Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

organic farming

1343537394053

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,300 ✭✭✭tanko


    You can make the existing cubicles longer, don’t know about the antibiotics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,114 ✭✭✭minerleague


    this has been said on here before but article in journal recently seemed to suggest you need fully bedded area as well as cubicles ??? Will look later to read again



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Contact the certification body about these types of questions, it's their job to provide this type of information, they get paid enough as it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Remember the IOA staff member is looking to include you in the organic scheme not exclude you. Play to that, make a good effort, ask for guidance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,834 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    The same tillage farmer can have some fields organic and others conventional. They don't have divide it up with a relative to be able to do so.

    I think this may also apply to livestock farmers but separate herds facilities land have to be in place.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,353 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit


    You mean an individual farmer can grow both organic and conventional?

    Sounds wrong?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,834 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Sounds wrong from what one thinks of all in being organic and driven by mindset.

    But seemingly it's allowed by the organisations.

    @tractorporn



  • Registered Users Posts: 381 ✭✭manjou


    The 2 would have to be run separately so no cross contamination could happen. Nearly 2 seperate yards. Also would be prone to more inspections. All it would take would be 1 sample of organic to show residue from sprays etc and u would be gone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,353 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit


    Jesus wept.

    Allowing any farmer to be both conventional and organic at the same time is crazy. It’s wide open for abuse.


    You must have separate ownership of land, facilities, stock and machinery here. Conventional and organic cannot be owned/directed/produced by the same farm/Company/Partnership etc

    Organic depends heavily on credibility…if there’s any bit of fraudulent activity, the whole industry suffers. There was a scandal before Covid where between 4 and 8% of imported organic fruit and veg were found to be carrying a heavy loading of pesticides. It was the start of the slippery slope for organics in France and Germany.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭tractorporn


    Well figured out.


    Yeah it is allowed but it is fairly strict in how you go about setting it up. For arable you cannot have the same crop on both organic and conventional land. The fine for this is 100% of your OFS and the organic crop would have to be sold as conventional. The last time it happened an inspector had to be in the field for the harvest and followed the trailers to the merchants at the farmers expense.


    For stock they have to be separate species so sheep organic and beef conventional. The areas also have to have a physical separation, ie in most cases its an outfarm away from the yard and a separation of finances. So meal for the cattle can't go through the same bank account as the sheep stuff.

    There is a lot more checks that have to be done as well at inspection time and the non organic land has to be seen as well



  • Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭Rusheseverywhere




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,353 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit


    Recipe for disaster!

    Anytime there’s a possibility for unscrupulous people to ‘game’ something..it’s a certainty that it will be gamed. Organic must be above reproach. No amount of greenwashing etc will repair a loss of credibility.


    Out of interest…do the merchants & coops that are processing the organic produce have to have separate production lines to avoid cross contamination?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭endainoz


    It's never been as easy to get into the scheme. Staying in and doing things right will be more of a challenge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭tractorporn


    Some would have separate lines the likes of Glenisk have separate lines for organic and conventional but smaller operations have to do their organic production runs first thing on a cleaned down line, they also have to notify their body each time they are doing a run and their inspection will take place when that run is taking place and they will have another unannounced vist later in the year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,353 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit


    Obviously they’re making an effort to keep the processors in line with good housekeeping when handling the goods, but why allow farmers to have a leg in both camps? It’s guaranteed that there’ll be messing at farm level without strict rules.

    Friends of mine that are organic ended up having to sell their sprayer because the neighbors were reporting them for using pesticides even though they were only using biostimulants etc. etc.

    It wouldn’t be a huge stretch of the imagination to see a farmer of both codes treating organic crops with ‘biostimulants’ or ‘trace elements’…?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    Why sell the sprayer? Surely if an inspector called he would have the receipt for the biostimulants or what ever and would be open to them testing the field etc for evidence of pesticide usage.

    Nothing to fear if nothing to hide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,353 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit


    No sprayer = nothing to hide.


    Remember there’s no solid scientific evidence backing the belief that organic is better than conventional, and visa versa.

    No amount of Teagasc/Government/Science/Greenwashing can dig organic out of a hole if found out to be adulterated with chems etc.

    Before Covid it became public that between 4% and 8% of imported organic produce was tested with pesticides. There was immediate consequences for the organic market and it’s continuing to decline. Credibility is everything with organic, absolutely everything. Allowing farmers to produce both is insane!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Should definitely be of interest to some people here. I'm certainly no fan of teagasc and their views but they do actually have a pretty good organic team.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16 cupacoffee


    A word of caution with teagasc I was chatting to a senior organic advisor about organic price premium or lack thereof he’s reply was that it was a good thing because it would put on political pressure

    He is not wrong but you’d know he’s paycheck was dropping into the bank every month



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    is there a premium at the moment?


