Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Is it time to join Nato

Options
1104105107109110152

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,659 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    It is an embarrassment we cant house our population. It is not an an embarrassment we did"t spend billions on a defence for an invasion that never happened.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,310 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    And in other news, the Defence Forces have said they are “aware” that two Russian-flagged ships equipped with sub-sea cable laying technology have doubled back towards the Irish west coast late this week. Michael Healy Rea said in the Dail he heard on Sky news the ships “raised serious concerns among military officials due to their movements around the IRIS high-speed, subsea communications cable, which became operational last year and runs west off the Irish coast”.

    The two commercial ships, named Umka and Bahktemir, departed from the Russian port of Murmansk on February 23 on a course for the Equatorial Guinea port of Malabo.

    The 79.8 metre-long Umka is an offshore supply vessel and the Bakhtemir, also 79.8 metres long, is a salvage and rescue ship. It is equipped with diving platforms and subsea submersibles capable of deep water work on infrastructure.

    Surveillance of vital subsea communications cables has been increased since reported sabotage last September of the Nord Stream pipelines, built to transport gas from the Russian Federation to Germany through the Baltic. The pipelines are owned by the Russian company Gazprom, and no group has as yet been identified for the attack.

    In a statement, the Defence Forces said that the Air Corps and the Naval Service are “aware” of the two vessels (they heard it on the BBC.) but “won't be releasing any further information on the matter”.

    Both the Air Corps and Naval Service continue to monitor activity on TV daily, despite it being the weekend. No Irish ship are currently at sea but Irish navy personnel have been warned they may have to - depending on the weather forecast from met eireann- pack "hang sandwidges" next week, to bring their sleeping bags and may not be able to go home to their mammies for dinner each day. Extra compensation will be offered for the inconvenience. If their mission is successful in travelling from to Cork to the west coast, they hope to make it back to dry land in time to appear on a special edition of the Late Late next weekend. Mr Healy Rea has wished them all the luck in intercepting the Russian invaders, and warned that the Skibberean Eagle is keeping an eye on them. There is not a pair of binoculars to be had along the west coast, complained Mr Healy Rae, and a called on the government to urgently provide our navy with underwater binoculars so our navy could see under the sea what the Russians were up to.

    Post edited by Francis McM on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The Irish Times is a failing newspaper propped up financially by the Irish government (via ad revenue and tax breaks). It's now the paper equivalent of RTE; hence it's obvious bias and parroting of government stance on various issues.

    Anyway, Simon Coveney and the government in general have made it clear they want Ireland in NATO. Que these articles now popping up from government media telling us the Russians are engaging in suspicious activity off the Irish coast. We'll just take their word for it then, shall we?

    They wouldn't be conditioning and "nudging" the public towards a pro-NATO stance, would they? Should we expect more "articles" like this before they table a NATO referendum over the next few years?

    The fact you're so frightened and influenced by propaganda, proves that propaganda really does work. Hence they do it. You, nor I, or anyone else here, have any idea what is (or isn't) happening off the coast of Ireland. That's a fact.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,159 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Not too much of an ask to be suspicious of the Russians ask the Cork fishermen!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Lol. No offense, but your knowledge of war and everything that influences it is clearly limited.

    Let me put this to you bluntly: No politician or global elites care about you, or your family. Varadkar, Zelensky, Putin, Biden, Trump, unelected EU bureaucrats, and any of their banking puppet-masters above.. none of them give a damn about you. Why would they? Not sure why you're on here arguing for wars, or advocating for their military alliances and lucrative military industrial complex. You're only doing their bidding. They literally do not care about you.

    In response to your NATO cat video, here's a video of Zelensky dancing in heels:


    You're definitely not being manipulated, right?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    You can go onto Marine monitor and see they 2 ships have been hanging around just outside Irish territorial waters with patterns over new cables quite easily. I'm sure a well informed anti-government person as yourself is quite capable of cross checking those element .. oh wait, no actually you're not.

    There are dedicated anchorages for ships to take cover from weather which they didn't avail of.

    They are still in Irish territorial waters around these cables even though weather has passed and their destination port is in Guinea.

    You're right, we have no idea what they are doing, but it's pretty sketchy behaviour which we cannot check on properly.

    If this was being done the same distance from Murmansk, the Russian's would be on you like a rash, and have you out of their area of interest as soon as possible.

    But no, this sort of thing is just government propaganda... you really spout some crap at times.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well said. Whilst these guys cry out for "neighborhood watch" membership, Zelensky is busy "reconstructing" the country with the help of his bosses at BlackRock 😃 Ukraine is obviously very lucrative to the elites as it's the breadbasket of Europe. Like they say, war is big business, haha.

    I mean, sympathy and solidarity to the innocent Ukrainian people displaced and killed by this war and consolidation of globalist power, but this Zelensky guy... Ex-actor and comedian. And I'm just seeing now that Sean Penn apparently presented him with his Oscar 🤣 Performance of a lifetime.

    To everyone else here, this is your hero? And yes, both sides are ultimately owned by the same people.

    I ask again: are you SURE you're not being manipulated?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'm interested in retaining our neutrality and staying out of military industrial complex alliances that will cost us a fortune, hand away more of our sovereignty to unelected bureaucrats, and see our people possibly being conscripted to die on foreign wastelands in future.

    Simon Coveney, Defense Minister, is a Bilderberg member and was mentored by late globalist Peter Sutherland (ex-Goldman Sachs bank chairman). You're sure Simon trying to redefine the world "neutrality" in the Dail last year is him actually caring about you, and not him just being a yes-man and serving higher interests? 😃

    Did they scare you with all the Covid stuff before rolling immediately into and scaring you with this war situation?

    Swallow your pride and think about it.

    And yes, you're right: some people would sell out their country in a blink. Those people are called politicians. Lot of our country, assets, and rights have already been sold off to the highest bidder. You're just encouraging it further.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,616 ✭✭✭maninasia


    You are interested in getting bullied by Russia by being a weak state with no defense capability ripe for **** around with.


    Seriously I don't understand people like you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    So much wrong in this thread I don't know where to start. And dont have the time right now.

    So a quick tidy up.

    • Russia has the means to cut submarine internet cables throughout the Atlantic, so Ireland needn't come into the equation at all.
    • Irish neutrality in WW2 was absolutely correct, the outcome was unknowable at the time and Dev's primary duty was to Ireland, Ireland had little influence on the outcome, and that lack of influence was in large part attributable to the UK absolutely wrecking the place and leaving it without the capacity to help anyone very much. Ireland did however still offer a little help as can be found in the Cranborne report to the UK parliament. Devs condolence was to the German people, which was diplomatic protocol. UK royals met with Hitler as good friends - king Edward supported his views, there are photos of the royals seig heiling, the British parliament was home to the leader of the British union of fascists - Sir Oswald Mosley, the Wehrmacht had a British detachment known as the British Freikorps. Britain invented the concentration camp. How did any of these things go down around the world? Let us consider how many condolences would have been paid on the death of queen Victoria, and that fat btch oversaw the systematic deaths of more millions than Adolf.
    • Zelensky being an actor and comedian is not news and its not really worth mentioning, Regan was an actor.
    • Nato did nothing to stop a nato member from colluding with loyalist terror groups to murder Irish people. A nato member wont reveal the truth about the Dublin and Monaghan bombings in which 33 Irish people were murdered. A nato member shot unarmed Irish civil rights marchers. We can't ally ourselves with those who have murdered our people and still won't admit it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,537 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Why should NATO do anything for a non NATO member ?

    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭indioblack


    And that's what this thread boils down to for some posters - Britain. Almost the entire post is directed at the UK.

    The endless regurgitation of DeValera's condolences to Herr Rumpel. This was protocol? Karl Donitz, Hitler's successor as head of state, tried that angle when he wanted to talk to the Americans on behalf of his "government". Eisenhower put a stop to that and arrested the lot of them.

    Condolences to the German people? Yes. On the death of their leader - a man who'd ripped Europe apart with his idealogical war.

    This wasn't the time for protocol.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap




  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    It's always those who are most vocal against NATO that are strangely sanguine about Russia and any other anti Western dictatorship



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    UK wasn't the main thrust of the post. Anything about UK was a response to an earlier poster who lives in a glass house and decided to test the old saying. Albeit with a pebble. You say Dev signed a book. I say Britain supported the Munich agreement and the nazi invasion of Czechslovakia/Sudetenland. I think that settles it.

    No the real point of the post was to say that Russia can cut internet cables pretty much anywhere in the Atlantic thanks to its submarines and the deep dive submersibles they can often carry.

    So no, internet cables aren't a reason to join nato.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Why would they ,

    They are a defensive alliance,not a political party why should they care about anything that happened in NI over the last 50 years ,



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    Russia is an insane dictatorship. Their war is an unjustifiable genocide.

    Nice try.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    Because one of their members was involved in state sponsored terrorism against a peaceful neighboring country.

    And not so much as a single comment. Not even some diplomatic platitude like 'we regret' or 'it is with disappointment blah blah' nothing. Just see no evil hear no evil.

    And of course UK is still a member, how can we ever militarily ally with them after such an abusive history.

    DUP/UDA are in govt with the tories. And recently one of their higher parliamentarians, Patel, was on screen (stupidly) suggesting that UK would leverage Irish food supplies to bring us to heel.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Meanwhile France, Germany, Poland, Holland, Hungary, Denmark all got on with it despite being invaded by Germany not so long before the formation of Nato .

    While complaining about the same British we are utterly reliant for our defense as we can't do it ourselves



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,159 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    We need to do more, no question but for historical reasons it might be a bridge too far to join the UK in such an alliance at this time. That doesn't mean we can't support Ukraine in their struggle.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    They got together out of necessity. To counter the USSR. Which no longer exists.

    What exists now is the much weaker Russian federation. And a much stronger Europe.

    The only time we "rely" on the UK is when Russia is testing nato defenses and they stray into our airspace. Thanks again nato.

    Russia is down to moldy old t-72s driven by retirees, something tells me they don't have the resources to sail over 2500km to invade Ireland. More pressing issues. So yeah we can do it ourselves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭indioblack


    Two sentences, one about internet cables, the other about Zelensky.

    The rest of your post was a rant against Britain.

    Four countries signed the Munich Agreement.

    They are all members of Nato.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    We can do what ourselves exactly.


    Defend ourselves, 🤣 🤣🤣🤣 no,

    no we can't



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,537 ✭✭✭brickster69


    The Brits. That is the only reason they are flying over Ireland warning off Russian jets from Irish airspace you know. They are secretly planning on invading Ireland themselves and don't want the Russians to get in before them. :)

    “The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal.”

    - Camille Paglia



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Anything....


    Attack, foreign agression, sabotage of vital infrastructure,



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭indioblack


    I knew it!

    They never got over signing that treaty in 1921.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    Very good.

    But can you answer the question with anything specific. Im going to say no, you can't.

    The only half decent argument I've seen was the internet cables effort. And Russia can cut internet cables anywhere in the greater Atlantic with few exceptions, so that sort of takes Ireland out of the question.

    "Russia, by comparison, doesn't rely on the cables as much, and it has a substantial fleet of spy submarines to operate on them".



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,159 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    You can bet they have a plan to do just that (unlikely I know). They had during WW2 but they believed it wasn't worth their while and would have upset Irish America.



Advertisement