Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Womens' rugby Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread

1343537394046

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 746 ✭✭✭minitrue


    An often heard refrain is that just putting the men's structures onto the women's game doesn't work. One of JC200022's recurring points is about elite Vs participation rugby and the 10% who want the elite performance environment Vs the 90% who don't. We can probably assume most of the 70 who you would see as poached are in the 10%.

    So I think what might be more like the answer to the problem you mention is for the AIL and provincial leagues to be regarded as completely separate in the same way the provinces and clubs are on the men's side. So maybe the same 70 players are still doing the bulk of their training with UL but UL release loads most weekends to play for the non-AIL clubs ( see now sydthebeat suggesting something a bit similar).

    I'll also go back to the "big 3" Dublin issue. There's another angle where young women are more prone to move to Dublin anyway for university or work but of course there is also the elite performance environment aspect where there's certainly very good arguments to be made that the IRFU should be throwing resources at e.g. Bohs, Galweigans, Cooke to help them have everything an elite athlete wants spread around the country (so I hear what syd says about a midlands team though I suspect at least for now that's a bit further down the road).

    All of this is kinda the big picture point though, right now there's no real plan and structure or if you take the IRFU at face value the plan is to centralise a lot more with the AIL being on the same level as touch rugby!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 746 ✭✭✭minitrue


    Yeah I thought twice about even hinting there might have been a reason to get rid of him (i've absolutely no reason to think that's the case) but I was trying to be charitable to the IRFU by suggesting there could be reasons why they had no choice other than to change now. I don't know what happened but will stick to my point that the fact the IRFU couldn't be bothered to even try to spin it somehow into a positive PR move speaks volumes to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Its the same as listing players clubs with the mens senior 15s side. Tradition. All irish squads will list a club for a player. As others have said 7s can be very inconsistent with some clubs not competing ever and some clubs only occasionally and even then its for a social weekend

    Now if IRFU were to be serious about 7s they would work with the existing 7s tournaments especially the big ones like Kinsale... they would create a 7s series and clubs or even a group of mates could enter a team and try win a series. So you would have the existing 7s tournaments like Kinsale, Midland midnight in Tullamore, Clifden, etc.

    Yeah very much social focused and you dont have anything like the take up of it here compared to a lot of countries. ive family and friends who play in england and for some of them theyre club compete every year in 7s and they even have a slightly separate club identity for a 7s team.

    And thats even including some of the players who only play rugby with the UL college team in SSI competitions. Ive been saying it about Bohs for ages. And Bohs dont even field u18 girls teams. they did have a 16s so hopefully this will change for next year. Shannon and Ballina-Killaloe and other nearby clubs field good numbers at underage but lose plenty of stronger players to Bohs at adult level which doesnt help anyone.. Id definitely agree about transfers. possibly even a limit on interpro players etc. Munsters interpro squad has basically been Bohs and a few others for years now which is wrong and doesnt aid development.

    At least Dublin has a few clubs competing and then Wicklow as you say have done great work with locally based team. Munster doesnt have near enough clubs at highest level. Max squad numbers should definitely come in and would really help.

    The Munster league had a tipperary team last season, primarily based in Thurles and just called itself Thurles this season and there were Waterford and Ennis-Kilrush teams. Get them coaching assistance and it would be great...

    Buccs have had a womens set up. But not sure if they did this season though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,158 ✭✭✭✭Caranica


    My local ladies gaa club has had to collaborate with another local ladies club to be consistently able to field a team at senior level. Underage is still age graded and separate clubs but there is definitely a drop off for college and work with people moving to the cities. It's something that might work for a 7s league.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,313 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I think there are two elements to it.

    First off , I would never want to stand in the way of a player who has aspirations of playing at a higher level - Regardless of gender.

    I'm involved in a junior club with a successful underage setup and we lose a number of players every year to AIL clubs because players want to try to make that level. It's just how things are.

    It happens in Mens and Womens rugby across the board - The big clubs hoover up any player that shows a bit of potential and fill their heads with idea that the only way they can make it is to be playing for them and they only they can offer them the coaching and the access to possible Provincial academies etc. etc.

    In Mens those players are spread across multiple AIL clubs so it's perhaps not as immediately obvious as in the Womens game where there are only a handful of AIL clubs.

    At college age (18-23) most of the players in womens rugby have far less rugby played than their male counter-parts - That's just the nature of the game for girls over the last 10 years.

    It's getting much better as the underage game grows but for the players in that age bracket now , they need actual game time more than anything else.

    In my example above, the 70 have all been told they are at an AIL level , but the reality is that a significant number of them will never play AIL regardless of the environment they are in. And even if they might eventually get there, they would be far better served now by playing regularly with a team at a lower level than by simply training in an AIL club.

    The concept of "Dual Status" player has always existed , but under current rules I think an AIL team is limited to only 2 or 3 such players per squad. That should change and I would also suggest that they junior club should have first choice on the player as if they are choosing Dual Status the player is unlikely to be a regular starter for the AIL side.

    The focus should be on maximising the game time for as many players as possible , having a few clubs with massive squads does nothing for that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭kita99


    Enya Breen injured. On behalf of her,a few un experienced players was called up. Why McWilliams don't call Jenny Murphy who is the most strong and reliable (expereanced enough) CTB. Or is IRFU going to call back some 7's players after next week for the crashes against Italy and scotland watching Ireland 7's result and standing in the world series? They are now 5th place following France (It is already quarified 2024 Olympics by the hosting prestage) and Fiji is 6th place below 10pt margin after Ireland. If Ireland keeps this margin, Ireland in fact 4th that qualification place. Is the understanding of me wrong? Even so,I think that it will be difficult to win both countries after 7's team's hard schedules.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Ireland Team

    15. Méabh Deely (Blackrock College RFC/Connacht) (3)

    14. Aoife Doyle (Railway Union RFC/Munster) (13)

    13. Aoife Dalton (Old Belvedere RFC/Leinster) (3)

    12. Vicky Irwin (Sale Sharks/Ulster) (2)

    11. Natasja Behan (Blackrock College RFC/Leinster) (3)

    10. Dannah O’Brien (Old Belvedere RFC/Leinster) (3)

    9. Molly Scuffil-McCabe (Railway Union RFC/Leinster) (5)

    1. Linda Djougang (Old Belvedere RFC/Leinster) (25)

    2. Neve Jones (Gloucester-Hartpury/Ulster) (14)

    3. Christy Haney (Blackrock College RFC/Leinster) (6)

    4. Nichola Fryday (Exeter Chiefs/Connacht) (30) (Captain)

    5. Sam Monaghan (Gloucester-Hartpury/IQ Rugby) (11)

    6. Dorothy Wall (Blackrock College RFC/Munster) (17)

    7. Grace Moore (Saracens/IQ Rugby) (6)

    8. Deirbhile Nic a Bháird (Old Belvedere RFC/Munster) (5)

    Replacements:

    16. Clara Nielson (Exeter Chiefs/IQ Rugby)*

    17. Sadhbh McGrath (City of Derry/Cooke RFC/Ulster) (1)

    18. Kathryn Buggy (Gloucester-Hartpury/IQ Rugby)*

    19. Hannah O’Connor (Blackrock College RFC/Leinster) (15)

    20. Brittany Hogan (Old Belvedere RFC/Ulster) (11)

    21. Nicole Cronin (UL Bohemian RFC/Munster) (22)

    22. Anna McGann (Railway Union RFC/Connacht) (2)

    23. Lauren Delany (Sale Sharks/IQ Rugby)n(18).



    i fear for that team against France. A dry track and france could put 50 on ireland.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    France team to face Ireland: 15 Morgane Bourgeois, 14 Cyrielle Banet, 13 Marine Menager, 12 Gabrielle Vernier, 11 Caroline Boujard, 10 Carla Arbez, 9 Pauline Bourdon, 1 Annaelle Deshaye, 2 Agathe Sochat, 3 Clara Joyeux, 4 Manae Feleu, 5 Audrey Forlani, 6 Axelle Berthoumieu, 7 Emeline Gros, 8 Charlotte Escudero

    Replacements: 16 Elisa Riffoneau, 17 Coco Lindelauf, 18 Assia Khalfaoui, 19 Maelle Picut, 20 Gaelle Hermet, 21 Alexandra Chambon, 22 Jessy Tremouliere, 23 Marie Dupouy



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    anna caplice doesnt give a very good overview as to the atmosphere and the management of the women's team from her time playing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,158 ✭✭✭✭Caranica


    I don't think it's much better at the moment either and people are afraid to speak up and face exile



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,431 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Good start by the women in green today, going toe to toe with this serious French outfit, however got quite easily overwhelmed in their own red zone to concede on 9 mins.

    And as I speak they just footballed their way to a second try. Fortunately their 10 couldn't hit a barn door with a bazooka, so 10-0.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Maybe if we reduced the French to 10, we might have a chance? For all the talking up of this game on RTE, pretty poor stuff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 46 Bobb Sapp


    Marked improvement. I think with McWilliams giving the young women their chance we have to be patient and give the team a chance to build over several seasons. But I understand people want results now!



  • Registered Users Posts: 46 Bobb Sapp


    I feel women are generally more astute intellectually and less prone to hot headedness than men but why o why can they not conclude that they are smaller than the French and are reaping more returns out side than close in? We are still getting good go forward but we are miles smaller and would do better trying to tire the French out on the fringes. Run it wide and run those large women around the park



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,171 ✭✭✭DellyBelly


    Bit harsh...God love Ireland they are trying their best...you'd feel sorry for them...



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭naughtyboy


    Even if the Irish girls were made the fittest team in the tournament it would make little difference . They have very poor skills , the passing is dreadful. The 9 and 10 positions especially poor , but its been like that for last 5 years at least. Any rugby team with a decent 9 and 10 can exert some kind of control even when the rest of team are under pressure.

    To see the 3 former players on tv3 spinning lies about green shoots etc etc is just a joke.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,171 ✭✭✭DellyBelly


    Again very harsh...they tried their best and that is all you can ask...God you'd feel so sorry for them....



  • Registered Users Posts: 239 ✭✭Fotish


    Good call, France to put 50 points on Ireland .



  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭kita99


    HAfter the match,HC talk about the improvement of stats 2nd half without the fact of 14 wemen France. What a easy-going man he is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 239 ✭✭Fotish


    True, we probably should feel sorry for them, nobody likes to see a team embarrassed every week.

    Thank heavens for the off button.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭kita99


    U 18 Irwland girls 15(3T) vs France24 (4T&2G). Well done Ireland. Especially Alma Obehi Atagamen and Risin Maher are both powerful. The Importance of the size at female rugby is proved by them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭kita99


    Ireland U18 5-14 England U18. It looked that Ireland Dominated in possetion and teritory by both 65~70%.Why they did't win.Was they teached basic rugby skills and tactics the way of training at ordinary time.They looked to win at phisical abilities.I want to know that how they wivel.ll be trained for getting abilities to internatinal level especially living urban areas. They did well done. Give them the basic envilonments and coaches please.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,158 ✭✭✭✭Caranica


    You do know that they only start contested scrums here at U16 right? The girls are still only learning, give them a break.

    As a side note, I find your posts difficult to read sometimes, is it that English isn't your first language?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    I think the studio pundits are looking for coaching jobs. They'll keep their powder dry and won't criticize the team. They'll keep on criticising the IRFU until the IRFU say "ok you do the job".

    And if you think the team already has a protected media status now, wait until the women who took zip responsibility and used the media to blame everyone else for them not qualifying for the world cup, they'll be taking over now 😆



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,158 ✭✭✭✭Caranica




  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    some valid points, some hyperbole, some hearsay. Nothing very helpful in it though really.

    Neither side comes out of that article very well in my opinion. There has to be a certain realisation from the womens side that things are progressing, however slowly, so pointing back to times when things weren't good is not helpful for anyone. Coaches from Railway Union adding to the conversation isnt really helpful either when they are part of the problem of the lopsided womens AIL due to their hoovering and storage of players. Plus their attempt a few years ago of looking for "senior club status" was a serious misjudgement on their behalf due to their lack of a senior mens side and a fully functions youths and minis sections.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Can anyone provide the full content of the article?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭Cosmo Kramer


    This is getting embarrassing at this stage with the constant player complaints and leaks to the media.

    The contracts they were offered look not dissimilar to the contracts offered to men's 7s players, ultimately the women's and 7s teams contribute next to nothing financially to Irish rugby, so it's just not realistic for them to expect to receive the equivalent of what male players receive at provincial level.

    And someone said "who gives a **** about women's rugby" - that's just the view of one person and we're not told what role, if any, they have in terms of the women's game. Why not name and shame, if it's that big a concern?

    The blue shorts were brought in for their benefit but they still find a way to use it as a reason for complaint as well.

    They seem to just go around looking for things to complain about, or maybe to use as an excuse given their pitiful showings on the field of play. More hammerings coming up in the next few weekends no doubt. And a seemingly neverending free pass from the Irish rugby media to go with them. This needs to stop and they need to focus on improving their results first and foremost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,158 ✭✭✭✭Caranica




  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Special report: Irish rugby likened to 'old boys club' with sexism commonplace

    Ireland's men are the best team in their world – but their women's side face an uphill battle

    By

    Fiona Tomas

    13 April 2023 • 7:00am


    Ireland's women are on course for the Six Nations wooden spoon, in stark contrast to their men's side and, given their players' concerns, it is not hard to grasp why CREDIT: Tim Clayton/Corbis via Getty Images

    The Irish Rugby Football Union has been likened to an "old boys club" after a damning investigation by Telegraph Sport uncovered an alarming amount of sexism towards its women's team.

    <mod: snip>

    Post edited by awec on


  • Administrators Posts: 54,168 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    @sydthebeat sorry, I had to snip your post as we're not allowed to paste pay-walled material here.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    It is getting absurd from both parties.

    The IRFU are just basically playing the media game. When there was that 30 Recommendation thing, the IRFU just flat out said yes to every thing. You'd think there would be some issues, some negotiations on certain things but no. It was a flat out, no thought, yes to everything. Why? Because basically they and the PR department wanted the thing to go away because the media were running with it, on the teams side.

    The team have been using the media and playing the game, that a PR/Marketing department would be proud of.

    It's basically 2 PR/Marketing departments having a tiff on the behalf of each party. It is pathetic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 746 ✭✭✭minitrue


    Where do you think the 30 recommendations came from? It was the IRFU employees. And if you read them what do you think who would have pushed back on? Also highly relevant to note that #29 was to consider the introduction of hybrid or retainer contracts (and #30 was to work with RPI to create a programme of support for players to enable them to balance work, study and rugby commitments) while of course one of the points in today's article was that they dropped that concept in favour of "all or nothing" derisory full time contracts.

    And it's not "the team" telling the IRFU their slurry still stinks as they all know they will be the next ones exiled if they do, it's people who have either left the game or at least the IRFU's influence (notice this article isn't from an Irish rugby journalist who would have their access pulled). If you think they are all PR/marketing folk ... hell do you even really think the IRFU are letting their own PR people deal with their responses? You think a PR department told them to tell a journalist they couldn't comment on a question unless they got the name of the player who dared tell a journalist a story?

    Some fun questions:

    1) How many of the €15k full time employees just see it as serving an apprenticeship in the shop window for a better contract elsewhere?

    2) Are the €15k full-time contracts legal in terms of minimum wage legislation?

    3) What do the contracts say about expressing any opinions? Could that be why the IRFU were so keen to jump straight to central contracts?

    #IGiveAFuck



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 746 ✭✭✭minitrue


    Meanwhile I tried to work out earlier how the WXV 2024 will work and got nowhere, does anyone know? Specifically will our place in the 2024 Six Nations decide our WXV 2024 spot or is that a one off for 2023? If the 2024 6 Nations result has no bearing on WXV we might have a rough time trying to qualify for the 2025 World Cup despite the fact it has expanded to 16 teams! How they split the pools in WXV 3, which I also couldn't find any info on, could mean we have to win all 3 games.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Isn't it amazing how all these stories always come out after embarrassing defeats. It's time they took responsibility for their abject performances and stopped anonymously blaming others with anecdotes of he said this we were denied that. It should also be ok for the media to critisise them,but they are getting a free ride for some reason.They are becoming a very dislikable team.





  • The last line sums it up. I back any Irish team or athlete. I've been to plenty of the women's rugby matches but honestly just find the team really hard to support.


    I had hoped the new beginnings would help and with a lot of new players maybe it would change. IRFU have made mistakes, there's no denying that, but I do feel like some of the women come across as an extremely entitled bunch who will blame anyone and everyone bar themselves. The media obviously are happy to write about it. The line "Johnny Sexton wouldn't be denied protein" is one of the most cringe worthy things I've read.


    Neither side are coming across well, would be nice to be focussing on the rugby and the fact that we've a lot of young players who are going to be learning and improving a lot.


    Yes there will be plenty of defeats but that's how you rebuild



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Qualification is a one shot.

    Then WXV division one will be ringfenced 2024 but WXV division two and three will have promotion and relegation after 2023.

    There are 4 teams qualified, there will be 6 qualified through regions or the pacific fours. These will probably mostly end up in Womens XV 1 and 2.

    The top 6 ranked teams that dont qualify through another path will qualify through WXV. That means that a mid table result in WXV3 in 2024 will get us qualification for the women's rugby world cup 2025.

    England France Canada and New Zealand will all be in WXV division 1 and are already qualified.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,158 ✭✭✭✭Caranica


    BS. The IRFU is rotten to the core when it comes to the attitudes to and structures around women's rugby. You also call this a team, given the wholesale changes in personnel over past few years, they've had no chance to gel as a unit.

    If you don't want to support the players, don't bother. They need support and empathy not negative diatribe like you've posted.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Sounds like more excuses . Let the results do the talking



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,158 ✭✭✭✭Caranica


    We're not going to get results with the current set up. That article is the tip of the iceberg but all of this goes back years. More will come out.

    And this article didn't come out after a bad result, it came out on travel day to Italy. It's bad timing for the players but it needs to come out.





  • They travelled yesterday. Not sure why, but the women seem to do out a day earlier than the other teams



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    I think many of the contracted players see it as first step towards long term more sustainable and liveable contracts just like with mens game and first pros here were on relatively little.money.


    That link shows qualification process.

    https://www.world.rugby/news/624265/world-rugby-launches-new-global-competition-and-aligned-calendar-to-supercharge-the-womens-15s-game

    Absolute nonsense. These stories have came out after big wins as well and these stories help show why some of the defeats are as bad as they are as its shows the lack of attention the set up is given by the powers that be.

    Not excuses at all. The players are not getting the support they should which would give them better performances/results.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 746 ✭✭✭minitrue


    The "these will most probably end up in WXV 1 or 2" part is a little bit of a stretch as I presume they will qualify for WXV from tournaments this year but then get the world cup spots from tournaments next year. That's 3 regions (Oceania, Asia and Africa) where one team might win this year (WXV 2) but another (WXV 3) wins next year to take a WC spot. Worst case that could leave only one spot for WXV 3. Throw in the confusion from promotion/relegation and the way it's played in pools and even if there are 3 spots available you could only lose 1 game and still not be in the top 3 if the other 2 teams in your pool are the weakest and get whipped by the teams you beat.

    Or IOW we really want to either get into WXV 2 and stay there somehow or win WXV 3 this year to get there!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    While South Africa aren't the best womens team (by a long shot) no one in Africa will challenge them and they will sail into the African championship this year and next year.

    You are right about the Asian tournament being up in the air. Japan or Hong Kong are realistic competitors. Oceania also could be up in the air with Fiji or Samoa being likely to qualify but if Australia doesn't beat USA in pacific 4s Australia may be trying to qualify through Oceania.

    Getting into WXV2 is the easiest route to the world cup. I suspect our team would be stronger than the Oceania or Asian qualifier.

    Our easiest route to the womens rugby world cup is probably to beat Scotland to claim 5th in the six nations this year qualifying for womens xv2. Beat either or both of Fiji/Samoa and Japan/Hong Kong to retain our spot in WXV2. That of course assumes that the split into pools allows us to face one of those teams. It may not which could see us screwed (facing the other six nations qualifier, the 4th place team in pacific 4s and South Africa).



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭naughtyboy


    We all know what's going on here with the current and ex players, this is nothing but a money and power grab.

    The problem is the ladies are useless and have been for years and so their bargaining chip is not success but instead we are women and so are entitled to equality.

    It's embarrassing, they should focus all their energy on getting better and as they do their will be more interest in the women's game and as a result more money , its basic common sense. Someone needs to get through to them that You get paid by your value not your Time.


    Mod: Trolling and misogyny will not be tolerated here. Infraction issued.

    Post edited by Zzippy on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 746 ✭✭✭minitrue



    South Africa seem to be on the up from a low floor with the most distant challenger(s) so I'd agree it would be the biggest shock of the 3 if say Kenya nipped past them but all it takes is one surprise result and between teams close that could be one early red card mistake (or a red and the wrong injuries/other cards). Oceania is a little nuts and I guess we'd want Australia to be 4th in P4N and then take the Oceania WC spot to make sure Fiji/Samoa can't do the flip-flop and both qualify without WXV results.

    If we somehow beat Scotland and get 5th then we'd probably have to beat at least one of Australia/USA, South Africa and Japan/Hong Kong to survive in WXV 2 (wikipedia says it's the 2 six nations and Oceania in one side and P4N, Asia and Africa in the other). Given what we saw in Japan and the trajectory South Africa seem to be on I wouldn't be very confident. If we don't beat Scotland you would hope we could win WXV 3 with something like Spain, Hong Kong, Samoa, Kenya and Colombia but I wouldn't be rushing to put money on it!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,431 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Ireland improved in some aspects, but were ultimately shown up again by a decent Italian side playing well within themselves.

    How you even ask this team to pull on jerseys to play an England team that are at the pinnacle of the women's game, I just don't know. It could very feasibly be a 100 point margin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭Cosmo Kramer


    The PR machine will be going into overdrive for the next week now. Who knows what kind of stuff will be leaked out this week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    They will have the sevens players back by then surely?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement