Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Italy V Ireland Match thread

1567810

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Italy always fade badly in 6N because they pick up injuries and don't have the panel strength in depth. I don't see them beating Scotland on the road but I predict a Wales draw!

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    We need to remember that Italian forwards were stalling our backrow constantly. They were lying on VDF or gabbing him somehow throughout the first half. Same for Doris and Conan. That's why we looked slow and scattered at times. Their rucking was clever but illegal and we should have got more penalties. Other teams will do the same if they can't get away with it.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users Posts: 719 ✭✭✭flatface


    Anyone giving out about Byrne at 10 is completely forgetting how meh Carbery has been for us with the First choice team around him. I thought Casey and Aki were the main source of issues, at least Aki was out of position.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Ah I’d agree you have to pick a point, but it is going to be arbitrary.

    Another way to look at it would be the points scored over that period and that’s trending upwards.

    It’s definitely the best Italian side over that period (which, as a side note, is great for the competition, you’d love to set them doing well) but it’s probably also the best Irish side.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And that 1.09 point deficit is ALL Ross Byrne's fault.

    Absolutely nobody is saying that any more than anyone is saying the defensive issues were ALL his fault.

    Posters are entitled to their opinion.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    @snotboogie literally had an extended piece yesterday where he lays 17 out of Italy’s 20 points on Ross Byrne.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Nope. It lays out Ross Byrne’s role in them. That’s different from saying he’s solely to blame for them, or that they were all his fault.

    It also includes lines like “Aki primarily to blame”.

    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,292 ✭✭✭Buddy Bubs


    What's people's thoughts on the current Ireland team and their improved fortunes? Going into world cup number 1 in the world having beaten all the other top 10 in the year before is a great place to be. But got me thinking why that is....

    Is it

    Better individual players than any time going into world cup? Personally I don't think so, lots of players since the year 2000 Id have way before current starters and have probably seen better starting 15s at times. Although debatable.

    Better 23 and squad depth? Very possibly, we do have depth now.

    Better coaching? I believe this is a big thing, Farrells Ireland play better brand of rugby than Schmidt/Kidney/O Sullivans Ireland. Very few mistakes and we don't lose games we should be winning any more by the looks of it, even the 50/50 games we are coming out on top by the odd point now. Great mindset by the looks of things.

    Opposition dropping away? England in disarray, Wales in a mess, New Zealand being at their weakest over last 2 years since I've ever watched them (they've just come off 25 years or so of golden generations though, some of the best players we will ever see) Australia not being vintage side but still decent, although to be fair Scotland and France are as good at the moment as they have been. South Africa reigning champions and sometimes politics/economics gets in their way. Dangerous animals though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Biggest danger is if/when we start believing in our own publicity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,848 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    Didn't anyone else notice how close Choo Choo Stu was defending to Ross Byrne. It might have been a called tactic, but it did give Aki and Lowe a lot of ground to cover.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,533 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    In fairness, for the interception, Aki wasn't "primarily" at fault. He was entirely and exclusively at fault.

    If you're going to throw a no-look pass under zero pressure and with no cover in the back field, you'd damn well better get it to a team-mate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,390 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Big Stu has been very impressive this campaign. His ability to truck up ball and get his hands free really keeps defenses guessing. He's also been excellent at taking slow ball to the line and gaining yards to allow for a quicker recycle. It gives us another option at centre and with Ringrose, Henshaw, Aki and himself we are in good shape.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,729 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Lowe bit in on defence at least 3 times that led directly to Italian line breaks and 1 try. He was good in attack but his defense could have cost us in a tighter game



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,729 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    There were multiple times when Conan got run over in defence and in attack he was completely ineffective in those tap and gos. (Neither was Doris or JVDF)

    Surely it's time to give Coombes a chance in the 20 Jersey. Conan added nothing yesterday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,729 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    We were doing the same too tbf.

    In this instance the Italian was lying on the ball trying to roll away but Conan was holding him in. Casey had to dig it out, we slowed our own ball down and it almost prevented us from scoring a try a few seconds after this

    Post edited by Akrasia on


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,004 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Sigh, plus ca change

    There were two reasons our defense was so out of kilter yesterday.

    Ringrose not being there and aki not being ringrose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,729 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    What did the

    "Sigh, plus ca change"

    Refer to?



  • Registered Users Posts: 303 ✭✭cantwbr1


    What yesterday confirmed is that, while our depth of talent is better than ever, once you strip out enough front liners team effectiveness/cohesion is impacted.

    We will probably still win most matches but it’s not as certain as with most front liners available



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,729 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Almost all of the changes were injury enforced. We can't look at this as a lesson that we should only ever play the same 23 in the big games.

    Selection should reward form over fitness. When Bealham went off, Tom O Tool performed better imo.

    We learned Aki isn't a good 13 and playing 2 12s doesn't work. Farrell should have picked Osbourne at 13 instead of trying to force cohesion by playing players out of position.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,719 ✭✭✭✭phog


    JOB and Crowley made noticable difference to our attack once they came on, unfortunately, they weren't on long enough to learn much from it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    How would the 2015 team missing, Kano, McCaw, Carter, Nonu and Smith have done against that Italy team. Hard to tell.

    The game was only in the balance because of the intercept. Which was a really poor decision by Aki. If he had passed to anyone else other than Byrne there, we would have scored because of the hole Bruno left.

    We also had two tries disallowed for knock on’s with the line at our mercy. There were times in the game we went flat. Particularly the third quarter.

    The Italians were also very good yesterday. Their scramble defence was quite good. Their attack looked like organized chaos and exploited the fact we had a 12 playing 13. With a last minute change.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think there’s a chance he could slip out of the 23 for the next 2 games. I’d prefer to see either or Coombes or Baird in the 20 shirt, especially for the England game.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,965 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    That doesn’t change my substantive point tho; people are attributing arguments to people that they’re just not making.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,533 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The overall thrust of the post in question was that Byrne contributed nothing in attack and was a huge liability in defence.

    Neither of those is correct. The semantics of exactly what he said aren't really relevant when the overall message is so far off the mark.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,179 ✭✭✭✭Sangre


    Only watched game today. I think a lot of very negative views here.


    of course a last minute change to 13 would cause issues. Especially with Aki who is not an out and out 13. Yes Aki should do better but the team didn’t have him in place all week.

    also thought Byrne did very well in a mismatch team. Attacking shape looked great. On another day there was 2 or 3 more tries out there. Credit to Italian defence

    standouts for me were VDF, keenan, Doris. Vdf was probably my motm. Thought kelleher showed signs of his old self too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,488 ✭✭✭✭cson


    I'd add to that the improvements in reffing.

    When you think back to all the stuff McCaw used to get away with (and the ABs in general).



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    I think its highly ironic that we of all teams would complain about other teams being illegal at the ruck. We are probably best in the world at getting away with dodginess on offensive breakdown. Its one of the reasons our ball is so quick.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    I think Leinster have produced several world class elite players at the same time, Farrell was in some trouble and he decided to double down on Leinster, modelled the system around theirs and concentrated on players who can fit that system and cohesion above all else. Its worked fantastically. We basically have club level cohesion in the international game which is not normal.

    On top of that the level of coaching is great. Our point of difference is the breakdown.



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 42,004 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    i think thats slightly unfair to Mike Catt who hasn't wavered from his attacking philosophy even when he was at italy. Farrell brought Catt in knowing how he wanted to attack, so it wasnt a change of system to suit leinster players, but more an attacking philosophy which Lancaster has leinster playing with as well, to a degree. So leinster player suit Catts system better, rather than Catt or Farrell changing anything to suit the leinster system.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Fair enough. The mechanism for how they got there might be different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Not too labour the point but I’m surprised no team has been able to make our relative lack of pace in the backline a more serious liability. Hansen, in particular, is vulnerable to the chip as the Italians demonstrated. Once he’s passed that’s it. Aki is the same. I guess it’s a tribute to how well organized we are these days.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,639 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Speaks to Keenan’s kearneyesque ability to cover the back field. He shows up just in time very often.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,204 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Keenan gets credit from pundits but not enough of it considering how great he has been.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,618 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Byrne got fairly roasted in the French press. Lowe got most of the plaudits.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    I am fully aware that we do it and we get away with it too. It's an art form. The point is when both teams are doing it, our plays look more ponderous and it's why our backrow looked ineffective (compared to France/Wales/NZ games) and we didn't convert more opportunities in the scoring zone. We have never seen an Italian pack ruck and counter-ruck so well.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,533 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Exactly.

    They play their own system. Catt didn't land here, ring up Lancaster and cog his notes.

    They pick mostly Leinster players because Leinster have the best players. I don't think there's a gameplan we could adopt that would result in a different split among the provinces tbh. It's just how it is.

    They pick the guys who can play their game. Hansen came from nowhere to first choice Ireland player and the guy probably never even met Lancaster. McCloskey was in the wilderness for years and now look at him. If you'd told me a year ago that Bealham would be rock solid as starting tighthead AND a fulcrum for complex backline moves, I'd have reported you for trolling. But these guys are thriving under Farrell and Catt. See the comments from Baloucoune about being told exactly what he needed to work on, which is exactly what Lowe and Hansen are best at. There's no big secret here.

    Unfortunately the corollary is that if there are players who adapt to the Irish game very well, there are others who can't do it with the same success.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Yea, that’s a good point. The key to slowing down ireland is at the breakdown. If you can get away doing it illegally, you should.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,729 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Italy almost exploited that yesterday. Byrnes chase was glacial. I never realised he was that slow.

    Luckily Casey was able to get to the ball first to prevent a certain try



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,030 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    Just on pace - three times in two games Lowe should have finished a try that I'd back nearly any other winger in the 6N (or from our other options) to convert.

    To be fair to him he's great for an offload from the tackle and rarely gives up the ball, and has that big boot, but his lack of pace can frustrate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,030 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    It's interesting the different perceptions we have - Casey has made the RugbyPass team of the round.

    I wouldn't have had him there personally but I thought he had a fine first half and then tired, a couple of poor kicks/passes before he was taken off.

    I think some of the criticism of Aki is a bit unwarranted - he hasn't touched a ball in ages and parachuted in to 13 unplanned, give the guy a break. He was immense going forward, could have done better in defence.

    Was delighted with Kelleher's showing, Tom O'Toole also. Our bench was used well apart from Crowley, dunno how he wasn't given more of a run.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    I watched it again today and i actually thought both byrne and casey were good. I also thought Aki was great going forward. Its weird how your opinion can change on second watch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,533 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Yep, thought Casey was good. A few wayward kicks in his latter minutes but did fine.

    think some of the criticism of Aki is a bit unwarranted - he hasn't touched a ball in ages

    He did play the first two rounds of the 6N... the interception put a bad slant on things and he gave away a soft penalty in the second half but on balance he was good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,030 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    The interception was poor but it also looked like Byrne hadn't hit his mark to receive in time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,733 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Aki came of the bench in the 1st 2 rounds. The lad can't play 13 at a very high level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,770 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    He was great in attack, but woeful on defense. There was a semi permanent dog leg between him and Lowe. Farrell should've played JOB or Osbourne, who've both shown a high ability to play 13



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,729 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    That dog leg was usually Lowe shooting out of the line. Happened 3 times at least leading to 3 line breaks and 1 try



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah, except this isn't true. The Cannone line break that led to Varney's try was absolutely on Aki.

    Bundee does not have the pace to defend the 13 channel, and was guilty of trying to play Ringrose's game of shooting the line, and he got it wrong multiple times.

    Lowe didn't have these sort of issues in the first two games of the 6N with Ringrose defending at 13.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,729 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I watched it back in slow motion. Lowe bit in, the French drove into the space behind him and Aki didn't have the pace to catch him to stop the try.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭OldRio




  • Advertisement
Advertisement