Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Their tactics if that's what you can call them is to throw men into the fight and repeat. Of course many will die but those that survive will learn and they use up Ukrainian munitions and stores. I guess Ukraine needs to keep the edge in technology equipment and training.

I don't see it making any improvements for them,

The 300,000 call up has led to embarrassment for the Russians they don't have the main power to sufficiently train and equipp 300,000 for war in the current climate, close to 1million men for a three day adventure to Kiev and still haven't achieved any major objectives,

Meanwhile the Ukrainans cancelled a winter mobilisation because they already have the numbers training, trained and Mobilized to the front,and a significant number in reserve,

They were literally turning people away from recruitment centers , where the Russians have been reduced to emptying prisons,

Russia can call up a million men but no one seems to be motivated to fight against Ukraine any other countries ok on behalf of putin ,if there is zero motivation imagine then zero motivated men being sent to another country with little or no supplies and outdated equipment and weapons,

Will anyone then be willing to fight to the death for your cause, freeing, starving and under fire 24/7 from an enemy who are better trained,, better equipped and motivated to fight to the death to defend their country and the lives of all Ukrainians ,

Think about it in terms of destroyed weaponry. Those tanks and fighter jets aren't cheap, nevermind a sunk warship!

Based on the quality of both forces shown so far, adding 500k troops on the Russian side mightn’t make much of a difference, assuming they even have the resources to deploy that many troops. However, even increased numbers of pure cannon fodder on the Russian side has a cost on Ukraine. They have to use those extra bullets to shoot those conscripts, which otherwise would not have been used, and the horror of this continuous slaughter must be extremely draining, requiring more rotation of Ukrainian troops. It is a costly and barbaric tactic for the Russians, but it’s mostly what they’ve got left at the moment since a lot of thier kit is trash.

Ukraine could call up the guts of near 1million with a full mobilisation. However unlike Russia’s mobilisation, Ukraine have a large professional army to support their conscripts, while Russia have barely anyone capable left.

So no one said anything about Ukraine not being allowed to have nuclear weapons.

The only ones with an issue was the Russians

I thought you don't do hypotheticals ,

You made the claim , but there's no historical discussion on the subject,yes the US were signatories because they were the biggest political and military powerhouses at the time in the region,

No point discussing it ,not because you say so ,

But because it didn't happen and your hypothetically speaking

They do have what are called blocking forces in place to stop any numbers of troops retreating from positions,if Russians try to retreat they will be attacked by their own forces

Mobilized russian artillery personnel complaining of being sent to infantry.

Running out of shells for them?

So send them to the front to be useful perhaps?

Come on now .

Why were the British and Americans signatories?

Not because they didn't want anyone else to have nuclear weapons,they were solely there to legimise the Russians scam , nothing else