of the original than a rose gold, or diamond encrusted version put out by the original maker.

    I am not singling out Rolex here, all watch makers seem to have gone down this route, and I'm not condemning anyone for it.

    My point is that to get the experience of a design icon, one doesn't necessarily need to have an original. When originals are far beyond the reach of most enthusiasts, a good homage can still deliver a large part of the experience at a fraction of the price.

    However, the power of the brand cannot be underestimated.

    For me, I have a TAG Heuer because as a child I was captivated by Formula 1, and that brand is irrevocably intertwined with it. TAG Heuer developed the basis for what is the modern timing system for all high performance motorsport.

    The Speedmaster heritage needs no run out here, but the Mark II, for me is the best one because it was designed with the astronauts feedback and aim of going beyond the moon to living and working in space. The tragedy of never being flight qualified by NASA just adds to the mystique. The Accutron Astronaut being the only watch that would work in the A-12/SR-71 cockpit assures it a place in the horological firmament,

    So then to Rolex, and brand is double edged sword.

    Despite its current F1 sponsorship, Rolex, as a brand, for me perosnally, holds no value at all. By the time I was exposed to it, it had already become the watch of ****. And I mean that in the Harry Enfield, 'Loadsa Money' sense, not that any one who aspires to owning one is, well, one.

    Despite early forays into aviation, exploration and certain types of motorsport, Rolex, for me, has never achieved what Heuer did in motorsport, Omega in space, or Breitling in aviation.

    For me, personally, I have no desire to own a Rolex.

    I fully acknowledge that this is my subjective, interpretive, experiential impression, and as such is one opinion among the multitude, but it is mine and has not changed after viewing and wearing Rolex watches. (A mate has a Hulk and another a gold Datejust).

    I'm always delighted to read and engage with people who derive great pleasure from a brand, a marque or a specific example of any watch, of whatever brand. I have a modern Sekonda my wife gave me, with a Seiko movement that is of tremendous sentimental value, though I am fully aware that value doubles every time I change the battery.

    I like the Elgin, because it looks and wears like a vintage Submariner. It also looks like a Rolex.

    Long-winded and verbose, this is my thinking and my reasoning, if that isn't too strong a term, for why I wanted a Sub homage, but still don't want, nor have ever contemplated, having a Rolex.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,827 ✭✭✭H_Lime


    Wow, the best summation of the topic I have as of yet read online. You do know of course there are the archie luxury types who will just say you're wearing shi11ers unless it's a (insert token of status), or that your a hater or worse still that you're not well off enough. Somehow I imagine it will fall on deaf ears.


    A recent purchase of my San Martin Gmt is a perfect example of what you have succinctly described above. It's a joy to wear, as I'm sure the bb Pro or rolex explorer is too but I have a life outside watches with other expensive passions as do you. That and I'm not stupid, they're massively overpriced and the AD system is imo reprehensible and laughable simultaneously.


    To just undo my point... I recently sold to mates a few steel dive willards with applied seiko logos to sterile dials. Likewise the king turtle prospex Ltd edits. They were all aware of what they're buying obvs. I made a small profit which I put towards buying the actual watch I was copying at six times the price and I'm delighted with it, despite needing serious regulating, crystal removing to align the chapter ring and likewise the bezel insert. I've even bought a z199 uncle seiko bracelet which I'm eagerly hoping lands today after paying the custom fees Tues...


    So my point being, homages can indeed spur you on to buy the oem. It's much like marrying someone blind, no thanks, want to know someone move in with them first!


    My last point is a line in the sand for me. My all time grail watch is the Speedmaster Moonwatch, a watch as a child I oogled in jewelers windows at. A buddy showed me his DH copy which frankly is amazing, on his wrist you'd be hard pressed to cry foul. But I've no intention of buying a copy, if I ever wear a speedmaster it will be real.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24 Allwheelsgood


    Its OK, your secret relationship with Rolex will be safe with us..... as a closet admirer.

    I saw Rolex as a brand to aspire to in my innocence and naviety. I first got a Datejust and sold it on Donedeal in the early 90's. It was eventually replaced with a new Submariner Blusey in the mid 90's. It has been in my possession ever since, worn many times but never loved like I expected it to be. Recently tried to use it again by changing the bracelet to a RubberB strap.... no, still didnt work for me, consigned to the drawer again.... and now to be sold.

    My everyday watch was a Citizen promaster dive watch as I was scuba diving weekly at the time. (Dived with the Rolex a couple of times but could never justify the chance of losing it to the big blue.) Recently the Citizen died and has been replaced with a Sinn U1 black Teg which is my new daily and very happy I am.

    Watches are a strange relationship........ enjoy whatever makes you happy!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    @Allwheelsgood "Watches are a strange relationship... enjoy whatever makes you happy!"

    +1 to that!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,165 ✭✭✭893bet


    “That and I am not stupid”.


    Ironic given you criticise Archie types while simultaneously insulting every Rolex owner as being “stupid”……


    I am not a Rolex owner but by your definition I am certainly stupid! 😀. I chase the very highest quality I can afford.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Despite early forays into aviation, exploration and certain types of motorsport, Rolex, for me, has never achieved what Heuer did in motorsport, Omega in space, or Breitling in aviation.

    Rolex were always more a brand of suburban Britain and her once empire, that then went worldwide from the 60's on. They were quite a small outfit with a narrow range of offerings. Originally their "Oyster" was the core, with a few variations on that theme and tiny runs of chronographs and even tinier runs of (very nice)oddballs triple date moonphases and the like. The Datejust was their dress watch for the most part. Then the Explorer became their core and kinda remains that way even down to today. The Sub was/is basically an Explorer with a bezel. They were the "fashion" marketing brand long before the mechanical revival of the 80's and 90's, much more than a "great Swiss house" brand. It clearly worked and works very well too. They are the aspirational watch for the average person.

    But of course our perceptions skew things too. So the movement in your Accutron had far more actual space utility at the height of the Space Race than your Omega. And Omega, Longines and Zenith had far more aviation history than Breitling could dream of. Then again Patek brought out a pilot's watch to rave reviews while claiming a history in the type. A history that consisted of one pocketwatch and two wrist Hour Angle rippoffs to an exact prewar nazi German Air Ministry spec, that were never delivered. So... though they leave the air ministry bit out of their bumpf, as did IWC with their Big Pilot. Hey, buy the watch that helped blitzkreig! said no marketing guy ever. Well maybe in 60's Arrgentina... 😁

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,827 ✭✭✭H_Lime


    I apologise for insulting you. I should have been clearer, I would deem myself stupid if I paid what rolex are asking for a rolex these days as I consider them overinflated price wise. Much like tulipmania imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭scwazrh



    If you think about the Submariner, when it came out, it was not a luxury item

    Most tool items if around long enough will become luxury items .Its not really a negative against it.A land rover defender was the ultimate basic utilitarian vehicle and now a decent one will cost near €100k .Very common in clothing brands as well , north face jackets were not originally designed for teenagers to crave as a fashion statement.Yet none of us are driving around in homage land rover defenders but granted half the north face jackets are fake , a bit like putting a seiko logo on a sterile dial.

    However, the power of the brand cannot be underestimated.

    For me, personally, I have no desire to own a Rolex.

    I like the Elgin, because it looks and wears like a vintage Submariner. It also looks like a Rolex.

    So fair to say you like the watch just not the brand which i can understand .To use the north face example , I like a warm coat but Id never wear a north face one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    Thick AF !

    A clever man would have bought a San Martin and a fake seiko

    instead you went and bought a Patek and a Lange & Sohne....What where you thinking ???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,827 ✭✭✭H_Lime




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Deep Thought


    Interesting comments, I had a couple of Steinhart to see how I like the look ( compared to Rolex). I just didn’t like it.

    Likewise Seamaster.. just don’t like skeleton hands with a dot on top.

    I have a cracking Seiko SZSC004 and a Steinhart GP LE, both of which I have had for a while and won’t get rid of.

    I sold my IWC to meet other needs and now regret that.

    A good Flieger is next and that’s me done. ( well that’s the intention)

    The narrower a man’s mind, the broader his statements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭micks_address


    I might be selling my stowa flieger soon if you'd be interested? Manual wind. Unitas movement

    Cheers,

    Mick





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,165 ✭✭✭893bet


    I don’t own one so I am excluded.

    so I am not not at all insulted and wouldn’t be if I did own one really. Just slightly amused at the reverse snobbery.


    Snobbery is bad in your post. Reverse snobbery is ok. Lol



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,165 ✭✭✭893bet


    I am stupid and greedy. Should have flipped the Patek at the top. I knew it was the top.

