Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1486487489491492805

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,623 ✭✭✭Villa05


    How is intergenerational wealth a problem, is it a crime to be wealthy.

    Land value tax would probably be the best solution as its value is heavily derived from the infrastructure surrounding it, largely provided by the tax payer.

    Discourages hoarding by placing a cost on inaction and idleness



  • Registered Users Posts: 244 ✭✭FedoraTheAura



    Obviously it is not a crime to be wealthy. Are you saying intergenerational wealth isn’t causing unfair divides in society? The widening yawn in intergenerational wealth means one child can be left nothing and has a drastically reduced chance in succeeding in life, while another is handed an incredible head start. That gap between is widening, not decreasing. It is a problem.

    You only have to look at the bank of mummy and daddy increasingly raiding their savings to get their darlings to join them on the property ladder, while those with parents that can’t help them out, may never be able to do so.

    I agree an introduction of a LVT could help, but it needs to be part of a package of changes, 1 thing isn’t going to fix the housing crisis.


    Post edited by FedoraTheAura on


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,612 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    If both couples had the same medium income how come one couple bought a house and one couple are still renting. You need much more analysis.

    I worked with people with similar incomes for all of my working life with the same choices and opportunities I had. However they choose to spend there earning differently. Some went on foreign holidays every year, or changed there cars every 2 to 3 years. Other followed Munster Rugby on both there home and away matches, others just smoked and went to the pub more often.

    Give ten people 1k/week every week for 5-10 year and give them a house and 5k in savings. There will be 2-3 that will be in debt from discressonary spending, there will be 2-3 that will spend it all, a couple that will save a little bit with the 5k a couple that save a decent amount and one person that will make a investment decisions on that income.

    In the last 40years there is a section of society that started with little, that have worked hard and have serious saving or have investments that have paid off. That is the reality of life.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Because a fundamental human feeling of ‘fairness’ becomes comprised. Two equally hard working teachers/nurses/guards - one can’t get a leg up in life. The other inherits €5m because their great great great great grandad had a farm in bray which got zoned for housing. It’s the very definition of ‘unfair’ which then erodes at the general fabric of society.

    Youd have people on boards foaming at the mouth at those ‘doing nothing’ getting €350 a week from the PUP but randomly get €10million given to you by a great uncle and it’s ‘well deserved’ and the 33% tax has been stolen from you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,644 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Why shouldn't they? I don't agree with the renting out the room part but surely if someone wants to buy a house and that happens to be a 3 bed etc, that is their choice regardless of if there is to be a family in there or not? A home (with however many bedrooms) shouldn't have to be bough by a couple with the intent of raising a family. Why the hell would that matter?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,859 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Ten years ago, when Occupy Wall Street first became popular in 2012, socialism was aimed against "the 1%". IOW wealth inequality was seen as between ordinary people and the ultra-wealthy.

    Now it seems to be increasingly directed at people who are slightly above the median: small landlords and people who inherited money from parents (often split between multiple people).

    Many people see generational wealth as 'well deserved' because they view families as an organic continuous unit, rather than people randomly linked by birth. So that family has earned money through sweat and hard work over two generations.

    Whereas welfare - unlike inheritance or alms-giving - is money taken off people through taxation and re-distributed impersonally.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,612 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    What a load of rubbish, that is a 50k-1 senario. Its more likely that one of the couple's saved harder and choose to cut there cloth to what suited.

    The other couple made different choices

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    The more left Ireland goes the more likely inheritance gets targeted. The big issue with the inequality becoming entrenched comes from the staggering rise in house prices the last thirty years; nothing special happened to the houses in that time do it was largely luck which lead to a lot of people becoming wealthy from their house appreciating in value. This unearned wealth is exactly what should be targeted by the State.

    The ideal property market only increases or reduces in cost, in line with mortgage rates, so a couple percent change in a ten year period.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭DataDude


    But thats utter nonsense. I’ll inherit more money they any professional could earn in 5 lifetimes. Literally because my great grandad had a farm which got passed down and then zoned for housing (I’m not joking).

    I mean I could claim my ‘organic continuous family unit’ led to my great success and wealth to which I was an integral part. Or I could acknowledge that I contributed as much as any Joe Soap on the street and my inheritance is a pure freak accident of birth.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,859 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Btw I'm not against welfare I just understand why other people don't like it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 491 ✭✭SwimClub



    Ultimately evolution wants to give successful genes a head start so inheritance is actually quite a natural process.

    (runs out of the room ducking) 🤣



  • Registered Users Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    They shouldn't buy it if they can't afford it themselves and the main point I made was that ensuring that a single person has access to a three bedroom home in South Dublin is not the barometer we need to class the market as healthy. A couple with or without a child, on average salaries, should be able to access the borrowing that would enable them to buy a 3 bed home in a better functioning market.



  • Registered Users Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    So is survival of the fittest so it is more natural to let people who can't pay their mortgage or afford their rent to just get on with it and live on the streets, force them to survive instead of having a nanny state swoop in and underwrite their housing costs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Not that I agree, but could potentially get on board except the vast vast majority of Irish wealth of the last 50/100 years was generated through purely accidental land holdings which then got zoned at the right time. Completely out of their control/influence.

    Not like we had a generation of revolutionaries changing lives and building massive companies. Nope, often barely literate people with a bit of land in right area at the right time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,859 ✭✭✭growleaves


    There's a strong element of luck if you're inheriting that much.

    That doesn't make it 'random' though. You had forebears that managed to become landowners (that part may not have been easy, I don't know) and managed to pass on their genes. Result: you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭DataDude




  • Registered Users Posts: 491 ✭✭SwimClub




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,623 ✭✭✭Villa05


    You are both looking at one of the symptoms of the problem rather than the actual problem of unaffordable housing.

    How many parents got caught in 2008 by either helping there children or going gaurentor on the mortgage

    Parents helping children is a response to a bubble that further fuels the bubble

    Put in a robust land value tax that extracts 4billion a year from the property market rather than the state pumping in 4 billion a year further raising prices. Use the 4 billion to build affordable rentals creating further income for the state and increasing supply

    Land value tax will cool future bubbles creating a sustainable property market



  • Registered Users Posts: 244 ✭✭FedoraTheAura


    ‘’Many people see generational wealth as 'well deserved' because they view families as an organic continuous unit, rather than people randomly linked by birth. So that family has earned money through sweat and hard work over two generations.’’


    These people you’re talking about would be wrong then as they believe there are two generations doing ‘hard work’ but the second generation doesn’t haven’t to work hard or sweat at all to receive the wealth. That’s the point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 491 ✭✭SwimClub


    "doesn’t haven’t to work hard or sweat at all to receive the wealth"


    Take the British monarchy, Andrew is so many generations in he's even lost the ability to sweat.....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,623 ✭✭✭Villa05


    This is a big part of the problem, people claim that intergenerational wealth is an issue and completely overlook this scandal.

    These homes should be state assets released to the affordable rental market generating income for the state that could be reinvested in building more. This way they are a help to multiple families rather than a gift to 1 family in a lottery.

    Taxpayer funded/subsidised projects should not be a gift to 1 person/family. From my experience, in the past desirable council houses had a habit of going to persons engaged in political canvassing



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals



    Highlights the repossesion situation here perfectly, defaults and still keeps the gaff.


    Fine Gael minister of state Damien English has not declared his ownership of a residential property for more than a decade.


    The Meath West TD defaulted on mortgage repayments for the house and four years ago the loan was transferred to a vulture fund. English however managed to maintain his ownership of the property.





  • Registered Users Posts: 544 ✭✭✭theboringfox


    He should resign.



  • Registered Users Posts: 722 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Nah should become the next housing minister 👀



  • Registered Users Posts: 753 ✭✭✭dontmindme


    Great work again on the ditch



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,569 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    What a complete idiot.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,623 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Do we have to pay his gold plated pension if he resigns? Our td's have all angles well covered for themselves.

    How a TD can get a write off of debt on a 200k mortgage when they have annual income of at least half the loan

    This was not his ppr and should have been repossessed if he was unwilling to fulfill his contractual obligations.

    Like so many, not fit for office



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,630 ✭✭✭quokula


    There's something ironic about the fact the people who attack him hardest for this will be the ones that historically most heavily oppose the concept of people being evicted for not paying their mortgage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,644 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    I don't see how the number of family members should be a factor in a normal functional market. Using your rationale, a family with 5 kids should be able to afford a 5 bedroom house as well, but it doesn't work like that at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 722 ✭✭✭drogon.


    you reckon they are the same cohort that has a second house they aren’t paying their mortgage on ?



Advertisement