Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

Options
1413415417418419

Comments

  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    WHO are still saying that the AZ vaccine is "safe and effective" https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-oxford-astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccine-what-you-need-to-know

    The vaccine is safe and effective for all individuals aged 18 and above. In line with the WHO Prioritization Roadmap and and the WHO Values Framework older adults, health workers and immunocompromised persons should be prioritised.

    So this begs the question, why are WHO still saying that AZ is "safe and effective" while Australia and several other countries have withdrawn it from use.

    So I have a genuine reason to be sceptical about your faith in the authorites saying that the other vaccines are still "safe and effective".



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,485 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    Hands up anyone who is not dead yet from getting the vaccine. It’s so dangerous that we should all be by now.



  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Well here's a nice chart from the UK showing adverse reactions during the vaccine rollout

    So plenty of adverse reactions reported for Pfizer as well.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,085 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Its not a matter of faith but of evidence. And actions like this are proof that the expert authorities are actively assessing vaccine safety.

    AZ can be safe and effective but withdrawn because there are safer or more effective vaccines out there. Which there are.

    The side effects with AZ were extremely rare. The impact from covid infection are more severe and frequent.

    You appeared to express a wish for vaccines to be withdrawn. With zero regard for those who therefore be left without benefit of vaccination v covid. You have not expressed a wish eg that pfizer still be available to those considered highly vulnerable to covid. You have entirely failed to show how across all age groups and conditions covid is less of a risk than vaccines in terms of cost benefit - which would be neccesary to support this position.

    This is an anti vax position that is morally and intellectually bankrupt.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,984 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    AZ is safe and effective.

    People die as a result of seat-belts. Seat-belts are very safe. Those two sentences are not mutually exclusive.

    However if vaccine X is infinitesimally safer than vaccine Y, and they both do the same thing, then vaccine X might be dropped.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,984 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    We're back to VAERS/Yellowcard reports again.

    To explain this (for the 50th time), if there was a report card for an adverse effect within 4 weeks of e.g. eating mackerel, there would be millions of reports.

    That's how VAERs, Yellowcard, etc works. Experts analyse the reports to see if there are any variations outside the expected results.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,237 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    Good grief. Are you ever sickened by your own level of obedience? Every morning I thank the Heaven's that there will always be a sizeable chunk of populations that don't swallow everything the government/media try to ram down our throats

    Here we have more attempts to normalise what were unprecedented government intrusions. "Getting vaccines is just like eating a fish!". Maybe to you it is Dohnjoe.

    How many times have you seen the world population being shoehorned into eating mackerel? (or in the case of mRNA vaccines - three-headed, neon mackerels)

    -----------

    Warning applied for breach of charter

    Post edited by Hannibal_Smith on


  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    Mackerel with garlic butter is amazing, you picked a poor analogy



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747



    So for a week (13/12/21) where there was roughly 3.9 million doses administered, there were roughly 4,400 ADR's ...meaning a reported issue in 0.001% of vaccines... (1 in 100,000).

    Thank you for highlighting this. This shows the vaccine is safer than paracetamol.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,096 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    You couldn't possibly have missed this line at the top of the page, could you?

    It is important to note that reported adverse reactions have not been proven to be related to the vaccine and should not be interpreted as a list of known side effects.


    We have been over the Yellowcard system multiple times, and I think it was only a day or so ago that it last got a mention as someone was incorrectly using the numbers to support their lies. It doesn't support your argument and never did. Why repeatedly keep returning to use the same data that does nothing for you?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,075 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Free jab? So government did not have to pay for them and still continue to receive them free of charge? Are the vaccine centers staffed with volunteers?

    This exercise in futility actually cost us dearly and cost keeps rising.



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    considering the state of the Irish public health system and the amount of hospitalisations avoided, it's probably the best and cheapest investment the government have applied to the country in the name of health, in decades.

    edit: also subsidised by the EU as part of collective purchasing



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,075 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Of course, but only if you are firm believer. You got to believe that there were "hospitalizations avoided" to come up with statement like that.

    Anyway, placebo tends to have the same effect.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,085 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    No they don't. This is a statement of fact that is without foundation. Completely blatant medical misinformation.

    There is no placebo for respiratory viruses that even begins to approach the effectiveness of covid vaccines at preventing hospitalisation and death.

    And you talk about "you got to believe". You have absolutely no evidence to support your statement re: placebos. When it is obvious your position on vaccines is not evidence based.

    The effectiveness of vaccination versus hospitalisation is borne out in study after study, country after country. This is but one of them. The effectiveness wanes but 64% is significant protection - where's your placebo that trumps that?

     For the outcome of severe COVID-19, vaccine effectiveness waned from 89% (82 to 93; p<0·001) at 15–30 days to 64% (44 to 77; p<0·001) from day 121 onwards.

    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-67362200089-7/fulltext

    Post edited by odyssey06 on

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,075 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Where did I say specifically that there is placebo for respiratory viruses? You seems to jump in conclusion before realizing that most of blatant medical misinformation comes from your overreaction where you "think" what people say even though they never said such thing.

    Placebo effect is fairly common and understood by medical community and in case you do not know here is how for example harward medical school define it:

    The "placebo effect" is a phenomenon in which the brain convinces the body that a fake treatment is real and can stimulate healing. It has been found to be just as effective as traditional treatments under certain circumstances, and some researchers now recommend comparing an experimental treatment with an existing one when possible.

    This was observed even during covid vaxx trials where on average about 30% of placebo recipients reported various systemic adverse events. It also works the other way where vaxx recipients think they were saved from hospitalization even though there is absolutely no way to say or predict if they would end up hospitalized.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,085 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Yes I know about the placebo effect which is why I understand the misinformation and half truths in your post. The placebo effect is a lot more nuanced and complicated than that short summary you have listed, and the effect varies dramatically depending on the type of disease.

    Someone who got the placebo (or vaccine) could have a heart attack or medical issue manifest in the trial period post injection. That gets reported. Doesn't mean there's any connection to the injection. And there are rare cases of injuries received from injection - or any substance, placebo or medicine or anything.

    Sure why not get rid of all medicines then and rely entirely on the placebo effect if they "tend to have to same effect"??? Would you say "placebo tends to have the same effect as antibiotics"???

    So how about reading your own posts - this was your quote: "Anyway, placebo tends to have the same effect."

    And the studies cited aren't talking about people who 'think' they were saved from hospitalization. But actual hospitalization records based on vaccination status.

    So no they don't "tend to have the same effect", and to suggest the effectiveness of the vaccination is comparable in that way to placebo is medical misinformation without foundation or merit.

    My point stands:

    The effectiveness of vaccination versus hospitalisation is borne out in study after study, country after country. This is but one of them. The effectiveness wanes but 64% is significant protection - where's your placebo that trumps that?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,075 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    As I said. You tend to go to overdrive attributing posters various scenarios which result mostly from taking quotes out of context and your overthinking.

    Besides, they do have the same effect as it was demonstrated time and again when we were constantly reprimanded that taking vaxx does not mean we should stop being afraid. Literally thousands of articles and quotes repeated ad nauseum about how vaxxed people may succumb to false security feeling and stop being careful and end up in hospital or dead. I would call it reversed placebo effect but I am not in mood to get to one of your word picking or out of context quotes duel.

    My point also stands. People believed and were led to believe that getting vaxx make them immune and they will not get covid, that was later revised to stopping transmission and that was also revised to reducing symptoms. Add little creativity and reducing symptoms become reducing transmission eve though some people still cling on "stopping transmission". People believed many promises and while reality was different it worked for some and didn't work for others. Placebo effect.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,085 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    This is the reality:

    The effectiveness of vaccination versus hospitalisation is borne out in study after study, country after country. This is but one of them. The effectiveness wanes but 64% is significant protection - where's your placebo that trumps that?

    Which you have pointedly failed to challenge with evidence, except with a smokescreen about placebos. Those results are proof positive the vaccines are significantly effective at preventing hospitalisation and death and this is not a manifestation of a mere placebo effect.

    It worked for some and didn't work for others - that vague remark could be said about any medicine. The metric is how many people did it work for - and the figures established in such studies as the below show a significant protection effect from the vaccine, entirely separate to, and dwarfing any supposed placebo effect.

    To try to dismiss that away as 'placebo effect' is completely without foundation and if you are making a statement of fact that the vaccine's effectiveness is down to placebo effect that is without question medical misinformation.

    Vaccination had a real, measurable effect at reducing hospitalisations entirely refuting your claim in post #12436

    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-67362200089-7/fulltext

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭323


    So in Switzerland, their Federal Office of Public Health now say that “no COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for spring/summer 2023.” And any doctor who does administer COVID injections will now be liable for any damage caused by the shots.

    While in the land of the free. after 1,120 days of slowing the spread, Biden has finally declared the national Covid emergency “over.”

    Does that mean that as there's no longer an emergency, the experimental COVID Shots will now have there "Emergency Use Authorisation" removed?

    “Follow the trend lines, not the headlines,”



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭323


    So in Switzerland, their Federal Office of Public Health now say that “no COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for spring/summer 2023.” And any doctor who does administer COVID injections will now be liable for any damage caused by the shots.

    While in the land of the free. after 1,120 days of slowing the spread, Biden has finally declared the national Covid emergency “over.”

    Does that mean that as there's no longer an emergency, the experimental COVID Shots will now have there "Emergency Use Authorisation" removed?

    “Follow the trend lines, not the headlines,”



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,085 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Not sure which country you are living in, but in Ireland \ EU they are not emergency.

    Your references to Switzerland appears to contain several incorrect statements.

    If a doctor recommends that you receive the COVID-19 vaccine because you are considered “high risk”, it will be provided free of charge, and covered by compulsory health insurance. In addition, such recommended COVID-19 vaccination will continue to be covered by subsidiary liability protection by the federal government... the doctor’s liability in vaccinating people against COVID-19 is no different from any other medical procedure or vaccination.

    And the vaccines are not 'experimental' full stop, statement of fact made without foundation as per


    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 655 ✭✭✭BoxcarWilliam99


    Yes once the emergency is declared over the vaccine manufacturer's have to apply for approval.

    They were only granted emergency use



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭323


    Guessing same will have to apply in Europe if a similar end to the COVID "Emergency" were to be declared.

    The EU's equivalent Conditional Marketing Authorisation (CMA) will also come to an end.

    Good luck getting approval, with the ongoing Pfizer test data being released. (The data they had got a court order to hide for 75 years), Moderna data starts coming out next month. Will take more than a fact check statement from a PR company (Rauters) to hide the fraud.

    “Follow the trend lines, not the headlines,”



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,984 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    CMA can be renewed even without "emergency" status... seasonal flu vaccine is generally under CMA...



  • Registered Users Posts: 655 ✭✭✭BoxcarWilliam99


    No they must apply for approval

    When the pandemic is over, the EUA cease.



  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747




  • Registered Users Posts: 655 ✭✭✭BoxcarWilliam99


    Contact the companies individually?

    I don't understand your point.

    Here :

    When the pandemic is over, the EUA will cease and vaccine manufacturers will need to apply for full U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval (here). No timeline on this has yet been given (here). The UK, meanwhile, has a similar mechanism (here , here).

    AP News.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,984 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Full FDA approval has already been given for the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines



Advertisement