Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread XIV (Please read OP before posting)

Options
1508509511513514555

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Cameron and everyone else wrongly assumed that the UK as a whole would either vote to remain in the EU or to leave it.

    Quite unbelievably, nobody seemed to factor in the huge constitutional implications if England decided to leave but the three Celtic nations (or two of them) voted to veto that decision. We may well have seen the start of the break up of the UK at that moment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,998 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Education, taxes, subsidies and direct state supports are just some of the things Ireland has that NI comes nowhere close to matching and wont come close to competing with us on any time soon. Also dont forget the elephant in the room that even though things are currently quiet there are still terrorist gangs who are recently again making threats of violence due to the constantly in flux political situation that large multinationals will definitely steer clear of the area due to.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,635 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    It's an odd one. On the one hand this deal is being sold as giving the DUP (primarily) the ability to veto new EU laws but at the same time making NI a unique economic zone.

    But we all know that business hates uncertainty. So if the deal is as sold any investing business faces the real possibility of getting stuck in trade disputes on a regular basis with the impact on supply chains and costs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,698 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Devil is in the details surely. The hoops that have to be jumped through for uncertainty to occur is unlikely to happen. First Stormont has to be up and running, which is good for business certainty. But then if the DUP starts a petition of concern it has to be proven to have a serious impact. Then it goes to the UK Government who has to agree with the DUP. Seeing as Sunak just signed this deal to make things go smoother they are unlikely to jump at the first chance to add uncertainty in to the process again. Then if the UK Government agrees then it goes to the Joint Committee to see if they can resolve it. We know the EU are not antagonistic to the UK so will be looking to avoid the same uncertainty and will be open to a compromise if there is a genuine concern.


    I know we have been looking at it from a UK to EU trade perspective, but the chance for EU traders to bypass tariffs and checks via NI also exists. The only reason why this is not something being done is because the UK is not checking much going through Dover from the EU, but once they get their house in order and do the checks they need to then the attractive proposition of EU traders sending something to Ireland and then NI to the UK will be more attractive, right? This is one thing the DUP seems intent on, avoiding checks between NI and the UK but this goes both ways. So I see the potential for smuggling to happen the other way to be just as big but not a problem for the EU. It will be the UK that will not levy tariffs rather than the potential for goods coming into the EU from the UK via NI.


    But this is all moot really. At the moment you have Sunak who, while he may be a Brexit backer from the start, seems to understands that it is not a one-way street like others. Once in power the deal he got was reasonable and something that May would have gotten as well. But he is more likely to be replaced by a Labour government who will not be putting up more barriers. So we are talking about something that is unlikely to happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭salonfire


    I think it has been forgotten too that NI had the lowest turnout of all the UK countries. A huge number of people there did not give a toss about staying in the EU or not. It's baffling all this time and energy is spent trying to solve problems the people there completely ignored.

    It is this handholding and flexibility from the Irish/US/EU that has the people and politicians of NI always behaving like babies. A dose or economic reality for them would do no harm if it means a hard border with the Republic.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 876 ✭✭✭reslfj


    Enzokk wrote:

    "...but the chance for EU traders to bypass tariffs and checks via NI also exists."

    Outside a full trade war:

    EU produced goods are tariff free into the UK per the TCA. VAT, excise duty, and tariffs because of Rule of Origin are the main/only reasons for smuggling into the UK outside otherwise directly criminal activities (e.g. trading narcotics). I believe the EU and the UK do and will continue to police the drug trade.

    Very little monetary incentive to smuggle goods EU-GB (UK) because of SM rules.

    Rule of Origin for "Made in the EU" products is a much smaller problem for the 450 million EU than for GB products due to fewer components are and can be manufactured within the only 68 million UK.

    Commercially sold and transported goods EU-GB will need to be invoiced by the seller and VAT/excise taxes paid by the buying company. The EU has given large concessions VAT in NI. No reason the EU should not be helpful in registration of goods going EU-UK.

    Lars 😀



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,559 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    A huge number of people there did not give a toss about staying in the EU or not.

    But some did give a toss and voted. Hence the fact that NI voted to remain. It doesn't matter how many turned out to vote. That's demovracy for ya. Works well.

    A dose or economic reality for them would do no harm if it means a hard border with the Republic.

    A hard border wasn't going to happen. It was never on the cards except maybe in the DUPs wanted position. NI has been the wart on the arse of the UK for many a year. Now though they are flying it and should continue to outperform the rest of the UK (with the exception of London maybe) for the foreseeable



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,698 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Turnout may have been lower than the rest of the UK but it was still 62.7%. The 2022 Stormont election had a 63.6% turnout. Do you think that means a huge number did not give a toss either? How about the Irish election in 2020, which had a 62.9% turnout. Seems to me that those that are electorally engaged voted in the election.


    As for the dose of reality, I would think bombs going off in Dublin is not the dose of reality that you mean. I think both paramilitary units for either side has been itching to get stuck in. I have no doubt Ireland would now be a viable target for Unionists just like the UK was for the Republicans during the troubles. I for one would like to avoid even the prospect of that. I would say anyone thinking that a border on this island would be slightly positive needs to have a lie down and maybe put the internet away. That is not sound thinking even if you are just jokingly saying it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭yagan


    For the love of god, please someone ban this salonfire troll.

    It's the same scutter every single post.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,658 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    More Brexit comparisons. The Chips Act aims to eventually unlock €43 billion in funding for the European semiconductor sector. Versus the UK where Chipmakers threaten to defect to US, EU if UK doesn't get its semiconductor plans sorted , it's the same across multiple sectors of the economy.


    New York beat out London to win the coveted listing of British chip designer Arm Ltd - $50 billion , of course Arm haven't been British owned for a long time but Arm chips are in 95% of smartphones and most smart TV's. The rest of the article lists companies like "our" own CRM who are also leaving the LSE and that while in 2000 pensions owned 40% of London stocks it's now down to 4% thanks in part to Truss's budget that forced them to liquidise their assets to avoid a complete meltdown.


    The ERSI report November 5, 2015 predicted Brexit would reduce bilateral trade by 20% or more. Remind me how much less we are importing from the UK these days ? Those involved in Brexit can't say they weren't warned.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    @Capt'n Midnight: Those involved in Brexit can't say they weren't warned.

    ...which is why many of them are now making the claim that Labour have blocked them from allowing Brexit to be completed in the way it should have.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,698 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Labour and Remainers must be the most powerful opposition ever, to stop a party enacting their policies when they have a 80 seat majority. Too bad they cannot use that power to actually, you know, get into power. The refusal to accept responsibility or that Brexit is the problem is still fascinating to see.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,874 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    No large companies with a base in the EU like Intel would consider relocating to NI, it's the UK end user who will pay the tarrifs at the end of the day so won't bother them. The potential for GB standards to change could wipe out any tarrif avoidance benefits and put more direct costs on them.

    Any potential new investors are no doubt looking at the political situation in NI and reluctance to agree to a favourable deal and thinking the benefits of locating in NI are at risk medium to long term.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,511 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Nobody's going to relocate, but NI's situation could make it competitive in attracting investment for new projects. But I think the major benefit for NI will be for domestic businesses, esp. small to medium ones. They avoid the hit to export sales that small to medium GB businesses have suffered, and there should be some opportunity for growth, picking up sales that GB businesses can no longer make.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,874 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I'm sure there'll be opportunities in the likes of British cheeses where apparently producers have been hit hard by Brexit. My point is that there is really very little risk of Ireland losing anything to NI under the deal. Maybe some milk product production could shift north of the border but the deal relates to movement of goods and there isn't really much production of goods happening here anyway and that is unlikely to change. High end industries like Intel or pharma isn't very movable due to sunk costs.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,705 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Businesses that will invest in enterprises in NI will be those currently operating in Ireland with experienced staff willing to relocate north, and with the expectation that hiring suitable local staff will not be a problem. Another source of investment will come from GB companies willing to locate the NI to give them a foothold in the SM while remaining in the UK.

    Now both will expect a level of financial support, and that has to be provided by the UK Gov. Will it be made attractive enough?



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,069 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The UK companies setting up in NI is the more likely but I still can't see the huge benefits.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,705 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    There probably are few benefits, but any would be better than none.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,635 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    But this creates it won problems. Will companies shift investment from Sunderland, Manchester etc to NI to take advantage of the unique economic zone? So far from making people better off, Brexit will actually result in most parts of the UK losing out. With a boon for NI. Will voters, nobody in UK votes for any of the NI parties, really accept that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,874 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Only EU-based companies with a British-based major competitor and for whom Britain is a big market might consider locating in NI to export into Britain. For everyone else, they can just pass the extra costs on to the British customer. The cost of establishing in NI, then transporting goods to core EU markets is not going to be attractive v relatively small benefits which can be taken away.

    For companies already based in Britain, they may look to relocate to NI but there is no way the British government could support them in doing so. It would be political suicide. The government will more likely have to at least be seen to be taking steps to prevent it.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,498 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    What you may see to circumvent that is smaller NI based operations being bought out by larger UK companies which then gives them the foothold and the SM outlets they might desire.

    A potentially good thing for NI assuming that the companies invest in those acquisitions and don't just boiler-plate them for export purposes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,994 ✭✭✭ambro25


    A lot of UK businesses have already shifted investment from Sunderland, Manchester etc to Continental Europe in the past 2-3 years, with the Netherlands a particularly favoured destination amongst others, wherein most parts of the UK started to lose out ages ago.

    It’s not been widely reported in the UK MSM (no surprises), but there is a non-trivial volume of 5-10 lines ad hoc reports in industry sector-specific weeklies or monthlies, and the volume of anecdotal evidence in interview quotes, website news and social media posts (LinkedIn esp.) is equally non-trivial.

    European (-27) businesses have also been investing in the reverse direction, for just as long. Particularly in the B2B services sector. But, and of course, that has been investment aimed at maintaining service (or starting service, for newcomers) within a national economy of 65m, not aimed at servicing a market of 450m, with the asymmetry to match in terms of ‘benefits’ for the UK.

    Far from getting their national market to themselves, UK firms in my field (IP services) have seen all the EU heavies (French, German, Dutch, Spanish (…)) opening national branches in the UK, with EU-inspired pricing schedules that are tearing the proverbial out of ‘legacy’ levels of profitability in the British domestic market.

    NI may well attract some investment chasing dual/straddling GB/SM trading opportunities (and I certainly wish the very best of luck to NI with it all)…but that is likely to be by late adapters and late comers. And so, knowing (edit: these sorts of-) Brit businesses as I know them, on a shoestring and under that ‘boiler plating’ approach mentioned by Quin_Dub.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,069 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Well it has to be more benefit than setting up somewhere else as well as more than none at all.

    Many business would I imagine see it as easier to just set up a second operation in the actual EU which NI won't be because of potential divergence or foot shooting from the DUP.



  • Registered Users Posts: 876 ✭✭✭reslfj


    No large companies with a base in the EU like Intel would consider relocating to NI, it's the UK end user who will pay the tarrifs at the end of the day so won't bother them. The potential for GB standards to change could wipe out any tarrif avoidance benefits and put more direct costs on them.

    There are no tariffs for EU produced products exported to the UK. Only a fair amount of NTBs including customs forms.

    There are no tariffs for UK produced products exported to the EU. Only a fair amount of NTBs including customs forms.

    Exception: direct re-export (EU-UK-EU) and where Rule of Origin (from EU+UK) can't be certified.

    Lars 😀



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,874 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Yes I meant increased indirect costs when importing/exporting between SM and Britain rather than actual tarrifs. The point is that the benefits of locating in NI are minimal so there is unlikely to be significant gains for NI, despite Sunak's bluster about this wonderful opportunity his deal creates.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    David McWilliams had a good article at the weekend about how the NI economy is in not great shape and how the Republic's economy is nine times bigger. At the moment, it would not be a good place to invest - it might have access to GB and the EU Single Market, but it's really just a neglected UK backwater.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,705 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think you could start by saying the UK has an economy that is not in good shape.

    So before an investment would be considered to be made in NI, the investor would consider whether is should be made in the UK at all. I would think that the UK is currently toxic for most investments, and NI is not currently a preferential location without some significant state aid. Look what happened to De Loriann and his Renault derived shiny car - despite its huge Gov subsidy, it is no more. H&W, once a giant ship builder is now just a tourist visitor centre.

    I do not think there is much chance that the access to the SM will be any game changer for FDI in the near future - or ever.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,665 ✭✭✭54and56


    If you didn't have a base in the EU or UK and were looking for a manufacturing base to serve those markets NI would tick the boxes for high value logistics friendly products and with the NI economy not in great shape the timing would be ideal, lots of local labour and grants available etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,657 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    In theory, but it is still one of the most underdeveloped and deprived UK regions. You might get one or two overseas manufacturing companies interested, but perhaps not a whole load.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,243 ✭✭✭joeysoap


    I thought H & W was still operating ( specialising in repairs etc) albeit at fraction of what it once was.



Advertisement