Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1263326342636263826393691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    In my view, the 'ordinary Russian' is somewhat of an irrelevant factor in this war - they have clearly demonstrated that they are willing to line up behind whatever fresh lunacy their government instigates, up to and including sending their men off to die by the thousand for a lie. They're not going to end the war, they're not going to topple Putin.

    Yes, they are repressed and yes they fear their state (with good reason) but they are not going to do anything decisive. So who knows what they think in the privacy of their inner minds, they are irrelevant in terms of stopping the war.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,595 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Its a bit difficult to organise mass protests when a single person holding a blank piece of paper is bundled into an unmarked truck to be taken god knows where. Multiple people, one after the other, were arrested for laying flowers at a memorial.

    Its like asking why Chileans didn't "just" overthrow the clearly unpopular Pinochet.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    JM, I read somewhere one needs permission to visit certain zones that are on the international border. Is this true? Ivangorod in Leningrad Oblast across the river from Narva in Estonia springs to mind.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Or to go even further, why 'ordinary Germans' didn't rise up against Hitler.

    Like I say, ordinary Russians are an irrelevance when it comes to factors that could end this war. It's very hard to see any scenario where there is some kind of Russian Arab Spring.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,439 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Do you think that they will be able to change Xi Jinping any time soon?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    They were protesting against covid restrictions, not a change of power.

    They were not afraid to protest. Same for Iran. If Russians, Chinese and Iranians all face similar punishment (Iranians far far more), but only the Chinese and Iranians choose to start mass protests, what does that make Russians? Easy to surmise the vast majority just don't care beyond their borders.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,439 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Given Putins military mobilisation plans, I'd say Yes, Russians will need permission to leave. I think I remember hearing / reading that the Kremlin was putting recruiters and FSB people on their external borders. Too many escaped last time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 767 ✭✭✭technocrat


    That’s not the point here.

    The protests worked as in they effected change at the top of government by forcing a policy change on Covid.

    I don’t think mass protests in Russia would necessarily get rid of Putin but they could change the outcome of the war for the better.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,881 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Not trying to manipulate anything...and my sympathy level for Russians at home and abroad is very low (honest!). I don't agree with that whole "orcs"/dehumaisation thing as applied to all Russians, but I think Russia + Putin-era Russians as a whole bear some collective responsibility + shame for this war analagous to the Nazi-era Germans.

    edit: It is a fair point re Iranians in Europe protesting.

    I know close family at home living under the regime is something that would give me, anon coward, pause, not when it would come to attending a large protest with 100s of k others but being a key organiser or central figure, sending letters to papers etc.

    Unfortunately the anti-Putin forces in Russia and outside in emigrant communities were alot weaker before this war I think than those against the mullahs in Iran. There's little base to build off there now when badly needed.

    I would not be certain, but would also think Russia's ability to identity and gather info on any organisers of protests or movements etc. in Europe and possibly go for them directly rather than just their family is probably greater than that of Iran.

    The UK is a country with alot of Iranian "ex pats" and seems like it is quite penetrated, and that regime is now able to pose a credible threat directly to these organisers themselves. e.g. below concerning dissident Iranian journalists operating in UK

    The toll of attempted assassinations and abductions was made public hours after a London-based Iranian broadcaster announced it had moved operations to the US after mounting safety concerns against its journalists from Tehran.

    Acting on advice from the Metropolitan police, Iran International TV “reluctantly” closed its London studios after state-backed threats meant it was no longer possible to protect the channel’s staff and the surrounding public.



  • Registered Users Posts: 728 ✭✭✭20Wheel


    Well the (initial) plan was/is to change those minds, by fcking up their economy, so badly that they eventually wake up and associate that azhole leader with gradual personal impoverishment and suffering, and increased chaos.

    Its a difficult play. To fck up the average Russians life in such a way that theyll finally pick up their own personal pitchfork from their shed, rather than a state issued kalashnikov from a barracks.

    The idea is to have Vlad fall out of a window one night, while we also get to avoid having a massive war.

    Thats why economic sanctions are the key weapon, even though the nerdlingers and armchair lieutenants like to deride them as the old 'strongly worded letter' trope.

    Post edited by 20Wheel on

    Putin is a dictator. Putin should face justice at the Hague. All good Russians should work to depose Putin. Russias war in Ukraine is illegal and morally wrong.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,506 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Watching the 1420 channel on YouTube, I get the impression that at least 60% of the population support Putin and the war. Most opposition comes from young people, particularly in more westernised cities like Moscow and Saint Petersburg. But as you say, this supposed 'opposition' is absolutely useless in the context of a country where there are virtually no anti-government street protests, no underground anti-regime movement, no anything. They think it's their lot to go along with everything the dictator says or does.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Unfortunately it looks like the thing most likely to end the war is 'military defeat' rather than 'popular uprising'.

    Anyone hoping for the latter, based on history to date, could charitably be described as optimistic. Maybe that will change over time and we may have a new Russian Revolution, although I wouldn't bet on it personally.

    Even if you did have an uprising, there is no obvious alternative. The most likely replacement would be someone from the same power vertical that Putin has constructed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,034 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Spain to send only 6 Leopard 2A4s, of more than 100 they have. They have over 200 newer Leopard 2A6s, of which they are sending none.

    Finland are to send just 3 out of their 200 Leopards 2s

    Either their stocks of tanks are in much worse condition than previously thought, or they dont really want Ukraine to win

    Post edited by timmyntc on


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,040 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Every society in this situation, even ordinary Russians, have their tipping point.

    Clearly the Kremlin consider as carefully as they can, how they can prosecute this war, without pushing their citizens into revolt.

    'The West' and concerned ex pat Russian and internal Russian citizens can do their bit, by sharing the harsh realities of this conflict.

    With a view to either complete withdrawal from Ukraine or revolt.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,339 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69




  • Registered Users Posts: 728 ✭✭✭20Wheel


    There is an underground. B.O.A.K is their name/acronym/whatever (iirc). So at least 1 group.

    I posted a video about them a few pages back.

    Putin is a dictator. Putin should face justice at the Hague. All good Russians should work to depose Putin. Russias war in Ukraine is illegal and morally wrong.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,034 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The plot thickens on ammo shortages

    The RU army in Ugledar have no shortages, just excuses from the incompetent in charge

    As for Wagner claims of ammo shortages, it seems likely that was just Prigozhin trolling again. You would wonder why would they expose themselves as having ammo shortages in Bakhmut area - perfect opportunity for Ukraine to counterattack them.

    And yet in the last 24 hrs they have actually made further gains in and around bakhmut, particularly in the NW side near Berkhovka, as well as reclaiming some lost ground in South Bakhmut near Opytne




  • Registered Users Posts: 728 ✭✭✭20Wheel


    Just takes 1 well placed bullet.

    His power base aside, there must be 100s of thousands of people fcking furious with him. Each one is a chance.

    Ides of March situation hopefully.

    As with Goodfellas, on the surface everything seemed fine.

    Putin is a dictator. Putin should face justice at the Hague. All good Russians should work to depose Putin. Russias war in Ukraine is illegal and morally wrong.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,595 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917 were in no small part due to military failures themselves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The F-16 is not inherently difficult to fly.

    The F-16 is relatively easy to operate safely, so it’s not too high a barrier to cross for the Ukrainian Air Force. An F-16 pilot told The War Zone: “In a matter of months it’s possible for a non-familiar aviator to be reasonably safe in a jet like the F-16. The systems are easy to operate, the jet is easy to fly, and it’s very intuitive to learn. The Viper is an easy transition for an experienced fighter pilot from a pure flying perspective, no matter what type they are coming from.” https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/this-is-how-long-it-would-really-take-ukraines-pilots-to-convert-to-f-16s

    That link contains the considered opinion of an F-16 instructor that it would take 69 days to train experienced Ukrainian pilots to fly and operate an F-16.

    AMRAAMS have been in service in Ukraine for months now, so that one didn't even get airborne:

    Ukraine has already received Kongsberg-Raytheon National Advanced Surface-to-Air System (NASAMS) air defense systems, which are armed with AMRAAMs.

    The F-16s main drawback in terms of being operated by Ukraine is it’s undercarriage is not a good fit for their soviet era runways.

    It has even been stated that Ukraine is already working to upgrade certain airfields to accommodate the less hardy Western fighter types in anticipation of getting some.

    However, there is a solution to this - F-18s - Australia has some that have recently been retired. Though the F-18 is a navalised aircraft intended for carrier based operations, Australia operated them purely on land and from excellent airfields, so they never suffered the corrosion their US counterparts did and their ruggedised landing gear were babied by comparison. They stopped the scheduled maintenance procedure of replacing the central fuselage, as ordained from US experience, because no corrosion was found.

    Valerii Romanenko, an aviation expert and senior researcher at the State Aviation Museum, says that Ukrainian runways are made of slabs with gaps between them, and F-18s have stronger landing gear than F-15s and F-16s

    He expressed his opinion on Espreso TV.

    “The main technical problem for which the American partners do not supply us with their aircraft is known. It consists in the fact that their F-15 and F-16 will not be able to operate from our airfields. Because our runways are made of slabs with gaps between them, and the landing gear of these warplanes just can't handle it. In my opinion, we need to do short-term planning and we should ask our allies to provide the F-18, because this aircraft has a much stronger chassis and it would be able to operate from our airfields, without their reconstruction,” the aviation expert noted.

    Valerii Romanenko added that Ukrainians will not be able to asphalt the lanes and remodel the airfields during the war.

    https://global.espreso.tv/f-18-aircraft-can-operate-from-ukrainian-airfields-without-their-reconstruction-aviation-expert-romanenko

    Your opinion that Ukraine should not receive western fighters is not shared by many experienced military people.

    Do you think Zelensky, Zuluzhnyi, Reznikov and all the other Ukrainians calling for western fighters are idiots? That they are naive and don't know what's needed to fight a war with Russia?

    General Ben Hodges ret. doesn't agree with you:

    Would anyone argue that Ukraine would be better off without the Mig-29s and Su-27s it currently have? Obviously not, so arguing against having more and better is equally ridiculous. The west have vast resources and training Ukrainian pilots and technicians isn't hard, it's incredibly routine, given there's a war going on, you extract the digit and accelerate the process.

    How about a former NATO commander in Europe?

    https://ukranews.com/en/news/908393-west-should-hand-over-combat-aircraft-to-ukraine-ex-nato-commander

    The West should provide Ukraine with MiG-29 and F-16 fighter jets.

    James G. Stavridis, former commander-in-chief of NATO forces in Europe, said this on ZDF.

    "I believe that Ukraine needs combat aircraft," Stavridis said.

    In particular, he advocates the provision of Polish MiG-29 and American F-16 fighter jets to Kyiv.

    According to Stavridis, MiG-29s can be delivered directly, and the Ukrainians know how to operate them. As for the second type of aircraft, this scheme will take more time, but Ukrainian pilots could quickly learn to fly the F-16: "It is a relatively simple aircraft that is easy to master."

    He's a former Admiral.

    The current Supreme commander of NATO in Europe, General Christopher G. Cavoli, says the same thing:

    So basically, your views are not widely held by millitary experts.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,858 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    That is if the person who takes his place is not worse or there isn't a cabal of like minded people. Then 1 bullet ain't enough. 99.9999% of the time it is never that easy



  • Registered Users Posts: 35,961 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Why isn't the US, Ukraine and NATO trying to make a deal with Russia? That they'll allow them to retreat and leave peacefully, and sign an agreement never to attack Russia, which shouldn't be difficult considering no one on the planet wants anything to do with that shi t hole.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    I like the Goodfellas analogy given the Mafia state that Russia is!

    My own take is:

    1. An assassination of Putin doesn't seem very likely
    2. Even if it happened, the most likely replacement is Putin v2.0 (there is no clear alternative)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Very true.

    But where I think the analogy falls down somewhat is that in 1917 there was no shortage of putative alternatives to the Tsar (Social Revolutionaries, Bolsheviks, Mensheviks etc). As we all know, the Bolsheviks ended up winning that particular power struggle.

    Today, there is nothing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41 DrivingMrDaisy




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    That has always been on the table. Russia has no interest in that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,375 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    They already have lots of such deals... Helsinki Accords, Budapest Agreement, NATO-Russia Founding Act, Minsk... Russia just breaks them whenever they want.

    They've shown they only respond to military force which is why Ukraine is responding as it is.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 35,961 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    But Putin keeps pushing the narrative that the West is out to destroy Russian, planning to attack, why not call that bluff and make it public that the West want to do a deal, never to attack Russia. Wht could Putin possible say then, he'd have no more lies to spin.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,445 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    If they are that worried they can wear a mask/ cover their face?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 29,375 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    He'll just invent a new lie.

    Russia has already re-deployed the bulk of its ground forces previously stationed on NATO borders to Ukraine. It obviously would not do that if it thought NATO was going to invade.

    Anyone paying attention already knows it is BS.

    Anyone already fooled will just get fooled by the next lie.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement