Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

low hot water pressure - appropriate kitchen tap

  • 04-04-2023 2:30pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,846 ✭✭✭


    Greetings all !!

    Son needs new kitchen tap. Monobloc, but after that, all that matters is that it looks nice and is expensive (to my mind). However, while the direct from the mains cold feed is fine, the hot is dreadful. (I know for a fact that my own isn't great, and I measured it - 20 seconds for a litre , 5L per minute. His is much worse, a guess would be about 50-60% of my feed.) His kitchen was extended and the sink moved about 20 feet away from where it was. The original pipes are not visible, but behind the new sink, the pipes are 1/2" copper. His existing tap is monobloc mixer tap with the braided tails. I assume the bore of these tails is about 5 or 6mm. Presumably this goes some way to explaining the poor pressure from the hot. Anyway, all the preceding is for context, now to the question.

    If a mixer tap specification says its suitable for 0.3Bar to 5Bar, why would it also say "not suitable for gravity fed systems"? My understanding is that for gravity systems the pressure will be about 0.1Bar per metre height. So we're probably expecting about 0.5 to 0.6 Bar on the hot feed. What's the risk of using such a tap?

    For further clarity, here's a link to the preferred (mad expensive, Ted) tap:

    I appreciate any comments. And I'm not too proud to have any of my wild assumptions debunked publicly. 🤣

    Thanks!



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭serox_21


    from screwfix website:

    Gravity Fed Systems - Not Suitable for Gravity-Fed Systems

    if your hot water is coming from hot water tank that's fed from cold storage tank then tap water pressure will be as you describe.

    Change the tap and buy one that's suitable for Gravity-Fed Systems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,846 ✭✭✭NickNickleby


    Thanks for the comment.

    Yep, I saw that, which is what led to the question - "what's the risk?" . Bearing in mind the low operating pressure requirement of this specific tap.

    My thinking is that gravity fed - lower pressure. So, if my cold tank (feeding the hot tap via the hot tank) is for argument's sake able to supply 0.3 bar, why is the quoted tap not suitable for gravity fed system? Insisting on gravity-fed suitable taps is very limiting, which is why I'm trying to get a handle on this.


    To me, the worst case scenario is that the cold feed could over come the gravity fed hot feed and send the water up through the hot tap and potentially overflow the tank in the attic (hopefully the overflow pipe would save the house from destruction). So, if THAT's a real risk and not just my fevered imagination doing its worst, then yes I understand the nature of the risk. But the 0.3Bar min spec is still niggling me...... that's me hoping it's a 'get out of jail free' card.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭10-10-20


    I think it's that you don't get the intended flow by way of an aeration valve or fancy spray head pattern as some of these require more flow before the features such as aeration become established. I think that's all really - cosmetic in all or most cases.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,846 ✭✭✭NickNickleby


    I was looking at that as well, but its quite dear. I suppose, thinking about what 10-10-20 says below, if nothing else it will ensure the aerator/spray functions properly. Probably won't be any good without it.


    Thanks for your response.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,846 ✭✭✭NickNickleby


    I think they (son and his wife) think they'll have a restaurant style sink if they get this tap installed. So, I think the tap AND the pump are probably the way to go - I'm in shock at the total cost of doing this, even though its not my money !!


    Thanks for your response.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭10-10-20


    I remember looking at replacing mine with a similar model after the valve went - North of 600 EUR for the same monoblock!

    Got a valve in the end for 32 EUR and it's still there 10 years later.



Advertisement