Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1240724082410241224133691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 485 ✭✭junkyarddog




  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Spain won't sent any we already seen that ,

    But the issue will Germany block/veto any transfers of their tanks to Ukraine



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭pcardin




  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Zhdanov suggested what the "Wagnerites" were pumped with before the attack on the Armed Forces of Ukraine: "All the tests have already been taken."


    “The evidence has been there for a long time, but this information is not announced in the public space as part of operational and investigative actions for the international tribunal.


    Second, what's the point. We will announce that they are under drugs. Russia will say: "No." Nobody here will disqualify the Wagnerites. If we say this, it will somehow affect the course of the war. No, not at all.


    Will we be able to cut off the supply chains of narcotic drugs or stimulants that they carry to the front line? No. And the fact that all the tests have already been taken, those who need it know about it," the expert said.

    I am not surprised. Sounds like the Ukrainians have run tests on prisoners and probably corpses. Was this part of the incentive for prisoners; free drugs, all you can take?



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,456 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The problem now for Germany if it vetoes ( probably what it tried with Poland) US Abrams are a replacement option

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,036 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    I have never known wanna besieged defender to occupy their enemy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭pcardin


    I am amazed for the amount of words and keystrokes you guys spend here in discussions with these muppets. They can't hear you, they won't listen to you. their brain is set to work like their arseh0le, only outwards, no incomming traffic.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's an Irish subsidiary of a Russian aircraft leasing company that seems to be part of a state owned bank. The aircraft are already presumably in the country since before the war and the Russian parent company has probably just made up some contracts in Moscow and ignored the sanctions on the Irish subsidiary. Not much we can do about it practically.

    Their accounts of the Irish subsidiary are well out of date from a quick look - it should have enforcement action against it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The Russian elites are preparing for a civil war and are already "showing fangs": Piontkovsky named the signs.


    The Russian elites do not care about the results of the war against Ukraine, because they are already preparing for a civil war within the Russian Federation - for a huge redistribution of property.


    This is the opinion of the oppositionist and publicist Andrei Piontkovsky.


    “Pay attention, private armies in Russia are growing like mushrooms after rain.


    Prigozhin’s army, Kadyrov’s army, and even Defense Minister Shoigu – this is some kind of nonsense – is calling his private army. created their own army. They are preparing for another war, for a civil one. They understand that the war in Ukraine is lost and a huge redistribution of property will begin," predicts Piontkovsky.

    Very much jibes with some of what I have been thinking as it seems clear that Prigozhin has long been planning on replacing Putin. Now with Shoigu apparently having his own private army called 'Patriot', it's really shaping up as a horrendous mess.

    Nuclear armed warlords, what could possibly go wrong?

    Also worth noting that Putin also has a private army in the form of the sizeable security organaisation seperate from the FSB that secure his family, residences, yachts and person.

    I'm actually surprised Solovyev hasn't thrown his hat in the ring and formed a private army. I'm also relieved.

    Russia's nuclear arsenal in the hands of Kadyrov...might as well initiate a preemptive strike rather than wait.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I would hazard a guess Germany will block it using the same bullsh!t excuse that no one else has sent (comparable) tanks.

    Poland is buying US and Best Korean tanks, tells a story regarding their thinking about the reliability of their neighbour.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,361 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    ESB Networks to ship powerful transformer to Ukraine


    Optimus Prime?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,236 ✭✭✭Widdensushi




  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Probably well knowing that there's only 3 Western tanks that are operational in Europe, the British challenger 2 ,the German leopard/2 and the Abrams going to Poland,that's going to take a few years to fill their order ,

    Not a lot to chose from tank wise , but Germany have a veto over the largest number of tanks in Europe,the leopards



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Touche you two ,touche

    @Donald Trump @Widdensushi



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Although it would hurt to lose control of Bakhmut, Ukraine could take a lot of heart in the fact that they have taken a lot out of Russia and those Wagner creatures. Russia are putting a lot into these kind of attritional gains. It's not the kind of warfare they can sustain.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @briany If worst comes worst, Ireland will need to have spent far more on defence than it is probably currently able to without making major cuts in other areas of public spending or proposing massive tax hikes, neither of which would be politically popular at all..

    I honestly don't think it would need to make major cuts or tax hikes to properly equip the Defense forces, possibly we could add 1-1.5 billion per year to the current budget to bring the budget to 2 billon per year,we could purchase a modern primary radar , someone quoted 36 million for 16-18 Saab gripen jets ,and the development of a new purpose built modern air base ,

    It's not going to cost tens or multiples of that being spent , along side massively increasing cyber security and secure infrastructure,

    It's about spending Smart in the right places and bringing the right resources,

    Over the next 10 years 250 billion + will be spent on social welfare alone, the defense budget will currently less than 10 billion which about half will be wages and pensions,

    We won't be buying aircraft carriers ,f35s and Abrams tanks, we don't need them but we do need aircraft that can intercept targets in our airspace, but there options available, we don't necessarily need Abrams tanks, but we could use IFV to protect infantry troops here and over seas with the UN ,we could also look into drones something like the MQ9s that can be leased they give an option for Long range aerial reconnisence which could be used by the Naval service, Gardai and army ,

    Cheaper than specific aircraft and can fly loiter for 22 + hours ,

    Cyber security,as I mentioned the budget for social welfare,25billion per year and increasing but if an outside or inside player attacks the welfare cyber systems like we saw with the hse very recently, people won't get payments,no rents,no utilities get paid and all hell brakes loose,

    It all has to go hand in hand defense systems can't just be bullets and jets we need to protect our vital infrastructures

    An adult conversation will have to be had and decisions made ,we can't keep ignoring the new world order doesn't play by the rules anymore



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Not dissimilar to Sievierodonetsk, it was a planned UA retreat after grinding down the Russians.

    Muppets on here predicted Ukraine loosing Sievierodonetsk would lead to a collapse on the frontline and Russia would make massive inroads.....

    Russia gained 16km since the fall of Sievierodonetsk..... 6 months ago.... That's like 4m a day advancement (A snail can travel 48m a day)



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,236 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Let's go nuts, spend 5billion a year,cut everything to fund it, yeah we still can't defend ourselves....



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    But you can do both side by side building cyber systems to protect vital infrastructure but we also need to physically protect vital infrastructure along the way,we don't need big ticket military item for power projection over seas but we do need to properly equip the Defense forces to protect our state and vital infrastructure,



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    We don't need to spend 5 billion per year the defense forces are looking 1.5 - 2billion to equip the Defense forces to protect our state,

    People keep going off on mad ones about unlimited spending while having to make major cuts elsewhere,

    There's no discussions where any increase in defense spending would lead to massive cuts elsewhere,



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    We've had people telling us bakhmut is gone for months now and yet it's still very much in Ukrainan control,

    Now they got to salt mine and suddenly we're getting the same predictions,

    The Russians move forward for half a day then over night Ukrainian artillery and drones hammer the orcs before they fall back and repeat over and over.

    Mystical meg's haven't predicted anything correctly yet



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,236 ✭✭✭Widdensushi




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I did say "worst comes to worst", ie a situation that would require Ireland to have a large and reasonably well-equipped military.

    Having some jets to scramble and other installations to protect infrastructure who enemies of the west might deem strategically significant wouldn't be a bad idea, however. Still, I don't think it will happen until enough pressure is put on an Irish government, and I have the feeling that such pressure would come from international partners long before it came from the electorate.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui




  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    That's it ,

    There's a lot more countries starting to point out the obvious,we can't keep saying ah sure it's grand the British and Americans will come and protect us ,we might as well be under occupation if that's the case if we can't do it ourselves we need foreign forces to protect our state.

    The Gardai are getting two new helicopters and a fixed wing aircraft to replace the single aircraft they already have,but straight away the discussion went from rough sleepers and giving the 2 helicopters to the hse instead.

    You can't get anything done in this country without people complaining about separate topics not related to each other



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Half that depending on variant and equipment load out ,it's the one of the cheapest aircraft in it's category .


    I believe you can least 10 aircraft+ 2 two seat trainers for around 700 million over 10 years with the ability to extend the lease or buy outright,and as more are built the cost per unit of falls ,

    That or keep buying trainer aircraft that can't intercept foreign or unidentified aircraft,and can't carry modern armourments either,

    Zero increase in capabilities while costing Money,

    While the Saabs give you a modern multirole aircraft , with modern radar, avionics and armourments, on a tight budget



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,166 ✭✭✭vixdname


    Just when you thought they couldn't get more embarrassing.

    Wallace and Daly are to speak at an "Anti - NATO" rally in the Uk on the 1st anniversary of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

    Alongside other noteworthy cranks such as Russia TV presenter George Galloway and former MP Chris Williamson.

    Mick Wallace and Clare Daly to speak at London anti-Nato rally on anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine (msn.com)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,456 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The French Leclerc is operational as well. It would be behind the other in capability but ahead of the Russian T90

    Slava Ukrainii



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement