Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Italy V Ireland Match thread

1567911

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Yea, there is inaccurate and then there is ‘should be caught’. Its not a clear delineation.

    So yea not accurate but there can be 10/15 passes like that in a game conservatively. They need to be caught. Its as simple as that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,330 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Lowe should have caught it, but it was still a bad pass.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The question was: It looked a decent pass but was it all Lowe's fault for dropping it?

    And it patently wasn't all Lowe's fault. It's primarily Casey's fault. There are times where inaccurate passing from a scrum half is more costly than others, and this is a classic one of those.

    When you're making those clearance kicks you're not bursting onto a ball at speed, you're standing static, and you are super conscious of the rush defence trying to block the kick, so you're focused on getting boot to ball asap. That pass can't be one you're reaching for because it doesn't have enough on it.

    Even if Lowe had held it, because of the position he was in, he wouldn't have been in a good position to get a good strike on the ball too because of the poor quality of the pass.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Lol, primarily his fault? If lowe normally dropped balls that would hit him on his knees they would drop him.

    This is complete nonsense lol.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    It wasn’t at his knees though, or anywhere near.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Lol - yeah, if a scrum half can't hit the kicker in his hands with a simple pass like that, then it's the scrum half's fault. Lowe drops the pass because he isn't expecting to have to crouch down and reach for it. Lol.

    This isn't constructive engagement - it's just you bashing a Leinster player again with your own opinions and nothing more than that, but throwing in a lol comment at the end of it, so good luck to you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Are you even listening to yourself here. There are tons of passes in EVERY game that come nowhere near to hitting the receiver in their hands. Nowhere near. You have to catch them. Its literally as simple as that .

    I’m not ‘bashing’ Lowe. He should have caught it. He’s still an excellent player.

    You would defend anything a leinster player does in any situation so you perceive any criticism as a massive insult. That’s fine but don’t tell me that its not on guys to catch imperfect passes just cos they wear blue. Such a homer god damn.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I absolutely do not defend Leinster players at any point - and that's a bullshit statement. Literally in my synopsis of the game, I was critical of Jack Conan's performance.

    I just find it surprising that Ross Byrne is the half back coming in for consistent criticism here today after a fairly solid outing, when it was his half back partner who had the much poorer outing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    I would say your standards for 9 play are higher than mine, then. And leave it at that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,316 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Would like to know where the hyperbole about Ross Byrne was over the last few weeks?



  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    What kind of nonsense is this?

    What has Casey done to warrant such an attitude?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    It’s not ‘attitude’ its putting width on the ball. Sexton gets to tell the 9 what to do basically all the time because hes a legend. Usually the 9 has the latitude to skip the 10 sometimes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Yeah that was it, I thought the pass died badly. He still should have caught it.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,639 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    I think you are being very generous. For the disallowed Lowe try he does a pop pass to Aki who then frees Doris to break the line, there are two more passes to get the ball to Lowe. For the Ryan try he doesn’t touch the ball at all in the phase and it’s Aki again whos pass sets Lowe free to set up the try. His best attacking involvement is in the Keenan try where does a lovely backdoor pass to Hansen who reacts brilliantly to put Aki free. The two involvements for the Aki try are pretty straightforward, the first is a simple ship pass to Henderson that actually puts him on the back foot but Henderson reacts brilliantly with a quick offload to Kelleher to get go forward ball. On the next phase Ryan is the first receiver and he gives a nice backdoor pass to Byrne who follows up with another backdoor pass to McCloskey who gives a flat pass to VDF to set up the try. For the Hansen try Byrne again has no involvement. For the disallowed Aki try you mentioned he was instrumental in, his first involvement is to be second receiver off another nice backdoor pass from Ryan, he then pops a pass to Henderson who is tackled. On the second phase he is first receiver and gives a nice short pass to Hansen who is unmarked and he puts Aki free. For the second Hansen try he isn’t involved in the final phase. His primary role in attack was to give simple pop passes to players outside him, occasionally he gave backdoor passes, he didn’t give a single offload. I can only think of one occasion where he gave a pass that ended up breaking the line and that was to Hansen, who was unmarked, for the disallowed Aki try. I’m not sure you could say he unpicked the Italy defence, Aki was the key man in most of the line breaks with Lowe, Hansen, Murray and McCoskey each popping up to make the crucial pass at different times.

    Defensively he was poor. For the first Italy try he is caught in two minds covering the backfield and makes the wrong read and ends up unnecessarily doubling up on a tackle with Keenan which leaves a gap for Italy to score in the next phase. For Italys second try it’s a mix up between Aki and Byrne that causes the intercept, Aki throws a no look pass so is primarily to blame but Byrne looks a step behind where he should be on a pre planned move. Byrne missed a tackle on the Menoncello break where he got absolutely burned which leads to Italy making 20 metres off the carry and a kick which puts Casey under pressure and gives Italy 3 points. He ended with six tackles made and two missed.

    I’d say this game illustrated why he was left out in the cold for so long. Offensively Byrne takes very few risks and relies heavily on players outside him to make the key pass to create a linebreak. He is extremely limited athletically at this level and offers absolutely no running threat. Defensively he is a minus. Carbury is as good a facilitator as Byrne but offers a far superior running and offload threat and is a better defender. Crowley will make far more errors with ball in hand than Byrne but will also make things happen himself, and we’ll as being a far superior athlete and defender.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Carberry is a better defender than Byrne? That’s one of the oddest takes I’ve ever seen. Carberry is a turnstile, whose weakest aspect of his game is defence. Outside of Sexton Byrne is the best defensive 10 in the country.


    I’d say this game illustrated why he was left out in the cold for so long..

    If this is the case, it’s very strange that the management choose to leave him on the field for 78 minutes.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,735 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I’d agree with a lot of that, but I think being poor defensively was atypical of Byrne tbh.

    And I definitely think he’s a better defender than Carbery.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nah, I think you're the one being overly harsh in how you characterise some of his involvements here. It depends on how you define unpick a defence, but clearly his passes in the disallowed Aki try and the Keenan try were the very definition of this.

    For the disallowed Lowe try - from when Ireland get possession he has 2 good involvements - one choosing to sweep to the narrow side which stretches the Italian defence to that side, and the second a good pass to Aki out the back which releases him into space.

    For the Keenan try he is taking the ball at pace, carries it beyond the line of the lineout (past the gainline), sits down Garbisi and plays a lovely pass to Hansen, then takes the hit just as he releases it. Hansen's pass to Aki is excellent, but both of these passes together are the definition of unlocking the defence.

    He had a good level of involvement in the Aki try, two possessions in the space of a few phases, and picked the right option in each case.

    For the disallowed Aki one - he has three good involvements, including his first pass to Hansen where he clearly commits the defender before releasing Hansen. His second pass to Hansen, the one you're fairly uncharitably describing as a pass to an unmarked Hansen, is another situation where he's making a decision to attack the blindside at pace, and he commits one Italian defender and then plays a really nice pass across the face of another Italian to Hansen, so has taken two defenders out on that attack, leaving Hansen with a relatively simple 2 v 1 which Bundee spills on the deck. Once again, it's a fairly textbook example of unlocking a defence.

    No one is disputing his athletic limitations, but if we were looking for an athlete at 10 we'd put Robert Baloucoune or Aaron Sexton in there. He got burned on the outside by Menoncello, but that's going to happen. Menoncello is an exceptionally quick winger.

    Italy made 8 clean breaks today, and Ireland's overall tackle success rate was a fairly risible 83% (versus 88% on average in 2022). Lots of players missed tackles. Byrne's 75% tackle success rate was far from the worst out there today (that would be Craig Casey at 40%). He's not a minus defender, in fact I would argue he is probably Ireland's best defensive 10 apart from JS. Claiming Joey Carbery is a better defender than Ross Byrne is an utter joke. Clearly Jack Crowley is a better athlete than Ross Byrne, but he's not a better 10 yet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    I think frawley and crowley are better honestly. Athleticism is a component to defense and both those guys could legitimately be 12s. I’ve been really impressed by both of them defensively. In fact, id say they are both more advanced on that side of the ball.

    However, defense isn’t really a selection criteria at 10 unless its disasterous.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    I have serious questions over Frawleys defence. He tackles too high and has been injured several time because of it. Big guy and physically has no problems there but needs to work on his technique. Crowley looks really good there and is certainly brave but we have seen very little of him at 10.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Of all the question marks about Ross Byrne (and I don't think anyone thinks he's a world beater at 10 here), his defence isn't one of them.