    But I love it and what really ducked me was the 25 year anniversary and talk of discontinuation. Greed! But even then I may not have sold. Like I said I like the watch.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Speaking of German Air ministry watches... Hasn't had that much wrist time of late. I forgot how daftly accurate it was.


    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 647 ✭✭✭fulladapipes


    I'm beginning to look a lot more closely at those simple three two-handers with the small seconds. Longines brought out a version recently, but it was a ridiculous 43mm. I would be quite opposite-of-adverse to something with a small seconds, preferably not new and not near 43mm.

    In the meantime, I've an incoming IWC Mark XV which I'm looking forward to (if the Dutch guy ever puts it in the mail)...




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    Stupid sexy Rolex Fans



    Post edited by Fitz II on


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    One of my regrets is not buying one of the 50's issued ones when the prices weren't daft. Like 1000-1500 quid not daft. Then again when they weren't daft there were also horror stories of frankenwatches, wrong crowns etc and this was before the scholarship ramped up. Chances are I would have bought a dogs dinner. 😁 Still they are a gorgeous design and IWC make some lovely movements too and have great records going back to the egg. And an example of a company that were hugely popular in both vintage and new markets who have nigh on vanished from the Current Trends.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Deep Thought


    What’s size is she? @micks_address

    The narrower a man’s mind, the broader his statements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Deep Thought


    See.. I think 43mm is bang on for a flieger. When I had my IWC , it was 43mm and perfect, easy to read the dial..thus why a lot of WWII were really big.. 45mm +

    I’d say your incoming IWC is small?

    The narrower a man’s mind, the broader his statements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭micks_address




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Oddly enough DT it was as much a geographical/cultural thing. The bulk of Europe tended towards big pilot's watches, 38-40mm+, the German B-Uhrs tapping out at 55mm. However the British didn't. They were more like 35mm, or smaller. In America pre war watches like Longines Hour Angles were big buggers 50mm kinda thing, but by the war itself American pilot's watches were well under 35mm. Longines even sold a 28mm Hour Angle(of sorts). Maybe that was part of the plan; if you could read the thing at arms length your eyesight was deemed good enough to be a pilot. 😁

    A large part(no pun) of the drive for bigger watches was simply more accuracy with the tech of the time. Slap in a pocketwatch movement with the much larger balance and accuracy was more achievable out of the box.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,684 ✭✭✭david


    Beauty Mick - pm me a price?

    Not like I need to buy more of your watches or anything 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭Deep Thought


    wowzers.. some great info there..can’t see the benefit of a 28mm Flieger.. surely things like vibration would have an effect when looking at it.

    The narrower a man’s mind, the broader his statements.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I'd agree. I suspect by WW2, few enough pilots wore specific "pilot's watches" and wore shop bought watches that looked military, or just wore their civilian watches.

    The B-Uhrs for example though known today as Flieger(pilot) are navigator's watches. Beobachtungsuhren – B-Uhren(observational watches). Navigators needed accurate timepieces for their job, but even there they were also using radio vectoring and timekeeping too. Actually issued specific pilots watches among WW2 forces are scarce enough. The UK Air Ministry watches being one. In general fighter pilots needed a watch to tell them the time outside the cockpit. Some did look for chronographs. The German fighter pilots for example, who bought Hanhart flyback chronos and may have bought them at the unit level. One reason in the Battle of Britain was their mount's very much reduced flying and fighting time over the UK so they needed to keep an eye on that(other than the Japanese Zero and the later Mustang which could both run on the smell of an oily rag, most fighters were high performance interceptors with very limited range. For the Germans this was made worse by their command's insistence they should fly at the same - inefficient for them - speed as their bombers).

    Post war and for the jet age specific Pilot type watches were issued alright; the Dodane, Auricoste etc French XX series, the Zenith, Breitling and Leonidas CP's for the Italian fighter and helicopter jockeys, the various examples for the German airforce, Heuer, Hanhart, Junghans, later on Tutima etc.

    These type of watches were (pretty much)all two register chronographs to a set pattern, 38-43mm, black arabic numeral dials, radium/tritium lume, bidirectional rotating bezels and handwound with the flyback complication. The latter was seen as vital for instrument flying which needed to be accurate to the second, where having to stop and reset the chrono would add seconds that could throw navigation off, or when following a radio signal, again to the second. Funny enough very few chronographs on their aircraft's dashboards had this function.