    Last organic price I heard was 5.60.


    Which is the conventional price at the moment as such with bonus. Anyone have an up today price for organic?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    One of the leading organic buyers said at a farm walk two years ago that, 'organic beef is now a commodity'. So you know where the thinking comes from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,114 ✭✭✭minerleague


    Not sure but I think organic price is set 6 months at a time and doesn't move as much as conventional



  • Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭Rusheseverywhere


    I am organic and finish for both and sell in mart. This year anything I factory is going conventional as for heifers, which I kill, same price essentially and kill when suits you. the 20c bonus for one movement, or none on, cattle makes the organic price pointless. Haulage to organic factory the killer; Tipp and Wexford the two places killing organically and it is 40 to 50 a head if you are up the North or west of the country. I only kill 25 heifer a year max and calved here and different ages ie calved Jan to June, so tricky get a load all fit same time. Same with bullocks i sell much same price in ordinary mart. Organic became a destocking measure by the back door when they moved the min LU/ha to 0.1

    Yeah it is a commodity I am in it years and essentially alot of "feed lot" in the organic too. Same few lads buying for the factories.



  • Registered Users Posts: 171 ✭✭massey 265


    I agree with you on the haulage to factory for organic takes away any premium that may be on organic cattle.The last cattle i sent to slaney in july last were 5.90 a kilo flat and conventional price was 5.40 ,so if u add 30 cent for aa and 20 cent for q assured it comes to same price but haulage was 45 euro each which equated to another 15cent bringing it to less than conventional price as local factory were throughing in free haulage at the time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭Rusheseverywhere


    Another thing is the time it takes to get there never killed the same day as leave yard so they are losing weight and prob slipping a grade. Now with 30 AA, 20 QA and 20 for one movement that is 70c per kilo of bonuses that Organic not paying out. As said I am finished killing organically.



  • Registered Users Posts: 171 ✭✭massey 265


    The spec is also tighter this year with organic as any o grades are outside the spec which alot of aa cattle can grade.



  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭JohnChadwick


    Looking to know what you guys think of moving from suckler-to-yearling system to a weanling to store system.

    The Suckler cows are costing a nice bit to keep, with needing a reliable tractor for feeding, decent sheds etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,300 ✭✭✭tanko


    Do many factories give a 20c bonus for one movement?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Certainly a lot easier if you're part time. What price do you aim to buy and to sell at? Are you buying Oct/Nov and sell 12 months later? Scouring the right stock is an issue that might need to be worked out, have regular sources.



  • Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭Rusheseverywhere


    All Larry's I am QA, breed what I kill and in the BDGP and GLAS and hopefully in whatever replaces them. My bull is 5 star




  • Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭Rusheseverywhere


    I thiought same as last year which is O plus as a min?? used to be any O was ok. I used to be all Continental swiitched to AA bull last year assume conitental cows bring as seem to be an R grade calf.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,300 ✭✭✭tanko


    A minimum of 20 cattle per finisher farm.

    Isn’t that nice of them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭Rusheseverywhere


    To be fair most lads would meet that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭JohnChadwick


    Would you buy a 6 month organic weanling these days for 800 quid?(3euro/kg x 250kg)

    Put at least another 250kg on over a year and sell for €1500 (3 x 500kg) at 18 months...

    I'd need to make substantial investment if I continue with Sucklers, so this is a more appealing avenue at first glance. I'm always more focused on reducing costs than trying to chase profits with this game.

    Sourcing would be buying em in the mart.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    If cattle leave the yard the day before unless very late and are traveling a distance you are probably looking at losing a other 1.5% in KO.

    Know 1-2 lads that are organic locally and carcass weight for bullocks us around the 300kg mark and that seems good for them. 50 euro transport is nearly 17c/kg, if you transport was 25 you be saving 8c/kg, if you could drop them.in yourself it back to 2c/kg.

    An extra 5kgs DW adds another 7-10c/kg depending on price. From the way you describe organics slaughtering conventionally would reduce costs by 20c/kg or there about minimum.

    FS may be an issue and that might be where you would get caught. I think you would need 20-25c/kg to travel a distance with cattle

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,212 ✭✭✭893bet


    The 3 euro x weight for both buying and selling might be over estimating. Same as sticking on 250kg in the year might be. 500 kg at 18 months consistently might be hard pressed unless you have very decent land and infrastructure (assuming you are not buying organic concentrates/straights)?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It's one of the issues I see with organics. You often may need substantial investment for sucklers which is a low margin business anyway.

    Weanling to store or finish is low margin as well because from what I see with organics there is a lot of lads that want to do this system to draw the organic payment. Many are reluctant to finish because of the cost of rations.

    Really if you are going organic you need to have your system decided before you jump

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,258 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    I'd imagine too that when you're a few years in to organic, the sward won't have the ability to put a kg/day on cattle. Perennial ryegrass won't tolerate low nitrogen imput



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    That can be rectified by the addition of clover. Even if not stocking rate and genetic ability of the animal decides the growth rate as more and more than sward. You can stock too low as well even though in low stocking rates the cattle tend to eat the most nutritious mixture of the sward. It's often for that period late in the year that thrive may suffer

    Problems I see with organics is the premium is not there. This is especially true when prices rise. The market price is alway much slower to respond to an increase, but it follows the price fall much faster.

    If you cannot do sucklers I would probably look at lamb production but that has its issues as well on lowlands.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,878 ✭✭✭mr.stonewall


    People haven't looked at the elephant in the room INFLATION. We haven't witnessed in this guise since the 70s and 80s. For most with organics it's reducing output and a potential for reducing input. The value of payments is being eroded every day and this will include SFP and organic payments. The majority of people I see converting are Suckler farmers. I have yet to come across anyone, who is willing to hang the beast. This is the pinch, where these weanlings or stores are going to have to be sold as conventional stock. Factor in a reduced LWG and reduced numbers, this is pinching the bottom line. The biggest cost saving for most is fertiliser and ration, and these wouldnt be huge on these types of farms.

    The other side is the market, people are watching the pennies now and the majority of beef sold via the multiples is mince. And this it down to cost. Most will look at the price tag when putting it in the basket. Maybe in leafy Donnybrook or foxrock, that the organic will be considered. People will still pick up a roast or steak as a treat,

    Finally, world herd size is contacting and population is growing, this is the pinch. We are a low cost producer compared to a lot of the indoor systems, this will be a major advantage.

    I have sat down and ran the figures here, it would leave an organic payment of about €15k. This would result in having to drop calf to beef and having to up the Suckler numbers. Output would drop by 40-50%. Fertilser spend isn't big less than €2.5k averaged over the past 3 years. Meal would probably drop a small bit at the reduction in volume would consumed by higher organic price. Some building work would be needed to accommodate bedding areas and €30k wouldn't cover it.

    I have decided to up the calf to beef numbers, by approx 10-20% and focus on improving DWG, through better use of grass, early turnout. Farmer numbers are dropping in Ireland due to age profile, and lots of opportunities will be there "Just remember that what glitters ain't always gold"



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,711 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    I agree the savings are meal and fertilizer. It really boils down to how suitable your current buildings are for conversion.

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭JohnChadwick


    In organic the last 5 years with Sucklers, sell as yearlings. Unfortunately haven't had the cash (or haven't had the optimism maybe) over the years to reinvest in facilities, and that's coming to a head now with money needed to be put into sheds, slurry storage, and a reliable tractor for feeding, if I stay in the suckler game.

    I agree it's all low margin, whatever beef system you operate. So my thoughts are, why not change to a system that doesn't require the largest capital investment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,078 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The problem wit sucklers is you do not have the output to cover costs. The cost of facilities 20 sucklers where the calves are kept to stores is probably equivalent to the cost for 60 store's. You are trying to get one productive animal to pay the same capital costs as three

    Organics has the same issue for an animals the capital costs are excessive. When your contract is up get out and go conventional

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭JohnChadwick


    Prob stay in organics as I'm not willing to forego the organic subsidy payment. Would never beat that OFS payment just by scaling up production in a conventional system.

    Weanling to store in organic is what I'm looking at. Needs less investment in wintering, can still draw down the subsidy, and it's a low risk low margin game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    The plan looks fine John, optimistic on the sale price. No problem doing 1kg/day on organic sward. I get that using a six week rotation, mob grazing.

    If you could grow some red clover silage, that would push them on through the winter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Glad to see someone is doing research study into red clover silage. Pity it isn't down here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Good to see it being embraced anyway, they're already mad about white clover here so it's progress I guess. Red clover silage bales would be a fraction of the equivalent in organic meal, it's amazing more people don't make it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,353 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit


    How many years do you get the organic transition payment for, and how much per hectare?



  • Registered Users Posts: 46 releasevalve


    2023 rates for new and existing participants.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement