Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

First Brain Injury case involving Irish players about to be filed

2

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,693 ✭✭✭Nermal




  • Administrators Posts: 54,059 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Not the same. Head contact is intended in boxing and MMA, it's unintended in rugby. In both sports you are actively trying to knock someone out. Boxers and MMA fighters know exactly what they are signing up to.

    Rugby players don't sign up to get knocked out / take head contact.



  • Registered Users Posts: 434 ✭✭tooka


    Totally different

    boxer and mma fighters are self employed contractors , no big deep pockets unions or employers to sue

    top boxers might do one fight a year , too rugby players are all go all year



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I thought this piece was interesting; find it a somewhat strange move from the Welsh Rugby Union.

    I would have expected the argument to be from certain rugby unions that players had implicitly or tacitly accepted this risk by the nature of taking part in the game. By now explicitly requesting that all 51,229 registered players in Wales acknowledge the risk, does that not potentially expose the union for injuries which occurred prior to this notification?



  • Registered Users Posts: 434 ✭✭tooka


    2 things on this

    1. can you imagine the underwriters reading this article, the premium and special conditions will be outrageous, millions
    2. all medical staff member working in professional rugby will be looking for new jobs, they won’t want their name associated with this


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    Very sad to see these men suffering.

    Unfortunately im sure there will be allot more suffering and more cases as a result.

    https://www.rte.ie/sport/rugby/2022/0929/1326135-ex-irish-rugby-players-to-sue-irfu-in-concussion-case/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,605 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    It's inevitable really! That's what is so concerning about rugby as a whole? A lot of players suffered head trauma.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE



    It's sad to see Jackman talking about safety in rugby.


    I have some of his first season as a pundit seared into my brain where he would talk about how it was a players duty to falsify baseline concussion assessments. That way the doctors could ask basic questions like 2+2 and he could get it wrong by answering 5 during a hia and still get back onto the field.


    When he mentions the word safety I always want to throw up a little.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah; he's still talking the same tired old narrative that it's all just about "teaching them the right technique", essentially claiming players are themselves responsible if they tackle incorrectly, and ignoring the widely accepted medical fact that you can incur a concussion from virtually any type of collision on the field of play, not just direct hits to your head.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,658 ✭✭✭jackboy


    It’s mad. We watch our high profile players get obvious brain injuries on the field. They stagger off the field only to play again a couple of weeks later. We all know the players who are going to have severe side effects in a few years time but the rugby community won’t talk about it, just let the players sustain further damage.

    Legal cases like this will finally result in the rules of rugby significantly changing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    I was watching the Dolphins game last wk and saw the QB Tua Tagovailoa get pushed to the ground and hit his head. Got up and wobbled and fell to the ground. They sent him back out to finish the game....and Tua said afterwards it was a back injury that made him fall!!!

    Last night he got another head knock this time from a tackle where he was swung to the ground and hit his head. Sickening to see the effect it had on him.

    NFL had paid out $1 Billion thus far for concussion.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/12/sports/football/nfl-concussion-settlement-race.html

    Watching last week it reminded me of what happened to Jeremy Loughman v Māori. The In-game HIA assessments should be scrapped. You go off for HIA and you stay off.

    Still firmly believe Sexton should not have played in the second test (even though he played magnificently) considering his history.

    edit: Should have sent Sexton home after fist test.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,605 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I wonder if James Ryan is a lesser player due to his concussions? He's svery good and plays at a great level but, is he ever going to be the dominant player he once was?

    He is a lad that I cringe at when I see him make tackle. I doubt that he's going to have a long career! Eventually, his health must come 1st?

    Rugby is shooting itself in the foot with the disparity of the officiating at the breakdown. I'm not sure if there's a high % of concussions due to the clusterfucks that we see at the breakdown.

    I've no answer to making rugby safer other than to get officials on the same page with regards to the breakdown. Maybe longer bans for high hits and reckless play would help?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,207 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Off The Ball had a specialist on concussion on last week which was an interesting listen.

    'I wouldn't ban heading in football' - Concussion is a treatable condition - Science of concussions - YouTube

    He's studying it so as to treat it if possible.

    For the players involved in the court cases they have to show that the IRFU knew about the dangers of concussion and did nothing. I don't think they'll be able to prove this.

    A fund raising game or charity might have to be set up to help these guys.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,505 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Have the dangers of repeated concussions not been well known for a long time? The NFL started looking at it in the 90s.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,207 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    "For many years, the risk of suffering a head injury on the football field was viewed as an acceptable hazard of the job. Players who had been concussed would be light-heartedly described as having been "dinged up", but little thought was given to the long-term repercussions of their injuries. Many of those players would return to the field before the end of that game, sometimes just a few plays later.

    The NFL first made a first gesture towards take these injuries more seriously by establishing the Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI) committee in 1994, but critics have since labelled this is as an empty, or even harmful gesture. The lawyer David Frederick, speaking on behalf of former players, described the MTBI as a "sham" during a hearing in April. He argued that the committee ultimately served as a distraction that stopped players from seeking out impartial medical advice."

    "On what grounds did the former players sue?

    The case against the NFL alleged that it had willfully misled its players over the long-term impact of head injuries. The former players' argument was founded in part on the actions of the MTBI, whose representatives had continued to reject the evidence linking brain trauma to CTE.

    As late as January 2010, the committee's co-chair, the neurologist Dr Ira Casson, argued that: "There is not enough valid, reliable or objective scientific evidence at present to determine whether or not repeat head impacts in professional football result in long-term brain damage."

    The lawsuit in the NFL was about the NFL knowing these injuries were serious but they ignored them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,605 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Maybe I am looking at this from a different pov but, if you do get concussions, you know it. It's got to be on the players too!

    You would know that you are incapable of playing! Why not stand down? Obviously, the franchise is at fault as are the medical team but, there must be liability on the player. Is the player not insisting that he be rested? The players have to put their health first. If they are not feeling right, they should speak up.

    The lawsuits are overdue. The affected players deserve compensation and future players need protection. But, I think that some responsibility lies with the players.



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭naughtyboy


    Watching this for a while and the game as we know it is goosed

    Insurance companies will decide the future,

    I defintely see the number of professional and amateur clubs reducing down in numbers considerably , as soon as the payouts begin and the number of claims increase as a result than that changes everything



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    After the latest Sexton head injury I hope, for his own sake, he's not rushed back, or rushes himself back. The images of him at the RDS awards (post surgery) tugged at the heart strings. He must be protected from himself.

    Since Sextons 12 week break in 2014 (when he had 4 'potential' concussions) I've counted 12 Head impacts of which 7 of them I classed as 'potential' concussions (Failed HIA 1).

    Just to note I would actually class most of these head impacts as a concussion.

    “It is most unfortunate and I feel bad for the club,”....“but I’m still not feeling 100%, and with injuries like this it’s not worth taking any risks.” - Sexton Dec 2014

    In his first game back after Concussion stand-down:

    v France 14th Feb 2015 Head Impact No.1 - Split by Basteraud in head to head collision. Went off field 44'-55'. Came back on to fin game.

    +15days v England 01st March 2015 - Sexton 54' Hamstring

    v Wasps Jan 23rd 2016 Head Impact No.2 - Head clash 9' HIA* Potential Concussion No.1

    Leinster head coach Leo Cullen said Sexton had failed his HIA, while the province’s official Twitter account also tweeted that the out-half had failed the HIA.

    *However, Cullen said this afternoon that Sexton had passed the HIA, but added that the province’s doctor wasn’t 100% satisfied to send Sexton back into the game.

    +15 days v Wales 7th Feb 2016 Head Impact No.3 - Sexton 75'. No HIA*

    *"I'm okay now, I just got a bang on top of the head and it just compressed my neck a little bit. But I'm fit to go and really looking forward to it.

    +6 days v France 13th Feb 2016 - Late hit by Maestri 14' - Sexton 69'

    "Johnny Sexton, with his neck and shoulder, it's more of a whiplash injury,"

    So how many concussions have you had? - IT Feb 27th 2016

    “There were other occasions when I had one or two minor symptoms. It’s a grey area, but I’d say I’ve had two proper ones. Two,” - Sexton

    https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/full-steam-ahead-johnny-sexton-speaks-his-mind-1.2550374

    +14 days v England 27th Feb 2016 - Sexton 76'

    v Scotland 19th March 2016 Minor Head Impact from Dunbar suplex on Sexton 67' - Sexton YC 76'

    v Montpelier 13th Jan 2017 Head Impact No.4 - Steyn RC 27' Clothesline to the head* - Sexton 69' HIA*

    *Passed HIA 1 in four to six minutes & Leinster said it was to the neck

    https://www.the42.ie/johnny-sexton-leinster-castres-3189498-Jan2017/

    + 8 days v Castres 22nd Jan 2017 - Sexton 22' Calf injury

    v Wales 10th March 2017 Head Impact No.5 - Davies knee to head - HIA*

    *Passed HIA 1 and returned to play.

