Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Munster Team Talk Thread - Beirne After Reading

1350351353355356561

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,117 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Ah ya, crossed-purposes; I’m not arguing we should be allowed 3 more in those positions mentioned, but we clearly have scope for 1 more.

    It won’t be at TH with Ryan coming back, but I’d love to see it in one of the other front-row positions.

    (Fwiw, if we brought in 2, we’d still be level with Ulster).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    RG's deal runs until June '24 so there's two (RG, Nankivell) already on the books for next season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    I'm not following your logic.

    "There's space in the suitcase for more stuff"

    "Yes, but if you put stuff in the suitcase, you will have used more space"....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    It needs to be a TH though or failing that a big ball carrying hooker. That’s consistently Munsters weakness in the business end of things.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,117 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    It is but I also think it’s extremely unlikely to be a TH, imo.

    Archer is signed on for 1 more season, John Ryan is coming back and we have Salanoa and Knox too.

    Any more would probably be too many in a position we don’t really have any international involvement.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,117 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Ya, that’s what I meant; we only have 2, so the lowest number of NIQ’s of any province.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Given Ireland's options at hooker I'd say its one of the positions they could actually bring in a NIQ



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    its more likely than 10 but id still think it more likely that someone gets moved from another province (leinster lets be honest) rather than importing a foreign player. maybe if it were someone world class like marx as working with a player like that could help younger hookers, but i would still be very surprised



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah, I’m not saying they shouldn’t be allowed bring in any, and as others have mentioned I think a hooker is feasible given Ireland have four good options there and it’s an obvious position of weakness for Munster.

    I just meant you won’t get the budget to bring in 3 in those positions (alongside Snyman and Nankivell).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,701 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Pretty sure both Snyman and Nankivell are privately financed, not paid for by the IRFU.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Haven’t seen it reported that Nankivell is, but would think regardless of that, it wouldn’t be likely you’d get permission for 5 NIQ players.

    Could be wrong but think it’s unlikely.

    Would it be a good use of those funds anyway? Are Munster just a player or two away?

    Genuine question: wouldn’t this private money be better spent funding an extra few player development officers for the next 10 years than on the likes of Snyman / De Allende?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Kelleher just extended at Leinster so that's one IQ option gone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Would Leinster be better off without the Heineken Cups that Rocky Elsom, Brad Thorn, Scott Fardy and Nathan Hines helped them win?

    (i.e., all of their Heineken Cups)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    A player or two away from what?

    At the moment I feel that Munster are just a player or two away from being on the same level as Ulster.

    That is to say a top 4/5 urc team that doesn't have to scrap to qualify for Europe and can compete for home knockouts.

    Nothing wrong with 3 quality NIQ imo.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    A player or two away from being genuine European and domestic contenders.

    Ulster aren’t that, and there isn’t realistically much between Munster and Ulster right now.

    Signing 3 high quality NIQ players in those positions is probably at least €1m a year or close enough. I think there are better and more sustainable ways Munster could spend that money.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Do you really think Munster are as close to European Cup success as that?

    The competition is orders of magnitude more difficult to win now than when Leinster won their first one.

    The aspiration here must surely be to get back to the very top table, not to just indulge fans in the short term with expensive signings when ultimately the team overall isn’t built to succeed.

    We keep hearing how Leinster’s advantages are money, but here a number of Munster fans are consistently proposing just spending money now on a handful of players for a short period of time.

    How many elite player development officers could Munster have employed instead of the money they’ve paid RG Snyman and Damian de Allende?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    on the other hand, there are benefits to adding a couple of world class players, such as those mentioned, to the squad - once its kept to a relative minimum. DDA was generally top class for munster too, he just was unlucky that he was playing in a JVG team.

    theres an argument that munster have brought in too many journeymen, but signing someone like frisch didnt excite me in any way initially and yet hes been pretty great so far. obviously jenkins didnt really show anything for munster and yet is now doing very well with leinster



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,117 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    You’re painting an either / or, black and white picture here when the reality is, it needs to be both.

    By all accounts Munster’s development pathways have significantly improved (we’re seeing that in the players coming thru now).

    Equally, Munster will always need to supplement with NIQ’s and players from outside the Province.

    And we have (and I’m repeating myself at this point) the lowest number of NIQ players of any Province.

    There is scope.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah, I’m not disparaging those players at all. They’re obviously world class (DDA, Snyman) and hopefully Snyman in particular will have had a big influence longer term on the likes of Edogbo, Ahern etc.

    I’ve just genuinely spent a fair bit of time thinking over the past week or two on player development pathways etc because of the comments from McFarland / Wigglesworth / Jackman, and trying to see what’s behind it.

    I don’t think it’s just demographics - it’s just not a case of more numbers into the machine means more quality players out the other side. Not to create the level of disparity we’ve seen in the past 10 years or so.

    I genuinely believe right now if you took 100 random 12-year old rugby players from Munster, the same from Ulster, Connacht and then Leinster, there wouldn’t be anything really between them in terms of quality. You’d have a few obviously athletically superior kids in there, quite a few average to poor players, and a lot of guys in the middle. Across all four groups.

    But, crucially, I think if you revisited the same set of 100 players at this point in time at the age of say 18, you would see what we largely see in underage selections in recent years, a far higher proportion of pro-ready prospects in the Leinster group.

    It wasn’t always that way. The schools system has always been around and always been the bulk feeder to Leinster, but the difference in quality in players coming from the schools versus elsewhere in the country wasn’t always so stark.

    So what is the difference? Investment. Investment in coaching, facilities, nutrition, gym facilities etc.

    If that’s what it is, that problem is solvable. It’s not that easy to find a target for how to make that investment, but pumping money into community development officers etc is surely a start (also I’m not oblivious to the fact that there is already a significant amount of these in Munster rugby).

    I’ve made the point before on the case of St Michael’s College in Dublin. A virtual non-entity in rugby terms prior to winning their first senior cup in 2007. Prior to that you’d count on the fingers of one hand the number of Irish internationals they’d produced.

    And yet, in the past decade, they’ve produced Dan Leavy, Luke McGrath, James Ryan, Ryan Baird, Ross Byrne, Harry Byrne, Ronan Kelleher, etc. What happened? What changed?

    Even closer to home, you see the benefits of what Regis Sonnes was able to do in West Cork, and the pipeline of quality players who came through there.

    Genuinely think there’s something in this.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,117 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    You don’t think it’s down to demographics but then are pointing to Michael’s as an example of how to produce International calibre players?

    I’m genuinely not trying to have another row FTD, but I really don’t follow that logic…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,278 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Regis Sonnes helped in Bandon a lot and helped Crowley a lot but he was likely to emerge anyway regardless of Sonnes and Bandon will do more and it wont be because of what Sonnes did

    You likely would see that change in Leinster as theyve more schools and more access to players through the schools in addition to the pro coaching, facilities as you say.

    Pumping money into community development officers is a help as they can assist coach players more or can or should be assisting clubs and schools put in the structures to help develop better players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Munster need immediate help in a couple of positions. And if the funds and personnel can be sourced, they should sign them. Just as any other province would.

    "No, you should instead sign more player development officers" is a statement which is, at best, lacking in any sense of empirical support.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah. People seem to forget it’s not just Leinster that has private schools.

    Take St Michael’s then - it has roughly 650 students or thereabouts and annual fees of around €6k. Doesn’t offer boarding.

    Are you saying there are no comparable schools in Munster?

    What about PBC? It has more students at c. 720, broadly similar fees (€4.5k), equally non-boarding. It has a better rugby heritage than Michaels.

    Yet in the past 10 years Michaels has produced 10 players who’ve been capped by Ireland (who’ve obtained 140 caps between them).

    Munster collectively have only produced 16 players over the same timeframe, for a cumulative 92 caps. PBC have produced 3 players, for a cumulative 25 caps.

    Are you seriously telling me there is a dramatic disparity in the socio economic background of the students of these two schools?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    "Hey, before Michael signs that contract, maybe we should instead hire more player development officers to improve our depth at tight-head"

    Said absolutely nobody in Dublin 4, circa April 2021.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    i agree with the majority of your post and this is slightly off point, but i will say from what i gather alot of the investment in leinster schools is mainly by the schools themselves (donations etc,) rather than irfu



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,721 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The point is that Michael's wasn't a top rugby school, then it was. The demographics didn't change, it's still a school full of teenage boys, so it must have been something else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    I think FTD's argument is that if you get one or two big schools which dedicate themselves fully to rugby and you fix the system in the school to allow dedication to rugby and back that up with coaching assistance and facilities then you will start pumping out future pro players. All you need is a random 100 kids a year and to have them between 12-1

    I disagree. I don't know how Michaels do it but I assume that they are importing quality players either by linking up with an amazing minis system producing top quality 12 year olds to enter the Michaels system or by importing students with scholarships at senior cycle level and taking credit for the best players who are already developed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,278 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    PBC isnt the problem. it is producing pro players/irish 20s at quite a decent rate. Its beyond that there needs to be more done and its there that Munster cant compete. Michaels have significantly over produced pro players/irish 20s even on a global scale the past decade. its not comparable to anywhere else in the country.