    The UK had some non chronograph pilot's watches like those IWC and Omegas, but again these seemed to have been much more aimed at navigators. Watches like GMT's were squarely aimed at the civilian airline pilots of the new jet age because they were often changing timezones and would have been as much use as tits on a bull to the fighter jockeys, because if they had crossed timezones they were likely lost, running on fumes and about to land in the Soviet Union. 😁

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 381 ✭✭Ian OB


    So, its time to try & sort this out. Hope all these aren't needed.

    They weren't thank God. A few new words were invented though. Unfortunately, the replacement stem is a bit on the long side.

    I'll come back to it next weekend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    Quick update on the Elgin.

    Despite the robust, near agricultural nature of the Miyota 21-jewel 8215 movement, after I adjusted the beat error to 0, it now runs between +2 and +3 on the wrist over the last 4 days. So even though the amplitude suggests the mainspring might be fairly old, it is running pretty well.

    And while it most definitely exhibits the flaw/charming feature of a noisy rotor, it hasn't displayed, as yet, the second hand stutter that it is also sometimes noted for.

    That's a win all round, methinks.

    There is one oddity, though, The lovely blue lume is still quite strong, except for one index, which is completely dead.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 647 ✭✭✭fulladapipes


    Yep, small for a flieger at 38mm. The Mark XII (and Mark XI) before it was 36mm; the Mark XVI after it was 39mm. And from then on they went 40mm+ as far as I can see. There is still 36mm model though, and a 39mm, but they are by far in the minority.

    I used to like larger watches (up to a 44.25mm Omega), but after wearing the 36mm Datejust and Explorer I kind of got used to the smaller size, to the extent that even the normal enough 42mm Speedmaster seemed too big. It's not, but my head went there. So, now I'm 40mm max.

    I'm looking forward to this IWC - the larger sizes always put me off them, so I was delighted to find a 38mm.


    Post edited by fulladapipes on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 647 ✭✭✭fulladapipes


    So, the Dutchman put the IWC in the post and it landed today. It's a IWC Mark XV (model: 3253), just serviced with a new IWC leather strap. The 38mm size is good on my 6.75" wrist and there seems to be some anti reflective coating on at least one side of the sapphire. This is the first watch I've had in many years with numbers; I'm usually much more fond of stick indices.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,042 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    That's class. Enjoy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭IrishPlayer


    A dream come true! Spending the week in Biel / Bienne Switzerland training on the new movement line after starting a new position in Movement Assembly


    Horage is what the new Bremont ENG movement is based on and where I am doing the training. Here's a link to their site

    https://www.horage.com/


    Some more from today, continuing on with the movement and part making

    Some highlights of the town


    Post edited by IrishPlayer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    Good luck to you, @IrishPlayer!

    You seem to be making rapid progress and enjoying it.

    And letting us all live vicariously with your excellent retelling. :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,741 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    My first Breitling. Very pleasantly surprised. I even like the rubber





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    I love the super ocean , have nearly bought one a few times now.Nice change from the blue dial you daily



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭traco


    That is a lovely Breitling, nice and simple. I'm not a fan of their flashy stuff at all, just too busy for me.

    Pulled this out today as it will be 20 years old this year. Had a new power cell fitted last year but I'll need to chase that up. It could be 9 months or more and it wasn't really worn but it seemed to be stopped. Usually it would go into a pseudo sleep mode with the second hand jumping several seconds at a time and when you put it on it would kick into normal operation. It didn't do that this time but seems OK now after much manual rotating to power it up a bit. Will wear it all week and see if that sorts it out.

    Anyway - not to everyone's taste but I like it.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭micks_address


    Lovely unkel. Very restrained for a breitling some of them are just super busy dials etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,741 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Exactly yeah that's why I was never that attracted to Breitling although I liked the super ocean. Some of them are incredibly busy as if wanting to break the world record for most words on a dial 😁

    Interesting that the likes of Breitling and Tudor have now moved into the entry level luxury watch segment. This used to be solely occupied by Omega, but their prices have gone to lalaland new and second hand. I bought a Seamaster pro 41 automatic back in 2017 for €975, those days are long gone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,276 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    I had one of those back in the day, probably my first decent watch!



  • Advertisement
Advertisement