Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Milk Price III

1229230232234235272

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,703 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    No certainty of actually getting the money though at each payment



  • Registered Users Posts: 791 ✭✭✭Pinsnbushings


    That's it of course, the cynic in me expects to see a good few of these leased renegotiated down in a few years as it will cost landowners more to get them out than take a lower payment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,061 ✭✭✭alps


    They may have been negotiated on that premise, in some instances even agreed between both parties.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    Alright when money is in advance though. you needn't let them in until money comes

    I didn't hear of any dairy farmers leasing at 250 - 300/acre offering to increase the rent this last 12 mths either



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,703 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    In fairness 250 to 300 are realistic figures not like the willy wavers offering stupid money



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 791 ✭✭✭Pinsnbushings


    Of course that would be a sensible approach in fairness, but I'm not sure how many are done that way in practice



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,227 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    You should nearly as careful picking a tennent as picking a wife/husband.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭straight


    Hard to believe that people would enter into a contract and decide not to fulfil their side of it. It's not an option that has ever been available to me.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,842 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    Leasing ground can be messy at the best of times never mind say when someone gives offers big money and then can't pay in year-2.

    What option does the owner have? Get solicitors involved? Re-negotiate a lower price? Kick out the non-paying tenant and go back to someone else who they turned down previously coz the big talker offered the big money?

    The owner should have a plan-b in place before taking the lotto-type money being spoken about a few months back.

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,060 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    If a signed lease is broken the tax free money has to be paid back as far and I’m aware



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,842 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    I wasn't aware of that.

    If that's the case, it's all the more reason for an owner to make sure of the tenant's ability to pay.

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,643 ✭✭✭roosterman71




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,829 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Not necessarily the catch is the lessor must continue to pay the PRSI and USC even though they are not getting the rent

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    If you get another lease immediately it can carry on tax free.

    The commitment to a lease is the important thing, a friend got another lease with another tenant without losing the tax free status. If my memory is correct he was allowed a year to get a new tenant before he had to give back the tax



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,829 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭straight


    Only a matter of time. Just reading in last week's journal what they are doing to our colleagues in the North. Not to mention holland. Sure we might be allowed grow energy crops or vegan food. Maybe Harold Kingston knows what's coming.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,018 ✭✭✭kevthegaff


    Whats the stocking rate per hectare without derigation?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,842 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    170kg and it depends on which band your cows are in after that.

    I think you could go above that previously and stay out of derogation if you exported slurry but this changed recently as far as I know

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,701 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Prince Edward Island home of the potato.


    The 5 to 10 is the potato growing ground. Ground water in places is already at 10mg/litre. 10mg is the limit for drinking water. Is potato growing going to be curtailed in Prince Edward Island because of this nitrate leaching? No. Because it's plant based and heads are in denial that tillage increases nitrate leaching into ground water and waterways. Their solution is to spread biochar on the potato ground. What will this do if it ever leaves the proposals? It'll reduce nitrates for a year or two after applying but it will increase nitrate leaching after. Why? Because the biochar will soak nitrates for the year but after it'll become home to biology and biology is nitrogen. So it'll increase the soils own ability to generate nitrates but it won't have the chance to stay in soil as it'll be tilled again and it'll be leached. The primary nitrate and biology will inhabit the biochar but any excess from this will just go.

    In this country we've nitrate levels of 7 in the tillage areas. It's 5 in pasture areas. Tilling no matter what crop, maize, potatoes, cereal, beans, etc allows rainfall to wash through the loose soil and leach through the nitrates from the dead biology to the groundwater and waterways. Here we blame it on soil types not the tillage. Never the tillage. We've proposals here to increase the tillage area. What will happen? Nitrates to waterways will increase. But where will the fault be put. It'll be put on the livestock and pasture land. Pasture land that with a fully functioning eco system and biology is able to soak up the nitrates and lock it into the soil. The latest result from the Cork farmers showed this in reducing nitrates. Back to the increasing nitrates from the increasing tillage area (proposals) the fault will be put on the livestock. Farmers will definitely loose the derogation. More land will go to tillage. Nitrates increase more now in more waterways. Farmers will be made destock land. Protests ala the netherlands. Farms may be offered to be bought. 2050 emissions targets will be met. But we'll now be gone from where we are now as the 2nd cleanest waterways in Europe to joining the European average. But we'll be woke now and drinking oat milk with more limestone added than goresbridge quarry. And singing cum by ya liqured up on middleton distilery's finest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,829 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Near enough 1.5-2 cows per HA, depending on cow type abd take into account calves on farm until six to eight weeks

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,061 ✭✭✭alps




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,535 ✭✭✭stanflt


    If derogation goes the people that are responsible for it will have to take the blame for the creation of the Bobby calf industry that will come as young calves will have no place on any farm



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,018 ✭✭✭kevthegaff


    It will reduce the amount of milk and calves in the system!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,829 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Sorry to give you the bad news but within two years you will be keeping them to at least 4 weeks if not 6 weeks of age.

    Ya it will land is effectively the new quota

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,611 ✭✭✭Mooooo


    A lot of dero farmers are in it to have viable numbers to milk full time. If it goes it could likely lead as much to an exit as a reduction



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,317 ✭✭✭green daries


    Ya big time on the western sea board where farm's are smaller and more fragmented



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,246 ✭✭✭Grueller


    Exactly Moo. As alps said above, 100acres would now divide down to 70 middle band cows, a bull and nitrates to carry calves to 3 weeks before selling. That would be a flying herd. You would see a lot of lad's heading for the door at that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,535 ✭✭✭stanflt


    Out of 240 calvings 160 calves are reared- all calves are kept for a minimum of 30 days already- if dero is gone we won’t be able to rear any calves.like other farmers and Bobby calf business will commence- farmers won’t have to worry about losing sfp as for me. It’s more beneficial to forego it then jump thru hoops

    reality is progressive farmers like myself who use 40-50% less nitrogen than the average- who produce milk with less ghg emission than the averages and with a focus on keeping waterways clean will simply give up - this leads to worse environmental issues



  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭farisfat


    Milk price heading for 30c will sort things out.Looks like it could long cycle.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,317 ✭✭✭green daries


    It will only make things worse in a lot of cases as the ones who don't care and the messers will just cut even more corners. Then the lads who should be building storage,calf housing etc won't bother due to poor returns. Imo there's a green agenda in Brussels to push our farming completely. Once the food is imported the emissions don't matter



Advertisement