Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Munster Team Talk Thread - New season title pending....

Options
1541542544546547878

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Yea, agreed. It’s not a conspiracy. He has the incumbent advantage. You have to be clearly better to take his spot. But that’s how it works everywhere.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,238 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    why would you pick on projected form continually though? surely there has to be a point where you decide enough is enough and move on though? carbery hasnt really shown anything since his first season imo and yet hes a guaranteed starter still?

    by bringing JC straight back into the starting team everytime he is fit they are making that claim when he simply isnt that talented of a 10 for that to happen.

    and that is rubbish that JJ or Healy were never good enough. at many times over the last few seasons both have being playing infinitely better than carbery

    why were lancaster and cullen (correctly) convinced that he was a 15 so if thats the case?

    nobody is saying there is some grand conspiracy (or at least im not), what im saying is that farrell/irfu see carbery as the next best option at 10 and are dictating that he is the starting 10 for munster when available and i , among others, disagree with this as he hasnt shown enough at 10 to warrant this.

    the irish coach dictating to provincial coaches isnt unheard of, kearney was picked for leinster ahead of JC down to schmidts intervention and carbery was likewise on the bench ahead of ross byrne

    Post edited by sprucemoose on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    why were lancaster and cullen (correctly) convinced that he was a 15 so if thats the case?

    They weren't, and he played a lot of games at 10 for Leinster that season. They just rated him that highly that they wanted to get him on the field as often as they could, so put him at 15 sometimes.

    Another factor was probably because they had a pretty decent guy at 10 you might have heard of called Jonathan Sexton?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    IRFU absolutely aren't dictating Munster selection.

    Why would they? It would be absolutely counter productive for both Munster and Ireland.

    No. This is pure mental gymnastics.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,238 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    rob kearney has said they wanted carbery to take over from him at 15 but schmidt preferred RK. yes he played 10 a bit but he mainly played 15 even when sexton was injured because although carbery is a better player overall, byrne was/is a much better 10 than he is



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,584 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    carbery hasnt really shown anything since his first season imo and yet hes a guaranteed starter still?

    I think the 4 games he put together after the Autumn Internationals were the best spell he's had in years, and certainly the best he's been since that period around Christmas in his first season at Munster (that included the Glouster game).

    The Edinburgh away game in particular, he showed great character after an early mistake, and I think the last 60 mins of that game are as good as we've been in attack in years. Carbery was instrumental in that. (I think we scored 31 unanswered points).

    During that 4-game period, he seemed to me to be taking to flatter and releasing it later than he previously had.

    Bear in mind, I was someone who was very critical of him, and wanted Crowley to start ahead of him earlier in the season, particularly after the first Connacht game.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,584 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I do think you have a bit of a point tho; the one that sticks out to me was the SF in the RDS in his first season where he was parachuted back in. In hindsight, that looked like a poor decision. But he had gone well earlier that season, so they obviously thought it was worth the risk.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So can you just confirm here please, that you are saying that for some reason, the Munster and Ireland coaches are being instructed to select Joey Carbery?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,238 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    i should have said for munster in my original post, although i agree he was pretty good against edinburgh this season. my problem is that even allowing for his fitness issues, for me he hasnt shown a consistent high level of performance for munster to warrant building the backline around him. hes had some decent one-off performances but all of the other options have had similar if not better games so i dont think he should be an automatic starter



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,409 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    When a player was the 'Next big thing' and the IRFU invest a lot of political capital to move him to Munster as the annointed replacement for Johnny Sexton, then they pick up a long term injury (while playing for Ireland). There is a huge reluctance to change the depth chart until that player comes back, especially if its in a period where almost all of the minutes were being given to Johnny Sexton and everyone else is fighting for scraps off the bench or against weaker teams in heavily rotated sides.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 22,409 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I always thought if you're playing a 6-2 split, you'd need an out and out 10, and 9 on the bench, but those players can cover the back 5 between them, or the players on the field can be reorganised to cover centres and wingers/fullback

    9 and 10 are pivotal positions, It's possible that your halfbacks could get injured or carded in the first few minutes of a game, and then you're stuck with a stand-in for the rest of the game.

    This is why I think a lot of promising 10s get played in 12 and 15 while they're gaining match day experience. Not because the coach wants them to play in those places long term, but because they want them to be able to be brought on as cover for 12/15 if they're on the bench in a 6-2 scenario

    The starting centres should be your best 12 and 13, but if the 13 goes off, it's easier for a specialist 12 to move to 13 and bring in cover at 12

    Similarly, start your specialist full back at 15 and if he gets injured, you can bring on the 10 to cover 15 in a 6-2

    The cover for 9 could cover the wings or FB (probably don't want them in the centre or they'd just be a speedbump)



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,238 ✭✭✭sprucemoose




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    We have different definitions of sensible then on the first post.

    The IRFU, much to the chagrin of Leinster management and fans, encouraged / facilitated a transfer of Joey Carbery to Munster to help solve two issues: (i) give a guy who looked like he might be the heir apparent for Ireland at the most important position the opportunity to really challenge Sexton and lead a team, (ii) help Munster out by transferring a guy who was a prize asset in Irish rugby at that time.

    That said, I absolutely refuse to believe that beyond that there is any involvement from the IRFU/Nucifora in mandating Joey Carbery's selection. No self respecting coach would tolerate it, and it would absolutely have leaked if this were the case.

    Furthermore, there would be absolutely zero logic behind it. Why would the IRFU, who's primary mandate is the success of Irish rugby, not want Munster and Ireland to develop and select the best possible player available?

    The coaches who have consistently picked Carbery as first choice for Munster and second choice for Ireland have done so because they believe he is the best player available to them at that time. Any other kind of tinfoil hat theory suggesting otherwise doesn't stand up to scrutiny.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,409 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I went very cold on Joey after the Connacht game, but to be fair to him, he as proven me wrong since then



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,409 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,238 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    you said it was to the chagrin of leinster management and fans but you forget carbery didnt really want to move either, but cullen and lancaster wanted at 15 so his hand was forced

    if you dont think the irfu/national setup has influence over provincial selection then youre very wrong in how you think the system works

    'Why would the IRFU, who's primary mandate is the success of Irish rugby, not want Munster and Ireland to develop and select the best possible player available?' - not that i think this is the case, but its pretty easy to think of justification here if you wanted. for example, the irfu could have looked at the situation in 2018 and thought, okay munster arent going to be successful for the foreseeable future anyway so lets give them carbery, if he eventually comes good we get an option for the national team and if he doesnt, theyre not going to be winning anything for a while so theres no great loss. leinster have the byrnes for when sexton is injured so theyre fine - problem solved. do i think this is what happened - no, is it inconceivable - also no.

    'Any other kind of tinfoil hat theory suggesting otherwise doesn't stand up to scrutiny.' - except for the fact that it has been confirmed by a number of people, rob kearney for one, that this kind of interference by the irfu does happen



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What are you claiming here that Rob Kearney supposedly said?

    i don’t even understand what point you’re trying to make with your theory above on the rationale for the move.

    you have repeatedly failed to post any credible theory for why the IRFU would be insistent that Munster / Ireland pick a player if those coaches think there is another Irish player there available who could do a better job.

    What you’re proposing is a theory that actually calls all of the individuals involved’s integrity into question.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,238 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    kearney has said that the irfu intervenes in provincial selection from time to time, pretty simple

    i have vague recollection of cullen mentioning it in a post-match interview previously too but i could be incorrect in that

    also, given how the main irfu and the individual provinces work i dont see why you are so incredulous at the idea of them intervening? it is far from the realms of possibility

    remember, this is an organisation that wanted to keep van graan.....



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,584 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'd agree with a lot of that, but would have a small quibble with this:

    Similarly, start your specialist full back at 15 and if he gets injured, you can bring on the 10 to cover 15 in a 6-2

    It depends on the 10. Like, for example, I don't think Ross Byrne or Ben Healy would ever move to FB. In that scenario, you'd be relying on the players on the field to re-organise / cover it, like you mentioned.

    Also, coaches often prefer to make a single change, rather than re-organising a number of positions, which is point against having an out-and-out 10 on the bench. (But I suppose that's exactly the point your making, for coaches player 10's at 12 and 15).



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The IRFU might intervene when an NIQ is depriving an IQ of game time. That might make sense. It would make no sense when both players are Irish.

    This theory is predicated on the idea that JJ Hanrahan is/was good enough to be Munster's first choice and in the mix for Ireland. He isn't and never was and it's laughable to suggest otherwise. Ben Healy isn't and never was either, but he at least has time to develop.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,238 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    right well kearney and carbery are both irish-qualified so thats your first point out, although id imagine it would usually be the case yes

    and i completely disagree regarding both JJ and Healy, but fine thats your opinion. i seem to remember consternation before JJ left for northampton as to why he wasnt starting in europe, id also argue he showed against castres at home and clermont away that he was good enough to be a starter for munster. healy against wasps would be a similar case

    maybe neither of them showed it consistently enough but i wouldnt accuse carbery of consistency either to be honest



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,409 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    JJ was a kind of wildcard appointment. He was no longer thought to be international standard but he was brought in as 3rd choice cover behind Carbery and Bleyandaal. While Carberry was injured, it was a chance for Burns, Carty and Ross Byrne to overtake Carbery on the international scene, but inside munster, we had blown our budget on 2 10s who were almost never fit to be selected

    Since 2021, we have seen Ben Healy graduate from the academy, and Crowley coming in directly behind him, while Carbery has finally found some fitness and has been given space to re-discover his match form at club and international level.

    Rugby is a cruel mistress sometimes. Munster went years without having a fit 1st choice 10, and straight into having 3 fit international standard 10s and having to play academy players in the league before the 6 Nations (they pretty much confirmed Butler is either starting or Benching for the Benneton game during the press conference today)



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    So after the 6N squad was announced are some still claiming that Munster have been picking Carbery over everyone else due to Irish management interference?

    At least we won't have any issues finding a 10 to play during the 6N.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,287 ✭✭✭✭phog


    The Munster players named in the Irish 6Ns squad - Casey, Crowley, Earls, Murray, Beirne, Coombes, Kilcoyne & O’Mahony

    As already mentioned Ben Healy is in the Scottish 6Ns Squad.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,584 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Can you link to where Kearney said that?

    My own view of it has been more akin to what @Former Former Former said above, that they will intervene possibly if NIQ players are obstructing IQ players, and obviously the protocols around player management.

    The Irish coaches obviously influence provincial selection in the way Farrell et al. have been prepared to select guys who aren't first choice for their respective provinces, but I haven't heard of examples of IRFU or Irish coaches dictating a player must start, and I can see zero logic for why they would.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,287 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Haley definitely but he's too alike to Keenan ands as Keenan is available then Farrell was always going to go with a utility back to cover FB. If Keenan was out injured I'd say Farrell would opt for Haley.

    I'm still not fully sold on Daly - obviously Farrell likes him but atm I'd have Nash ahead of him.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 14,599 Mod ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    I kind of thought the same until Farrell named 7 outside backs in his squad. With 7 there should be room for a dedicated back up fullback.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,287 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I think Farrell has one eye on his RWC Squad and I'd be surprised if he ever thought of naming two dedicated FBs in his squad.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 14,599 Mod ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Fair


    I'd say Earls and Stockdale are there as much to be in camp to know calls and patterns in case their form improves (and to be a leader in camp in Earls case) and I'd give a second dedicated 15 a spot for the same reason (to learn forms patterns and strategy) if I was going for such a large group of outside backs.



Advertisement