Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

So why are you advocating it? You criticised my post which criticised people taking H&M website as gospel which means you advocate H&M website - you don’t get to do the reply you gave me and think it will pass without comment- you accused me of advocating here-say not facts- I never said that nor advocated it - so don’t put words in my mouth- engage with me if you wish but don’t twist my words- I know exactly what I said and what you said I said- is bullshit

The real Harry?

Should be added that the entire RF (including Harry) have form for hunting and for continuing to hunt even now.

It's more than a bit surprising that the British public, supposedly a nation of animal lovers, seem to be quite okay with this.

My own take is that the media and a large section of the public are so much in thrall to the monarchy that they daren't even question their passion for hunting. But it's been well documented and not even remotely a secret - we saw it in the movie The Queen for example as well as The Crown series.

It does leave me with raised eyebrows though. There barely seems to be a murmur about the RF having regular hunting weekends and killing animals and birds all the time.

I'm not anti-hunting in that if animals need culling or it's a sustainable business that puts a focus and money back into conservation and habitat and the animals hunted are treated humanely and killed instantly- but those boxes can be ticked all too easily and often, animal suffering continues anyway, which I don't like.

I believe horse and hound hunting could continue through scent trails as opposed to tearing a fox apart- but look, I don't know what rock their boat on such outings so maybe this isn't a good enough compromise.

I'm a meat eater (disclosing in the interest of debate and openness ) so I guess I can never be completely impartial on this argument - but I hate coursing, I hate unnecessary suffering of animals and I hate killing for the sake of killing- but even taking all of that into account, there's a place for hunting in my view - birds, game, vermin etc- but only if it's done in a wider conservation and habitat context and suffering is minimised- a tall order.

The RF, given their position and extensive knowledge in this area, could actually lead the way - but they're too in up to their necks and up their own backsides and possibly just too stupid to realise the power they have to change peoples view and behaviour in this area.

Harry is a twit. Meghan is an arch manipulator , only one result

Willing to forgive. Pure messiah complex with this guy.

More of the same hero-and-the-victim-at-the-same-time narrative. There are "things" he left out but he magnanimously didn't include them. The message there is apologise to us or else I might change my mind and go and write about that stuff.

He's so desperate for a reaction that he has also said he wants to save his brothers kids as either Charlotte or Louis will inevitably end up suffering his same spare like fate unless everyone listens to the guy who knows what to change in the monarchy.

The multiple book deal + announcements such as “I could never tell everything as my family wouldn’t forgive me” go hand in hand. It’s a threat and his bargaining chip to gain control over an organisation that sees him as replaceable. It won’t work but he is too deluded or thick to realise that this will end badly.

I think denying they wanted privacy is actually playing semantics with words IMHO.

Heres an extract from an article from Vogue 2020- they quote their website directly:

On their official website, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex outlined their agreed departure terms as working royals. “The Royal Family respect and understand the wish of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex to live a more independent life as a family, by removing the supposed ‘public interest’ justification for media intrusion into their lives,” reads one bullet point.

So, by saying that they’re essentially looking to reduce their public interest, and hence media intrusion, Shirley it can be naturally implied that they’re looking for more…privacy?

It’s also ironic that they’re intensifying the level of negative media interest on a personal level towards the RF also through their tittle tattle stories- something they claim they’re against- they truely are a pair of disgusting hypocrites

I'd look at it as them deciding to no longer engaging in the royal rota and seeking more control over who they gave access to (those supportive) and control over what those they give access to would release (favorable coverage) as their wish for privacy while being in an intermittent public role. Pictures of their kids was given as an example if I remember correctly e.g. People Magazine getting rights but the likes of the Daily Mail getting sued if they printed the same pics. The tabloids took the piss of such wishes by showing unnamed pictures of a "publicity shy man" (clearly Harry) with black bands over his eyes.

I think it's only the people who already disliked him who are upset about the Royal Family digs. He probably doesn't have much time for them anyway.

Initially upon hearing the few snippets from the book making the rounds, I thought it must have been ghostwritten by that ChatGPT thing.

Then I remembered Charles peculiarly wishing to be Camilla’s tampon, and figured Harry may well be his son after all what with tales of being reminded of his mother while smearing skin lotion on his mickey 🤨

The book was definitely written to capture the American market in the same fashion as Fifty Shades of Grey - it’s not going to be nominated for a Pulitzer, it’s just going to make the former Royals bucketloads more cash.

More guttural noises. He sounds like a complete head melt.