Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Kerry Babies Case

Options
1181921232461

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 41,072 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Agreed. Your sitting in moral judgement is outrageous

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    Most of that is fact, but you’ve worked in some opinion and you’re wrong on some points of detail.

    There most certainly is an obligation to register deaths, since 1864. There is no obligation to register stillbirths, and there was no stillbirth register at the time. There’s no forensic evidence as to whether the Tralee baby was stillborn or died shortly after birth.

    Theres also this statute, prohibiting concealment of births.

    And, yes, there’s no point in pursuing those matters now. There’s also no point in assigning a significance to events that they don’t deserve.



  • Registered Users Posts: 35,064 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Seems that it's yourself who wants to experience outrage over what was a tragic stillbirth in the Hayes family - unless you can prove different of course and overturn the findings of the courts in the process.

    © 1982 Sinclair Research Ltd



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    The fact that Hayes was coerced into admitting the murder makes you lose faith in the competence of the gardai of that time. This case was the biggest reputation damage to gardai in it's history. The west Cork murder a decade later makes you question any evidence the gardai collected then as they had a narrative in that case too that they needed evidence to fit. There was another case Grace Livingston in the early 90's where the Gardai had unfound narrative but still interrogated the husband as if they had evidence he did it..... but a hunch from an experienced garda seemed to go a long way back then.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭Yellow_Fern


    No this is misconception. That article is sampling contamination. There was loads of papers like that in 1990s. but they dont get published anymore as we can detect contamination now through methods like deamination and full genome sequencing. There are special cases like 2 million year old frozen DNA, but not 120 million year old DNA. Proteins maybe yes but not DNA



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    At no point did I say anything about the mother of the baby being responsible for the murder.

    There was never a time in this country to any sane person where murdering a baby was preferential to being stigmatised, thats just a ridiculous thing to say and some sad attempt to justify or minimise the murder of a baby.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,588 ✭✭✭enfant terrible


    Well said what a horrible justification for murdering a baby.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,741 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    Headline should read Man.

    Link not updated.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,265 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    So both have been released without charge and files sent to the DPP.

    So the Gardai at this stage must have identified the parents of baby John through DNA and the arrests and questioning but don't have enough to charge them with his murder.

    And that's fair enough, even though these may be the parents they may not have been the murders.

    The actual murderers could have been older relatives long since dead.

    By the time the DPP reviews the file it may well be a lesser charge for the two arrested this week.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,741 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    From The Times;

    "The woman was released from custody shortly before 7.30pm on Friday. The man was released early on Saturday morning. Gardaí said a file would now be prepared for the Director of Public Prosecutions.

    The solicitor representing both, Padraig O’Connell, said his clients had protested their innocence throughout the interviews which were conducted with their legal representatives present.

    “Obviously they are totally denying the allegation of murder, which is what they are arrested for,” he said.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,969 ✭✭✭cute geoge


    The plot thickens ,the gossip is the

    'grandparent of baby John was a member of the guard's as well as more family members!!'

    Quelle surprise



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭Mo Ghile Mear


    It’s possible (though unlikely) that the baby’s mother didn’t even know he was murdered… she could have been told he died shortly after birth or had been adopted. The actual killer may be dead .. or maybe not. There could be a lot of twists to this investigation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,741 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    According to Virgin News, it appears the two people were arrested at the same address and have been a couple since the early 80's



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,239 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    The actions of the Gardaí at the time keep coming back into this sorry tale. Maybe there'll be another tribunal yet to ascertain truths and rule out suspicions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    No outrage at all, just drawing attention to things like people using the terms “stillbirth” and “ died of natural causes” as if they were interchangeable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,028 ✭✭✭Call me Al


    There's no evidence that JH committed a crime no matter how much you add 2+2 together to come up with 5.

    And don't we all know that if there was even a hint that she had actually committed a crime that she would have been hawled through the courts about it to much glee from some quarters.

    Burying dead newborn babies on family land back then used to happen. Not as frequently as it had in the past admittedly but it still happened. There's nothing shocking about this unsanitised reality although it may be a bit unpalatable and hard to process for the eyes and ears of people nowadays.

    The crime being investigated here is baby John's murder. Nothing else.

    Post edited by Call me Al on


  • Registered Users Posts: 35,064 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The fact is that if it hadn't been for blood group testing (all there was in the 80s) proving that she wasn't the mother of the second baby Joanne Hayes would certainly have been charged with murder and probably convicted - for a crime she couldn't possibly have committed but the Gardai had scapegoated her for.

    © 1982 Sinclair Research Ltd



  • Registered Users Posts: 725 ✭✭✭M_Murphy57



    I'm class of 95 and girls in my year were made leave our school if they got pregnant. Also Dublin.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭Yellow_Fern


    Unmarried mothers were not incarcerated and there was not forced adoption. Hotblack Desiato, you really should know better than that. The mother and baby homes facilities mothers keeping their children, particularly the Regina Coeli home. I can recommend you some historical sources to read. Adoption was sometimes coerced by the community and family, but not forced. By the late 1950s adoption was a regulated process, by the 1960s but homes were being closed and remaining ones were modernised. Standards became quite quite good, for example, in some boyfriends could visit. Medical care was superior than in rural areas. In 1966 two British social workers visited, one (M J Farrah) of whom published an account in social journal and said

    'post-natal stay was ‘governed by circumstances, and not by rigid rules’., ‘atmosphere of freedom and friendliness, and the girls appear to be as happy and relaxed as they are in our Homes over here’



    "great efforts have been and are being made to divide the large dormitories, and nurseries into smaller units. Where alterations have been completed, and new wings added, the decoration is light and all furnishing modern. Gone are the long tables in the dining rooms, and in their place small tables with three or four places at each. We saw television rooms which could be cleared to make a dance hall, or divided up into two or three smaller recreation rooms by the use of sliding partitions."

    BTW your aunt was a sensible woman by all accounts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,995 ✭✭✭Xander10


    Was Joanne Hayes dragged on to the Late Late Show?

    I was trying to find a clip on YouTube with no luck. Was curious to see if Uncle Gaybo treated her as nastily as Annie Murphy.

    Maybe I dreamed the interview happened or maybe as part of the State settlement it has been removed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,117 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    RTE have a clip of it, if you look at the links posted when the man was released today you'll see it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 652 ✭✭✭Duvet Day


    Just awful to think that a group of adults (seemingly) hounded a young teenager knowing that she was totally innocent, endless interviews and a court case, I don't know how she or her family went through it and survived. It must have been a nightmare for them. There must have been cases where innocent people were locked up as scapegoats after been similarly stitched up , sickening.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,927 ✭✭✭Princess Calla


    There was an rte investigative program on not so long ago "Confessions of ..." It was maybe 4 or 6 episodes long, it featured this case and other cases where innocent people were beaten into confessing.... While all cases were sad , there was a murder where a group of teenage boys were framed their lives absolutely ruined afterwards.



  • Registered Users Posts: 450 ✭✭Balagan1


    Young teenager? Joanne Hayes was approaching 25 and in her third pregnancy when her son was born dead in a field late at night. She had a living young daughter who was being raised by her in the family home and had also had a miscarriage. The way the Gardai behaved and the way the court/Tribunal was conducted was absolutely foul and the 2.5 million she and the family received in compensation could barely touch the horrors she and they were put through. However, portraying her as a "young teenager" instead of a woman making choices serves no purpose.





  • Whoever murdered Baby John did so in a fit of manic rage, to put an end to an u wanted new life would “only” have required oxygen deprivation or central nervous system suppression in a relatively less violent way, but stabbing 28 times indicates a scenario of great anger at the birth, involving hatred, mental illness of intoxication or any combination thereof. Could have been committed by a man or by a woman, including the mother, especially had she suffered from the rarely discussed phenomenon of puerperal psychosis which causes delusions & hallucinations. In the latter event it is possible that a loving partner / family may have wanted it kept quiet as likely such illness would be confined to the situation of post pregnancy.

    But the scenario whereby the grave has been desecrated in intervening years is puzzling, where or not connected with original offence. Somebody became or remained angry at Baby John being memorialised.




  • Registered Users Posts: 450 ✭✭Balagan1


    Short audio clip, less than 2 minutes, of part of the Late Late interview here. She wasn't "dragged on" but says she came on as she wanted to thank all those who had supported her. She highlights how unprepared her own counsel were for the Tribunal and the anti-women tone of the proceedings. https://soundcloud.com/rte-radio-1/joanne-hayes-late-late-show-1985



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭walterking


    Looks like the gardai have learnt nothing over the years.


    It took them THIRTY FOUR YEARS to accept they were wrong and make an apology to Joanne Hayes. Even then Garda Gerry O'Carroll would still not apologise himself and still touted the theory that she could have given birth to twins that had different fathers - yes he really did come up with that theory and still held it until 2018


    Now rather than question in private, they shout to the world that they have 2 people being questioned for murder and then release them 24 hours later making sure all the local know who they are.


    Despicable and disgusting from an garda siochana.


    And they wonder why they are so disliked?



  • Registered Users Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    Its less about me making 2 + 2 = 5, and more about people trying to squeeze 2 + 3 into 4.

    I'll let people make what they want out of your statement that it wouldn't be remarkable for Kerry people to put a dead or stillborn corpse in a white plastic bag and leave in a pool of water on their land.

    We like our reality unsanitised, sure we do.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,969 ✭✭✭cute geoge


    But what has this to do with baby John who was murdered?

    Joanne Hayes has been cleared of any wrong doing no matter how many times you are going to drag up her past ,a baby who was not babtised could be buried in a holy cemetary .In some parishes there was a place called a 'killeen' where these babies were buried and other instances these babies were buried in farm land.

    What is done today with premature babies /stillbirths?



Advertisement