Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

I haven't seen any reports online as of yet and you'd imagine if he said anything derogatory about Anne Andrew or Ed that it would be out there at this stage.

I'd say he has very little inside knowledge of the Andrew affair as this came to a head when Harry himself was at loggerheads with the Queen Charles and William so I'd doubt he got to hear the inside track, and who in their right mind would have confided to Harry at that point.

After that, Harry is just a nephew and considerably younger than Anne Andrew and Edward- I'd doubt he had too many dealings with any of them, especially Anne, considering they were all mostly travelling the world on official duties and only saw them a few times a year at family gatherings.

If he's said anything about Anne that's not complimentary i would not like to be Harry right now- Jayzuz she's not a woman to be crossed 😁

Is anyone under the age of 50 reading or buying newspapers anymore?

Harry and Megan seem to think it's still the 1990s.

I think I saw somewhere recently that the Daily Mail made 50m last year. Other publications may not make money and are used by their wealthy owners to manipulate public opinion. For instance, the British press support the Tories who support tax cuts and legislation that favours them. Rupert Murdock wanted Brexit because he could manipulate whoever was in Downing Street, but he could not manipulate those as easily in Brussels!

Just on new media, internet. Bot Sentenal did a report that there were something like 80 Meghan Markle hate accounts on Twitter/You Tube and that just four of them make close to $500K spewing hate about her.

Its too late for reconciliation. The right time to have done that would have been when they were told they were fully in or fully out and not cut their security with little warning. Charles, his father, is a very wealthy man and you would think he could have covered the cost of his security until they got themselves settled instead of having to rely on the kindness of strangers.

I think what Harry is doing is getting it all out there so that the tabloids have nothing to use against him again. Its all out there (though judging from the reaction of the palace sources who seem relieved at what he has said, there is a lot more they could have said, i.e., who is the racist who questioned how dark the baby would be and perhaps he could have said some stuff about Williams alleged infidelity).

The full extract about the Taliban kill has been released. Its very thoughful (and well written). Worth a read to get the context and a good demonstration how the British media sensationalise everything.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/harry-book-exclusive-25-taliban-kills-read-full-extract-144021236.html

I was actually thinking about your last point this morning - what was he thinking talking about his confidential army career ?

It was irresponsible.

There is no love on a human level in that family. I agree with you that it won't harm the institution very much. I remember watching a renenactment of the last Queen's corananation on Netflix (fairly accurate as the cornation was filmed at the time) and it was very cultish / religious focussed, similar to the ordination of the pope or the canonisation of some deity. It probably worked ok last time as the Queen was very young and had not acquired any baggage, unlike Charles and William have.

GB News is a nothing. No one watches it. Completely irrelevant. It's losing so much money. It's on the verge of folding up.

It is true the Mail has a large online audience so they are pretty influential.

The other traditional tabloids like The Sun, The Mirror, The Express have a very small online presence and dwindling sales in shops.

Love/family is secondary to the institution. The whole family have been brutalised by the institution (Margaret not being allowed Townsend, Ann not being allowed marry Parker-Bowles (he was catholic), Charles not being allowed marry Camilla. Charles forced into a loveless marriage. All (except Edward) of the Queen's children ending up divorced. William having to marry Kate (he waited 10 years) because no one else would put up with the shite they have to put up with. Same with Harry, Meghan was the only one that would take it and lucking for them, they could get out.

Cutting their security isn't the actions of a loving family.

What lies have I said?

Your list of the numbers just makes my point. Express is number 40! Tiny presence.

And I said the Mail does have a big online presence.

You're not able to debate if you accuse someone of lying with your aggressive posts.

You're not an adult I presume.

what a brilliant riposte from you! Found out as being wrong and then calls the other person a child. If you think being the 32nd and 40th most visited websites in Britain is a tiny online presence then I've no clue what to say to you. You were wrong , maybe you didn't lie.

You're too much drama. Bit like the tabloids.

Ah now I think we have found the child. You probably did just blatantly lie after all.

Fair play to Edward - I thought he was the really boring one. So everyone of the males (bar Harry so far) have been unfaithful to their wives, including Prince Philip and then there are question marks over who is Andrew's biological father, so the Queen must have been carrying on royally as well. What a family.