    His tackle success ratio in the URC this year, across an 11 game sample, is c. 87% (53 made, 8 missed). That's the definition of solid.

    Joey Carbery, by contrast, is at 73% (43 made, 16 missed). From a smaller sample size, he's missed twice as many tackles. And, even when he makes tackles, he's a less impactful defender and tends to make soak tackles which give up the gainline. This shouldn't be surprising to anyone who has seen both players, as Carbery is noticeably slight, and a fairly renowned poor defender.



  • Registered Users Posts: 403 ✭✭Tommybojangles




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,639 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    I do think you are being very charitable in your description of the passes! For the Lowe try I don’t think that Byrne released Aki into space, he gave a simple short pass to Aki who was 5 metres behind the gainline. Aki then took the ball to the line and released VDF in contact. Did Byrne play a role in a well worked backline move? Yes. Would I expect any international front row forward to be able to make that same pass? Yes. Most of the examples of him unpicking the Italian defense you gave are mundane functional attacking contributions. In what was an open game at times it’s a pretty underwhelming highlight real.

    Athletically you don’t need a wingers pace at 10 but it’s nice when you can offer some running threat.

    I think he was poor defensively today and had a role in 17 of Italys points via missed tackles, poor decisions and a misread. He may be a better defender in the URC but International is a big step up and it’s always extra difficult if you have a gap athletically. He was one missed tackle vs three made against France as well.

    I think dropping Carbury has been a bit of a strange move by Farrell and based on today I hope it’s one he reverses for the World Cup. I don’t really see anything that Byrne offers at this level that Carbury doesn’t. I think the debate should be between Crowley and Byrne. Like you say Byrne may be the better out and out 10 atm but Crowley covers 12 and 15 very well and can change a game coming off a bench, rather than manage it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Can you tell me what players stepped out of the line and missed tackles today? They were responsible for a lot if Italy's points leaving a gaping hole in the line which the Italians exploited every time that happened.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I can't remember the last time our attack functioned as well as it did today without Sexton at 10. Byrne deserves credit for that. I think he did a very solid job, and I've been a big skeptic of his for a while. Some of his involvements in the attacks might not look significant, but they were. He took the ball flat, fixed defenders and picked the right passes. He played a big role in unlocking the Italian defence on multiple occasions. He's had a lot of media coverage over the last couple of weeks and I suspect lot of people had already decided they were going to lay into him before the match even began.

    I thought it was a really good win personally. Italy played miles better than they did against France, we were missing/rested 8 first choice players and we beat them by 14 points in Rome, having been seriously under the cosh at one stage. Lots to work on of course, but I was really pleased with that match. That was the best Italian performance I've seen in years. They could do a serious job on Wales.

    And I don't get some of the Conan criticism. He averaged 2.3m per carry over 9 carries. Doris averaged 2m over 12.



  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 8,142 ✭✭✭fitz


    100% think this Italy side should beat Wales.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    Yeah, look, he's playing in a really mix and match backline today, with a guy making his first 6N start inside him, and two 12's outside him. While he was on the field, we scored 34 points and 5 tries. As I mentioned earlier, across our past 6 visits to Rome, we've averaged 31 points.

    We can go back and forth on the specific passes he made all day, but especially his involvement in the Keenan try and the Aki disallowed try are exactly the sort of thing people say they want to see in a 10, and that they typically don't see in Carbery (a number of people noted how exceptional it was in Carbery's performance v the Ospreys).

    Very few Irish players played well today, and he was one of our better performers.

    You're downplaying his direct role in tries we scored, but you're claiming he was responsible for 17 points we conceded? That's absolutely ludicrous.

    Look at the Varney try - he's deep in the backfield at the time when Aki and Lowe are at sea for a clear line break. Keenan gets caught in a kind of no man's land where he's not close enough to pressure the ball carrier, and not deep enough to cover a kick if it comes. Keenan has to keep his body turned outwards towards the winger, and Cannone burns through on the inside. Aki can't get there, missing the tackle, and forcing Byrne up to make it, which he does (along with Keenan). Bundee and James Lowe never get back onside, and all three of Ross Byrne, Hugo Keenan and Caelan Doris are committed to the collision on Cannone, leaving Varney a clean run in for the try. There is absolutely no way that try is on Ross Byrne, and anyone claiming otherwise is trying to push an agenda.

    It's even more laughable to claim the intercept is on him. It's not even clear from the pass if the intended receiver was Byrne or Keenan, but either way, the onus is clearly on Aki to identify the winger has shot up into the space and not to just pop the ball into his arms. Once again - seriously ask yourself who is to blame for that try?

    On the 3 points you're putting on him - yeah he definitely gets burned on the outside by Menoncello, but once again he's getting to that position after chasing up from kicking the ball deep. He's got two props inside him in the defensive line here, Bealham and Porter. This was a serious breakdown of our whole system. Menoncello kicks it through (as Hansen gets across) and Hansen gives him a little shoulder bump, which Adamson gives a penalty for. Putting this on him too seems a little spurious to me too.

    You say 1 missed tackle and 3 made against France like that's some outrageous stat line (like for example Bundee's 9 made and 5 missed today, or Craig Casey's 2 made and 3 missed), but it's an identical stat line to Johnny Sexton's and Stuart McCloskey's from the French game.

    You can claim he's a bad defender, but you're not providing a whole lot in the way of facts to support it.

    I do think Jack Crowley will be Ireland's next long term 10 after Sexton (it'll take Sam Prendergast a year or two), but he needs to be playing more games at 10 for Munster. It's hard to infer anything other than the coaches didn't trust him today with the game in the balance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,566 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    Italian defending was pretty shocking I thought, it felt as if we were getting line breaks at will and didn't have to work particularly hard for any of our tries along with the close opportunities from Aki and Lowe twice.

    I think Ross Byrne is what he's always been, a solid and reliable player who can operate to a certain level. I would trust him to close out a game or to start against opponents like Italy but there's a clear ceiling on his ability. I don't think he's a Sexton successor but he could certainly have a role as a squad player going forward.

    It's also important to note that Italy had zero players in their starting lineup with more than 50 caps while we had multiple along with a pair of test Lions captains on the bench so the notion that we were walking wounded and a ragtag group patched together at the last minute isn't really true. It was a vastly experienced selection and much more so than our opponents.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Byrne has certainly improved over the last twelve months. I'm happy with him and I think the more games and experience he gets the better he'll get.

    Conan is a fine player but Doris is a better 8 and it's not even close. Somebody said during the match that they should switch Doris and Conan and I fully agree with that.

    As regards our performance today. We kicked the ball back to them a couple of times when we had the opportunity to go for touch. Those were stupid decisions because Italy are at their best counter attacking.

    Ireland had a lot of missed tackles too which isn't normal.

    Overall I don't agree that it was a good performance. It was just okay.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,302 ✭✭✭All_in_Flynn


    Ye I'd have no concerns about Byrne today. Thought the attack functioned reasonably well. I think there is too much attention being paid to him getting burned on the outside by the Italian 12 in the first half. He was playing with an inexperienced 9 and a makeshift centre partnership.

    On another day he'd have had a big hand in 4/5 tries.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I think Ross Byrne is what he's always been, a solid and reliable player who can operate to a certain level.

    And over the last 3 weeks, he's proven he can operate at 6N level. Our attack has functioned to a reasonably high level whenever he's been on the field. That's a huge feather in his cap. If you look back to last year, our attack was poor against France and poor against 13-man Italy until Sexton came on.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,638 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Carberry is a turnstile. Where do you hide him?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,638 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    That was Byrnes 3rd start? He wasn't great, he wasn't poor. Carberry was dropped because he's awful. 37 caps and he still isn't getting the job done.

    Munster fans calling for Carberry to be moved out of the 10 shirt , not so long ago. Hymmn



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,551 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    I’d say Carbery was average to fine for ireland, and slightly worse for munster. Like, against France last year, Carbery was pretty decent.

    If anything he got dropped when he started playing better for munster than he has done in a long time.

    Him and Byrne are similar to me in that they both have obvious weaknesses. But both are fine.

    I feel like improvements from ringrose, Keenan, Lowe, Hanson together have made it so we can probably survive better now without sexton.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,735 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    While he was on the field, we scored 34 points and 5 tries. As I mentioned earlier, across our past 6 visits to Rome, we've averaged 31 points.

    ”Last 6 visits” seems pretty arbitrary. Is that the last time the average dipped below the 34 we scored today?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    It would be so cool if Italy could finish ahead of Wales and one other country this year. They've been one of the best teams to watch.

    I mean, it's unlikely but if they replicate today's performance in the final two rounds, you never know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,638 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I think they'll beat Wales!!! That's delicious if it happens.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,546 ✭✭✭typhoony


    One thing I'm convinced about and today proved it for me is that the most important player in the Irish setup is Henshaw, because he can be equally effective at covering 12,13 and 15. If we lose Ringrose or Keenan in the World Cup and Henshaw isn't available we're in big trouble.



  • Registered Users Posts: 196 ✭✭Lil Fred




  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Andy farrell was quite happy with that result. It's easy to see why when you consider the injuries and the disruption caused by the timing of them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Objectively, they should hammer Wales. They are patently a better team at the moment, and I could see them beating Scotland too. It would not shock me if the tournament finished with them being the toughest team we face.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No, that's because I had a ready to use data set of all of our results going back to the start of 2010, so it was easier and quicker as a datapoint for me to pull.

    I'd have to go back to include the 2007 season (and our last 8 visits) to exceed the amount we scored today.

    If I go back across all 11 trips to Rome since 2001 in this Championship, our average points scored is 35.09.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭Rigor Mortis


    There does come a point where going back further makes no sense.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Maurice Grumpy Stitch


    And that 1.09 point deficit is ALL Ross Byrne's fault.


    He played well enough today. He did what he does, he had some nice involvements for tries, he kicked well from hand. The two missed conversions were very tough. I don't see at all that any other OH bar Sexton would have improved things for us.


    Overall I thought we were decent against a good team. That was a proper test match. I really don't know what expectations people have that warrant some of the complaints.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,735 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Ok it’s just a coincidence then but I’ve just checked and any of the last 2,3,4,5 all have higher averages. So it is the last time the average dipped below the 34 we scored yesterday.

    I agree with Rigor Mortis point as well tho. For example, the last data point there was 2011. Only 3 players from the 23 are even still in the squad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    There's lies, there's damned lies and then there's statistics.

    Comparing seasons is a futile exercise. There's so much changes each year and the gulf can be huge over two or three years.

    We weren't ranked no.1 in the world any of those seasons. We didn't have the results over the previous twelve months that we had this year. To put the credit for points scored down to one man is ridiculous. And that is what you are doing whether you think it or not.

    There's fifteen players on the park each game. The relationship between the scrum-half and out-half is hugely important. The right no.9 can make thinks a hell of a lot easier. The relationship with 12 and 13 is critical too.

    When have we had an 11 that can kick the ball like Lowe? When have we had the quality on the wings and at full-back that we have now?

    And we haven't even started to consider the other five teams in the six nations yet and where they are at compared to other seasons.

    Now if you've read earlier posts you'll see I like Ross Byrne and I think he's improving and will continue to improve with more game time. I'm very happy with how he is doing and I've no doubt he's our best option outside of Johnny Sexton.

    I'm simply pointing out that your stats are worthless.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah, but you’re literally splitting hairs whatever way you look at it.

    My general point with the stat on how we scored 34 points and 5 tries (while leaving at least 2 more out there) is that all evidence would show we did exactly what we could have expected to do yesterday in attack.

    It works both ways too, if you’re going to go back and compare it versus historical averages as well, then you’ve to give some acknowledgement that this is probably the best Italian side of that whole period too.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Italy today are arguable better than they have ever been since 2000. All you have to do is look at the scalps they took last season, and also how much difficulty a fully stacked french team took to beat them by five points.

    For an irish team, where over half the team were effectively reserve players, to score five tries against them in Rome, is a good result.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,330 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Whatever our issues were yesterday, attack was low down the list.

    More concerning was the loss of defensive shape, and if that's attributable to the changes in personnel, then we need to work harder to get everyone up to speed. Far too many gaps and dog legs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    100% correct. Byrne's tackles are more effective. And a bit like Ringrose, when he misses a tackle, they are still effective because he can disrupt the play. Carberry tends to soak tackles.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,466 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I wonder what would previous RWC winning teams have put on Italy yesterday and would the game have been in the balance midway through the second half.

    Before the game I said we'd probably get the BP win and we did but I really didn't see us being torn to shreds in defence and at times finding the Italy defence line difficult to break. Even with all the changes we should have done better



Advertisement