Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Italy V Ireland Match thread

15791011

Comments

  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Oh fcuk!!!

    Pardon :D



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Thankfully Italy games are no longer a foregone conclusion.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,512 ✭✭✭Dick phelan


    Positives are we scored 5 tries could easily have been 6. We gifted them a try so again from real play held them to 1. O Toole did well when he came on.. Very sloppy at times bad decision making. Doris should be at 8. Ringrose is vital. Casey didn't provide enough quality ball firmly 3rd behind Murray and Gibson Park.

    Who should be back for the Scotland game? Don't think we'd beat them playing like that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 151 ✭✭VeryOwl


    Good win given how inspired Italy are, but Byrne and McCloskey looked very slow to my eyes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,947 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Hansen 🤪😅😂



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Who is the back up to Sexton now? Can't be Byrne he is ponderous, missed kicks , just shoveled out passes. Carbery not answer either. Crowely not playing 10 for Munster .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭Tileman


    Great to see Italy being really competitive. Ireland were not as clinical as they need to be. They don’t seem to be able to finish well enough. Lowe on that last one should have finished . Those 7 points could be the difference in a championship at the end.


    I could see Italy beat wales.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,302 ✭✭✭All_in_Flynn


    He's fine in attack but he's not quick enough to get on the outside defensively. I'd be very nervous with him there against any top 5 side. To be fair, he's probably struggling for match fitness and he will be better for that game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,639 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Thought he was very passive, sat deep and mostly just shovelled to the next man. Worryingly he looked extremely unathletic in defence. I’m not sure he’s offered anything that Carbury wasn’t previously. Carbury also covers more positions and is a far superior athlete.



  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭Ragwort and Stones


    Definitely not Carvery, he must be a friend of Bundee's😛



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 740 ✭✭✭phily2002


    Comfy enough win in the end. Italy played well but you never felt we were losing that. We struggled defensively out wide, Ringrose was badly missed. 15 points out of 15 points, role on Scotland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    Adamson needs every bit of help he can get though. At the end there he even lost sight of where the ball was in the ruck.


    Farrell said before the game that this being game 3 he expected their best performance to date in the tournament. What he got was far from that. Not sure if the break next week will help or hinder them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,081 ✭✭✭blackcard


    Thought Casey was poor, a number of passes at head height and poor kicks. Ireland got nowhere with their maul and struggled in the Italian 22. Gave away too many penalties. Doris late on, Murray and Baird made a difference. Murrayfield will be nervy particularly if we have any more injuries.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Lowe should of been MOTM



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    I'd agree that Carberry has more class but he is also made of glass. Imagine Carberry as first choice in a WC - he'd be gone by Game 2.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,300 ✭✭✭tanko


    Scotlands backs will rip that Irish back line to shreds if they play like that again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Baird and O'Mahony and Murray really helped but Italy were a very tired side at that point. We are a fitter team.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭naughtyboy


    Conan is not the same since the lions, looks to have lost pace and power.

    Byrne lacks the pass and the pace to start a game

    Baird looked very good when on, pom showed why he always starts

    Farrell will not sleep well tonight, Ross Byrne was so poor and crowley is green

    For me it's frawley or carberry



  • Registered Users Posts: 481 ✭✭CptMonkey


    Byrne didn't inspire confidence in that match. Maybe playing with Murray might have helped. Looked a bit out of his depth. Not sure what we will do at 10.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    We were poor enough there, but always felt we were going to win the game.

    There comes a point where you can only lose so many first line players out of your squad without seeing performances suffer.

    We saw even more evidence today of how world class Garry Ringrose is when he wasn't on the pitch than we did in his first two (excellent) performances.

    Bundee is 100% not able to defend at thirteen at this level. He might have made 10+ bad reads today where he left the back three in no mans land and gave up line breaks. He was at the centre of a lot of the good stuff we did in attack, but was appalling in defence.

    Ross Byrne was pretty good to me - he showed some really nice touches in attack. People having a go at him for missing two touchline conversions need to cop themselves on.

    To me, Craig Casey had a poor outing. It's so frustrating because I feel he is excellent coming off the bench to inject tempo for Ireland, but he really lacked composure today for me when we needed him. The difference was evident to me when Murray came in and closed out the game.

    TBF to the people calling for Jack Conan to be out, I'm in that camp after today's performance. He was poor today. Doris wasn't as visible and effective and we weren't getting as much ball in his hands at 6, so to me, the coaches got that decision wrong.

    Bench brought good impact - especially POM, Murray and Ryan Baird, who had two massive moments.

    Good outing for Tom O'Toole who showed well. Really hope Bealham's injury isn't as bad as it looked.

    Josh van der Flier would have been my MotM. His work ethic today was just incredible again, and he had some massive moments for us.

    We'll need to be a lot better than we were today to get a win in Murrayfield.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    I have consistently argued that Casey is not a test quality SH. He is thoroughly likeable because he is small, honest and tenacious. But he seldom delivers.

    He has potential to be Irelands starting 9 but he is not there yet. Murray is still a much, much better option ( behind Park).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    I agree. That said I'm glad Casey got his shot. He is stylistically more similar to JGP than Murray so I thought it was worth giving him the start.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    I'd rate that as a largely positive outing for us.

    I say outing because the performance was around 6 or 7 out of 10, and that was largely down to Italy.

    They will now give us as tough a game as Wales and possibly even Scotland.

    Their intensity, strike running, power in defense, were all fantastic. They are a proper side.

    A proper side against which we could test a 9,10,12,13 combo of Casey, Byrne, McCloskey and Bundee.

    We showed creaks on both sides of the ball, but seeing how good Italy were, that's not the end of the world.

    If Italy keep doing what they're doing, and grow in confidence and composure in the red zone, Rome will no longer be a holiday in the 6N for anyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    You'd hope that a backrow of Ritchie, Watson and Fagerson wouldn't be as aggressive as the Italians today. Their locks were immense as well. Gilchrist and Gray (either of them) just flop on rucks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 740 ✭✭✭phily2002


    A lot of people saying Conan was poor. He had the most carries out of the forwards when he went off. His rucking was solid, he a couple of big ones to prevent turnovers. He'd a great double tackle after a break. He smashed their 9 with a good block down.

    I didnt think he shot the lights out but he definitely wasn't poor.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Italy will beat both Scotland and Wales



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    We will need 3 out halfs at the WC. Sexton, Byrne and Carberry (if fit).

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,369 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    They stood out a mile today as a tick below.

    Byrne didn't have the courage in the second half to actually get to the line as he would normally do.

    Ringrose also an enormous loss in terms of defensive discipline.



  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 8,142 ✭✭✭fitz


    Agree with this. The POM/Doris/VDF backrow is clearly the most effective in terms of how we playing. Conan didn't do anything today to advance good case to start instead of any of them.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I dunno, to me there's something confused and not cohesive to how our back row works with him at 8 and Doris at 6. He showed up for a good few carries, but wasn't that effective with those carries. I don't think he did enough for me, to justify not having a look to see if Coombes or Baird can offer more off the bench.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Can we agree now that Aki shouldn't play 13? He's absolutely at sea in defense, dog leg after dog leg. Doing no favors to his wingers and Lowe needs all the help he can get. Real missed opportunity by Farrell to not play Osbourne or JOB.

    Our backs were pretty slow, Ringrose and Keenan are the only 2 with some decent gas in their positions. Be nice if Balacoune could sort his form out ahead of the WC.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,818 ✭✭✭Eoinbmw


    We are blowing too much smoke up Scotland arse France will expose them tomorrow!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    We must have the slowest back line in world rugby.

    Also, you could make the argument that our 9-10-12-13 combo today is about as unathletic as any we've fielded in the past 20 years. Each one of them have at least one clear athletic deficiency.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 532 ✭✭✭wittycynic


    Good to see us dig in and find scores at important moments to close out a really difficult match.

    Positive also that the bench made a positive difference but there are some worrying issues coming out of it.

    Can't really understand positive views of Byrne coming out of that came. Sure he didn't make any glaring errors but he was ponderous and did little to unlock the Italian defence. Kicking was also iffy. A very decent club player, but it shouldn't be surprising that a guy who will be 28 in a few weeks, and who has never looked like a top international up until now, is unlikely to become one at this stage in his career. Its a real problem area for Ireland because if he's our starting 10 against quality opposition we are unlikely to play well. Really hard to imagine Byrne is our best option here.

    Aki really wasn't great defensively in the 13 channel and Conan was largely anonymous. Must be difficult for Coombes to look at that backrow performance and still not get a look in, despite his form.



  • Registered Users Posts: 196 ✭✭Lil Fred


    Billy Burns or Carty might get another shot. Perhaps Ian Madigan should be tried again?



  • Administrators Posts: 54,168 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Doris is just too good at 8 to move and Conan is not good enough at 8 to justify moving him.

    I think today made clear that POM, VDF, Doris is Irelands best trio.

    Conan either competes with POM for 6 or he sits on the bench.



  • Registered Users Posts: 196 ✭✭Lil Fred


    He was hopeless. Beyond poor and will be out of the 23 v Scotch



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Did little to unlock Italian defence?

    His passing and decision making was centrally involved in two of our tries (and two of the tries where a player spilled it in grounding), and numerous other good moments in attack. We scored five tries, and on three other occasions we spilled a ball within 5m of the attacking line. We put 34 points on the board. He had a good game, made a lot of good reads in attack and distributed well.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,330 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    We could pick Larmour and Baloucoune on the wings and we'd have loads of pace but the trade off in footballing ability would be considerable.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No, I get that, I'm not saying I'd change it, just remarking on the fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 740 ✭✭✭phily2002




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭ersatz


    There was a period in the second half before he went off where we looked very rudderless in the Italian half. We ended up coming away with nothing after a multiphase headless period with no ideas and no leadership in attack. The difference in the very same situation with murray and Crowley ten minutes later was night and day. Otherwise I thought Byrne was ok but that period said a lot, Italy on the rack and no idea how to take advantage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,316 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Lowe and Hansen are a bit loose in how they play, but they add so much to our attack with their ability to act as secondary playmakers. Much like POM/VDF/Doris is our nailed on backrow, Lowe/Hansen/Keenan is the nailed on back three.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,275 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    We are a tough crowd to please. The pack did well today, including Conan who got through a mountain of work, along with Ryan, Doris, and Hendo. We got burned on the outside a couple of times today but when you're missing Ringrose and Hemshaw at 13 it's going to be tough. Aki looked rusty in defense and I think Italy targeted him excellently today.

    Hansen and Lowe did their bits and looked very dangerous in attack.

    Casey took the wrong option on a number of occasions but he's still learning at this level.

    Byrne was solid today. Created some lovely tries today and unlocked the Italian defense a number of times. Folks giving out about his kicking don't seem to realize that he was clearly instructed to keep the ball infield with the majority of his kick. One area he was poor were his up and unders. Thought they lacked a bit of hangtime and placement.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No, to me, that sequence you're describing was the exact sequence where I thought Casey was at his poorest. He made a poor decision twice in terms of what direction to attack, and killed our momentum. He got hauled off immediately afterwards. Casey did the same in the first half when he panicked on a penalty advantage and threw a sloppy attempted double skip out wide on the wing that didn't get there. It's not on Ross Byrne if the ball isn't even really getting to him a whole lot in that position.

    He did unpick their defence multiple times today, including for the Bundee try in the corner that was ruled out by the knock on.

    I don't know what situation you're describing where we looked much better with Crowley, as he was only on the field for the last 3 minutes. Byrne was still on the field when we scored our last try (and that was all Murray and Doris' work).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,752 ✭✭✭degsie




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    Yeah, you can't laud a player at 8 for carries in the tight or "smashing the 9". Every big carry he showed up for he got driven backwards.

    Time for Coombes to take the bench.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 284 ✭✭Munsterbhoy


    I'm glad Casey + Byrne started even though they both were a mixed bag. Giving them big game experience is exactly what was needed especially Casey. They may potentially start a WC q/f or even a s/f they way our half of the draw is.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement