Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Zero political centre or centre right, solutions!

  • 24-02-2023 6:43pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭


    Given that all we have is left wing options, with the exception of the property gouge, which is more of a right wing ideology, what do you do? Many people wont vote for SF, we have a useless FFG. FG are now more interested in increasing welfare than looking after workers. It doesnt seem we will get a party that will do, what FG said they would do in 2012. Is one solution, a mass of votes for FF in protest of the lack of fiscal prudence and even the working poor being hit with a 50% marginal tax rate, to fund the waste and wasters. Its one possible arrangement I can think of, that might force the issue... That as FG are the most right leaning, in a left to far left only options we have politically, when you talk of parties of any scale. I dont see many / any options...



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,251 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    https://politpro.eu/en/ireland/parties



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,336 ✭✭✭HalloweenJack


    If ALL the major parties are left-leaning, which I disagree with in its over-simplicity but that's another post, surely the fact that an overwhleming amount of the voting public (last GE had 62.6% turnout) voted for them would suggest that most people want 'left-leaning' parties to lead the country.

    Turnout for 2016 was around 65% and in 2011 it was nearly 70%. A brief glance at previous elections would suggest turnout seems to hover between 62% and 70%. There is a downward trend but even if the next election had 70% turnout, I don't see all that 8% voting for some new 'cente-right' option. Even if there was magically 100% turnout, do people really believe that 38% want to vote for 'centre-right' options? Even then, it still wouldn't change the make-up of the Government as 'left-leaning' parties would likely get.more votes, if previous elections are anything to go on.

    There is room for new political movements in the country. FF and FG can see that civil war politics is dying as people see there's little different between them apart from their party colours. I think SF are targeting a protest vote and picking up lots of former/potential Labour votes. I'd argue that all parties are moving towards the centre as they try to be all things to all people. There are still a few hardcore left and right parties (all small) while the number of Independents seems to grow.

    The downward trend in turnout could suggest that people are losing faith in political parties though its something that has happened previously and is within previous ranges of turnout. I think turnout will increase for the next election and people do seem to have less faith in the big two parties but I don't see where they are going to go. As there hasn't been an unprecedented drop in turnout and the biggest winner in the last election was a 'traditional' left party, I don't see a big group of people waiting to vote 'centre-right'. It would seem that people prefer to re-direct their votes around the current choices.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,316 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


     Is one solution, a mass of votes for FF in protest of the lack of fiscal prudence and even the working poor being hit with a 50% marginal tax rate, to fund the waste and wasters. Its one possible arrangement I can think of, that might force the issue.

    Do you mean SF here? I've seen several disenchanted right-leaning boardsies propose this but I don't understand how it would work. The only conclusion I could see FF and FG drawing from such a surge is that they need to move further to the left.

    Broadly agree with the first paragraph here. If there was this much-vaunted gap in the market on the right, something would have emerged to fill it by now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Murph85


    We heard of a politician getting death threats recently for speaking the truth! Its so much easier to just say, all of the electorate should get more, you are a great bunch of lads. I believe there is no desire to put yourself forward here, to be obliterated for being the far right nazi's you would be made out to be, if you werent to the left... I can really see in this country, why nobody would want to be that person or party...


    Human nature and certainly politics especially in IReland, is choose the easiest path. If FFG can maintain power and choose easy street every time, they are going to keep doing it. The lack of political choice here on the spectrum, I would attribute, as to a large part of why there are so many problems in the country...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,316 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Does responsibility for this state of affairs not ultimately rest with the electorate?




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    I would consider myself centre to right, Unfortunately what one of the posters above said is true, the vast majority of people vote FFG or SF so we will get left wing governments as that’s just how democracy works even if we disagree with them. Aontu are starting to look good for my vote in the next election depending on them not going farther to the left, I voted Renua no 1 the last time out but they just seem to be a bit of a non entity at the moment and not making any progress whatsoever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 296 ✭✭Ham_Sandwich


    get rid of the right, they just bring racism and bigotry



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,752 ✭✭✭quokula


    We have pretty much the fairest and most representative voting system and form of democracy possible. The parliament we elect represents what the people want, and there are absolutely no barriers to far right parties running other than the fact they have a tiny amount of support.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    Who said anything about Far Right? We’re talking about Centre Right parties here.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Murph85


    By a mile the worlds lowest entry point to a signficant rate of tax, at an absurd level! YES ... One of it not the most generous welfare states on the planet? Free luxury housing, welfare bonuses galore etc... YES... Yeah someone tell me how they think FFG are even centre? they are left..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,921 ✭✭✭buried


    Time to forget about all political entities. None of them should be your concern. Time to look after yourself, and anybody that still has their health intact has no real excuse not to. If your expecting any sort of politician to have a "solution" to any of your concerns you may as well head into the local Abrahamic church and expect the Middle eastern god who resides in there to give you the solution too.

    Make America Get Out of Here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭Morgans


    Is there a spread on how long it takes this just "right of centre" "FG are left-wing" OP to expose him/her self as more far-right than he/she believes?

    Going to go for 3-4 more posts myself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,316 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    I do get the impression Leo is testing the water for a move towsrds centre right policies though, cap on immigration is being considered.

    I think he jas read the room where the other parties have not.

    The taoiseach and leader of the party that has been in government for over 10 years is 'testing the water' for a move to the right? Do you think he will try to introduce these policies in the 18 months or whatever is left of the current government or save them for the election campaign?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,755 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    They are all centre left on social issues. There is a genuine right/left divide economically however.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,755 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    The right seeks market solutions to society issues and government solutions to business issues. The left proposes government solutions to society issues and market solutions to business issues.

    Exemplars of this in the Irish context are housing and banking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,719 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Get more folk to vote for FG and give them an overall majority.

    For as long as they are condemned to coalition, they will be centre-left.

    I'm not saying that good or bad, its just where we are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,316 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


     its certaonly testing the waters.

    Is it, or is it just chucking out some palaver to propitiate right-leaning voters while having no intention of doing anything substantial to actualize it? Someting the same Leo has a bit of a history of, if you look back...

    At some point does the following old saying not have to kick in for people looking for Leo to deliver on his right-wing posturing




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    Part of the problem with right-wing politics is that it attracts religious nutters, and that puts off a lot of normal people.

    Ireland has roundly rejected the church and it's grip on the country, and anyone who even looks like they might think about bringing religion back into politics is rightly given short shrift.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Murph85




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,861 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Is this not just Leo being the populist that he is. If the political wind turned against gay marriage this fella would have no issue saying he didn't agree with it. IMO



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,251 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I don't want to get too much sucked into this debate but just to point out that right-wing parties do not necessarily spend less public money.

    Right-wing parties like to promise less spending but the evidence seems to point that if they do the effect is minimal.

    Where right and left wing parties differ is more on what and how, they spend.

    For evidence on why FFG are centre-right look at how they will almost always look to the private market for solutions.

    Whether the private market can effectively deliver public solutions is open for debate, I'd say certainly in the case of housing and health they haven't.

    And I think people often fail to factor in how small the Irish market is, in a lot of cases we we'll have little competition to deliver services.

    Look at the disaster that is the home retrofit scheme. Only a handful of companies have signed up to be 'one-stop shops' and there appears to be massive gouging. Only 89 (sic) homes retrofitted in year one, against a target of approx 80,000 per year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,945 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    I think what we really have are neoliberal, 'market ueber alles' politics disguised with a veil of 'inclusion' as left wing politics. I'm not sure looking for less disguised versions of the same is the answer.

    Left wing politics would include tolerance, inclusion & equality for sure, but at its core always was and is equality or at least some sort of balance in the economical sense. Nobody seems to be looking for that at all anymore. And the few that still do are branded as nutters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,420 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    We dont have any left or right wing major parties. They all go with the wind, he will stand up for landlords and vulture funds with one hand and then give out record welfare with other.

    We are nothing but a tax haven for big business. Golden handshakes and alms for the poor is their prerogative, anything to hold onto power. SF ever get a go, their left vote swaying ideology will be thrown in the bin too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,438 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    fg and center left! serious! its clearly obvious, fg prioritise the needs and wants of wealth most of the time, this is clearly obvious!

    the days of the majority are over, for now anyway, id say fg are in for a bit of a shock in the next ge!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,438 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    again, wealth is generally stored in the value of assets such as property and land, but parties such as fg have a refusal to implement polices and taxes to reduce this accumulation of wealth, and in fact continually implement polices that encourages it! this is the protection of wealth!

    yes, in order to maintain an element of functionality of the country, since there is a strong resistance to the implementation of such, this means labour and consumption taxes take on the brunt of this need!

    ....since theres such an outrage towards welfare classes, maybe some boards members should try it, just for the craic, well it makes sense, so to also experience this 'easy life'!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,316 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Yeah but 'testing the water' implies a genuine openness to introducing serious restrictions on immigration that I don't believe is there. It's like when Varadkar said this, how likely is it that he was genuinely undecided in his own mind?

    To me he's just fobbing off right-wing voters with empty sounbites as he has done so often before. And he keeps getting away with it not because many of those voters are geuinely convinced by his posturing but because they have no credible alternative to FG...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Bobblehats


    Leo is a man who is energised by the power of the lie and how there is nobody to hold him account for; bar his own conscience I wouldn’t believe a word out of him



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,251 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Thanks BlueSkyDreams, I suppose my answer to that would be that it's not just where a center-right government spends, it's also how it spends.

    So looking at health, a large proportion of that figure would go towards private gps, private nursing homes, private pharmacys, private disability services, and private hospitals through treatment purchase schemes.

    I think it's important to remember too that welfare would make up a smaller percentage of the Social Protection budget than you might think. It would also include state pensions and disability. Those pensions are generally universal too, so Irelands billionaires and their families will also benefit. A significant portion then would also go to employment and community services, which is back to the semi-private quangos, fas, rehab etc.

    Also we've a scenario where a lot of both health and housing budgets will go indirectly towards private housing, whether directly to hap payments or through recipients topping up private landlords.

    As for why private construction is the only game in town, I'd suggest because we've had so many years of center-right governments.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,316 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    There is no better card to play before the election to pull voters from SF.

    He cant fix housing or healthcare before the GE but he can make changes to immigration.

    Can he though? Significant policy changes would require buy-in from FF and the Greens. I suppose if Varadkar were fully committed to this approach he could engineer the fall of the government over it and fight the subsequent general election with restrictions on immigration as his main policy proposal but that would be very uncharacteristic edgelord behaviour from cautious, respectable FG...



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The FG/Labour government of 11/16 was a pretty centre right government, it was cutting off dole to people who refused to engage in retraining etc but it got destroyed in the 2016 general election and that's how we ended up with the big state spending we have today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,316 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    But FG are not going to 'catch' SF no matter what they do. Pretty much everybody accepts SF will be the largest party by a distance after the next election. This begs the question, what would be an acceptable performance for FG? Based on recent polls, this guy is predicting 37 seats for them, slightly ahead of FF

    Given that they will have been in power for nearly 15 years by the next election, I think most in FG would take that. If they can achieve this through a 'steady as she goes' approach (and presumably ramping up the anti-SF rhetoric as the election draws near), do they really need to take the massive gamble of a lurch to the right on immigration policy?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,316 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Yes because they would be stepping outside the political consensus on a significant issue, which the establishment parties are extremely reluctant to do. I'm struggling to remember the last time one of the main parties took a 'right-wing' stand on a major issue that put clear blue water between themselves and the rest of the establishment. Thisb is the best I can come up with, and tbh the issue has nowhere mear the salience of immigration

    Harney got absolutely slaughtered by the rest of the establishment (including the PDs' erstwhile allies in FF) for that (to me pretty innocuous) proposal. So imagine that ramped up by ten if FG were to propose serious restrictions on immigration. Would approval-craving Leo really want to bring the wrath of his liberal friends in politics and media down on his head in return for very uncertain political gains?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 141 ✭✭TagoMago


    The main parties are not ideological IMO, they are opportunistic. If a significant percentage of the population wanting stuff like complete abortion bans, harsher punishment for drugs, etc. then FFG would change their tune pretty quickly but at the moment that's not the case. The electorate has moved to the left and the party's rhetoric and (some) policies have followed suit

    Immigration may prove to be a different kettle of fish as anti-immigration sentiment becomes more common (it would also give them a a scapegoat for their abysmal housing policies), but for now the likes of Aontu are the only option for those wanting to vote right wing. The fact they only got one (already sitting) TD out of 26 candidates show how appealing they were



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,376 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    No matter how many times it is said on here it is not true. Every single EU government including Ireland is right wing, many like Hungary and Poland leaning very far right.

    People are confusing conservativism with populism clearly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Murph85


    Fg would any win some votes back by reducing income taxes, raising entry point to marginal , not even matching inflation, is a joke. Abolish usc over 2/ 3 budgets....


    The funny thing is, fg won't do stuff they actually stand for, because of optics from the media etc... that's how spineless they actually are...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Mullaghteelin


    Historically what you say is true, but I do wonder if the combined power of the media and NGOs have been allowed to grow to unhealthy levels.

    Whenever the media debates any political issue, there is almost guaranteed to be one or more representative from a lobby group or NGO, taking part in the discussion along with the politicians. What the ordinary voter thinks barely registers in the equation.

    One of the most extreme examples of this is the silencing of the trans-versus-women debate on RTE radio last year. A conversation silenced, with RTE pulled up before a committee. Legitimate questions no longer allowed on the subject.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,316 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    IMO it's the approval of Una Mullally and Justin Trudeau and the rest of the liberal elites Leo craves, not the protestors in East Wall, who'd never vote FG anyway. Reading Irish Times op-eds denouncing him as 'an intellectual version of Peter Casey' or 'Ireland's answer to Enoch Powell' would be more than he could bear.

    At this stage there's a pretty lengthy record of a majority, or at least a very large chunk, of the Irish public having 'right-wing' convictions on various issues, and no party coming forward to speak for them, despite the apparent political payoff of doing so, and I firmly expect this to remain the case with immigration.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    On those numbers the current government would easily be returned with the help of a few independents



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Murph85


    We will likely see a return of the current government, what becomes very interesting is though, when one party is by far the largest, is it undemocratic that they dont lead. After nearly one hundred years of a ffg duopoly farce, appalling governance.... Will the dissenters tolerate another five years of failure?

    I dont expect sf to do any better, all if the parties are weak anti change and populist, but many do and it is as yet, unproven....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,316 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    FF/FG would have a good chance of putting some form of government together, but it wouldn't be easy and would likely require the support of SDs, as the largest of the 'other' parties. And Holly Cairns is understandably yet to set out her stall re SDs' potential role in government...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Murph85


    I hear that we have a " progressive " taxation system. Whats progressive about a poor person earning 40k , losing half their income over that pittance?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,039 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    What progressive means in income tax, is that the effective tax rate rises as income rises.

    Ours is very progressive.

    If you compare somebody earning 67% of AW with somebody earning 167% of AW, the increase in effective tax rates here is very high.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,039 ✭✭✭✭Geuze



    Conclusion

    Compared to other OECD countries

    • The level of direct tax paid in Ireland is low particularly for those below average earnings
    • Employee PRSI in Ireland is less than half the OECD average2
    • The Irish system is the most progressive in the EU
    • The top marginal rate is not particularly high but it applies at a relatively low level of income

     

    Source: Taxing Wages 2017, OECD 2017



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,019 ✭✭✭I see sheep




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Murph85


    I'm aware of what it means... is irelands so " progressive " that its regressive? That would be my opinion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Murph85




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,039 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    I don't get you?

    Two features of our income tax / PRSI / USC that a centre-right party should improve:

    (1) all workers / earners should pay something, even a bit: I suggest abolishing the PRSI exemption and re-introducing the 100 PRSI allowance

    (2) we need more rates, so that people don't reach the top rate at 40k



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,251 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    For a centre left government anyway I don't think the target would be to spend more on health, housing and welfare.

    Rather that were these services to be provided by the state, a greater and fairer benefit would be accrued.

    Look at the cost of what FFG pay for social housing, 450k+ for small apartments, in some cases even paying similar for long term leases before handing the property back to the developer. The centre left ideal would be that the state uses its financial and legislative clout to build more social and affordable housing for less.

    That's not something that could happen overnight in Ireland. A whole generation of construction workers are lost because of the boom and bust nature of the Ffg approach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Murph85


    Why many high earners stay here, is beyond me...



  • Advertisement
Advertisement