Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1258825892591259325943691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,743 ✭✭✭zv2


    Kadyrov is about to invade E. Germany. Where's the goddamn napalm?


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Throw a happy meal meal at him and he will sit quietly enough



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I am not confused, those downplaying the Kinzhal are confused. It's not just a slow cruise missile and it doesn't matter how old the plane firing it is or that it's based on a slow cruise missile, because the actual result is that Ukraine does not posess the means to intercept them.

    Break it down: What is the purpose of 'hypersonic' in a missile? Is it so you have a cool name and the brag to go with it or is it to make it hard to detect, hard to intercept and to give you the guaranteed ability to penetrated an enemy's air defences and hit a target?

    I don't care whether Kinzhals only manage mach 4.99 and not mach 5, because 'hypersonic' doesn't matter and a perfect fit to the definition of hypersonic doesn't matter, the only thing that matters is the final result. If it can't be stopped, then no amount of 'but' matters and you might as well call it hypersonic if it delivers the same result.


    Hypersonic missiles fly at a much lower altitude than conventional ballistic missiles.

    They follow what is known as a low atmospheric-ballistic trajectory. That means that by the time a radar-based missile defense system clocks them, they are already so close to their target that in many cases it is too late to intercept them.

    I still want to know why the UK sent the Sky Sabre ADS to Poland and not Ukraine, when Ukraine needs the ability to intercept hypersonic missiles and Poland doesn't? I think I know why, and it would be typical of the stupid sh​it that is happeneing in this conflict. Sky Sabre appears to contain some software from Israel's Iron Dome, so I'm betting the reason is Israel said no.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    Oh sweet jeasus, another one.

    Maybe I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, tell me, what in your opinion should Ukraine and Russia do to stop this war ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Maria Ponomarenko, a journalist who spoke out about the targeting of the theatre in Mariupol.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭Virgil°



    To be honest even Ukraine is not immune to political aims influencing the battlefield which is why I think they're staying in Bakhmut at all at this stage. Despite the fact that the place is heavily fortified and they're inflicting huge casualties for every inch they give and probably taking many of their own.

    If Ukraine manage to stay in Bakhmut and even push Russia back on any of the marginal gains they've made, it would be an enormous middle finger to the Kremlin on the anniversary of the beginning of the war. Hugely morale boosting for the UAF. Equally demoralizing for the Russians and potentially even politically destabilizing within the Russian government itself. Wars are won with more than bullets.

    Which is why again I've always subscribed to Ben Hodges idea of what victory should look like in Ukraine. And why choke-holding Crimea is so pivotal. If the Ukranians push the Russians back to the 2022 borders, yeah that's awful for the Russians but Putin could possibly survive that and Zelensky might be put under undue pressure to negotiate at that point by the west. However if Crimea is isolated then the very idea of Putins government is eroded and Russian politics as we know it may fall apart. At which point cleaning the russians town by town out of the East may not even need to happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,440 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Actually MudSpud, its the burning question of the day, and more interestingly and important, when it will happen. But happen it will !!!



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @cnocbui I still want to know why the UK sent the Sky Sabre ADS to Poland and not Ukraine, when Ukraine needs the ability to intercept hypersonic missiles and Poland doesn't? .


    Simple answer Ukraine aren't being hit by hypersonic missiles,



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,374 ✭✭✭SortingYouOut


    I indirectly acknowledged the targetting of civilians in my post, i'm well aware.

    Should civilians not be provided with as many safeguards as possible or do we ignore the basics because their chance of being targetted anyway is high? For the sake of a bit of paint, and what is at stake, I think they at least deserve an attempt at preserving their lives, even if it only saves one.

    Beverly Hills, California



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    It means we've been plagued by new posters such as yourself for the past months who trot out the idea of "peace" without ever mentioning what that peace would mean in reality. If both sides simply stop launching mortars at each other tomorrow and the frontline stagnates that's a win for Russia.

    Because they get to hold on to land that wasn't theirs before and shouldn't ever belong to them if we want to validate the very idea of sovereignty.

    So do we assume that by "peace" you want Ukraine to have its country back and then we return to peace? Or are you another Kremlin apologist that thinks we should just stop, let the lines fall where they are now and Russia gains something that isn't theirs? We shall see.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    How certain is it that it's actually been used though? U.S. officials have used terms like "not able to refute" along with "can't independently confirm" re the Russian claims that they've actually deployed it. Mixed signals IMO.




  • Registered Users Posts: 486 ✭✭junkyarddog




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Another one means a brand new poster who supports the Russian side. They often don't come into the threads openly supportive of Russia though, not initially. They aren't debating in any sort of good faith. They're generally just there to wind up or pollute the thread with scutter. There's still an ongoing one right now on this thread who I'm amazed has avoided being banned so long.

    They opt to skirt around the issue by equating both sides to each other morally or demanding that peace should be sought immediately regardless of consequence. There's nothing aggressive in my post.

    So what's your stance on Russias invasion? Morally speaking?



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    The ARC integrity has been completely offloaded,and it's a pretty sight,





  • Registered Users Posts: 8,440 ✭✭✭jmreire


    MudSpud

    Well MudSpud, three things are crystal clear from your comment.

    (1) You know little or nothing about vehicle maintenance and repair's except maybe to pay the repair bill from the workshop. You think that there will be multitude of non-standard vehicles confiscated, DeLoreans and Morris Oxfords??? Really? As for mechanical skills, guess what, Ukrainian Mechanics know their jobs very well ( as do Polish and Russian ones, the ones that I've worked with, here and abroad) As for spare parts, in Ireland, if you order any part before 11 am, 90%+ of the time, you will have it following morning or afternoon. Same service available throughout the EU, which includes Poland, so also Ukraine.

    (2) Likewise, you possibly know even less about Logistic's than you know about Vehicles. (If that's possible) AND 3rd:-

    (3) The nearest you have ever come to a front line is what you have seen on TV.

    The best you can come up with are sarcastic and derogatory remarks MudSpud.

    Yeah,,, thats your standard.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,440 ✭✭✭jmreire


    What gets lost in the consciousness is the fact that Russia is a mafia state, headed by Vladimir Putin. Once viewed like that, all is crystal clear. No other explanations needed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,440 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Russians are shooting everything and anything that comes in their sights..Men, Women, Children, Hospitals, Cemetery's, Apartment blocks, Nurserys Playschools, anything, literally, marked or unmarked. There is no mercy shown by Russian military, not even to their own,when the situation demands it. especially when the situation demands it,,,,there has been reports of Russian officers shooting their own wounded soldiers, rather than rescue them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,440 ✭✭✭jmreire


    ...



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,374 ✭✭✭SortingYouOut


    Again, i'm not disputing Russian targetting of civilians and civilian infrastructure. I know Russians are targetting civilians, it's impossible to dispute for anyone with a pair of eyes and an internet connection.

    My point is that the high risk of civilian targetting shouldn't prevent measures being taken to protect them and clearly distinguishing them from military personnel seems like something they themselves might appreciate but it also makes sense logistically within the military to be able to identify your own troops from civilians.

    Beverly Hills, California



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Military kit is not like consumer items constantly churned out for fun and profit. The US F/A-18 is still one of the most capable platforms in the world and it first flew over 40 years ago. The B-2 bomber first flew over 30 years ago and has been in service for over 20. How old is the B-52?

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,743 ✭✭✭zv2


    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Hypersonic missile generally refers to a new class of missiles which are very fast while also being maneuverable.

    Simply going at a hypersonic speed doesn't qualify because hypersonic ballistic missiles have been around for 70 years.

    Kinzhal is an air-launched ballistic missile related to the ground-launched Iskander. They air launch it so that it goes further, that's it's reason for existing. There's nothing exotic about it. It's not a hypersonic missile as defined above. They may be somewhat harder to intercept than the Iskander because it's going a bit faster.

    Ground launched Iskanders (and ballistic missiles in general) are already difficult to intercept. Ukraine have very low success rate against them. If Russia are using Kinzhal it's not to evade interception, it's simply to go further / to launch from further away. As far as I know they have used them rarely and probably mostly to evaluate them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,440 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, SortingYouOut, and I agree 100% with you, as would any right thinking human being, and in the most cases, Country's will do everything in their power to protect their citizens, as indeed Ukraine is doing now and has been doing since the beginning of Putins illegal invasion. Every possible protective measure that can be taken is being taken. The problem is on the Russian side. Putin does not care about human life ( except for his own, and his Family) either Ukrainian or Russian. So normal human behavior goes out the window when it comes to him, and its reflected in his military and their behavior. What can you expect when you press gang murderous and rapacious convicts from your prisons? You can expect murderous and rapacious results, and that's what we are seeing, unfortunately.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,374 ✭✭✭SortingYouOut


    To bring it back to my point, do you think cars donated to the Ukrainian military should be marked to make them distinguishable from civilian vehicles?

    We're in agreement that civilians are being targetted and that Putin does not care about the human cost of this war or the tactics used.

    Beverly Hills, California



  • Registered Users Posts: 873 ✭✭✭Addmagnet




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    There can be very good insights on this thread, stick around and you'll see. BUt as mentioned, Russian bots are hard at work trying to derail conversation. There are a number of ways this war ends, the prefered by most here would be for Russia to withdraw from Ukr and then pay for all the destruction, with those responsible going to the Hague for war crimes and getting locked up for good. That's the goal, prob unlikely to get there in the coming years, but with time lets see how it works out.

    What has happened so far is a realisation by Europe that we all need to take our security concerns far more seriously, if this doesn't open a strong debate on an EU army of sorts I'd be very surprised.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    The f18 is being continually updated and in Most cases already replaced with super hornets,yes the B2 is similar age to the mig31 but Still untouchable,and yes the b52 is heading towards a century of flight if the US keeps it flying,still very few aircraft can drop it's payload,but as we already seen the B2 is going to replaced with the B21 raider and the f22 is getting replaced ,

    Where the mig31 is a one trick pony fly in a straight line fast and not a lot else ,yes gets radars and so on ,but it's a dragster big old Russian engines capable of mach 3 for relatively short period before risking failures , nothing has really changed since the Soviet era aircraft and doctrine for Russia,they did move to thrust vectoring for several aircraft which makes for great aerobatics during airshows , but it's next to useless in aircombat where your getting hit with a missle long before you get to see who's actually shooting



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,440 ✭✭✭jmreire


    According to the Geneva Conventions, a Country's military must be clearly identifiable, so all Uniform's and Vehicles used for military purposes have to be be marked as such. For vehicles, it can range from the full out camouflaged military shades of green or blue etc. to any vehicle simply carrying a flag, regardless of colour. So the vehicle in question could be a red Toyota Corolla, carrying the Ukrainian flag, for example. In normal circumstances of course, military vehicles will be painted in various shades of green, grey, beige etc depending on where they will be deployed,,, desert invariably means various shades of beige, shades of green for forested areas etc. But even commercial convoys, with multi colored and types of vehicles travelling in Ukraine, will normally have Ukrainian flags, or Ukrainian military escort vehicles.The bottom line is that they are identifiable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,440 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, but as it happens, it is a shade of military green, and carrying the Ukrainian Flag ( plus the German one) but equally, it could have been any other color too once its flagged. I've just watched some convoys heading into Turkey from Syria, and the vehicles are all shapes and sizes, but all are marked as been in the convoy.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement