Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Is housing really that bad or is it just another hyped up 'crisis'?

Options
168101112

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 15,217 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You just gotta laugh as some of the suggestions on here.

    We apparently have landlords that are making money hand over fist but we still don't seem to have the ability to attract landlords to the market in the numbers required. Why is that do? Do people just hate the idea of making buckets of money without any effort or risk as is being suggested here?

    Some appear unaware but HAP a subsidy provided by the state to help house those that do not generate enough income to provide housing themselves. HAP is an inconvenience to most landlords, the state had to legislate in order to make landlords accept it. There is enough pent up demand in the medium term to keep rents high if HAP is reduced but reducing HAP will only result in tenants getting notice when they can no longer afford the rent putting more pressure on council housing lists and I don't know if anybody on here has noticed recently but councils are doing the bare minimum when it comes to providing social housing.

    Its so strange that so many here expect landlords to absorb the increase in costs that are associated with the property they are living in. Others appear blissfully unaware that rentals are a necessity for those how cant afford a house straight after finishing with their education.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    the imaginary ones, who live rent free in the heads of all these self-proclaimed 'champions-of-the-proles', who foam at the mouth as they talk about how all landlords are parasites and should be abolished but all without fail stumble over the very first hurdle which is: Where do people live if they cannot rent?

    Anyone able to think critically and with an iota of common sense can see that the rental market is a necessity, for people who cannot or do not (yet) want to buy a home and take on the burden of a mortgage. Renting is an essential part of any society, so abolishing it is simply inconceivable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,509 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I find this bizarre! Are you so desperate to minimize how bad the housing situation is that you'll come up with nonsense like this?

    As I read your story, daft.ie is irrelevant, there's a hidden network of landlords with houses to spare. They'll sort you, and the multinationals out.

    It's really all a very effective system to keep the gurriers out.

    I'm not saying there wouldn't be a small amount of property rented by word of mouth, but it's a drop in the ocean, and of no use to somebody who wouldn't be from the area, or connected to this network.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,509 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Double post in error



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,007 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Again, calm down. I have been a witness to this for decades, hyperventilating about the property market is one of the reasons it's bipolar.

    IF you want to believe virtually all rentals go through Daft, that is up to.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'm torn between believing he's genuine or a parody of one of those "he wouldn't hurt a fly, it's the government's fault - no facilities" types.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    said poster has a track record of making up BS anecdotes to try and prove a point

    During covid they infamously claimed no construction sites ever closed down because they went for a walk near their house and saw some men still on site

    all houses secretly being rented through friends and family is another such claim



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,509 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I would think that Daft is certainly a very strong indicator of the state of the market.

    I heard an interviewee on Newstalk lately stating that when people were talking about a housing crisis 6-7 years ago, there were 90 properties in a particular area advertised on Daft, now it's 9.

    I've no doubt that when supply gets this low some landlords won't advertise on daft because they can rent by word of mouth, but that in itself is an indication of the level of demand.

    And I've seen housing 'crisis' over decades myself, this is different.

    I met a man in a low paid job lately in his sixties. Terrified because his landlord is selling up. Where is he going to go?

    At that age you might not have the social network to couch surf, or stay with family for 6-12 months until you might find something, or what, emigrate?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I would think this is quite normal.

    I have a number of units that are let long-term to multinationals, they are currently actively looking to rent or buy more units. They use them when employees from other countries visit their sites in Ireland. They are currently looking for more units in order to attract foreign talent that are afraid to move to Ireland due to the rental market, they plan on offering them a place to stay for 6 months until they can locate a place of their own as a sweetener. The HSE also have schemes for medical staff that are training they generally stay for only a year before they move to another hospital so are handy in that you don't end up with long term problem tenants.

    I would then rely on word of mouth from friends and good current/former tenants prior to listing a place on Daft. This is how I would find the majority of new tenants.

    A small number of units would reach Daft but it is generally the last resort as you have to filter through so many applicants and the risk is the greatest.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,431 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    If I was renting a property, the last option would be to give it to a stranger from daft.ie.

    Of course, I might get a little bit less rent doing it that way, but I'd rather take a bit less for lower risk. It's your choice whether you want to rent it to the complete stranger for 2000 a month, or the person you have some connection to, direct or indirect, for 1950.

    So I could well imagine that plenty of rentals are done by word of mouth and connections.


    The people who froth at the mouth over the idea of not squeezing every last possible drop of blood out of a tenant are probably the same that froth at the mouth over not being able to summarily evict tenants



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,509 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    That doesn't mean it's not an indicator of how much availability has dropped.

    Also it seems then there really is a network where properties are kept aside for certain sectors and multinationals.

    I know myself from working for multinationals they would have staff to help new arrivals find property.

    How's an ordinary Joe supposed to compete with that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,703 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Are you honestly wondering why people are cashing out of an investment when the asset value is at an all time high?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,217 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    To solve this we have to roll back some of the knee-jerk things that happened post the boom.

    The very strict mortgage lending rules have to be eased so borrowers don't have to save for years for deposits.

    And tax breaks should be given to builders to make big projects worth their time.

    I'm not saying go back to the tiger era free for all, but something in-between.

    There is a plot of land beside me that was supposed to be Phase 2 of our estate back in 2007.

    It's still empty and on it's third iteration of planning permission.

    The current applicant has revised the planning from 20 or so large detached houses to 30+ semi detached.

    Because he knows he could not sell the large detached houses in this market, people would see them as too expensive, and he can't sell them "cheap" because he won't make any money.

    And even so there are rumors he is doing a deal with the likes of the housing body Cluid to get them to buy them and take people off the housing list.

    Everything else for him is too risky given his costs to build, so the land is just going to sit empty.

    Another thing that needs to happen is that China needs to get back to pe COVID levels of productivity.

    That will reduce inflation and thus reduce interest rates.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,007 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I would think that Daft is certainly a very strong indicator of the state of the market.

    Bebo used be the only show in town, things change.

    And I've seen housing 'crisis' over decades myself, this is different.

    It really isn't, it the same vested interests screaming all sorts of fearmongering to stoke the market into a frenzy, I just explained to you in detail how that just happened.

    We are still dealing with the last bout of collective hyperventilating.

    Remember, 'you would want to fair thick to rent, rent is dead money, you have to buy'.

    Then it flipped to renters tutting at people who took on massive mortgages.

    Now it's flipped again.

    Same pattern, same bollíx same horsé ****. Rinse and repeat. Until we enact stupid policy that brings us to the next crisis.


    I met a man in a low paid job lately in his sixties. Terrified because his landlord is selling up. Where is he going to go?

    At that age you might not have the social network to couch surf, or stay with family for 6-12 months until you might find something, or what, emigrate?

    Well did you ask him? There really isn't any point asking me.

    When SF getting in, they want to ban sale of property as a reason to end the tendency.

    I can see that working wonders for the rental market.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,509 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Yes Bebo was replaced effectively by Facebook, Tik Tok, etc?

    Daft hasn't been replaced by your underground housing railroad.

    It is true that when there is demand like this some landlords won't use daft, but there has still been a huge drop in the number of available properties.

    I didn't think anyone was denying there was, until I came here!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ordinary Joe is not supposed to compete with that, multinationals are aware that the shortage of rentals is causing problems for them acquiring new talent and they have the means to secure long term rentals. Its a win win for landlords and multinationals.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,431 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Solution to your example is an enforced punitive vacant site levy. He can either build, or sell to someone who can build if he is not able to. He shouldn't be allowed to squat on the site and hoard it in order to hold everyone to ransom. Either that or it should be zoned as greenbelt or a green space.........given there apparently isn't demand in that location.


    Although not quite the same, below is a property which was recently put on the market for auction. It had apparently been sitting there for years and was burnt out in 2019. Eventually the council got around to some enforcement and took legal action over it being left derelict. The owners were fined in court and directed to do remedial work last year...............lo and behold it is now up for sale. So no more squatting on it.


    Suggestions to relax lending rules are idiotic. No offence.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,217 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    "No longer being in negative equity" and "I'm retiring and my properties are my pension" are down the list of reasons why landlords are leaving the market according to the RTB survey of Nov 2022.

    Thighs like tax, regulations and it's not profitable are above them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,639 ✭✭✭victor8600


    Lol at "for people who cannot or do not (yet) want to buy a home and take on the burden of a mortgage." My mortgage, for the house in Dublin which I bought almost at the peak in 2008, is €900/month. Anyone with an iota of sense would prefer to have this "burden" rather than pay €2500/month for the same house.

    The problem is the lack of supply. Small LL are not the answer, whether they are parasite scum or benevolent benefactors of the society. The state must intervene by helping to build more houses, whether through the councils or through some other scheme.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,431 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Yes, the renters tax credit meant that a lot of them were rushing for the exits in case Revenue came knocking.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,007 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Daft hasn't been replaced by your underground housing railroad.

    How do you know it hasn't? Ronan Lyons told you? Who pays him for the quarterly property porn update?

    Why do think he has never expressly stated that one of the reasons there is less property available is because for the first time in the history of the state renters have some form of security and far less likely to be transient?

    Not to mention there is an eviction ban.


    It is true that when there is demand like this some landlords won't use daft, but there has still been a huge drop in the number of available properties

    I know, I spent a long time explaining why.

    The pertinent number is how many people are currently looking to rent compared to pre pandemic levels.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,217 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    This builder is no small time one man show.

    His company have built many an estate in the region.

    But if this builder can't risk building private houses (with the obligatory % set aside for social) which builder can ?

    The numbers just don't add up for so many of them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,774 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    If you read my posts, you'll see that I have never denied that there is a housing crisis.

    I've said this already but what I've questioned was the two stories earlier in the thread where one guy on 900pw was sleeping on the streets and another one about an electrician saying he couldn't find anywhere to rent in the whole of Ireland after searching for a full year.

    I've never denied that it's difficult to get somewhere to rent, but I do think the two stories above are bullsh1t.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,774 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    He's a landlord. The ba5tard. Get him.

    Am I doing this right?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Not everyone wants to be rooted permanently in one place

    If I'm a student, or working on contract, or any one of a myriad of reasons do not want to buy at this moment in time, then I need to rent. The fact that mortgage costs less than rent is due to a chronic undersupply of rental units and is not the norm. In normal times renting is cheaper than a mortgage



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Haha. Careful now I might quit, making people homeless and driving rents up further. I'm sure I'd be blamed for that too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,007 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    In normal times renting is cheaper than a mortgage

    How did you come to that conclusion?

    If someone is renting their property out at a loss, that's hardly what would you call normal or sustainable.

    Leasing an asset should always be more expensive than owning it. Risk should be rewarded not penalised.



Advertisement