You've been looking in the wrong direction, the dangers are coming from the right.

I am not upset. I would just like the truth.

They have the details of the Ashtown attack down to the breed of 2 of the dogs and that all of those present were white Irish yet have no indicative figure of how many men this 'group' was, was it 4, 8, perhaps a gang of 37.5 because 1 was preggers?

Ok. What is the truth in your opinion.

One question.

Did she see the attack happen?

But it’s ok to speculate on an attack you didn’t see?

Unless you think I've done that somewhere in this conversation I'm not sure where this question is coming from, but it appears loaded.

And there is the deflection. I replied to you with the link of the interview in which she admits to not seeing the incident.

Not to I you haven't? Not sure which post you're talking about. What post num #?

Still waiting for you to point to or provide the transcripts from the radio programs you allegedly heard today that are also central to your allegations about the woman?

Neither, when she said "Heard" at the front of the interview, she said she had heard about the Camp, not an attack at the camp?

Your recollection of the radio interview you heard earlier exemplifies why witness recollection is often found to be so notoriously unreliable.

Found a parsable link, jesus his website was terrible.

2:26 - "I went back to get my car, and the photographer when back to get his car, and then as we were driving back into the city center, I [inaudible] saw these men approaching, and they were with dogs, and 1 was carrying a baseball bat, and a couple had sticks, and 1 was wearing a black balaclava, and just knew where they were heading, like they were kind of trying to get in over the ditch into the forested area and they made their way down there. So I rang the photographer and he rang me and we both sort of said gee we better go back, and so we ran back and the photographer said to ring the gards which I did. And I suppose they probably heard me before we got there because I started shouting 'what are you doing? stop stop!' yknow, what are you doing, and so by the time we got there they were like, in retreat, they were leaving, and they they - yeah so they left. And, but we heard before we got down there I could hear like the loud commotion and banging and crashing and intense screaming at them to get out and that sort of thing. So they, like I said to them, "why are you doing this?" And they said there had been an assault locally and that was they were kind of linking the people living there to the assault."

That depends on what you mean by that. She witness the alleged assailant(s) approach, enter conspicuously, and armed, witness herself shouts from around the corner 'what are you doing stop stop etc,' heard a fight erupt around the corner, and then leave, and while doing so admitting to a reporter you were linking the camp inhabitants to a local assault?

Why is it a big story? The camp inhabitants that were attacked are also witnesses. You're allowed to call multiple witnesses.

If you saw me break into mamas house (anyones momma), with a baseball bat and heard a fuckton of bangs and screams, and saw me leaving, and said something to you like 'she had it comin' and you went to mama would you say to the cops you had not witnessed an attack, or had no idea where she got those injuries? Would it also not be, patently true of you to say you witnessed a crime? The cross examiner will clarify you didn't see the bat contact mamas face (or maybe even argue, it wasn't the bat at all, but she fell on something etc), but the jury, the prosecutors, and the other witnesses can handle the rest and suss out a conviction.

🤣🤣

The story reminds me of this classic:

Back at Headquarters.]

Darling: Are you sure this is what you saw Blackadder?

Blackadder: Absolutely. I mean there may have been a few more armament

factories, and [looks sideways at George] not quite as

many elephants, but……

Are we to believe a journalist doesn't know you can crop people's faces out of pictures.

So what is more likely a journalist doesn't know this or the photos don't exist.

I know which is the more likely, if the photos did exist they would be online.

It is literally a big story to the point where it was headline news most of yesterday on most radio stations.

So far there's no verification beyond the article that it happened the way it was described.

Videos that were made available didn't show any violence at all and you and others claimed to have seen videos showing the violence but refused to share them.

So if there's deflection going on it seems to be coming from one direction.

Delivered by Lord Lucan on the back of Shergar.