Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Andor [Disney+]

16781012

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Perhaps Andor was slow paced, but the quality of the acting and the cinematography was top notch.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I think that's underestimating the phenomenal levels of hype, and enlarged expectations around 1999. The subsequent 20 years have coloured events, not least how "Star Wars" is perceived - but at the time? No way, this was the Movie Event prior to word of mouth tanking the reputation. Remember how infamously there was a tonne of merchandise readied for presumed demand?

    Of course the actual pop culture phenomenon that year turned out to be some random martial arts movie from a pair of siblings making only their second film - who could have seen that!

    I never said the prequels didn't have a story to tell - just that the mythology had built up to a level that any set of prequel films were always up against engorged, enlarged expectations from a fanbase crazy for more movie Star Wars. Lucas might have fared better had he just left the Clone War Saga well alone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    I was around at the time, remember it well. I still don't think anyone was expecting high cinema. Just a good ScFi Romp in the Star Wars universe.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    As was I and there was hype by the bucket. For an era just before the internet the zeitgeist was awash with it. IIRC it also came hot on the heals of the Special Editions of the original trilogy, so the franchise was primed for a new era of Star Wars - and got a trilogy of infamously awful movies. But there was a huge amount of hype.

    The Phantom Menace sucked hard, word of mouth killed the buzz, then a month later the aforementioned Matrix movie came out and created its own replacement buzz; not least by being a stronger voice of the future of blockbusters than Lucas' old hat.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,807 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I think it's one thing for film & TV fans on the internet to have opinions about Star Wars, but the thing is the series as a whole is burdened with its self-created plethora of iconic ideas, characters, iconography, music etc... For many people Star Wars is the Jedi, the opening crawl, Darth Vader, Luke Skywalker, Yoda, Princess Leia, Han Solo, that theme music, lightsabers, the Millenium Falcon... the list could go on and on and on. For a series with theoretical vast possibilities of what can be explored, its own success has confined it in the popular consciousness. Of course the main batch of prequels and sequels were always going to stick to the basics and the Skywalkers.

    So yeah, I don't think it's a big surprise the films have never strayed far from the original trilogy well. Even Rogue One, the most tonally different of the mainline features, couldn't escape the orbit, both in its general conceit and - IMO to the major detriment of the film - gratuitous extended cameos from familiar faces. The Mandalorian too explicitly draws on familiar iconography - excessively so in its fan-service-heavy second season, I would argue. But that's what so many people want to see. In the end, some of the best Star Wars content has been the things imaginative creators have been able to do within the restrictions.

    Andor though is truly the most liberated of any mainline Star Wars creation to date, even if there still is some original trilogy baggage - thankfully handled much more elegantly. Frustratingly but unsurprisingly, it also seems to have had one of the smallest cultural footprints, perhaps second only to a true hard flop in Solo. This show is (rightly) beloved in enthusiast and fan circles, but maybe struggling a bit when it comes to crossover appeal despite rave reviews. I think it is a hard sell to any more casual Star Wars fan or even just a casual viewer (anyone who doesn't like Star Wars in the first place will probably just ignore it outright), even if the rewards here are much deeper and richer than virtually any other piece of Star Wars media. I'm someone who'd love to see more risks taken with Star Wars, but that's a wish that I think somewhat clashes with the role Star Wars has in popular culture and what so many people expect to see from something with a Star Wars logo.

    It's easy to blame Disney, and we of course should blame them for the way they've flattened and commodified popular culture into an endless parade of #content (Star Wars included). But the people they've handed Star Wars to are also sort of cursed with the franchise's own iconic legacy. That we've gotten something as great and refreshingly different as Andor out of it is a wee little miracle.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,292 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It's one thing having tight parameters to work in it's a whole other to make Rey a Palpatine or have C3PO being built by Anakin.

    For all the stupid gimmicky scenes Johnson had (fking space bombs) he made Rey "no one" and that little Oliver Twist kid was an opening to do Jedis in the future without it being about the same old families.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    The problem is too often they rely on trotting out the old fan favourites and not bothering to write a meaningful story to set them in. They released Solo too soon after the audience had the battering that was Rise of Skywalker and The Last Jedi.

