Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
1272327242726272827293691

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,855 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Officially yes, but there have been historic instances of them clearing out during times of war. They cleared out completly when Napoleon invaded (He took the city itself, but was very pissed to find out that taking Moscow didn't result in an overall win -as was the tradition of the time) and when Nazi Germany seemed poised to take the city themselves the Soviets evaculated a good bit of the government East and away from the fighting.

    Unless Moscow becomes Ground-Zero in civil war fighting I don't think they'll do it yet...but if they are thinking about it at all, it is interesting.



  • Registered Users Posts: 475 ✭✭SoapMcTavish


    B52 over Europe again today




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,705 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Boyd Barrett on telly last night again talking about the hypocrisy of opposing the Russian invasion but not Israeli aggression toward Palestine or the American invasion of Iraq. Although I take the point that aggressor nations should generally be opposed, I'm not sure what his conclusion is. Is it that because European countries did not do enough to prevent the USA invading Iraq, they should stand back and let Russia have at Ukraine in order to maintain moral consistency?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,584 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    A vast, vast swathe of people and countries did oppose the American invasion of Iraq.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,705 ✭✭✭✭briany


    His thing was that the governments still didn't do enough.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    This year, Ukraine will receive 252 Western tanks, in addition to the approximately 550 Soviet tanks that have already been delivered or will be delivered in the near future:

    🇬🇧 14x Challenger 2

    🇺🇸 31x M1A2 Abrams

    🇩🇪🇵🇹 21x Leopard 2A6

    🇩🇪🇵🇱🇨🇦🇳🇴🇪🇸 86x Leopard 2A4

    🇩🇪🇳🇱🇩🇰 100x Leopard 1A5

    🇵🇱🇨🇿🇸🇰 550x T-72 of various versions (will be in the future + provided earlier).

    That should please Zaluzhnyi, though perhaps a lot of those wont arrive in time for the show.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui



    Occupants are preparing for a Ukrainian offensive

    New satellite images show that Russian troops have stepped up construction of fortifications in the occupied regions of Ukraine.

    Mostly in the South. They are afraid of a breakthrough of the Ukrainian Armed Forces to Melitopol and the Sea of Azov, as the Crimean bridge will be under threat.

    I wish they could get some western air power, that is a lot of territory.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,986 ✭✭✭rogber


    Sure. But I also don't buy into this "Russia is on the verge of civil war" talk. Sounds like more wishful thinking.

    Time will tell.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭opinionated3


    I put BB in with the other clowns like Daly, Murphy and Wallace. I've zero respect for any of them...



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Curious_Case


    Their mollusc-level thinking goes something like this -- "US bad then in Vietnam & Iraq so Russia good now in Ukraine"

    I mean, "How can you have any pudding"?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Great annimation of the development in the situation in Bakhmut. The Orc forces seem to be just so much deeper. Kingdom of the ants/Orcs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Now making the front pages. Two passes caught on camera, and dumping fuel. Let me guess, the Kremlin after denying this happened will now likely say this footage is "fake".



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,879 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Well you'd assume from that the pilot(s) were told to go out and fly very close to the drone + harass it.

    May not have intended to bring it down (I suppose they could just as easily have damaged their own aircraft and endangered themsleves with what they were doing), but it was obviously a risk they + people giving them their mission were willing to take.

    Quite reckless from Russia, the NATO surveillance and help it gives to Ukraine must be really píssing them off!



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,801 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    They will say the drone was close to the Russian border. The US will show radar tracks and evidence the crash site (the one Russia themselves are at) are far from the Russian border. Then Russia will say it was a Ukrainian plane. When that fails they will say the footage is fake etc...

    They always seem to have their lies lined up to be proven wrong.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,584 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    His thing is that he's an utter crank and tankie.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,799 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    The reality is, that's an act of war.

    They know this.

    Again, I think they are trying to force the Americans hand before Xi's visit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Supposedly there are reports on social media coming from Crimea where the SU-27s landed, that one of them is damaged. That second pass looks to me like the SU-27 didn't just clip the propeller but impacted the drone significantly. The video feed going out would tend to suggest that the drone fuselage was impacted.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭paul71


    Russian soldier admits to Murder in Ukraine, and is sent to prison in Russia for 5.5 years, not for murder but for spreading "Fake News".

    And we have idiots trolling here who claim the Media in the West is controlled and we don't have free speech.





  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,584 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Russia shot down manned aircraft not in Russian airspace more than once during the Cold War and it didn't lead to open hostilities.

    It would take a lot more than downing a drone to be considered an "act of war".



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    lets all not fight and hold hands...

    I think he fails to realise that sometimes in life, you have to decide between 2 or more bad choices



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    interesting if it ever happened.... there'll be even less people in Siberia now that they've all been shipped to Ukraine.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,584 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Yes I know. The Soviet Union shot down more than 1 manned aircraft not in Russian airspace is what I said.

    This will do nothing to relieve tensions, but is essentially meaningless.



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    or the satcom feed interrupted by the SU-27 as it blocked LOS



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,566 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,223 ✭✭✭Nate--IRL--


    As an aside, they keep posting images from a Video Game for this (re)announcement of Polish MiGs. Crazy how believable games look these days.

    Nate



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,652 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    There are major Nato intelligence gathering air assets currently focusing on the Kaliningrad and Baltic areas at the moment. Before I break it down, take a look at all the military ( Note, these are just military aircraft) currently in the air over Europe as of this moment. Its an incredible sight and obviously daunting to any Russian strategist. Also the majority of these aircraft are only Logistical or Intel aircraft.

    Over the Baltic, we see a Swedish AF G4 SIGNIT asset...

    Joined by an RAF RC-135W SIGNIT asset

    Also in the area, an E8 JSTARS asset

    And a Swedish AF Saab SIGNIT

    Clearly an intel-hoovering/ "we won't be intimidated" exercise or a prerequisite to a push by Ukraine.

    Bearing in mind, these are aircraft with transponders on. There are many, many aircraft with transponders off flying in the theatre of operations.



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    that's a pretty normal day from an ISTAR perspective

    edit: it's actually a little less... no "Yank" aircraft from Lithuania/Estonia and no "Brio" aircraft (that seems to be over Romania a lot recently)...

    Not to mention the daily U2 and whatever drones



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Russia and Chinese pilots have a history of doing close intercepts and then "showboating". Buzzing, doing stunts. In one case a Chinese pilot flew very close and then held up a sign with his email address. (The same pilot died due to a collision during a subsequent intercept).

    That's what I see here. Harassing the drone. Probably trying to spray fuel on the optics. The contact was surely unintentional because it's only sheer luck that the Russian pilot landed safely.

    I think it's a non-issue, neither side want to escalate over an accident. The Americans will keep flying drones and Russia will keep intercepting them. I'd say for a short time they won't do such close intercepts, they'll be a bit sheepish. But eventually they will start at it again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,652 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    I've been trying to figure out where the drone went down, taking into account marine activity on the Black Sea today.

    The US mention that it went down 75 miles southwest of Crimea.

    Here is this rough area:

    But here is where I've noticed some unusual activity on Marine Traffic:

    It's quite a distance away. If you zoom into the highlighted area, you can see a cluster of marine vessels, positioned by satellite around a half hour ago, away from shipping lanes and designated as " tugs".

    Someone is looking for something in this region!

    Could be nothing, seems odd though.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,792 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Eoin oMurchú, he was Official Sinn Féin/Worker's Party and has written columns for An Phobalacht in Irish.


    He self describes as a Communist Republican and radical Socialist, depending on his mood.


    It's a given he is going to be having a position that isn't a problem for Russia considering his ideology.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement