Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Marathon Improvers Thread.

Options
1565759616265

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,417 ✭✭✭Lazare


    Cheers guys,

    I had difficulty twice trying to complete registration so googled whether it was sold out. Result came back that it was but have just copped it was relating to a previous year.

    Delighted obv. Will attempt registration again this evening.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,761 ✭✭✭FortuneChip


    I might tag along to this thread if there's room for one more!

    Dublin doesn't suit my calendar this year unfortunately, so I'm going abroad. I tried the Berlin ballot, but had no joy, so off to Estonia instead (it was either there or Amsterdam, and I don't really understand my why, but I chose Tallinn).

    I've run Dublin 3 times.

    2016 (4.18) fairly delighted to have completed it, but if left a Sub-4 itch I wanted to scratch

    2017 (4.26). I think I suffered from over-training here, without a proper programme either. Ran myself into the ground ultimately.

    2018 (3.48). Most enjoyable training programme, not nearly as heavy as 2017, but got myself into overall better shape, and it really worked well on the day.

    Had a great running year in 2021 despite no marathon. Made some serious improvements over 5k, 10k and half marathon distances. Achilles tendinitis in 2022 kinda ruined me and just starting to get going again.Working a lot on overall fitness this year as a base, and will try find a suitable programme for Tallinn. Ideally would like to go sub 4. Would be delighted to beat 3.48, and if I do much better than that we can just assume I've cheated!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,182 ✭✭✭demfad


    If the Donadea went well and there was no significant fade then after your 2 recovery weeks, I would choose the last 5 weeks and taper of a plan with faster running rather than mileage based endurance running (eg Hanson perhaps).

    If you had a big fade (from before the marathon distance marker at 42k) and/or you struggle with endurance in marathons, then keep focusing on that.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Hello. I am getting back in to running and have a marathon soon. I want to run it at a set pace that will allow me to finish it.

    Is there a good watch that would allow you set a pace and assist you to run at that pace?



  • Registered Users Posts: 750 ✭✭✭marathon2022


    The best value watch out there for running is the Coros Pace 2. Less than €200 and amazing functionality.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 737 ✭✭✭Sandwell


    Yeah, it's a great watch. Have mine two years and battery life is still excellent. I really like the Coros app too. The workout planner is fantastic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,182 ✭✭✭demfad


    I would consider steady running appropriate and necessary in good basebuilding after a couple of months of largely easy running. Scullion makes the point that steady running has a rythm similar to marathon running so it gets you efficient.

    He also says you should run easy before and after and this is the crux in my opinion. Steady running should be part of a well thought out training program. It shouldn't take away from other sessions. If you can do a steady run sandwiched by 2 easy days and not compromise recovery from other sessions then that might work. His idea of adding steady segments to easy runs gradually is good. That stops it from fundamentally changing the balance of the training.

    It can also have a use the day before a long run, perhaps for a person who has already developed a 2hr long run, isnt on huge mileage then the steady run could be introduced the day before to prefatigue and make the long run more challenging.

    Not to be introduced willy nilly. Best time to use them IMO again is after a base of easy running has been established.



  • Registered Users Posts: 750 ✭✭✭marathon2022


    I agree, steady being about 20 to 30 seconds slower than MP.

    The Marathon plans I've followed recently all had steady runs built in. These plans (based on the BAA online plans) are usually 11 days every 14 of running so its easy to fit a steady run in.

    For example I had a 9 mile session last night - 2 mile easy- then 1 mile at 10k pace(6.45/m) with 3 minutes rest x 4 reps - then 400m at 5k(6.00 to 6.15/m) pace x 4 reps followed by 1 minute rest and 2 mile cool down.

    Today I have an easy 6 mile recovery(8.15 -8.30 depending on the shoe)

    Tomorrow I will do a steady 6 mile(7.45) with a session on Friday( with 2 x 3mile hmp(6.55 ish) reps), easy Saturday and long Sunday session.

    PMP is 7.15.

    In fact there's even a steady 20 miler later in the plan, to the OP I would say don't be afraid to introduce steady running, fit them in but not at the expense of easy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,761 ✭✭✭FortuneChip


    Just read that Ryanair have done away with their Tallinn service.

    So either looking at a 6 hour trip with stop-over in Frankfurt or Sweden...

    Or looking for a new marathon. FFS! Hitting the wall before the training even starts



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 938 ✭✭✭Unknownability


    Is Amsterdam sold out?

    There are a few of us signed up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,761 ✭✭✭FortuneChip


    It's not sold out by the looks of it. Will make call on it later.

    The date suits anyway, so we'll see!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,182 ✭✭✭demfad


    Agree but steady state will vary as a % of marathon time. I would say for these purposes 'steady' would correspond to whatever 3hr race pace is. (can be deduced from McMillan). https://www.mcmillanrunning.com/dashboard/

    Another thing that's really vital to note for improvers is Aerobic threshold pace. (2hr race pace). That's the pace where the maximum amount of fat is burned. (It's still only 50% of total energy needed, glycogen amounts to the other). The absolute amount of fat burned doesnt change between that and steady pace. I think improving pace at AeT is far more important for improvers than working on VO2 max or even Lactate Threshold which intensities are very far away from marathon race pace. The point I am trying to make is that steady running is way way more important for marathon improvers than it is for Scullion (and it's important for him). I would take a hatchet to the VO2 max and LT sessions in some schedules or at least I would combine steady running into the second half of those sessions.

    Many of the schedules advertised for improvers are just pace adjusted versions of elite programs even though a 2 hr race should have a very different approach to a 4 hr race training wise and therefore TYPE of session wise. Cue major fades late in marathons because sessions that should focus on endurance around race paces have been left out in favour of sessions very far from race paces and of limited relevance to the persons race.



  • Registered Users Posts: 750 ✭✭✭marathon2022


    Some nice analysis there, I don't know much about the specifics of training to VO2 max or lactate threshold intensities but I would guess some of the sessions in the plans I use are designed with these in mind. If I'm reading your piece right I guess apart from steady there is a happy spot between HMP and MP were stamina especially for the latter stage of a long one can be found.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,182 ✭✭✭demfad


    There is, and I believe increasing speed at 2hr race pace is most important for improvers and even folks looking sub 3 who have a problem fading. You increase endurance at 2hr race pace and slower steady paces, the fade goes. That brings the marathon time significantly down. Lipid power (the power you can exert from burning fat) increases and this brings average pace down too: makes the runner very strong. LT paces should be used but I would suggest using alternations: that is where a faster segment is used to produce lactate alternated with a steady recovery which 'uses' that lactate as fuel. AFAIK that's how you will be consuming glycogen in the marathon anyway, so doubling any LT work with getting better at reusing lactate is a win win.

    The 2hr race pace also helps marathon pace feel easier, as in feel easier for most of the marathon not like LT training which makes race pace feel like a 'piece of pish'....shortly followed by the reality check 'Oh f*ck!!!' for 10-12k.



  • Registered Users Posts: 583 ✭✭✭FinnC


    Some excellent posts there demfad 👍



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,417 ✭✭✭Lazare


    Yeah, some top quality discussion in here. Bravo.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,182 ✭✭✭demfad


    I'll keep going so! If you watch a marathon (as I did Dublin from leaders to midpack on a few locations in October) the big difference you can see as the speed reduces is that running form changes drastically. Runners with slower times have generally inferior running form, and the slower the time the more noticable it is.

    Ok, we all know this, so what? Very, very fit runners with very fast times and very good form spend a lot of time on their form. Very slow runners don't. They believe it's something for the elites, that when you get to a certain level of fitness maybe time to look at it. But we can see clearly that runners are expending way more energy than is needed at their marathon pace. But maybe they can't afford to spend that time, maybe they are better off running? You can improve forms just by incorprating it into exercise during running.

    Let's return to those VO2 max and hard (short tempo) sessions that many schedules prescribe (because form work can fit here instead). The idea of these VO2 max sessions wrt an elite marathon is that aerobic power (the amount of air your body can absorb) is increased by these sessions, the LT runs raise the LT obviously but form part of the process where they can be extended out so that the runner can still use a high level of aerobic power as he/she approaches marathon race pace. For these elites, aerobic power/LT is close enough to marathon race pace where it directly improves it or sessions can be utilized to spread the aerobic power like butter across the marathon duration. I think Amercian coach Joe Vigil called it % fractional utilization of VO2 max, but its same thing, you get the picture hopefully.

    But marathon improvers race pace is not close to LT OR VO2 max. Doing these sessions and extending them out is not going to help (ENOUGH) your race pace because it is way slower (law of specificity) and most of your energy is coming from burning fat anyway. That is why IMO translating these elite sessions with pace adjustment does not work for the rest of us: a 4 hour race run with poor form, has very little to do with and very different requirements from a 2.xx race run with good form if the objective is to maximize the improvement.

    The key paces are 2 hr race pace (Aerobic threshold) and the paces between that pace and your marathon race pace. LT is important but to a lesser extent. With so much to be gained by improving efficiency at race pace (form is visually a huge part as we can witness) why not swap out the faster sessions with sessions that incorporate form AND these other paces?

    Biggest, BIGGEST adaption is to use your but. "When running do not try to save ass, let ass save you!". Remember that.

    How so you do that?

    Incorporate strides, but develop the form gains in the same session. FAR away from the Warmup, do glute activation exercises (google and try to do them before most runs (60-120s) ) do strides (flat ground, hills). After strides, run a short portion (2 mins start then increse) with the same form as you just did in the strides, jog 3 mins, then do say 5 min LT with same form, then do say 10 mins AeT. Get the idea, you are doing strides but teaching yourself to run with the good technique at these other paces.

    Normal runs, do a minute of glute stuff before, then have a hill EARLY in the run. Run up the hill using your glutes (move hips forward and feel glutes work). Slow down run easy up hill, but use glutes. You will likley use glutes for rest of run. In fact every time you meet a hill think of teh new proverb above.

    LT, AeT runs etc. Glute activation, hill strides: shallow hill so you can run as if on flat, good form, with glutes (dont kill yourself its just to activate glutes). Off you go on your run. Good form, easier intensity (hill strides before a tempo/AeT run make it feel soo easy).

    Incorporate it consistently, 3 weeks ingrains habit etc., will make a massive difference.

    This type of training also best helps youre longer term development as a runner. You need to address form sooner or later. Why not start early in a marathon buildup

    Once your sessions then focus on improving endurance at AeT, marathon pace etc.

    Happy to do out a few sample sessions or schedule if people want?



  • Registered Users Posts: 737 ✭✭✭Sandwell


    Some sample sessions would be great. I'm in the middle of a base building block at the moment with Berlin on the horizon in September and while I'm already doing strides and hill sprints, some other form drills would be a welcome addition. Currently running 4-5 days easy, one LT session (usually broken up into intervals) and one long run (normally steady or progressive). Strides and hill sprints are thrown into the easy days in a fairly unstructured manner.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,182 ✭✭✭demfad


    Things to consider off the bat.

    Cardinal rule (dont get injured especially if old like me)

    -Do you wish to increase mileage? Now is the time but glacial pace of increase to achieve fitness from consistency (no injury/niggle)

    -Make sure you maintain the occasional easy long run to support the faster long runs. Nice to do it in a nice place, hills, nature etc.


    -2 week cycle???: E = easy, S=session, M= moderate EL= easy and long

    Week 1. M T W T F S S

    E E S E E S E

    Week 2. M T W T F S S

    E S E M E S EL


    FULL SESSION: To be run RELAXED, fast will come naturally later.:

    From John Kellogg: Sets of buildups or strides (ex.: 2-3 sets of 5-6 x 15-40 secs., jogging equal distance between reps and jogging 5-10 min. between sets - always do buildups, strides, and drills WITH the wind, if any) + drills and/or hills on occasion + 2-8 min. @ 90% effort (following last set of strides) every 2 weeks


    Increase gradually eg with 3 x 6 x 15s. Then next time 2 x 6 x 40 (I dont do much more) then 3 x 6 x 20 then the 2 mins fast. Next 3 x 5 x 40s with 3 fast etc. (do what you feel is right for you, but progress and do it gradually). Later Morph session into where you add an LT rep at end..strides then 2 mins fast then 6-7 LT and start reducing number of strides.... Next drop the VO2 max bit and keep adding to LT....Progress to AeT in this way all while reducing strides volume back to maintenance levels.

    I'm making it more complicated than it is but that's the gist.

    Also, beforehand. Find a few drills you like. Do half a drills routine controlled before that stride session. Good technique during strides.... transfer it to good technique on the reps after

    (google 'John Kellogg PDF' for that session)


    Sample MODERATE SESSION:

    Hill strides: 10-20 x 30 seconds (very relaxed, focus completely on form and technique, use glutes (NOT an all out sprint/hill rep). First start with 8 add a few every time). Followed by 7 mins fastish. Keep adding to the 7. (reduce stride duration for the first couple of sessions if you feel 30s initially too long)

    Glute activation before, make a point of using glutes and good technique. This session reinforces goof technique in the hill strides before utilizing the learned technique in the subsequent rep. As with the previous session, as time passes AeT reps can be added or used exclusively. As form improves and you get into meat of marathon training, reduce the strides eg to 5-6 x 10-15s and the sessions become normalized.

    Plenty of easy days between. (For you, Try and get standard easy run up to an hour or just over.)

    Note: Edited

    Post edited by demfad on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 737 ✭✭✭Sandwell


    That's fantastic, thanks. I'll make a point of adding in those sessions over the next few weeks. The two week cycle thing is interesting too.

    Yeah, I want to increase mileage to roughly where I was during my last marathon block (55mpw average topping out at 65). I've been floating at around 40 mpw since November while doing a good bit of racing, XC etc. I'd like to start the Berlin block from 55mpw and top out in the mid 70s this time around. I'd be pretty confident that that change alone would be enough to see a decent improvement (I'm looking at going from 2:44 to 2:3x).

    Easy days are already at an hour but I'm gradually transitioning from 6 to 7 days running per week. That along with a couple of extra miles added to the long run should get me into the mid 50s. I think I'm being fairly conservative but time will tell...



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,182 ✭✭✭demfad


    I agree that the mileage change and the consistency you'll get if you avoid injury will see you into the 2:30s.

    Just train as if the gains will be in a few months, hold back, thousand mile stare etc. A little within yourself.

    Reward yourself with the occasional race (I'm looking at 1 per month now, often as just a particularly hard training session where I might just have one extra E day on either side).

    Milo of Croton is a good reminder of how conservative consistent gains pay off: https://www.lionstrongcoaching.com/the-story-of-milo-and-the-calf/#:~:text=Milo%20was%20a%206th%20Century,carried%20out%20the%20same%20feat.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,314 ✭✭✭Bluesquare


    Thanks for the info . If you’re talking about two hour race pace being your steady pace - for someone who’s hmp is circa 1’50 what type of pace is steady ? I have been treating steady as 5:44-6:15? So a moderate progression run will go say from 6:40 to 5:45. Would this pace make sense ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,182 ✭✭✭demfad


    I'm not saying it's the pace you should run steady (I believe 3 hour race pace may fit that better) I am saying it's the Aerobic Threshold pace and that pace is more important for improvers than VO2max and indeed LT pace.

    From McMillan for a 1:50 HM, Ive snipped race and training paces-

    2h race pace is 5:15 which relates to mcmillans steady state 5:08-5:21. This is max fat burn. I would start at slower end and start extending runs out at this pace. Maybe first 20-30 minutes of run to progress and then hover at this pace. Keep extending run to run

    3hr pace is circa 5:25. straight long tempo (an hour or whatever you can manage first)

    You can do a run at 5:45 as a long steady.

    Also long runs at your normal long easy

    Tempo runs can be used: a few to build up the LT then use intervals with initially marathon pace as the recovery, then work the recovery down to 3hr pace and towards 2hr pace.

    EG 48 mins 3 min LT 3 mins MP

    Progress to 60 if you can but slolwy work the recoveries down. Thats the key speed there not the LT.

    Use the form stuff and hill reps to make you strong.

    Marathon training is like all good things. You have to wait. Be patient, progress the sessions, no hero stuff, patience is the hero stuff.







  • Registered Users Posts: 1,314 ✭✭✭Bluesquare


    Thanks so much for this



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,047 ✭✭✭✭event


    Have been tipping away with multiple run a week, nothing massive structured. Have been doing two trail runs a week, not looking at times, just getting in the elevation. On Friday, I signed up to a 5k for Saturday morning. Said I'd see how it went sure, no expectations. Was very flat, elevation gain of 7 feet. And I woe the Saucony Pro 2s for the first ever time, never wore carbon plate shoes before.

    19:41 - first time ever going Sub 20. Over the moon



  • Registered Users Posts: 583 ✭✭✭FinnC




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,021 ✭✭✭Kellygirl




  • Registered Users Posts: 737 ✭✭✭Sandwell




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 234 ✭✭TheRef


    May be best to post this elsewhere, but hoping for more experienced eyes...

    Running about 16 months, consistently averaging 35m/week. DCM22 was my second marathon (part of boards novice program), first being back in 2008. Since Christmas I've done a few halfs in training and was planning on doing a half each week as LSR. I have a couple of races coming up - Naas 10 mile this weekend and the Wicklow half 26th March.

    I went out yesterday and done 16m and it got me thinking....

    Can I run the Connemarathon? That's in 8 weeks. Yesterdays run was fine but I struggled from about 11m. Legs felt very heavy. If I do it, it target will be to finish, not for any time. And, yep, I know it has hills and likely long periods of nothingness, and the weather could be dreadful (or great).

    So, I was thinking this week to do a 12m midweek and the 10m on the weekend before trying to do 16-18 the weekend after (11th March) and building up from there. That's 6 weeks from a 16-18 mile to race day.

    Thoughts?

    Oh, and no interest in travelling that far for a half, and I know there are other races towards the summer but Connemarathon send out the race packs, so I don't need to go down and collect the day before.



Advertisement