     



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    The timing of 'Solo' had nothing to do the sequels (BTW 'The Rise of Skywalker' was released after it). It's just a poor movie that should never have seen the light of day in the first place. That, coupled, with the fact that it was about Han Solo meant that it was always going to be rejected in some fashion, because it was Han Solo without Han Solo. In fact, it was rejected the moment it was announced. It's reveal was met with a resounding meh by most people.

    'Solo' should never have gotten the green light, and it's indicative of the shambolic nature of Star Wars under Disney's tenure. Anyone who knew what they were doing with regards to the series would have known that it was a bad idea from the get go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,292 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I don't remember much talk down through the years about Solo's backstory. It didn't seem a burning question fans were mad to know the answer to.

    Seemed more like an attempt to cash in on the "origin story" craze that the superhero movies were doing.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I suppose whatever generation of cinema we're talking about, never underestimate the lure of "Before they were famous" prequels for some quick cash or engagement.

    It is kinda funny that in panicking over the initial comedic tone of Solo, Disney's desperation to reshoot the entire movie basically guaranteed the end-result they feared - a financial bomb. Rumoured to ultimately cost $350 million, that's some blindness to greed to think you'd still make profit vs. whatever version Lord & Miller had produced.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I think it wasn't a story anyone was looking for. As you say no one wanted a Solo movie without ford. But I don't think its a bad movie in itself. I missed in the cinema and got it on BR. But didn't watch it months after getting it. I do rewatch it. Whereas I've never been able to rewatch 'The Rise of Skywalker'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Yeah the whole backstory/prequels obsession never rang my bell. A new story in the same universe I'd be happier with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    That's literally all it was, an effort to create a "Marvelised" type of Star Wars franchise, where a million mediocre "origin" movies could be spurted out. But, yeah, absolutely no one was asking for a Han Solo origin movie. It's now destined to be the weird red headed bastard of the Star Wars family. A mild curiosity at best.

    It's kinda a shame, though, because if you eliminated Solo, Chewie and Calrissian and all of that baggage, they could have made an interesting heist story set in the Star Wars universe involving Woody and his gang. I'd get rid of that 4 armed monkey thing from Brooklyn as well. Or at least, reduce him to subtitles and an alien language.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,292 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Star Wars has a ton of movies in the Harry Windsor category at this stage.

    Long before Solo we had the Ewoks movies and the Christmas special. Solo is definitely heading to that "direct to video" bin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    In it's defence it didn't really degrade those characters in the same way the prequels and Skywalker have done. At least imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,552 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    i must be the only one who didnt think Solo was that bad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I think it was decent. Though I didn't really warm to the guy playing solo, but I thought it worked well enough. The whole life under the empire was interesting especially as ground pounder and of course we've seen even more of this Andor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Well, I don't know about that. It reduced Han Solo down to a mere collection of his props, silly explanations that nobody wanted and a Kessel Run that looked bloody awful. Maybe not as egregious as the character assassinations that went on in the sequels...but still.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,167 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    It was the ONLY Star Wars movie I didn't see in the cinema..... And they released the 2 Ewok movies in the cinema here in the 80s



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    In fairness the original characters are very one dimensional as designed. We have a good and bad wizard, the stable boy prince hero and a magic sword etc. A literal princess, a thief, etc.

    That's what's great about Andor the character development.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Haven't seen the ewok movies. I see them on Disney but have no desire to watch them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,167 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It was neither good nor bad, which is why nobody talks about it I guess. Darth Maul's supposed return will forever be in live-action limbo I guess. While in retrospect it's a work of art compared with something like the Boba Fett show. Also: I've long been curious to see the infamous Lord & Miller Cut.

    Well. I found Ron Howard's direction far, far too dark but the argument has been that was the fault with the projection in cinemas - not Howard's choice. But I've been disinclined to watch the thing to check.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,432 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Slow paced, I don't think it was apart from perhaps the first 2 episodes.

    It was gripping from episode 3 onwards.

    Rogue One was very rushed in comparison but then again ~40% of that was reshot.

    Rogue Ones ending was a complete mess, there was too much going on, the rebel ships appearing out of nowhere in orbit around the planet trying to get the shield down.

    Just an excuse to have a space battle, there was no real need for it at all.

    Jyn and Andor trying to get the plans, the pilot trying to get the transmitter up, the other rebels fighting on the beach, too much going on and not enough investment in the characters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,292 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Cut out the space battle and the rest is fine. I always turn it off as soon as the Death Star kills the 2 lads. That's the real ending and the rest is pointless CGI memberberry fondling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,432 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Yes the space battle was completely unecessary, there was enough going on down on the planet as it was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    The space battle in Rogue One is one of the best things about the movie. 😕



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    "...No battle plan ... survives contact with the enemy..."

    Personally you can never have enough space battles. It's called "Star Wars".

    The chaos of them flailing around is the whole point, it wasn't planned they just threw everything at it as it arrived and mostly uncoordinated and unplanned. Personally I love the ending.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Hammerhead Corvette. Makes no sense but brilliant all the same.

    Classic old school space battle. Enough to make me want to dig out XWing vs Tie Fighter.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,167 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Slow paced, I don't think it was apart from perhaps the first 2 episodes.

    It was gripping from episode 3 onwards.

    Agreed. A HUGE amount happened throughout. I think there is a difference between "Low-Key" and "Slow Paced".



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,807 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I still think the Darth Vader stuff is the worst part of Rogue One, simply because I've rarely seen anything that so loudly shouted 'this was done in reshoots' quite like those scenes. It's entirely disconnected from the rest of the film to the point where I think it just sort of undermines the rest of the story the film's trying to tell. I know a lot of people liked seeing Darth Vader mowing down rebels, which is fair enough, but it was just such a jarring scene for me because it was so clearly haphazardly slotted in late in the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    The pre star wars prequel hype was unreal, nothing today compares to it.

    People bought tickets to see movies at the time just to see the star wars trailer and didnt even bother watching the movie that was on afterwards!



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Oh shoot yeah, I remember that all right; people just upping and walking out once the trailers ended. It's madness to think how different the media landscape is now. That the only place you'd see previews of coming films was in the cinema itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,167 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    100% I like taking time. Something to get your teeth into



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    The more time goes by the higher up Rogue one goes in my rating to the point where its possibly my favorite star wars movie now.

    Andor has only added to that and if they get season 2 right (where it goes right up to Rogue one and stops) this could be the best combined non cartoon star wars material yet.

    At the core is the grey areas of goodies and baddies that was always missing from the main Star Wars lore along with characters with fleshed out motives and actions. Not just "kill rebels/jedi cause empire" , "Kill storm troopers or sith cause bad".

    Luthen Reel is an absolutely superb character, as a "villainous goody" as one can have, with clear motives and a tragically clear understanding of what hes sacrifice for the cause. Also has one of the best monologues in the entire star wars universe explaining what he is sacrificing in his goals.

    Dedra Meero and syril Karn are fantastic driven civil servant type empire employees. Again, in some ways showing how many bought into the empire concept of order and just focusing on defeating the foe. No real independent thinking or self reflection outside of their goals.

    Ando is actually as adult a star wars story that I think has been made and it didnt need to be R rated. Just a really well made series , with fleshed out characters, no over reliance on special effects and some of the finest material in the star wars universe in my view.

    I have enjoyed alot of the star wars stuff for what it is, but Ando stands out as something quite different. Its nearly a completely different kind of programme that nearly doesn't feel at home in the star wars universe for good reasons.

    Star wars = popcorn in every sense of the word . Andor = top quality drama/action/adventure



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,807 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    The all-consuming cultural impact of The Phantom Menace launch is definitely still out on its own, but easy to forget that The Force Awakens was massive. It was nearly Titanic or Avatar big. Regardless of your thoughts on the film itself - and we know there are many opinions out there :P - it was in hindsight just as big as TPM in viewership terms, if not maybe as culturally seismic. Still, I think a mix of the prequels underwhelming and a very smart launch campaign (that initial Force Awakens teaser is still a masterpiece of marketing) meant there was a massive appetite for that film even if it wasn't quite as visible as Episode 1.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    I think the big difference is that when the PM was released there was absolutely nothing remotely comparable at the time. SW was everything with regards to this sort of material. Also, Marvel has carved out the perfect ingredients to groom the right audience to watch whatever sh*t they put together, so SW really isn't as mainstream as it might of been in the 90s. It also probably has a more loyal support, which can work both ways, particuarly when what fans want "not my luke" is not what they get.

    Marvel and even DC (to a much lessor degree so far) have somewhat changed the landscape of these sort of events. I was at a midnight viewing of TFA, but I was at the midnight viewing of Marvel movies aswell. I remember the excitement for TFA but wouldn't class it as significant as the 90s.

    I was in USA just after the TPM was released in 1999 and it was insane at the time. There was no marvel or Dc or comparable movie within years before or after that even came close to the hype. The reason the box office maybe not as impressive as it could of been is because there was a lot of disappointment and poorer word of mouth. Jar Jar Binks probably cost then an extra 300 million alone !



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    While it does have that "let's stick Darth Vader in here" feel, I didn't find Vader's scenes out of place and in fact, I really like the ending. It shows why people feared Vader and why he was a force to be reckoned with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Austin Powers had a Star Wars like trailer around the time. Lucas was fine with it, but apparantly it was seen as marketing genius (attaching anything to TPM) . Imagine that , a movie trailer recomending you goto see an entirely different, popular movie and then see their movie aswell maybe!





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    It's been second only to Empire since I first saw it. I was so, so, surprised at how great the film was when I saw in the cinema and each time I sit down to it since, that greatness hasn't faded.

    it certainly has its issues, of course. The overplaying of CGI Tarken and that bizarre and completely unnecessary cameo from CGI Leia being the most uncomfortable. But, over all, it's an excellent Star Wars movies that's leagues ahead of either the prequels or the sequels, which I don't think I'll ever put myself through again, I consider them that bad. But 'Rogue One' was easily the most "Star Warsy" of Disney's Star Wars movies, the rest being wannabe also rans in that regard.

    And I agree completely, 'Andor' has expanded the universe in more ways than the entire six movies of the prequels and sequels combined. It, along with 'Rogue One', should be considered the bench marks that all other future Disney Star Wars productions should try to attain.

    As to Scarsgard's character, he's a refreshing extension of what Cassian Andor brought to Star Wars, in that he's on the "good" side, but not above doing the bad thing. In fact, all the Rebel characters in 'Andor' have grown up from the silly, twee, representations that we've grown accustomed to and I'd say not before time too.

    Star Wars needed to grow up to continue, AFAIC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,292 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    One of the best scenes in any Star Wars and one of my favourite TV moments of the last few years.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,167 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    APPARENTLY She was gonna say "Fight the Empire. Fight the Empire. F*CK the Empire"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Darth Vader is integral to the search for Death Star plans and the Death Star itself.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nah I enjoyed it. I never really liked the core Star Wars.

    Really enjoyed Rogue One, Mando and love Andor.

    Enjoyed Solo far more than I expected to



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,432 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    The highlight was the guy nonchalantly booting the Stormtrooper off the tower, some kick he had on him.

    I rewatched the final episode last night, it was outstanding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,292 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Or some stormtrooper getting that funeral brick across the face.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,947 ✭✭✭De Bhál


    that was great. the whole sequence with the marching band and the music to the brilliant speech leading to the riot was great tv.

    All those scenes brought Northern Ireland to mind and the stiffling expereince of trying to live under an occupying force. (saying that as someone with no experience of that but it came to mind)

    Andor was top notch tv. Actors sets dialogue everything, it was all done so well. That jail while being the brightest cleanest prison I've ever seen on Tv was also the most depressing.

    Loved it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,659 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    In fairness the trailer for the 'Phantom Menace' was probably the best thing about that movie. 😄



  • Advertisement
Advertisement