Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Remap and Insurance

  • 03-02-2023 8:00pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭HBC08


    I'm looking to have my 163 bhp 2.0l diesel remapped to stage 1.

    I'd like to be above board about this.I spoke to my broker and he said you'd be doing well to even get a quote.

    I have 27 years full license with full NCB and no points

    Does this mean that almost everybody going around with their cars remapped have no insurance (whether they know it or not)



«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,153 ✭✭✭zg3409


    Correct. In the event of a serious claim.the insurer will.do everything in their power to deny a claim checking things like engine numbers, annual.mileage, occupation, and any modifications including new radio, non standard map on ECU, any data logs in ECU such as speed at time of accident, were seat belts in use at time of accident etc. They can check things like was a mobile phone being used around the time the accident occurred. Many cars log location and location history, in addition to speed.

    That said if you wanted to declare there is probably specialist insurers that will quote high, however you are flagged as "boy racer" will crash from a risk point of view. Some insurers may only quote third party.

    Many really heavily modified cars are track use only, others are on classic policies and occasional low mileage usage but it can still end up being specialist weird insurers.

    Lots of very slightly modified cars are technically not insured, such as window tints, aftermarket radios, aftermarket wheels etc. Some insurers have no issues once notified, others don't touch "modified from factory spec" cars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Thanks for the reply.

    I don't know much about it but I'd be sceptical they can assess your phone records.

    However the rest sounds plausible, if you remap the car I'm talking about in the UK it's an extra £20 -£25 on your insurance, here it seems you don't have many options.

    I'm surprised to hear about the radio thing,I was planning on having a kenwood put in but I'll have to look into that now aswell



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,537 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    The only way they’d know about the phone (and I’m skeptical that they would even do that) is if it was connected



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭HBC08


    I know you work in the trade Colm,would you have a steer on the rest of it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭HBC08


    I've been quoted €250.

    I believe its a stage one remap.I don't know a whole lot about it.

    The car is fast at 163 bhp but for that price to bring it up to around 200 I think is a nice thing to have.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    I'd say all new car owners are tracked now a days as they have that SOS button in their cars so if they were in an accident or witnessed one they can press that button and call emergency services and they just follow the GPS to your car. So I wouldn't be surprised if the car was tracking you at all times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭HBC08




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,339 ✭✭✭PsychoPete


    Personally I'd just get the car mapped and say nothing to the insurance



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭HBC08


    I'd like to do that (it seems that what everybody else in the country has done!)

    Just would be worried in the event of a claim/crash.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,105 ✭✭✭Allinall


    You’re right to be worried.

    Be up front with your insurance, otherwise you could be in a whole world of pain if anything goes wrong.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Delete



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭mobby


    Agree with this. Have a serious accident and your Insurance company will drop you big time. you would be left with a serious financial hit at best.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,570 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    A friend of mine had a GT-R at one stage and had some work done on it, I know it had an engine rebuild but not sure what else. No insurance company would touch it on the grounds of it being “modified”. He had to get an engineers report done by a professional motor assessor in order to get it insured.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    Just remap it and do not tell them. And don't be listening to these people the insurance company do not go through the ECU after an accident. Well unless you are going to drive like maniac through built up areas and mow down a load of pedestrians then yes they may go through the car more thorough but you'd be in jail anyway so no big deal. But anyway if you drive the way you do now but just have a bit more power on tap you will be fine even if you have a accident they will not go through your ECU.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭mobby


    Rubbish .. You have a serious accident and your insurance will do all it can to avoid a payout. so it's okay if you mow down a few pedestrians "no big deal" wow just wow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,138 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    It takes seconds to connect a reader to see if a car has been modified, do you want to take that risk when you need it most? The insurance company will pay out 3rd party but will come after you in the courts for the money and win as it's a civil case. The other issue is that when your insurance discover that you've modified your car and not notified them your policy will be cancelled and that's a whole other level of pain.

    If you want a faster car buy one or inform your insurance company if you modify your own, otherwise you're insurance is only good for getting past a checkpoint.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,153 ✭✭✭zg3409


    Often if car is heavily modified such as aftermarket wheels or new aftermarket shocks then insurers need an engineer's report to ensure car is road safe. I got one recently for engine swap and upgrade and new wheels etc. It cost about 200 euro, and was straight forward enough, car is totally legal with new engine vin on paperwork. Insurance was difficult to get but not expensive.

    In terms of remap there are loads of reports of people blowing their engine within a month due to "a bad map". Sometimes the map is wrong for the car and causes issues straight away, in most other cases I suspect is the extra power causes extra strain and often the car is old anyway and driven by a boy racer, so the chances of a failure go up massively, particularly if you drive like a lunatic before the engine has warned up, and if you have not upgraded things like the air filter, new timing belt, new water pump, the engine can easily struggle and fail. Certain engines are more suitable for remap as they can handle the extra power easily, other engines can't handle more power without failing much earlier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭chiefwiggum


    Rubbish.

    Friend of mine had an accident in his car. Was worth about 40k at the time. Was to meet the insurance assessor at the the place it was recovered to. The assessor was there first and had done his job. He had been through the Ecu and had a print out of what the spec was and what it was remapped to,about and extra 50bhp. Assessor shrugged his shoulders and said insurance won't pay out .that's exactly what happened.

    Mate bought the car three years old and says he wasn't told by the guy he bought it off that it was remapped.

    It's now heading for court!

    I just wouldnt bother for the headache it could potentially cause you.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,925 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    In 29 years and having dealt with hundreds and possibly thousands of insurance claims including "serious" claims involving serious in jury and even a car in which someone died NOT ONE insurance assessor Ive dealt with has plugged a code reader into a car to check if its been in any way modified / remapped.


    Read that again - not one single assessor.


    However cars which "look" modified have been scrutinised more than ones that dont look modified- ie stupid looking body kits, massive wheels that dont really fit the wheel arches - that type of stuff. One thing the assessors I dealt with were particular on was those window stickers / visors with some ridiculous slogan on it that covered half the windscreen with regards to visibility.

    Ive had heavily engine modified cars through the doors - supercharged Type -Rs @ 400+ hp, Hondas which had engines changed completely from factory in for insurance claims and again not one was plugged into a diagnostic. I had a Fiesta with a 2.5 duratec fitted to it involved in a serious accident and it wasnt even looked at sideways because the engine mod was the only thing that was done to it - the rest was factory standard. You couldnt even tell it had the engine upgraded from looking at the car - I dont even think the assessor opened the bonnet.


    The OPs car will gain maybe 30-50 more Hp in a stage 1 remap. Fairly light mod in the grand scheme of things. If it was Id fire ahead and go for it without notifying the insurance company but thats just me - Im not telling the Op what to do.

    Theres worse mods that can cause serious crashes than 50 more horsepower ie suspension not setup correctly, visibility issues, oh yeah and those wheel spacers used for fitting wider wheels - one claim I handled was refused because the wheels were held on with literally 2 threads and were loose on the day of the assessment. Wheels that are too big and rubbing on the arches was another one i had refusals for.


    What I usually found was that mods that were carried out incorrectly, that is by the owner without any type of training usually were questioned more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,091 ✭✭✭User1998


    Great advice. OP this is the only post I would take seriously



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,339 ✭✭✭PsychoPete


    Wouldn't be one bit worried personally, we've dealt with a lot of insurance jobs in the garage and never have I seen an insurance assessor plug a car in to check what's on the ecu. The insurance company wouldn't have a clue if it was mapped or not. Each to their own but I'd say nothing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,105 ✭✭✭Allinall


    A lot of recommending illegality here.

    Not cool.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,153 ✭✭✭zg3409


    In a lot of theft cases they ask for both keys, if the have the car they can query it to see if key was present. Modern cars have more and more info easily available. In cases where the car breaks to cause an accident the brand of car are very worried about manufacturer liability and they can pull all data. The whole "unintended acceleration" cases the manufacturers usually prove it was driver error and not a car fault.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,934 Mod ✭✭✭✭Turner


    Insurance is based on engine size, price of the car etc.


    By remapping a car you are not altering that. You are tweaking how the engine runs to improve efficiency with respect to mpg and how the vehicle uses the torque created by the same size engine.


    In no way does it mean you do not have insurance. Once you have your policy you are legally covered.


    If you remove the spare wheel and back seats to decrease weight and increase mpg, does that mean the insurance wont cover you in the event of an accident? No



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,865 ✭✭✭blackbox


    It is ridiculous to suggest that changing the radio counts as a modification that will invalidate your insurance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,105 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Think you need to read terms and conditions that you sign when taking out insurance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭Eoinbmw


    Bull a reader can not tell you how much bhp was gained in a remap lol!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,153 ✭✭✭zg3409


    It impacts the risk of theft, which is part of insurance. The question asked is car modified in any way from factory spec. It may seem stupid but it's used as a way of getting out of paying claims. Be upfront on any changes. It may not impact the quote.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭Eoinbmw


    I've had insurance pay out for cars fitted with coilovers and exhaust systems undeclared no hassle from insurance company!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    I just have to come back to this. You changed what I wrote as if I said mowing down a bunch of pedestrians is ok. Maybe I worded it wrong. But what I meant was if he drives like a maniac and mows down pedestrians then yes they may look through the ECU, but that is his own fault for driving like a maniac. But he would also be in jail for killing or injuring them and since he is already in jail it will be no big deal for them to go through the ECU as he is already doing time so they cannot do anything else to him but give him more time. Any debts he may get do not pay them and he will just get more time. Simple.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,300 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    If your car looks 'stock' .. I wouldn't worry about any software upgrades.

    Never mind what other posters say.

    Insurance asserers are usually retired gardai in their 60's +, with no technology ability (or interest) in discovering any SW mods.

    They get paid a small amount to check for physical damage.

    Some people on here watch a little too much CSI , and don't realize how the real world actually is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,871 ✭✭✭Lenar3556


    The key element is that you have a duty to disclose ‘all material facts’ when you take out a policy of motor insurance. If the car is higher powered than standard that is a material fact and there could be an issue in the event of a claim.

    It’s not quite as simple as the policy being entirely invalid. Motor insurance in Ireland is issued in accordance with the road traffic act 1961, as will appear on the top of every insurance certificate. If the driver is insured, it will be very difficult for the insurer to deny any third party liability - but damage to your own car may potentially be another matter if it can be proven that you misled the insurer as to the risk.

    An insurer could conceivably seek records from the cars control modules after an accident, but the significance of this seems to be misunderstood by previous posters. The whole concept of insurance is that pays out after an accident in which the driver was negligent in their use of the car. So speed or the manner of driving for example won’t impact the validity of a policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Fair enough,like I said I'm not that knowledgeable on it.

    However if I'm putting all my eggs in the basket of 100% of assessors being an elderly retired non tech savvy Gard I'd be worried.

    The only assessor I know doesn't fall into that category.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Am I reading this correctly?

    Not one (except all of them that looked modified)

    I'm not being smart,I appreciate the reply as you seem to know what you're talking about but that sentence contradicts itself.Whats the arbitrary line between looks modified and looks factory? After market wheels? A wrap? Increased BHP through a remap?After market gull wing doors? Big difference between all of them.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,925 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    Absolutely 100%. Not one assessor in my experience has plugged in a diagnostic / code reader into any car Ive had in for an assessment for insurance repairs. Even ones that were involved in serious accidents. I never said they plugged in modified ones either any where in my post.

    What I said was that ones that looked modified were scrutinised more than a factory spec of the exact same model.

    So the assessor sees huge wheels / big exhaust that dont look like they fit right they then proceeded to test the vehicle more thoroughly ie suspension, check the brakes etc. Still not plugged in by the way and never seen one plugged in either.

    In my opinion and just an opinion assessors were more interested in using visual mods in order to try refute a claim.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,685 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    That no longer applies, since S.8 of the Consumer Insurance Contract Act (CICA) 2019 came into effect on Sept 1st 2021. There is no longer a duty on the part of the consumer to disclose 'all material facts'. The procedure now is that they ask you questions, you provide truthful and answers and that's all there is to it, you have no responsibilites beyond that. It's well summarised in this document on the AIG website at the link below. Summary of the essential change follows....

    For consumers, their pre-contractual disclosure obligations have been changed. CICA removes the duty to disclose all material facts on consumers and replaces it with an obligation for consumers to answer all questions the insurer asks honestly and with reasonable care. Failure to do so can result in the Insurer being able to rely on proportionate remedies for misrepresentation.

    But if you already have a policy and you get the car remapped, I think that would constitute a material change to the risk profile and you would be obliged to notify the insurance company.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,921 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Some interesting comments in this clip about the possibility of Garda investigators examining a vehicle after a crash


    Also interesting to note that the usual Boards.ie policy of not permitting posts that advocate illegal action doesn’t seem to apply in Motors forum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,685 ✭✭✭✭coylemj




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭Eoinbmw


    It's not illegal to remap a car!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,921 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    It’s illegal not to tell your insurer about the power of your vehicle.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭Eoinbmw




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,921 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Under the law that requires you to be honest when entering contracts. So when you’re asked “has this vehicle been modified in any way “ you need to give an honest answer to have valid insurance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭HBC08


    No such law (and I say this as somebody who's not well up on this)

    Usual standard of posting by you.

    I was hoping to get some real info on this (and have done )

    Can you please keep your nonsense to the gender war threads etc,good man.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭Eoinbmw




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,921 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Are yez seriously suggesting that you get to lie on your insurance proposal form and still have the insurance company on hook to pay for your messes?

    Go back and read the Act quoted above about answering questions honestly - S.8 of the Consumer Insurance Contract Act (CICA) 2019.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,871 ✭✭✭Lenar3556


    A good point, although I suppose the insurer will have adapted its line of questioning to be suitably comprehensive, yet general enough, that the consumer would ultimately be responsible for non-disclosure in the vast majority of scenarios likely to arise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3 dualclutch


    Was reading this and just wanted to give my own thought

    Before people jump down my throat, call me boy racer or whatever, I’ve the below car NCT’d, tax’d and insurance paid. Not looking for a lecture and just wanted to make a point.

    Full licence 6 months, have a Bora, it’s mapped to 190bhp with smoke…straight piped..lowered…tinted etc

    Not declared like every other young lad but if anything ever happens it I won’t go claiming and will just lie to the loss of it…just thought this point was worth putting it across



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,921 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Do you expect your insurer to pay out for catastrophic damage to other people or property resulting from your ‘enhanced’ engine? Insurance isn’t just about damage to your own vehicle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,083 ✭✭✭Eggs For Dinner


    Obtaining insurance by deception is fraud and opens you up to prosecution. I would never non-disclose any matter to insurers, because of the world of pain it brings. In my 43 years in the industry, I have seen numerous cases where modifications have caused cover problems and refusal of indemnity. However, I've never come across one for re-mapping



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,685 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    No, the legislation anticipated that exact scenario - you have to be asked specific questions, they can't get away with 'catch all' questions and try to fall back on them afterwards. 'You should have told us that when we asked you if there was anything else we might need to know about you or your vehicle' is not allowed.

    (2) The pre-contractual duty of disclosure of a consumer is confined to providing responses to questions asked by the insurer, and the consumer shall not be under any duty to volunteer any information over and above that required by such questions.

    (3) Where the insurer requests the consumer at the pre-contractual stage to provide information to the insurer, the insurer shall be under a duty to ask specific questions, on paper or on another durable medium, and shall not use general questions.


    https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2019/act/53/section/8/enacted/en/html#sec8



  • Advertisement
Advertisement