Russia - threadbanned users in OP

With every post your story shifts.

Earlier you appeared to say they were paying 4 times for lng imports now than before.

At one point rhubarb was mentioned, or our electricity bills but you still could not provide the source or exact detail.

Accordingly no one has any idea what you are trying to say or the truth of it.

Multiple posters have asked you to provide evidence to support your claim and you refuse to do so.

You can state it all you want, without evidence it has no standing and is highly dubious.

The irony of pulling €350k per year for talking shíte whilst complaining about the widening gap between rich and poor seems to be lost on the bould Antonio.

SPR has a number of faults to be sure, but I've never found the above to be one of them. It's (yet another) story about a special behind-the-lines mission, not The History of of the Battle for Normandy. The action takes place in on an American invasion beach, and later in the American sector, with American troops. There is no reason why any British or any other troops should have been portrayed. The British and Canadian beaches were further east, as were the British parachute landing areas. The Brits were pushing towards Caen, the Americans towards St. Lo and Cherbourg. Do people really imagine that platoons of British squaddies would have been fighting alongside American ones? The only place that might have happened (theoretically) was at the junction of the boundaries of different corps and army level formations (traditionally a weak spot and one exploited by Napoleon in Belgium in 1815, for example).

Later in 1944 Brits and Yanks would have been likely to encounter each other in rear areas such as Paris or Brussels, on en route between there and the front, but in Normandy during the summer of 1944 the rear area was the beach, and each nation had its own.

A good answer to that criticism would be "Which scenes are the British and Russians missing from?"

‘Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.’

"..Zelensky is the wrong man for the job."😮

He and the Ukrainian people have made ignoring this war so uncomfortable that nations far removed from Europe have been compelled to help.

He has rewritten the book on how to lead in the event of a war and how important communication is.

He's asked for and gotten modern weaponry all the way up to America's most advanced tank.

And I'm guessing that countries like Taiwan are taking careful notes of his every move.

I'd like to see your suggestions for who you think is a better man/woman for the job?

They are/were the political wing of the INLA. Insignificant now yes, but in their day they were a dangerous bunch of murdering filth.

Surely someone better? You think that, the Ukrainians apparently don't. And as you are appear completely ignorant of Ukrainian politics and unable to present a case for any alternative, your claim has no merit or foundation. By someone 'better', this appears to be synonymous to you with, someone better at giving in to Russia.

You are just repeating obvious Russian propaganda cues here. The dig about him being a comedian. Would a doctor or teacher or accountant or county councillor be any better background at leading a country fighting for its survival in wartime? The people who throw out the dig never explain.

So it is pretty obvious pro-Russian propaganda when you throw digs at Zelensky for being a comedian and throwing away his men's lives... Yet absolutely zero comment on Putin's conduct.

There's documented evidence of Russia executing and torturing civilians. That is the peace Russia has in mind. The peace of the grave.

Ukrainians prefer to die fighting to liberate their country, and they are killing far more of the invaders than they are losing.

This is one of the most bizarre posts on the his thread, there have been a lot of stupidly crazy posts by Russian supporters.

Just because someone’s job was something else does not mean they can be good at another. People change careers successfully all the time. It really sounds like he is doing such a great job (which he is) that comparing him to Putin exposes what a shitshow of a leader Putin is. Therefore he must go because he is Ukrainian, and has his country rallying to his call to defend itself. I’m sure you’d rather of he rolled over and left Ukraine to Russia.

Ukrainians are not dying for nothing. They are dying for freedom, and so that their children won’t be raped, murdered, kidnapped by Russians. Russians are the ones dying for nothing in the tens of thousands.

The ability to express one's self via the medium of comedy is an indicator of intelligence.

The same can be said of musical creativity. Putin, for instance, would be too stupid to comprehend musical structure.

How can you not know this?

I'm surprised you're not convinced he's a drug addict too.

I suspect you're trying to imply that "the easy thing was to STAY". Who knows what other points you're misunderstanding?

Ukraine is a sovereign, democratic, free country with plans to join the EU.

Under full Russian occupation, their culture would be dismantled, their national identity would be erased, they would cease to be a democracy, a puppet would be installed (someone like Yanukovych), they would live under totalitarian control, their kids would be forced to learn only Russian (already happening in occupied areas). Their press outlets would be dismantled and replaced with Russian propaganda organs. Their judiciary would be controlled by a foreign power. Their police and security would be controlled by GRU and FSB. Their politicians would be acting on behalf of Moscow, not the people. They would be imprisoned, tortured, murdered and liquidated arbitrarily (like Bucha, Kherson, Borodyanka). This would be perpetual, a Russian servile state, protected by it's nuclear weapons.

This is why they are fighting, not just for their lives and families, but for future generations and the existence of their country. They've pushed the Russians all the way back from the outskirts of Kyiv. Yet here you are scratching your head why they haven't stopped and decided to bend the knee to Russia. Again, nutty views that show no grasp whatsoever of what's actually going on.

It is this lobby that will force the Swiss Federal government to act. It's great news and may get them to change their laws and contracts. There is already pressure building from multiple sides and they are looking at making a rapid change to the countries laws to allow the export of arms to Ukraine.

They are saying that the usual process (approx 4 years) is too slow so advocates of the proposed changes are looking at a short term solution to help Ukraine (an exception until 2025 or something) while the long process (which includes a referendum) is respected.

I suspect the the 2022 invation of Ukraine will be added to the list of miliatry blunders and will be up there with Market-Garden, the Charge of the Light Brigade, etc. as an example of what not to do.

People who don't understand leadership think that they guy at the top should be making all the decisions. True leadership is giving the experts space to act, and binging them all together under under one common aim. Inspiring people, not instructing them. The last thing Ukraine needs is some melomaniac who thinks he's a 5D chess super-strategist making all the decisions and mucking up at every available opportunity, with no-one being able to tell him he's wrong. And thankfully, they don't have that.