Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1243724382440244224433691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,172 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    True but there is nothing preventing us from getting our goods and services from companies who are not selling to the Russian embassy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,466 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    For sure, that would be democracy and freedom of expression in action.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,172 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    There you go, not that I ever had an interest in the crap they sell.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Headline should be…


    Russia switches to "Special Military Operationtime economy" in preparation for drawn-out Special Military Operation.

    🙄



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,398 ✭✭✭Homelander


    For those who shill for Russia, and in a more general sense, how could you possibly try and put a positive spin on either the war or the current battle for Soledar from a Russia perspective.

    We are talking about a tiny town of questionable strategic importance and a monumental meat grinder for the RU forces. Even if they "win" this localised battle, what then? What is the end game?

    I can't get over the fixation on this town and the bizarre notion that winning Soledar will somehow herald the beginning of the reversal of their misfortunes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 394 ✭✭Bitcoin




  • Registered Users Posts: 29,291 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    How many 'victories' like Soledar can Russia afford? As others have alluded to, it is textbook example of a pyrrhic victory, or one in which the political imperative of a victory, any victory, outweighed the military cost or strategic value.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I thought all Ikea stores were closed in Russia and they were looking at options of selling them.

    The MEGA brand is shopping malls, not the Ikea stores. Not sure how they could close the malls when Tennant's have contracts etc... But they could certainly try sell the malls on to someone else.

    Unless they reopened the Ikea stores under the MEGA brand, which would be pretty **** of them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 287 ✭✭dennis72


    The propaganda that Russia is losing morale lack of supplies mobilisation problems etc

    I fear wager was used to wear down Ukraine forces and the Russians will push to karmatorsk

    Yes it's a small victory but it's what comes next is the west backing off allowing dombass to fall

    Predicting war outcome is impossible

    What is certain Russia is in for a long fight and won't stop at Ukraine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,968 ✭✭✭Big Ears


    You could debate what Russian morale is actually like.

    I suppose many of the mobilised won't be there for very long and have been subject to extreme Russian propaganda until very recently.

    However I can't imagine that lasts very long. Even Russian forces in Soledar who have successfully advanced will see the quantity of fellow Russian soldiers who lie dead on the battlefield. It's impossible to expect the majority of those won't be questioning their own mortality right now.

    Sure some will fight with renewed vigour with success, but most will try to prioritise their own survival above all else going forward, not progression of their army.


    As for supplies, it's been well substantiated how many Russian soldiers do not have appropriate body armour, tourniquets and often weapons. There's a reason underwear is so frequently looted from Ukrainian homes. Of course this isn't all of the Russian army, many will be well equipped, but a vast number are not.

    Also add in the fact their missile supplies are starting to run low. Which is probably why they have changed the head of their army again, as trying to target Ukrainian civilians and their energy supply with missiles hasn't really worked.

    You have to say without question they are short of supplies. Also if the previous mobilisation had worked so well, would they really need another one ?

    If anything, another mobilisation will only highlight the fact of how poorly things are going for the Russians as things stand.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    At this stage they would be better giving ukraine cruise missiles so they can hit deep inside Russia , especially it's airbases



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,466 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    No way could that be construed as 'collateral damage' or a military target. They just fire cruise missiles straight into city centres.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,309 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    More political "Hey, send Leopards, you idiots" than practical.

    My interview here.




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭rolling boh


    If the company who supplies oil to them is known nobody should support them bit harder to boycott the others I suppose though nothing against the law should go on just hit the company in the pocket .



  • Registered Users Posts: 713 ✭✭✭Cushtie


    What I can't understand is everyone is calling for Russia to withdraw to end this war. I mean heads of European Countries etc. It's fairly obvious that's not going to happen, so the logical step is to provide Ukrane with the means to drive them out. That means the equipment they need.

    Why the f**k if there is plenty of tanks and arms etc scattered around Europe can they not be sent to Ukraine to get the Job done. Finish it.

    People are saying that Countries don't want to commit their equipment in case they need it themselves. Against who? Each other? We all know who the aggressor is. Are they waiting for RUS to beat Ukraine and then progress to other European Countries so they can use the equipment.

    Send the equipment, finish them off, it will be a decade or two before they can try something similar. By which time arms stocks can be replenished.

    Its fairly simple, what are they afraid of.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭JoChervil


    How Russian mentality shows even in such silly events like Miss Universe




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭Elmer Blooker


    Angela Merkel admitted that the Minsk ‘Agreement’ was basically a hoax and not worth the paper it was written on.

    name calling and insults to follow for pointing out what is fact.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It was putin broke the two agreements as you remember from the threads 9 years ago, which you blamed Ukraine for everything along with the CIA



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I think the west just need to tell Russia if Russia keep attacking civilian targets, Ukraine will be given what ever is necessary to prevent said attacks up to and including weapons to take out the airbases etc...

    Like an ultimatum but it would be Russia technically escalating it rather than the west by giving Ukraine ATACMS and cruise missiles etc...

    We have seen with recent attacks on Russian airbases that it does have an impact on the timeline for the mass missile attacks.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,737 ✭✭✭zv2


    Ukraine are perfectly entitled to buy time by whatever means they choose. It is their country and Russia should remain within its own borders. There should have been no need for any agreements with the Russians.

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,768 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Even a fully mobilised Russia will not be able to fully conquer Ukraine, even Kyiv, it may however take a lot more of the East and really bed in to what it already has.


    It's still a poor outcome and may well finish the economy of Ukraine for a generation, the serious implications for the economy of Europe etc.


    This is the problem with the drip drip approach from much of Europe. In another few months there could be several hundred thousand more Russian troops in Ukraine, badly fed they may be but they'll still be there dug in.


    There is a sizeable chance that this war could go on for years, every day now buys Putin more time to ensure that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Sure bombing civilian populations back to the Stone age ,

    Isn't telling about Russian mentality


    What is



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    This is happening since day one terrorist attacks on ukraine by a terrorist state,

    And people are more interesting in making sure nobody says anything bad about Russia or the correct PC language is used.

    Priorities people priorities





  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,131 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty



    Do you support Russia's actions in invading Ukraine?

    Do you accept Russia is a terrorist state?

    Do you condone the war crimes committed by Russia in this conflict?

    Do you think Russia has observed all it's international obligations?

    Do you think Russia is a force for good or bad?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,874 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    Maybe Ukraine should start hinting that, when the massive rebuild starts, priority will be given to contractors who's countries provided the most support.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,466 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Are Russia allowed to compete? That really surprises me, especially given the contest is being held in the US. They've been banned from numerous cultural events, including Eurovision.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,850 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Miss Universe was previously owned by Trump right up to 2015. The stories of him hanging around the changing rooms of Miss Teen USA also date from his ownership of these pagents.

    Passed a few owners after 2015 and now belongs to some Thai group. However given the stink of Trump from this thing, I’m not too surprised that Russia got to join in.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Well Zelensky has already announced an alliance with the huge investment company Blackrock to help in reconstruction. They'll be the ones deciding who will be given priority. Their friends who will get the massive cash payback over time. Which will be the already hyper rich mostly in the US. Everyone else will get scraps from that table. Oh sure they'll let some EU stuff in, because they want in there, but...

    IMHO this is well bloody dodgy. That company are utter bottomline bastards buying up whole neighbourhoods in the US and elsewhere driving up house costs and creating an extended renter demographic for fun and profit. They have their hands in everything that turns a profit for them. 21st century robber barons. They'll try and likely do the same in Ukraine. They'll have it by the short hairs when this is all done and dusted. A "virgin" nation in effect in hock and beholden to them for their help. The conspiracy nutters go on about "elites" and nebulous "lizard people" types pulling strings and Blackrock and those like them are hiding in plain sight with the financial clout of countries.

    On the positive note as far as the war goes, the fact that these scumbags have backed Ukraine means The Money pretty much worldwide is backing Ukraine. They care little as far as "morals" go, it's all about the juice and it has decided that Russia at this moment and for the foreseeable(until it breaks up enough for them to get their snouts in the trough again) simply isn't profitable. If there was anything to add to the pile of why Russia has already lost, this is a big one. You can be sure they're already "lobbying" dissenters in the US government.

    The only other negative is they also see this going on for a while and crowds like Blackrock are also heavily invested in the US arms industry, so even if Russia suddenly pulled off the reversal of fortune of the millennia, either way they'll still make bank.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Of course, only the very innocent would believe that Ukraine will not have to pay back what they are receiving ten times over. It’s an existential crises so Zelensky has no choice but to sign his country away.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,076 ✭✭✭threeball


    Any victory there will make another mobilisation easier to sell. Your average Russian hasn't any more clue what Soledar is than you or I had 12months ago.

    The masses get sold a lie telling them of their heroic victory and taking of this vital crossroads, a springboard for consolidation of their lands in Ukraine. Now is the time to join our glorious victory.

    And it will make getting the numbers they need to fulfill easier. No victory should be considered small, especially one that has attracted so much attention, due to the propaganda potential.

    If Ukraine were to prevail here you could be looking at reducing the length of the conflict quite substantially.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement