Did the Americans put a man on the moon?

this is very entertaining really

its like the video of the flat earther who fired the was firing the lazer throught the 2 holes to try and prove the earth was flat and when the experiment failed ( or actually worked) he just looked confused and said there was something wrong with the experiment

some people are so stupid they think they are smart

They lifted it up (which would adjust it for the earth's curvature) and it "worked" proving the earth was curved, their panic was funny. But it's all either attention seeking, grifting or an attempt to believe a god into existence.

And if people want to know where the "thrust doesn't work in a vacuum" came from, it was people arguing against Robert H. Goddard, a rocket scientist, and was famously editorialised in the New York Times, they printed a correction to the story 49 years later in 1969 (the year of the moon landing):

New York Times Retracts 1920 Article Saying Spaceflight is Impossible - RF Cafe

"A sickening part of this video is how he mentions being visited by men in black suits, not long after making contact with Sibrel, threatening him and his family, which is why he decided to only release the footage after his death."

But he was OK with the "men in black" who threatened him hurting his family after he had died? That was fine?

There are two possibilities here:

1. You actually believe all the, I'll be charitable, questionable stuff you post here. In which case you have my sympathies.
2. The other possibility.

First time I've seen this but very interesting. Just shows they were wise to it before NASA (the organisation founded by a satanist and scientologist) started making their fraudulent grainy footage. They've only bought themselves 50 years of time, the age of the internet is already exposing their disgusting lies.

Lies like the challenger "disaster" which killed all these astronauts who somehow have doppelgangers still walking around today. Some who couldn't even have bothered changing their names 🤣

But I guess this was debunked long ago...

Not sure why I keep coming back here posting these smoking guns. I guess I get a little enjoyment to see just how neck deep in the fairytale people are.

Kinda sad...

you expect others to accept an unsourced photo as proof of anything from you of all people?

With every post the poster makes, they either submit evidence contradictory to their earlier claims - such as here, which completely discredits their own theory in a fundamental way.

Or, are forced into ever more implausible claims such as the Challenger doppelgangers, which doesn't stand up to a moment's scrutiny.

Apparently now the conspiracy and charade it has to maintain extends to anything involving satellite communications, and the Chinese space programme.

They might also throw a distraction grenade, where they will try to distract from being caught out in the above, by trying to get posters to prove some irrelevent tangent.

Coming back to this point after thinking about it. The only person I can think of that you might be referring to is Jack Parsons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Parsons

He's a very weird and interesting fellow, but he wasn't a satanist, he wasn't a scientologist and he didn't found Nasa.

Would love to hear who you believe founded it.

It really means it's going to be ~47 more years before you post your own correction.

Honestly, the real interesting area (as you're not that convincing at all with the other evidence) is if you actually faced on and tried to prove the existence of a greater being rather than trying to disprove verifiable facts. We're heading into the next decade where the likes of Artemis and SpaceX will push boundaries (budgets withstanding) leaving you with unsurmountable evidence to try and debunk or you can face it head on, outline your actual beliefs and why they are true (odd that you wouldn't know about Goddard and the Markus of his time trying to debunk him, but at least you can see what the vacuum fallacy was built upon now).

But you're not able to point out any anomalies in the previous missions that you are actually willing to defend.

This is a good indication of the quality of your claims going forwards as well.

It was funded by the Americans with lots of help from German scientists.

So yes, kinda, I suppose ..

Multiple mars rover launches to Mars by multiple countries

Lunar rovers sent to the moon by multiple countries

Mapping satellites for mars and the moon in continual orbit.

Robots flying on Mars.

Re-usable rockets flying multiple times each month.

Starlink (that's visible for people who use telescopes)

Investigation of Pluto.

Deep investigation of Saturn.

James Webb uncovering the oldest known galaxies and reshaping the big bang theory.

Artemis 1 flying successfully around and back from the moon on the first attempt with a crew module.

Chinese space station.

International space station.

Many space tourists.

Among lots of other things, all since the 90's.

Start the debunking :)

Yet still nobody on the moon in 50 years.

Whether it happened or not I don’t really care, but do you not at the very least question why it hasn’t happened (beyond the funding, headcount, politics excuses).

On another note, as I’m not an Astro Physicist like the many that the conspiracy theory forum on boards strangely attracts and have little knowledge of space flights, in the 6 landings, was it 6 for 6 in 3 years or was there any disasters/failures.

Genuine questions.

So you're asking "aside from the reason, do you not think about the reason?"

That's kind of a nonsense question.

Also, no, the apollo program wasn't perfect. There were many failures, namely Apollo 1 and 13. Again it seems like you're asking "Aside from the failures, how come everything was perfect."

Since we are asking genuine questions, could you answer the previous one I asked you?

Why would it be impossible?

Ok. So then you agree that it's possible that apollo landed on the moon.

We also agree that it's impossible that they faked it.

As for your questions:

There you go. Was incredibly easy to find.

You might not agree with the reason or you might not personally understand it. But funding was the reason.

Just because wealth in the world has increased, it doesn't mean that Nasa's budget has also increased.

Can you explain why we don't have a super sonic jetliner these days?

Concorde was developed in the 70s. We have the technology and people. So all jetliners should be supersonic if not even faster.

Is it reasonable to then claim that Concorde was all fake?

You just could not make this stuff up.

Interviewer "There's a rumor going around online"

Smith "Yeah, but if you look at facial recognition software and look my CV up online you'll find we are not the same person. I send emails I get directly to the FBI. He was a great guy though and I'm glad I wasn't him"

🤣

My oh, oh my the screw is really tightening on these Challenger spoofers. The train is gaining momentum!

There's a job for you professional debunkers. Find us evidence of these Hawaiian twins. Must be the only twins in history that don't have a photo together as children...

🤣

Yea. You just seem to be stuck in spamming mode now because you are upset that your claims have been torn apart. You're ignoring all points because you cannot address them.

You are now suggesting that Nasa spend trillions faking space missions, millions of that budget going into giving the astronauts they didn't kill new identities.

But they couldn't photoshop a picture of a guy standing next to himself.

Again, 2 seconds of critical thought exposes how flimsy the conspiracy claim is.

are you agreeing its not him right?>

No, he is arguing that they are the same person.

This is based on them having the same name and the people behind the conspiracy were unable to change his name.

How this makes sense is unexplained and has never been explained in any of the many times this silly claim has reared up.

They can fake a moon landing and satellite technology but cant cone up with a decent disguise or plastic surgery!

If you believe this you will believe anything.

Can't use photoshop to give a guy a twin.

Can't have names legally changed.

Can't just kill people.

The conspirators are simultaneously all powerful and incompetent. It just depends on what point is being thrown out at the time.