Wokeism of the day *Revised Mod Note in OP and threadbanned users*

A lot of people throw around insults like that purely because they don't have the intellectual capacity to get involved in a rational debate. They know that they'd lose easily so, instead, they just try to smear the other person.

Never tweeting anything abusive is kind of the line for me. She's transphobic, end of story - as in phobia is not nessecarily fear or hatred, it's an irrational discomfort.

That said, I don't have Twitter and don't pay attention to her, so I've no real idea what she's said other than being TERF, and while I don't agree with her, I can see why some ciswomen would be wary of the motives of some transwomen.

Where is the thread for mocking people who invoke the term "woke" for anything they don't agree with, don't understand or makes them feel icky?

People who are arachnaphobic aren't tying to claim spiders have no right to exist, though.

If Muslim players want to break / end a fast, or engage in any other religious protocol, during a match, then they can remove themselves from selection… simple.

simply football takes precedence, if I pay xx euros to see a certain match, two teams… im not paying to watch any religious carry on, protocols or traditions,

I think there is a very simple solution to this made up problem: without adequate hydration during the day of the match no player should be allowed to start the match for reasons of health and safety. So no fast to break. There, problem solved.

They don't even need to do anything plenty of natural stoppages in play for players to get water or small bits of food ( fruit) if they need it and there is half time if they need to properly fill up on stuff during the match itself.

Fact is nothing needed to be said or done, the premier league just decided to make a statement to pander to people.

a phobia…. it’s a fear, an overwhelming and debilitating fear. A phobia is an overwhelming and debilitating fear of something or someone.

it’s suiting certain members of the trans community and supporters to delegate her the term ‘phobic’ as relates to them.

to criticise or disagree with something doesn’t make you ‘phobic’. If that’s the case we are all phobic as relates to something or some people… which is of course ludicrous and laughable.

you can be critical, disagreeable, whatever without being phobic.

unfortunately it’s part of the woke gameplan to toss out terms like, ‘transphobic’.. ! Or xxxphobic…saves them the bother of entering a salient, credible and intelligible debate. Label your enemy, discredit them , misinform your audience about them, wash..rinse and repeat.

its a woke game plan because we’ve even seen these woke monsters label people who believe in border controls as.. racists 👀 Despite the majority of the countries on the planet, from Africa, to Asia, and beyond having border controls .

Are Muslim players actually going 12-13hrs without water on the day of an evening match?

As someone who has pushed the boat out to pretty extreme levels in terms of fasting and exercising I would have major doubts they are.

Playing in a fasted state, with adaptation, would be possible while far from being optimal but 12 hrs without water before elite level football is something else.

I say that as someone who has regularly done 100km plus cycles without drinking from my water bottle.

Really...? OK then.

I said that she was transphobic and gave very clear reasoning as to my rationale (albeint limited - which I openly admitted) based on her widely publicised exclusionary viewpoints.

You could have responded with a comment on her tweets or my interpreation of them, but instead you responded with a snide remark about a person (me) having a mystic phobia based on a viewpoint that was expressd you don't like (that she's transphobic),

That should clear everything up, but if not, perhaps YOU could tell ME exactly HOW you think it was a comment on the post and not the person posting it...?

Me neither.

But my point was that you can have a phobia without it actually being hateful or politically/socially based.

The obvious comeback to your point made above is that the same logic can be applied to straight women being sexist.

Just had a long multiple page discussion about this!

Short answer: Because if someone asks this, It's means you want me to justify the existence of trans women. And that's a debate they can have with someone else.

Now, if they want to debate a trans issue? Sure - which issue? But I'm not doing existence.

Transpeople don't have to prove their existence, and I'm not doing it either.