Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

Options
17027037057077081190

Comments

  • Subscribers Posts: 41,592 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    its telling there's no cribbing about Joey Carbery and Kieran Treadwell being called up.... i wonder why that is... hummm??



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,574 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    So... this is a problem? Should the other provinces get dibs first on the schools talent. It's funny that this argument relates to the schools when the pathway to pro rugby is changing. Furlong and Frawley are good examples. Aitzol King another. I get the point of the advantages for Leinster. Surely, these school kids should not be held to a different standard. Should we ban school trained players from playing at Leinster? I know the resources are not there at the other provinces. How is this the fault of the Leinster school system? What's the answer?

    Ben Healy would rather go to Edinburgh than play for another province. Who's to say that the Leinster players wouldn't feel similar? Karl Martin went to France. So did Will Hickey, Wales in his case. It comes back to forcing lads to move?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,987 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The "coaches have more information, he's doing / not doing what the coaches want, QED" argument is very binary

    It's as binary as "he's from/not from Leinster, QED" tbh.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'm not sure what the answers are, tbh. But that doesn't mean that there aren't problems. (Or least, potential problems).



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I've spelled out pretty well why I would prefer Hodnett, and indeed Coombes, to be involved. If you want to ignore that, and just assume it's provincial bias, fair enough...

    But to re-iterate; if Conan got injured after the team was named and Coombes was then selected for the 23 jersey, would Coombes then suddenly be doing what the coaches want that he wasn't doing before the injury? It's a false dichotomy.

    And leaves no room for discussion on any selections which may be marginal calls.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 53,829 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Because the scenario is completely different. I don't know why you think this is all some big dig at Leinster, I don't get why you are trying to make it a provincial thing, so I don't get why you're leaping to the defence of it in this manner.

    Of course Joey Carbery was going to be called up. He was the only other cab on the rank. Of course Treadwell was going to be called up, he was the only other cab on the rank.

    Nobody is "cribbing" because they are completely uninteresting decisions. There's nothing to discuss. Both players were surprise omissions from the squad in the first place!

    Penny over Hodnett is worth discussing, it's an interesting decision because it's an unobvious choice. Discussing this is not some great conspiracy against Leinster Rugby.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,317 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Ben Healy would rather go to Edinburgh than play for another province

    No province would have Ben Healy once he becomes NIQ. He WENT TO Edinburgh so he can get to play international rugby



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Coombes has 5 years on Conan, its shaping up to be a natural replacement at the moment and looks to be a mater of when not it.



  • Administrators Posts: 53,829 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    This is incredibly reductive. Literally nobody is saying anything like this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,987 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    And literally no-one is saying that the coaches decisions cannot or should not be questioned, but that is what people on the other side of the debate to you are being accused of.



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 41,592 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    you have ONLY made the provincial argument here, so its very rich for you to say im trying to make it a provincial thing. Talk about cake and eating it



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Big news folks.

    Got a call from the IRFU this morning looking for a photocopy from my sixth year annual as confirmation that I went to a private school.

    Could barely contain my excitement but emailed the image straight back. I've just had a call from Andy a little over an hour ago.

    I'm going into Ireland camp.

    Haven't played rugby in two decades and I'm into my 40s but if Sexton can do it and I've passed the qualifying criteria I might as well yolo things and see if I can get a run out.

    Would anyone be interested in an AMA?



  • Administrators Posts: 53,829 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Of course nobody is literally posting "you cannot discuss this", but again I think you know this is not what I was saying.

    So far on this we've:

    1. Heard about idiots on twitter, who are apparently bitter or hateful or whatever cause they posted a view on this
    2. Vague digs at people for actually caring about this decision. "Sure he's only holding tackle bags, it's nuts that this is even being discussed" etc etc
    3. Not-so-vague implications that it's all provincialism or we only care cause he's from Leinster, which is missing the point entirely. "Nobody is complaining about Carbery, I wonder why...."
    4. The same old "the coaches know best, we know nothing" attempt to shut down and dismiss the discussion

    There is a patronizing and condescending tone emanating from plenty of posts in this thread on this particular topic, as if anyone who doesn't fully throw their full support behind the selection of Penny somehow doesn't understand rugby, or isn't a real fan, or wants us to fail.

    This is the sort of thing I am talking about. It has to stop.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Are you sure you didn't mean "pot and kettle"? These idioms are a dime a dozen, and I know you've got a bone to pick with awec, but at this point I nearly think we should put this discussion on ice...



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,145 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    There is a huge difference between 'caring' about a decision and implying that the selection is incredibly damaging to Irish rugby.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    I’m excited to see Penny in camp, personally I think he’s past due a call up, while I’m really enjoying Hodnett’s performances lately I’d prefer that he keeps motoring away with Munster for now.

    He’s getting great exposure at the moment for Munster, and it opens a door for Connors to get a couple of starts for Leinster while Penny gets experience training with the Irish coaches.

    Timoney should feel aggrieved, I really think he’s a great back row, but unfortunately for him Ulster are going through a terrible run lately and he’s not shining through, and in all likelihood it’s equally a kick up his backside as it is a casting the net wider to get a closer look at another quality option.

    I suppose what’s on everybody’s mind is that there will be very few opportunities to get noticed before the RWC squad gets selected, and the door will almost certainly close to anyone that hasn’t already been in an Irish training camp after the 6 nations, barring injuries.

    Hodnett’s time will come if he can keep his current level going strong for another season or two.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,145 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    As I pointed out to you earlier, there was a decade where Ireland was incredibly dependent on Munster and they were head and shoulders above the other 3.

    The world didn't burn down and all the other provinces got their houses in order and have improved greatly since then.

    Munster had a barren few years, potentially in part due to holding on too long to what gave them success during that period, but they're getting more good young players through now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,145 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    How many games has Hodnett started in Europe when POM, Coombes and JOD were all available? Hint - it isn't an impressive number



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof



    I don't think anyone is saying this specific selection is damaging to Irish rugby. But it's hard to argue it's not a growing trend.

    It's impossible to know what implications that may have, but I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest this could be damaging in the medium-to-long term.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    That's also a function of how many times they were all available at the same time. Hint. That also isn't an impressive number either.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,166 ✭✭✭✭Zzippy


    Mod: I've just read the last few pages of this thread, and the tone of discussion really needs to change. Posters are allowed to question selection decisions without accusations of provincial bias. Derogatory put-downs, arrogance and such remarks have gone unchecked with some posters who really should know better at this stage.

    For the foreseeable, a zero tolerance policy will be reintroduced. Don't complain if you are warned, thread banned, or banned. Fair warning. Be nice people.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,145 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    So the core of argument on minutes is based on the pure luck of the players ahead of him being unavailable for european games



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    I’m not saying it’s provincial, I’m just saying it’s because he’s from Leinster and went to private school.

    Can you not see yet hypocrisy of your position on this?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22


    I think you make good points. Within Leinster there are also imbalances, which partly relates to the hype machine around certain players in the big schools. JVDF, from unfashionable Wesley, was very much seen as second/third best when Dan Leavy emerged (who to be fair did have one good season) as well as Max Deegan - both from Michael’s.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,987 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    attempt to shut down and dismiss the discussion

    It's an attempt to discuss the discussion!

    This all kicked off with a poster talking about Coombes' ongoing form and "what more can he do" to get selected ahead of Conan.

    In this scenario, when you have Player A apparently shooting the lights out for his province and not getting selected for his country, then is it not at all plausible that the coaches have seen something at training or wherever that is swinging it for Player B, even if his provincial form is less eye-catching?

    Like, we heard the same questions about Baloucoune, what more can he do, he's been in squads for ages, face doesn't fit etc etc. Then, from the man himself last October;

    "That was a big reason why I was on this tour. I’ve just listened to what the coaches want from me, trying to get off my wing more and bring that into matches and training as much as possible

    The biggest point [from the coaches] is just trying to get more involvements"

    and then he's starting against South Africa a few weeks later. The guy is living proof that simply being picked for Ireland squad and turning up to camp isn't evidence that you're the finished article and you're still going to get work-ons - and that if you can do it, you'll be rewarded.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I complained lots about certain selections going the way of Munster at the time though.

    Again, supporting the Irish team is an emotional decision and investment - and that is just from a supporter's point of view. You definitely don't want players becoming disillusioned.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,240 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    you absolutely missed the point of my post so if thats what you think



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,145 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    They absolutely are saying this selection is damaging, especially because they are using it as evidence towards 'a trend' that is only real when people put their blinkers on and ignore when the shoe is on the other foot when it comes to camp, first team selections, and even central contracts.

    I agree it is impossible to know what the implications are regarding selections, however I completely disagree to suggest that we're heading towards some doomsday scenario for Irish rugby. It didn't happen when the Irish starting team was mostly Munster players, it isnt going to happen now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,145 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Absolutely - I did as well.

    I however don't remember many (any really) claiming they were becoming disillusioned with the Irish team when it was winning because of the provincial jerseys the players were wearing and that the selections were going to be disastrous to Ireland in the medium to long term. This is a whole new talking point, a very toxic and damaging one in my opinion.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Well, you don't remember it cause we weren't winning! And its an interesting thought experiment as to whether I would have felt differently in that scenario.

    However, there is a perfectly reasonable academic point to be made that over-reliance on one province is in fact going to be damaging in the medium to long term if it results in player leaving the other 3 provinces and a backlog developing in Leinster. Every single selection decision made can be correct in its own right and this can still be true.



Advertisement