Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

You've been looking in the wrong direction, the dangers are coming from the right.

15051535556112

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Blaming every attack by thugs on “the fash” isn’t even Fresher level debate. It’s Junior Cert Inter Schools Round 1, where earnest bubble enclosed teenagers are confronted by calls for logic, evidence and facts for the first time.

    The same posters who were dismissing a mini riot in an asylum centre which led to multiple hospitalisations as “handbags” are suggesting a handful of thugs attacking people who were literally sh1t ting in the neighbourhood is some extreme right wing attack on democracy.

    Is it now unreasonable to ask people to back back up their claims with evidence? Or is the correct slogan, “fash”, “racist”, “far right” etc, enough to settle the debate?

    Whoever these thugs are, I condemn them. It was an appalling attack on vulnerable people and can never be minimised or justified.

    However if one is to label this as an attack motivated by ideas of the far right, such as racism. Let’s see the proof. If they are far right scum who carried out this attack, I will condemn them as strongly as if they were non politically motivated thugs. Violence is wrong. The way to avoid violence is talking. Discussing. Honesty. Proving your point, convincingly, with facts. Not ending the conversation with empty slogans and insults.

    If you could explain what “the fash are well known” means. Do you mean the people involved are well known racists? Have they been identified as such? Was this done at the scene or by viewing social media postings etc?

    I will absolutely accept that the fash were involved but if you could elucidate your reasons for believing so, it would be more convincing than simply stating it’s “the Fash” in’it.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    When you use the UK over the last four years as an example of fascism, you have lost the argument.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,993 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Would you deny their attitude towards the north recently has not been tinged with the feeling of being superior?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    It was a mess without a doubt but it wasn't a fascist state.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    So the United Kingdom was a fascist state during the troubles?

    And your proof is?

    Don't get me wrong, the way the United Kingdom dealt with the North, and how they continue to do so is far from ideal but labeling it as fascism is just not accurate.

    Glazers Out!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Internment should be all the proof you need.


    But the idea that they used the army against civilians. The idea that votes were tied to rates so that the poorer class (usually catholics ) often had no vote. The idea that many local councils in catholic areas were gerry mandered and controlled by protestants. I could go on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Was is not is!

    The poster claimed the UK was a fascist state over the last 4 years.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    I take issue with all of those things just like you, enormous human rights abuses and the United Kingdom should be rightly ashamed.

    Northern Ireland was an apartheid state without a doubt. It wasn't a fascist state and nor was by extension the United Kingdom.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,993 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    No, ai didn't, I said there were plenty examples of vehaviour from it that align with traits if fascist regimes.

    You should all go read the OP again, nowherein it is mentioned fascism or even the far right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Definition of facism


    centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation and race


    from the uk govt website


    anyway this is REALLY off topic mods will give out to me



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Northern Ireland was an apartheid state.

    The United Kingdom was and remains empire (albeit much smaller these days). I find their behaviour during the troubles abhorrent but the United Kingdom was not a fascist dictatorship, there was not a fascist party that came to power in the United Kingdom that introduced changes that made Northern Ireland what it was. Partition and the mess that was made of it was to blame for the apartheid state that was Northern Ireland.

    Literally nobody believes that the UK has ever been a fascist state nor by extension Northern Ireland. You're ignoring the facts and going with your feelings which is your perogative but just you shouldn't expect your opinion to hold up to scrutiny when it isn't supported by any evidence.

    Glazers Out!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Arrest without trial? Like in the USSR? So by your definition the USSR was a fascist state as was the US in the 1940s, Ireland in the 1940s etc, etc. All a bit silly really.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    How can you say the USSR wasn't a facist state? Some states in the US during the 40s were definitely facist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Oh yes, yourself and Tell Me Know with the “well x shares traits with y so x must be y argument”.

    What next? Arguing that whales are fish because, you know, it’s obvious, they live in the sea and swim!

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    The USSR was literally a Communist state. That's why it wasn't a fascist state.

    Glazers Out!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Might these two not be mutually exclusive but in fact have many similarities? I would argue a lot of communists are facists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,993 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Any chance of arguing the OP or is it another day for the strawmen?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Oh I agree to an extent.

    Extremism typically results in the same behaviours.

    Far left and far right ideologies are extremely dangerous and harmful, but to say that communists are actually fascists whilst doing bad things is a bit of a cop out.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,212 ✭✭✭Cordell




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Sickening stuff, we've allowed scumbags to take over our society.

    There was a video doing the rounds recently of a foreign guy working in a shop in town trying to deal with a skanger who was shop lifting and getting abusive it ended up getting physical and the foreign lad took the skanger down beautifully and then the skanger turned into the classic victim( "I can't breath") after telling the foreign lad he was going to rip his head off a minute before hand.

    That foreign guy working for a living was worth a thousand of that skanger but who'll end up in more trouble?

    No doubt the issues in the link above will be ascribed to the far right by some but the reality is different and that should be obvious.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    The conspiracy forum is packed full of lefties to begin with their heads might explode if this thread ended up there.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,993 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Not even remotely close.

    We've had both sides-ism, lets focus on extremism, Russia is Left Wing, several trips down memory lane for some reason, no shortage of posts focusing on me and my motivations and the insistence that one persons non-revealed definition of fascism is the sole arbiter for the ideology and that's pretty much been it.

    If it has been disproven, please summarise how that was done for us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,212 ✭✭✭Cordell


    Of course, the only thing that prevents the lefties from blaming the Indian workers is that they are immigrants, this results in a mental block between two of their main thinking principles, i.e. immigrants are never to be blamed for anything and young criminals are angels in disguise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,993 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    The US holds 4% of the worlds population, and 22% of the worlds prisoners and yet experiences of what is referred to in that article are frequently common there also.

    UK has had right wing governments for the majority of all our lives and the same happens there apparently.

    So please explain how exactly Left wing policies are responsible for this and why the problems exist in right wing governed societies, and societies with high levels of incarceration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Your OP contended that the threat is coming from the right. Then there was some disproven false flag references thrown in for good measure.

    This thread since has been full of people claiming everything that is bad from North Korea to Communist Russia is right wing.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,212 ✭✭✭Cordell


    It doesn't matter if the government is right wing when the judge lets a criminal go free with a suspended sentence for their 80th conviction.

    As for the US, it depends. Some cities and states send their criminals away, some others are like Detroit and SF. US is a whole different world but even there right wing places are the safer ones.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    If the US has such enormous incarnation rates due solely to the Republicans why don't the Democrats do something about it while they're in power?

    Oh hang on in 1994 the Democrats introduced the Violent crime control and law enforcement act also known as the Clinton crime Bill, the senate version of the legislation was drafted by some guy called Joe Biden.

    Rates of incarceration have ballooned since and with the increased privatisation of prisons you have a recipe for disaster as seen in the huge prison population in America.

    Blame the right for everything and ignore the role the left has played in creating the situation you're up in arms about.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,993 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    So nothing has been disproven then.

    The events detailed in the OP are demonstrably the outcome or the favour of right wing individuals. That continues to be the case.

    If you still think Russia is Communist, I've got a bridge to sell you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    The difference between a communist State and a fascist State for those living in either of them is negligible.


    Communism is better at the control, conformity and achieves that by randomised and arbitrary mass killings.


    The most loyal party member or most benign citizen could be disappeared at any time.


    That key difference is why Communism survived WW2 while most of the Fascist states fell. Everyone was expendable in the Soviet Socialist Republic, the Germans looked after their army at least, the Socialists barely fed or armed their own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    If you believe that a country can gradually become fascist over thirty years I've got a bridge to sell you as well.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    indeed which is why perhaps many slip into the latter



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Are you saying that people living in communist regimes became fascists because of their mistreatment at the hands of their communist masters?

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    For those who like to control others, the Radical left offer a proven product but there is also a deep body of theological works guiding the Left, the egoism of the lie that it is to help others rather than narcissistic constantly reinforced in those writings and delusions.


    Every activist thinks that they will be the commissar eating well rather than worker no.5 living in squalor and frightened that a wrong word or bad luck will have him declared a fascist or a Zionist or capitalist dog. Whatever the latest excuse to kill and torture is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    The defining problem and challenge of and for the left is it's deep problem with enforcing conformity and control of society, others and themselves.


    Socialist dogma is riven by disagreement, differing analysis and this drives the splits, faction hatred within the party etc. The absolute moral certainty of the believers drive that on.


    Is it any wonder that division, collapse, murder and savagery is the natural conclusion of the Left.


    The people involved are the problem, the mindset.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,993 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    What, you think they order the Fascism package from Amazon and change it out over a long weekend?

    Have a read of Nick Bryants book on when did America stop being great to see exactly how things can change gradually over a long period.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,993 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    This is brilliant. It's like an excerpt from some magazine called Red pill monthly or something with a picture of Elon Musk on the cover about Dinesh D'souza's follow up to 2000 Mules. (Free this month, a stamped addressed envelope to write to Andrew Tate.

    Your second paragraph says everything about your own motivations, you cannot fathom that someone or some group of people could countenance advocating or working for the benefit of someone other than themselves.

    On the topic of 'people who like to control others'. The ability to practice whatever religion you wish (or none) or marry who you want whatever their gender or race or background, to move freely as much as possible, to do what you want with your own body, to be able to vote in elections that will impact you, to be able to live your life without fear of prejudice or discrimination are all things which we enjoy because of various activists who have come before us. And many of these privilege's hard won and continually picked at by those of a right wing nature.

    Now someone else could rock up and say that both sides are accusing the other of the same thing, but the difference is, as outlined in the OP, in our experiences, in the societies that we have been born in to and live our lives, it is almost exclusively right wing groups that advocate for the explicit control of others whereas Left advocate for the ability for each individual to live as they wish. The exception to this you could argue is the topic of gun control the Lefts position on which is clearly focused on the greater good. A concept that the human race has predominantly sought to consider throughout its history despite difficulties and setbacks and challenges. You could possibly but work place safety, road regulations and environmental protections in to this also but again, all of these also fall in to the greater good determination. Same as happened decades ago with the steps to minimise smoking because of its impact on society. Steps seen as draconian by one of the chief right wing mouth pieces as recently as a couple of weeks ago.

    It takes some mindset to look at society and type what you have typed given the mountains of evidence to the contrary all around us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Fascist regimes begin in opposition to an existing order.

    Fascist political parties use intimidation and force to drive changes in society on their way to gaining power typically via the ballot box.

    Russia doesn't fit the criteria for being a fascist regime and all of its current behaviours are things that the Russians were well practiced at during the days of the USSR, but lets forgot Russia was home to the largest far left empire in history and label them as fascists because that's easier and doesn't call into question the cuddly image the left wants to project into the world.

    The traits of facist regimes you and others have mentioned on this thread come afterwards, they are also traits of left wing totalarian regimes so aren't inherently fascist although they are things that happen under fascist regimes also.

    This is basic stuff, to the point that having to say it should be embarrassing.

    The world hasn't had an active fascist regime for almost fifty years but somehow, I'd have to assume as a result of the "culture wars" the world and his dog can be labeled as fascists at any time.

    For the crime of pointing this out I've been called right wing, far right an apologist for the far right. All this coming from people who don't understand the basics of what ideas like fascism actually are.

    You need a new insult to hurl at people you disagree with because fascist isn't cutting it.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Fair enough, I got the wrong end of the stick so.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,597 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    We've already been through this. The USSR never reached a Communist state. No nation has.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,597 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    That key difference is why Communism survived WW2 while most of the Fascist states fell. Everyone was expendable in the Soviet Socialist Republic, the Germans looked after their army at least, the Socialists barely fed or armed their own.

    Once again, you've proven that haven't the first clue about what you're trying to talk about. You really should try and inform yourself before coming onto threads and bleating this type of shite.

    And no, I don't just mean a couple of quick trips to Google to find the first couple of links you like the sound of.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,597 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    ..............



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    They killed tens of millions trying though so I guess they get an A for effort at least.

    Would you agree that the USSR wasn't a fascist state?

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,474 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    The smoking ban was introduced in Ireland by Fianna Fail in 2004, you know Fianna Fail, the exact type of centre right conservatives you've been blaming everything on in this very thread.

    Not everything revolves around America. Especially not on Irish discussion forums.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,597 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Plenty of regimes have killed millions under dictators of various flavours, Stalin is no exception.

    As to whether the USSR was a Fascist state, if we take fascism to mean an authoritarian, dictatorial, totalitarian state, then (under Stalin especially) it resembled more along the lines of Fascism than it did Communism, which was state of being that was still being promised "sometime in 20 years" to the people in the 1950's. As we all know, that state of being never arrived because the USSR broke up in the 80's.

    As I've said before, none of these countries that claim themselves, or are claimed by outsiders, as "Communist" have even come close to realising that type of system. At best they qualify as quasi Socialist, with Fascist dictatorial overtones, without necessarily going into Fascism in the Benito Mussolini mould. In every case, the promise of Communism was distraction dangled in the faces of the people, while in practice these nations were/are anything but.

    The reality is, is that states like Stalinist USSR are better termed as dictatorships, having neither feet fully in what we would consider Fascism. But they certainly take some cues from fascism and in their practices, under single party dictatorships, can resemble Fascist Italy or Nazi Germany. So much so, that former Communists became what was termed "anti-Stalinists" whilst not giving up their Communist credentials. Communists around Europe, who were once impressed by the revolution and the hope that it brought to ordinary people, began to see that when Lenin died the USSR had morphed into "Red Fascism". Becoming, in numerous ways, the thing they claimed to oppose. The term was applied to Mao's China as well, as that particular nation resembled little of what European Communists were politically motivated towards and more often than not reflected what they were against.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement