Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Liverpool FC Team Talk, Gossip, Rumours 2024/25

18588598618638641608

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,504 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    He's not really the problem, team is imbalanced and tearing itself apart. No amount of training or talking will fix it,it will self tune in time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,069 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    It's a major problem with your defensive midfielder can't defend, or run, or really do anythign at lal.

    When he plays he's the biggest problem on the field, but unfortunately our only option to replace him is a very talented, but very young inexperienced kid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,698 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Watched the Madrid game for the 1st time in ages. They too look like a team out of sorts. Held at home and poor in front of goal. Thing is, even if by some miracle that our team remember how to play and we somehow sneak past them, we'll hardly go any further.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,510 ✭✭✭population


    Funnily enough I think Fabinho should only be considered as a centre back option.



  • Registered Users Posts: 976 ✭✭✭AdrianG08


    "If" we are stuck for funds and need to sell to buy Trent should be sold, he'd bring in a big fee. Serious whiff of Dele Ali about him, instead I reckon Ali was a more rounded player.

    Trent is a one trick pony lads. Our tactics of using him and Robbo as wingers has been sussed out. He looked a world beater as the free man out wide, the entire pitch in front of him and given acres of space, where we got to see his terrific delivery and the occasional outrageous pass.

    Robbo can still defend, but Trent cannot, he cannot play as an Orthodox right back or right wing back. Klopp gave him an almost free role to attack, but that can no longer be the case, and in my opinion he cannot defend, his shape is all wrong when trying to defend, he lacks every defensive instinct a full back needs, he doesnt have a lot of pace, he's one of the areas opposition are targeting.

    Southgate got slaughtered for not playing him but he was completely right in hindsight. He's a guy who has won everything at 23, I'd question his attitude aswell at this stage.

    I preface this comment by saying this should only be considered if we need to sell to raise funds to rebuild.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭Zak Flaps




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    Buying 3-4 midfielders would be the way to go, one player isn't going to sort out the mess we're in. If by some miracle Bellingham signed for us, he'd probably be injured the first day out, signing 3-4 players would give strength in depth and reduce the impact of injuries. As someone pointed out earlier, there have probably been 20 midfielders signed in the Premier league this season that could have improved our midfield.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,650 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    I don't agree with any of this really.

    If Trent is SO bad, why would any team play big money to sign him??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,724 ✭✭✭Cartman78


    Is it time to try Trent in midfield?

    The season is pretty much a write off either way so nothing to lose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,504 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    We have 3 winable games in the PL before we face Real, plus we have games in hand on teams above us, it's not a right off just yet. I believe we'll hit form and go on a run.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 54,128 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I keep hearing this, but IMO Trent in midfield would make us worse, not better. The only place he fits into our team is at fullback, he doesn't suit our style anywhere else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,985 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    3 more opportunities for us to lose more players more like.

    Unless we sort out our injury situation we are going nowhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭AidoEirE


    Trent was not all that bad for ye, he got exposed when the subs came on. Played a sublime ball to Sarah outside of the foot.

    I'd go looking at the midfield before the digs on trent.

    He was able to make Mitoma out of the game because he brought the game to him going forward so Mitoma had to track, Trent had the cover of midfield when he did it.

    The subs killed that, Mitoma had trent the rest of the game.

    Trent hasn't been great for ye lately but not a game where he should take the blame.



  • Registered Users Posts: 225 ✭✭Summitatem


    Fixing someone else's mess is usually easier than fixing your own. Well known in project management and business.... Not overly sure about football but in times like this the manager usually isn't about for much longer.

    He won't be sacked though as FSG won't pay him off 😎🙂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,202 ✭✭✭Talisman


    When presented with the opportunity he hasn't wanted to change the personnel - that is his failure as a manager.

    In the 2018/19 season, the team finished second in the league with a 97 point total. The money was available to make signings but Klopp publicly declared that he chose not to because his group of players deserved to try again. That summer, the club signed a 17 year old defender for £2M and a couple of reserve goalkeepers on free transfers.

    Man City's level dropped for the 2019/20 and Liverpool got a free run at winning the league. Dejan Lovren finally got the message that Klopp no longer wanted him and he left at the end of the season. Klopp was happy for him and didn't see the need for signing a replacement. Liverpool began the next season with three centre backs that had played for the senior team, two of them were known to be injury prone. At the time it seemed ridiculous that neither Klavan or Lovren had been replaced, but according to Klopp there were some young defenders coming through so things should be okay.

    The 2020/21 season was a missed opportunity to build upon the success of the previous season. When van Dijk had a season ending injury and the inevitable injuries to the other two defenders piled up, Klopp didn't turn to the two young defenders. Instead he gutted the midfield and destroyed the balance of the team. Nothing changed in the winter transfer window until Fabinho suffered an injury. All of a sudden it was panic stations and the club had to find defenders in the few days before the window closed. The young players continued to be ignored until the loan signings were also unavailable. Having Nat Phillips and Rhys Williams available saved our season and the team scraped into the Champions League places as both Leicester and Chelsea lost form for the final 4 games of the season.

    Wijnaldum left in the summer of 2021 and Klopp made it known that he didn't need to be replaced. In the press conference where a journalist dared to question the decision we got to see the petulant side of Klopp. He challenged the journalists to name a player that was available for transfer that was good enough to replace Fabinho, Henderson or Thiago. The 2021/22 season was amazing but the team came up short in the two competitions that they wanted to win. Van Dijk, Fabinho and Thiago had been overplayed and were being patched together by the end of the season.

    Last summer, it was obvious to everyone that Liverpool needed an able body for the midfield and when Klopp's preferred option chose to sign for Real Madrid, the manager got the hump and decided to make do with what he had. He had exhibited the same behaviour in the past but Edwards and his staff had been able to convince him to change his mind on alternative options. In August, three of the midfielders suffered hamstring injuries (Henderson, Keita and Thiago) and this prompted Klopp to acknowledge that he got it wrong thinking that a new player wasn't needed for midfield. It didn't help that the players the club had passed on signing because of Klopp's earlier decision had moved to other clubs or were no longer available because it was the last week of the transfer window.

    It was never likely that the team was going to repeat the feats of last season. However with Klopp having the final say on transfers and nobody from the current recruitment staff apparently able to convince him to change his mind when he gets recruitment decisions wrong, there has been a serious impact on the development of the team. This season is a write off because of that failure and it shouldn't be a surprise that the senior recruitment staff have chosen to move on.

    There's no doubt that Klopp is a great football coach and man manager but in his time at Liverpool it has been quite evident that responsibility for player recruitment should not be part of his remit. By all means he should be involved in convincing players to join, he's a great ambassador, but the club should keep him away from the important business of identifying the players needed and deciding which of them to recruit.

    Klopp should focus on his own strengths and trust the recruitment staff at the club to do their jobs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,014 ✭✭✭ballyargus


    I too would prefer 3 new players rather than 1 Bellingham



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    A pretty good summation of the situation, only point I'd argue with was the free run we got to the title, the team was magnificent that season and had broken City's spirit before Christmas, City simply weren't able to keep up that season. After the break for Covid is where things started to go wrong, not strengthening when on top to hammer home our dominance was a huge mistake. The following season had we signed even one decent defender at the beginning of January and promoted Nat Phillips sooner rather than put Henderson and Fabinho back there I think we'd have won the title that year, we had a decent lead by the turn of the year, but, totally collapsed in January & February.

    Klopp is a wonderful manager, but, he's also part of the reason we are where we are at the moment. Why no midfielders have been signed this window or last summer is astonishing, not counting Arthur as that had disaster written all over it when he signed, what other club signs an injury prone player in a position they desperately need cover in and was not even fit when signed? That signing is an indication that things are not going well behind the scenes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,698 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Problem is that we can only recruit so many non English or homegrown players without letting a few go. We need at least 3 for midfield though, preferably 4.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,288 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    Trent was the first player subbed off yesterday. Not really sure how you thought Milner was Trent from 59 minutes onwards???!!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,202 ✭✭✭Talisman


    Before the 2019/20 season, Man City held a team meeting that set out their targets. Gundogan, De Bruyne and Kyle Walker all spoke about it in media interviews afterwards. De Bruyne explained that because their team had accumulated almost 200 points over the two previous seasons, the backroom staff felt it wouldn't be possible to sustain that level for another season. 85 points was deemed to be a target that could potentially secure the league title but the Champions League was to be their priority for the season. Klopp had the Liverpool squad fired up for the start of the season and there was no stopping us but we were the only club that were targeting another 100 points season.

    2020/21 was definitely a missed opportunity. We were 5 points clear of Man City when Klopp seemed to lose the plot after the Crystal Palace game. He got riled up on the side line against West Brom and was booked after Matip was injured. It sent the wrong message to the players and Curtis Jones was a passenger/liability when West Brom tried to put us under pressure. Midfield needed an experienced head that wouldn't be bullied or be afraid to get stuck in but Jones didn't get hooked until after West Brom had equalised. Phillips did well when he started the next game against Newcastle, he looked a bit rusty but that was to be expected seeing as he hadn't played for most of the season but he read the game well and stood up to the challenge. Jones continued to be a liability in midfield and for whatever reason Klopp began the Henderson and Fabinho centre back pairing in the next game against Southampton. To this day I don't understand what the thinking was behind that experiment, it played right into Man City's hands. Conceding early goals became a thing and we struggled to get back into games. When Phillips played, we were competitive at the back and it also meant we didn't have to play Jones in midfield.

    The 12 game period in the middle of that season was a taster of what to expect from the current team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,965 ✭✭✭✭Osmosis Jones


    Joao Cancelo being ousted at City? Maybe the strangest move of the window




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,367 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    This should be noted.

    Manchester City are showing what you do when a player, for whatever reason, is not performing at their optimal level. you fúcking move on. no sentimentality. no phasing out. no needless loyalty.

    Cancelo - disruptive to the team and out of form. gone now to Bayern.

    Sterling - past his peak. better finisher into the club. gone.

    Jesus - wanted to be number 1. let leave.

    Zinchenko - wanted to be more than bit-art. let leave.

    you must constantly refresh at elite level. it is pointless to hold onto players for too long. part of the job of management is to spot declines and plan ahead. the idea that the decline of Fabinho and Henderson in particular has come as a shock needs to be questioned. we don't have the data those highly paid managers of the players do. but the cliff has been so steep that I can't see it as logical that this has come out of the blue.

    City are ruthless. which is why you can see how Pep is managing the team through the mini-slump they were having.

    our club needs a solid kick up the ass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,965 ✭✭✭✭Osmosis Jones


    Just due to our resources it'll always take us longer to rebuild than City, but right now it feels like we should be way further along in said rebuild. Not enough groundwork is being laid this season, it feels like we're just going out week after week with the same performances just to get this season over with.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,128 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    City aren't rebuilding though, they are just keeping their squad fresh and making continual improvements.

    It's worrying cause it's very easy to go into a slide, we've been there before. We cannot afford to take a couple of seasons to get back into the top 4.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,506 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    Definitely feel like we should be treating Fabinho the way Cancelo has been today.

    Even if we don't replace him in this window, simply not having him available would probably benefit the squad, as there are constantly hopes that "this time he'll play well".

    He won't.

    This season is already close enough to a write off, throw Bajcetic in there and see if he's up to the challenge over the next few months, anyone can look good in one or two games, might be time to see what level he's really at. Hendo can do a job at 6 if needs be, albeit at a slower pace and lower level than previous years.

    It's all fantasy anyways as there's no way Klopp will part with Fab in this window. He'll still play most of our games, and we'll suffer badly for it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 433 ✭✭koppy


    City replace players with ready to go players. We've been replacing players by promoting youngsters or buying youngsters. Weve then extended the contracts of the players been replaced while the new ones get expierence and develop. Too many of these youngsters either aren't good enough or are progressing too slow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,965 ✭✭✭✭Osmosis Jones


    I still wouldn't be looking at City's outgoings as all signs of good business, I'm sure there are plenty in the City camp frustrated they're losing the league to a team they just sold 2 good players to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭steve_r


    This is the lineup from the 2019 game, where Mane's shot was cleared off the line.

    https://www.skysports.com/football/manchester-city-vs-liverpool/teams/390963

    If you look at the Man City team, you'll see players like Kompany, Fernandinho, Aguero, David Silva and Sterling. Fast forward to now, and all of those players have been replaced by equally good players like Dias, Rodhri, Haaland, Foden, and Grealish.

    That wasn't done cheaply by City but it's maintained their standard. Whereas if you look at the Liverpool team, anyone who has been replaced has generally been replaced by someone of lesser quality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭AidoEirE


    New baby with colic has had me up to all hours, getting zero sleep myself. Apologies, scratch my comment as it makes zero sense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 433 ✭✭koppy


    Exactly..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,301 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    This where our recruitment policy has went wrong, we are afraid to dump an underperforming player while they still have value. There is just far too much sentimentality in our squad, its been allowed fester and we are lumped with player with little value. Fabinho should be gone in the summer if he can't recover form, Firmino should not get a new contract, Gomez should be sold, tell henderson you can stay but your no longer a starter.

    I still maintain if we couldn't compete with City we should of sold key players to refresh the squad. We now need 200m min. to fix a broken squad and don't have it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 532 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    We have several players who have been given plenty of time and should have been moved on; Jones is a prime example as I do not think he is Premier league level and at the very least should have been loaned out to a lower half PL team.

    Gomez has been very unlucky with injuries, possibly a decent 4th option as CB but being English would get a decent transfer fee, given we seem to struggle for funds we need to cash in.

    Carvalho, in my opinion, should be given game time over Jones, if he is not going to get it then he should be sent off on loan.

    Our biggest problem is Fabinho is under contract till 2026, Hendo till 2025 both on very high wages and their decline seems to be rapid with several years left to run.

    Edwards leaving and quickly followed by his replacement Ward handing in his notice along with several other background staff is very worrying.

    Think we will be in a worse position on the pitch at the end of this season than when FSG took over at a time where other clubs are improving rapidly. Off the pitch FSG have done an excellent job in my opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,845 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    We are ruthless enough ,

    Jones, Ox, Milner, should be gone already ,

    In the summer we should look to move on Ox ,Naby , Jones , Milner, Phillips, Gomez, & Fab is he does not improve,

    Id also seriously look at cashing in on Trent if we can get a crazy price ,

    Id keep Bobby



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,511 ✭✭✭✭noodler




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,845 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Firmino is the least if our issues now, we can keep him around & he can be behind Nunez & Jota as CF choices even Gakpo ,

    If he does go i wouldn't want him replaced every penny we have available needs to go on midfield its that big of a mess ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,130 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    You want to sell 6 HG players, leaving 3 HG players in the squad.

    You'll need to buy 2 CBs, a RB and at least 4 CMs of varying age and quality with view to buying another the season after.


    I can't see that happening.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,128 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Chelsea have bid for Fernandez, he was one of the players linked with a summer move to us right?




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,845 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    We need 1 new CB & 3 midfielders anyway ,

    Ox , Phillips , Jones add nothing anyway, Milner is a hero but he is done & i hate saying that but he adds very very little these days,

    Gomez & Naby who would be noticed if they left as both can play decent football ,

    Fab & Trent aren't going are they, its more wishful thinking that we'd get really good money that can be reinvested



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,301 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    He declined long before this season we can agree, should of been sold instead of hoping he comes back into form. We aren't ruthless and we need to be with limited funds vs City, we used to be a selling club and thats fine if you have funds to keep the squad fresh but we don't.

    What if we had sold Salah when he was worth 200m?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,511 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    But he came back into (goalscoring) form? We'd be a good few points shorter this season without him.

    If we sold Salah and Bobby then Nunez would have been the only for striker most of the season.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,845 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    To be fair when Nunez was signed it was to demote Bobby to no 2 CF ,Diaz was Manes replacement ,

    Injuries to Diaz , Jota ,Nunez have kind of hidden that ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,301 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Your missing the point, not this season but before that, we should of sold him when he declined and had value. We have aging players running down contracts or stuck on big contracts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    The big problem we have now, is that instead of needing just 1 or 2 signings to keep the squad refreshed and ticking over, we now prrobably need 4 or 5 signings to rejuvenate the squad. Over the past few seasons we should have been signing 1 or 2 players each window to strengthen weak areas of the squad and move on players who weren't performing. It was noticeable towards the end of last season that performances had dropped off, ( which was understandable due to all the matches), but, we were still getting the results, but, labouring badly, I was hoping we'd sign at least 1 midfielder ( ideally 2) to freshen things up for this season that didn't happen, while Fabinho's huge drop off was difficult to predict, there was a question over the fitness and standard of most of the other midfielders, it was an obvious area that needed attention, we are where we are, because obvious areas of weakness in the squad have been neglected over the last few seasons, and are still being neglected this window.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,620 ✭✭✭Damien360


    Surely both Fabinho and Henderson's dramatic drop off in pace is obvious during basic training sessions. So begs a question, why do we insist on dropping them into the team. I felt the fanbase put pressure on the owners to give Hendo and Milner another contract and Salah but in some ways he is the only one I could justify. Sentimentality came into a business and we are paying the price for it.

    We were quoted recently as having a larger income than Utd for the first time. So we appear to be sitting on a small fortune and not even looking at the transfer market. Holding out for one player is the kind of nonsense Utd tried last season and it didn't work, and it looked embarrassing.

    Chelsea are back to old ways and sweeping up every available player possible. It's too many all at once to be coherent this season but they will have a good squad for next season leaving us very much further back.

    I would like to know who is currently controlling the transfer in and out strategy. If it's all Klopp then we have no objectivity as he is too close to the players to want to clear them out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,594 ✭✭✭brevity


    Still can't get over how Liverpool have managed to **** it all up.

    Hubris. A hell of a drug.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,399 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    If Fernandez goes to Chelsea I'd be looking at Mount. Could be that Lalana type player (minus the Cruyff turns) who is full of running and pressing. A player who holds the ball well and is good in tight spaces as well.

    Could be a very nice option for our CM.



  • Registered Users Posts: 548 ✭✭✭BillyHasMates


    After seeing Brighton a few times I think McAllister seems to play much like Wijnaldum did. Would add greatly to our midfield.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,278 ✭✭✭x43r0


    Not commenting on his ability by any means but he'd have such a premium on the price due to the world cup flavour of the month effect



  • Registered Users Posts: 548 ✭✭✭BillyHasMates


    No doubt we would have to pay a premium but think he is worth a mention seeing as we are being linked to Bellingham and Mount who will cost more, alot more in Bellingham's case.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    It's why we should have bought players before the World Cup, no players value went down because of the world Cup, but players who did well saw their value soar.



Advertisement