Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

Options
16446456476496501190

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,577 ✭✭✭Dubinusa




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Ya, but ultimately, 6+ years later, it's going to have zero influence on selection.

    If anything, JJ being nominated should be a cautionary tale about how much you can read into the award at all tbh.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,762 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    The pattern is that there are some people who fervently believe he is the bees knees and needs to be involved. And anyone who doesn’t 100% agree with that gets stick. You can say that he’s gone well and should be in the squad but if you in the same breath you say that Conan is ahead of him the former is irrelevant. There will be no acknowledgement that you’ve acknowledged his form or that you’ve been in any way complimentary of the guy. You haven’t agreed entirely and so you’re wrong and need to lectured to.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    If anything, more than under any other coach, things can change quickly under Farrell.

    Like Conan getting the start vs England. That was in large part due to James Ryan's injury and POM's red card in the Wales game.

    Like JOB getting on vs SA. He got on the bench in large part down to injuries to Henshaw, suspension to Aki (and an injured Lowry?) and then got on due to a first half injury to McCloskey.

    Coombes might need a few things like that to fall his way. It's a very competitive position.

    That it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean he has nothing to offer. I'd love to see him getting a start vs Italy.

    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Backrow always seems to be a position with a lot of players getting through a lot of work that makes it seem as if they belong in the team.

    Coombes is awesome. He needs to be in the set up imo. I'm not sure he will make the cut for the 23. Given that Conan and Dorris both play 6/8 when needed I consider those positions together. Conan POM and Doris are also awesome.

    I do feel that despite Deegan getting ahead of Coombes in the AIs that Deegan has fallen behind now. Furthermore he is injured at the moment so won't necessarily get to play his way back in.

    I wonder if Ryan Baird has a chance to add to his international tally. He seems to have changed position to 6 which adds to the congested backrow.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Na, sorry molloy, but that's not the full picture at all.

    I've seen praise of Coombes described on here as "gassing him up" and "hype".

    I suggested something as mild as Conan having a drop in form prior to the NZ summer tour, and got accused of all sorts.

    There's absolutely a legitimate argument that Coombes deserves to be in and around the 23. There's also an argument that anyone suggesting that are the one's being lectured to also.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,057 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    But my point is its completely irrelevant to Deegan playing now. It was 2016. he has 2 senior caps. nearly 3 years ago. talking about an under 20 award is completely irrelevant to what he is doing now.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Baird is just a completely different player to Coombes or Conan. If he is selected (and its not unlikely) there is not much Coombes could do to overcome that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,577 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    That's true. My point is that the competition for the jersey in Leinster is nuts. The depth is incredible. 3 very very good players! Competing for the 8 shirt. The standards are high.

    Conan may have had a drop off in form. He's been in the squad for yonks and is trusted. Coombes hasn't achieved this yet. Nor has Deegan.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,840 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    Are we not forgetting the 'God of War' POM?

    He is a definite in Farrells 23.

    POM was playing the best rugby of his career. He's an essential mix to this team for set piece, leadership and organisation.

    Coombes is on the outside and he's not getting into the 23 without injuries. He's a good option to have but I would say Farrell will stick with both Conan and/or Baird ahead of him for impact off the bench.

    Personally I would be more interested in getting Penny into the Irish set-up ahead of Timoney.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,988 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I suppose my point is that the assumption keeps coming back to Coombes being next cab off the rank, but nothing we've seen from Farrell actually backs that up. Like, everyone is talking about Coombes v Conan, but Timoney, Prendergast and Deegan have all been capped more recently than Coombes, and if Baird is now a back-row, that's another one in the mix who has been a Farrell favourite.

    People keep talking about Conan's form (and that's fair enough) but it's not Conan keeping Coombes from earning caps.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Coombes went on the NZ tour.

    It was reasonable that Deegan was given a some game time from the bench to see what he could do given his lack of game time. He got 19 minutes against a beaten Fiji side that were down to 14 after a red card.

    Coombes was released to play for Munster against a South African XV, so there was an opportunity to see how he went in that match.

    Good use of fixtures by the Irish coaches to spread game time around.

    Wouldn't bother trying to draw conclusions from that decision to release Coombes and give limited game time to Deegan, that match was a tier two match anyway, could argue the South Africa XV selection were a more formidable team.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,762 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    The point I’m making is that there isn’t really anyone (that I’ve seen at least) claiming that Coombes isn’t good enough and shouldn’t be near the team. What people seem to be saying is that while his form is good he still has work to do to get into it.

    FFF summed it up well above. People are talking about Coombes being involved ahead of Conan, but he hasn’t been able to get ahead of the guys behind Conan yet. If he hopes to be in the 23 he’s going to need to prove he’s better and more deserving than a list of players. And maybe he can, but that remains to be seen. But for some people a reasonable position like that can’t simply illicit a “I get that and respectfully disagree” type post. It has to illicit a “blind provincialism” type response instead.

    What we don’t get is a whole lot of analysis of anything at all. Coombes possess a skill set that few others in the Irish squad do in terms of his carrying. And while he also does have a wider range of skills beyond that, one thing I’ve rarely, if ever, seen from him is the link play and decision making we look for from our back row a lot. Those tip on passes and the decision making ability of when to give them vs when to go out the back. The short line and footwork in contact to exploit gaps and dog legs etc. Now I’ll freely admit that I don’t see as much of Munster as I would like and so possibly have missed things, but he’s never seemed that player to me at all. And if he isn’t then he’ll have trouble getting into an Irish 23 because of how we play and what we want from our back rows.

    Either way it is fair to say that the guy has work to do. He was the only one dropped in November despite not being the only one who performed poorly in that NZ A game. So there must be a reason beyond that singular performance that caused that. In as much as we know he is currently behind a good few players in Farrells mind. As you and others have said, there’s no reason why that can’t change, but like Lowe before him, if he has been dropped he’ll have been told what he needs to improve on to get a look in again. If he’s shown he has he’ll get a look in again. If he hasn’t then he won’t. Unlike Lowe we aren’t sure exactly what he has been told to work on so it’s much harder to assess his chances this 6Ns.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,988 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Are we not forgetting the 'God of War' POM?

    The exact opposite I'd say, everyone assumes he's nailed on for the 6 jersey so not much to discuss.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,106 ✭✭✭✭Interested Observer


    I wonder if Baird is going to be the sub backrow for Ireland. He seems to be Leinster's first choice now at 6 (though small sample size to go from), he's playing very well there and he's already in the Ireland squad and has caps under Farrell. There's not really much question of anyone breaking up the starting backrow at the moment I would have thought.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,840 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    I must have missed a beat. I would have also assumed everyone would know Coombes is not getting into the 23 as it stands.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    But do you think "he stunk the place out so badly, they had to fumigate the RDS after" is akin to "I get that and respectifully disagree"? The point being... it works both ways.

    In any case your 3rd paragraph is the interesting point in all of this, and on that note:

    Those tip on passes and the decision making ability of when to give them vs when to go out the back. The short line and footwork in contact to exploit gaps and dog legs etc.

    Coombes absolutely has that ability; his offloading is excellent, as are his close tip-on passes. He's also significantly improved his footwork before contact, imo. I don't think he has quite the same speed as Conan, but equally Conan doesn't have the same heavy carrying. (Fwiw, I also think Coombes is a significantly better jackal threat).

    And Coombes has put in serious workrate with his carries and tackling lately. He even had 2 lineout steals at the weekend playing from the 2nd row. And, I don't think there's another player in Ireland I'd want ahead of him on the ball 5m out.

    Either way it is fair to say that the guy has work to do.

    I think the point people are making is that, since he was dropped, he has put in a serious shift; he's been in brilliant form. It's entirely possible he has since moved ahead of some guys in Farrell's mind. We'll find out in a few weeks.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Another point worth mentioning in all of this is that Munster's gameplan now is an awful lot closer to Ireland's than it had been in previously.

    And while Munster's form up to the November Interationals was very poor (when Coombes was dropped), they've turned a corner since that SA game and have been significantly better since.



  • Registered Users Posts: 238 ✭✭Tommysocks11


    I would necessary have POM as an automatic nailed on starter in back row, I think it's the 1 position that we lack is an out and out number 6. Don't get me wrong he is very good but can seem lightweight and goes missing in games but his line out is excellent. I wonder would baird or even Doris move to 6 and put conan back in at 8 work. Anyway ya it's POM's Jersey at the minute and I just hope he proves me wrong but it's great to have quality options as back ups.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,840 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    I think the overriding argument against Coombes is what the other Irish players have delivered for Ireland in the last 12 months.

    Farrell clearly picks on what you do in a green jersey.

    As it stands I wouldnt think he'd make the WC squad: JvdF, Dorris, POM, Conan, Baird, Timoney

    Personally I would think Timoney is the spot up for grabs. Penny is probably a bolter but he may even take Timoney's spot in the 6N squad.

    Prendergast is another player Coombes is going to have to get ahead of.

    Realistically it's only going to be injuries before Coombes gets a shot in the 6N... and then its WC time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 739 ✭✭✭phily2002


    Then you have Connors coming back who's our 2nd best 7 after Josh. It'll depend on how much the injuries have taken out of him.

    In fairness to Coombes he's going well this season and has been Munsters best Backrow. The NZ XV was the worst I've seen him play but he's bounced back.

    An Irish Backrow of 6 Dorris 7 VDF 8 Coombes is probably the form one and would be good to get a look at in a competitive game.

    POM and Conan are going well but neither are at their best this season. They both have credit in the bank though which Farrell holds highly. He's a fan of Baird too who's going very well at 6.

    Prendergast, Timoney and Deegan will need injuries to see any important game time.

    We'll know soon what Farrell is thinking.

    I'd imagine for the 6 nations he'll go with Dorris, Josh, Conan, POM, Baird(might be brought as a row) then that only leaves 1 spot. I think he might go with Timoney as he covers across the 3 positions or maybe he'll go Coombes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Has Baird ever tried to play as an 8? If he's very quick why hasn't he already played there?



  • Registered Users Posts: 739 ✭✭✭phily2002


    Probably because of Dorris, Conan and Deegan! Ridiculous talent at 8 already. I'd imagine he'd fill in fine there though if needed



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,577 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Timoney is in a bad position due to Ulster being awful, right now. While Coombes is playing great, it's worth remembering that Conan while off the boil is still fantastic. He has credit in the bank



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,840 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    Connors has run out of time for the WC. I think he's class but It's a long road back. When is he even due back? He's played..... 8 games of rugby in 2 years. Only 306 mins.

    I just don't see why Farrell would want to bring a different player into such a well oiled machine as the pack. You can always get better but is Coombes (or Prendergast, Connors or Timoney) going to improve it? Doubt it. Of those outside of the 23 Coombes and Baird have the potential to provide a real impact from the bench.

    For the 6N Squad I'd say Farrell will pick both Baird (5.5) and it's between Coombes and Prendergast.

    2022 6N Squad:

    Tadhg Beirne

    James Ryan

    Iain Henderson

    Kieran Treadwell? - Joe McCarthy for 2023 6N Squad

    Baird

    Caelan Doris

    Josh van der Flier

    Peter O’Mahony

    Jack Conan

    Coombes? or Prendergast

    Nick Timoney? or maybe Penny for 2023 6N Squad



  • Registered Users Posts: 739 ✭✭✭phily2002


    Yeah he's had a mare with injuries but he was also getting in ahead of Josh before that. He brings something none of the others can with his tackling and also has great hands. He's looked great when he's played(granted its very little).

    If he can get a good run he'll definitely be in the picture for the world Cup. If Josh got injured Connors is our next best 7 and the one you'd want to start.

    A lot of ifs though. He's due back around now so still has time if he can get an injury free run.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    I'd like to see an Irish back row of 6 Doris, 7 Van der Flier, and 8 Baird, with Deegan off the bench.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭Must love hardship


    Why would you not just pick baird at 6 and Doris at 8?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,840 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    Fingers crossed for him. Do you not think he'll have a job getting ahead of Penny though?



Advertisement