Enoch Burke turns up to school again despite sacking - read OP before posting

It's not about whether the student is trans or not, it's about the school's policy regarding use of pronouns,

We will never see or hear anything more from the unions than unnamed sources, they will be far too cowardly to put their names or faces to this story.

How it was done: the Govt used the tactic that is commonly used to break Union power/legacy conditions, to wit: threaten to reduce the pension entitlements (that members have paid into) and reduce existing benefits such as grat/early retirement/career breaks etc if the existing staff don't agree with the introduction of "yellow pack" wages and terms for new entrants. Naturally, the existing people will work to protect what they have so the newbies will take the hit. It was used successfully against the Gardai, Defence Forces and other State agencies and private companies were already using it. Things like the Haddington Road agreement meant that legacy teachers got their conditions back but newbies lost out, so they will leave with worse pensions, have less leave and terms and will earn less over the same time period. In some cases, the State tried reducing the conditions of junior members of workplaces such as apprentices and recent joiners and quite rightly, the Unions did stand up and fight back as it was clear breach of contract and the State and private companies backed down. The downside for the State and other employers was that people stayed away from apprenticeships in droves, as they felt that they were being shafted from the off. The State suffered a wholesale loss of apprentices who quit and went to work for private companies, leaving huge gaps in the ranks of techs and nurses and so on, that were never truly filled.

Principal and personal integrity are not necessarily positive traits in themselves. Depends on context.

How would you react if a Muslim teacher with very strong principals insisted all the girl in his class wore a hijab. Would be on here praising his strong principals

I identify a male as a person who as a penis and testicles and a female as a person with a vagina. Their genders are male and female, respectively. Am I wrong to identify as a person who thinks like this? Should I expect other people/society as a whole to to respect my thoughts on this?

If a male was to have their penis and testicles removed and replaced with a vagine/lady bits, am I right or wrong to then identify that person as a female?

"Furry" sounds rather cute :-) I could go with that.

If you decide to identify as a cat, fair enough, I will treat you as a cat.

First, I will have you spayed, then microchipped, and if you get ill, I'll make sure you are put down humanely rather than being dumped in the canal in a bag of stones. Oh, and a diet of cat food, no clothes, and sleeping outside every night, no matter the weather.

In return, perhaps you will agree to treat those who identify as female, as female.

But what if I identify gender and biological sex as the same thing? Can I not be respected for such a draconian stance? Should I sue the department of education for teaching me evil things?

But I have never said it once , If i have an you show me ?

I think your referring to me saying " there are two genders & lots of mental illness, "

What you made from that was that i said Trans people are ill which i never said , not even once,

no because the correct word is principle, not principal