    + 8 days v England 18th March 2017 - Played 80'

    v Exeter 16th December 2017 Head Impact No.6 - Kvesic shoulder to head - Sexton 3' HIA* Potential Concussion No.2

    *Failed HIA 1

    +16 days v Connacht 01st Jan 2018 - Played 80'

    v Scotland Feb 9th 2019 Head impact No.7 - Sexton 24'** HIA* Potential Concussion No.3

    *Failed HIA 1

    **Bang to head 17' and Played on. Taken off 24'

    +15 days v Italy 24th Feb 2019 - Sexton 78'

    v Connacht 2nd Jan 2021 Head impact No.8 - Sexton 24' HIA* Potential Concussion No.4

    *Failed HIA

    +36 days v Wales 7th Feb 2021 Head impact No.9 - Knee to head - Sexton 75' HIA* Potential Concussion No.5

    *Failed HIA 1 and presumably 2 & 3

    +20 days v Italy 27th Feb 2021 - Sexton 80'

    v Exeter 10th April 2021 Head impact No.10 Sexton 27'** HIA* Potential Concussion No.6

    *Failed HIA 1

    **Shoulder to head on 23' and Played on. Taken off 27'.

    v Wales 5th Feb 2022 - Josh Adams YC for shoulder charge into Sexton 48' - Sexton 64'

    v NZ 2nd July 2022 Head impact No.11 - Sexton 31' HIA* - I think he was concussed and should have been sent home.

    *Failed HIA 1 & passed HIA 2 & 3

    + 7 days v NZ 9th July 2022 - Sexton 74' - Played one of the games of his life.

    v Connacht 1st Jan 2023 Head impact No.12 - Head on head - Sexton 63' HIA* Potential Concussion No.7

    *Failed HIA & has an operation on injury Jan 3rd (?Broken Cheekbone?)

    + 33 days v Wales 4th Feb 2023



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    as important as he is to ireland, i think he should have retired a while ago, i shudder to think of the repercussions that are coming down the line. might not agree with george hook on alot of things but i think his speaking out on the issue a few years ago was completely correct



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    I also thought he should have retired. After the WC would have been the time. Amazingly he played prob the greatest rugby of his career from Nov 21 - Nov 22.

    Cant remember what Hook actually said. Generally the commentary about concussion is inflammatory. One of the reasons is because the concussion information flow coming from the national team and provinces is usually grey and sometimes contradictory.

    The NZ tour (Sexton and Loughman) and Nov internationals (White) just underlined that the concussion protocols are not fit for purpose.

    With all the cameras, tmo, medics and independent doctors they make significant errors. I dont want to be hyperbolic but these are errors that impact lives.

    https://www.nzrugby.co.nz/news-and-events/latest-news/nz-rugby-statement-on-ireland-prop-jeremy-loughmans-head-injury-assessment/

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/rugby-union/63792321

    If there is a head impact and a suspected concussion the player should go off and undergo the HIA. But they must stay off and not return to play for at least 16 days.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,964 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I think something they should do right away is do away with the in-game HIA completely.

    If you get a head-knock you should be gone for rest of the game , end of story.

    I'd be happy to discuss the use of the HIA protocols and benchmarks to manage the return to play for the next game , but once you go off for a suspected concussion you should be done for that day at the absolute minimum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,344 ✭✭✭✭phog


    If you introduce that then you need to introduce proper sanctions against players that target the head in tackling and when carrying the ball.

    I don't know how you can ensure that someone like Sexton isn't targeted to get him removed early in the game and the opposition only loses a player for 10mins.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,505 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    I thought hits to the head resulted in a red card if there is no mitigation?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    That's one of the many dilemma's.

    But if you put player safety first. And I reiterate if it truly was a safety first culture then the players would not return to the pitch after a HIA.

    Put the players safety first then come up with proper sanctions. Not the other way around.

    Admittedly I don't know what the proper sanctions are even now (tmo, mitigation, disciplinary hearings etc) or if they are ever going to be able to do it.

    Dare I mention the Black card?!? Impact to head from Player A on Player B. Player B goes off for HIA (And cannot return). Player A is given black card and TMO review before deciding on YC or RC (or even no sanction if accidental).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,344 ✭✭✭✭phog


    You, yourself have talked about mitigation yet in the scenario I was replying to, the guy that received the bang to head has to be removed for the full match.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,505 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    I'm not sure what your point is. You said the penalty for deliberately targeting the head was a yellow card. this is incorrect.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Just to correct the record on one minor point. George Hook has never, at any point, had any genuine concern about Sexton's health or wellbeing. He has a huge axe to grind when it comes to Sexton and this is the avenue through which he exercises it. It's incredibly juvenile trolling and people shouldn't fall for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,344 ✭✭✭✭phog


    We've all seen players that caused head injury to a player stay on the field, get 10 mins, get a red card and then we have had cards being rescinded but all of that is how we currently manage Head injuries.

    I was replying to a post that said (with some merit) that in the future that it would be mandatory for anyone who receives a bang to head should be removed from the field of play for the duration of the game. From a health of the player pov that's good but then you need to ensure the opposition doesn't gain from that mandatory decision. How do you then deal with players that target a player like Sexton to have him removed from play. Surely the culprit needs an automatic sanction too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,505 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    There is already a red card sanction in place for hits to the head.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,344 ✭✭✭✭phog


    The current card sanction has nothing to do with what was being talked about as currently a player who receives a bang to head can remain on the field.

    We are discussing a situation where WR might bring in a mandatory removal from the field for any player who receives a bang to the head.



Advertisement