    Problem with doing it in 1/2 schools is it isnt enough. Munster need to fix/improve the system province wide not try do things in 1/2 schools

    Michaels arent really importing anyone. They have a junior school but many from the local clubs minis are now going there when they may have went to other schools in past. Michaels dont really have too many whove moved school for senior cycle to play cup rugby iif you look at a lot of the recent cup sides.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If John McKee keeps developing he'll be far too good to be 3rd choice at Leinster, could be an option



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,721 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    However they get there - and copying whatever Michael's are doing probably isn't it - the only way the provinces can be competitive is through home grown talent, and lots of it.

    Leinster have been on a roll for a few years but a few lean years are inevitable and when they come, results will suffer.

    Any foreign signings are only ever going to be sticky plasters, but that's what Munster need in the front row right now.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Blackrock have produced even more over the same period - 10 internationals as well, who've earned a cumulative 244 caps. It's a bigger school, at closer to 1,100 students, but equally it's producing professional rugby players at a simply remarkable rate.

    Those two schools alone have produced more Irish internationals in the past 10 years - 20 players (384 caps) than Munster (16 players - 92 caps), Ulster (15 players - 137 caps) and Connacht (12 players - 169 caps).

    It's clearly not just numbers when you look at this. Of the players produced as well, of the 20 Blackrock/Michaels internationals only 6 earned less than 5 caps, with the median number of caps 19. There are 8 players in there who've earned over 25 caps (James Ryan, Hugo Keenan, Caelan Doris, Andrew Conway, Garry Ringrose, Joey Carbery, Ian Madigan, Jordi Murphy).

    From the other three provinces combined, of the 43 internationals who've earned 398 caps, the median number of caps is 3. 25 of the 43 earned less than 5 caps, and only 5 earned over 25 caps (Robbie Henshaw, Kieran Marmion, Finlay Bealham, Paddy Jackson, Jacob Stockdale).

    It's clear as day what's happening in those schools is on a different level to what is happening anywhere else in the country, arguably in Europe, but so far no one has put forward a good reason for why it isn't replicable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 534 ✭✭✭Stanley 1


    My understanding is St. Michael's developed as an overflow school by parents (Dads) who could not get their sons into Blackrock, St.M's saw the gap and brought in a NZ pro Coach to attract boys who did not have old school, nod nod, connections, they may now have 2 full time rugby coaches.

    Gonzaga seem to have cottoned on of late.

    Maybe a follow on is Blackrock old boys club ain't at the same top level they once occupied.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,117 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Mod: Can I suggest taking this to another thread? Listing the reams of players produced by Michaels and Blackrock is, at best, tangentially related to Munster.

    Have at it:

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058292319/development-pathways/p1?new=1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030



    Blackrock is a very difficult model to replicable because few other areas in the country have the combined affluence and population density within the commutable area to sustain a school of over 1000 fee-paying students, plus access to whatever contributions come from alumni and parents of the current cohort.

    Fair play to Michaels, but in a similar vein, I'd like to see how much their rugby programme costs per year and how the bill gets paid.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah, nice little joke, but you might have noticed I haven't said anywhere that there shouldn't be any overseas recruitment. I just queried originally a post claiming Munster needed funding for 3 'high standard' NIQs at 10, 2 and 3, in addition to Snyman and Nankivell.

    Bringing in good quality overseas players is valuable to bring in outside perspective, and to help pass on good traits / habits. I'm not saying at all that Munster shouldn't sign any NIQ players, but arguably the level of spend they've allocated towards it in recent years could have been better spent.

    Belvedere and Terenure have similar student numbers (and rugby heritage) as Blackrock, yet in recent times have fallen well shy in terms of player production.

    Even in Munster, CBC is a sizable school of over 900 boys, with a strong rugby heritage as well. These are all fee paying schools, that have wealthy cohorts attending them and as part of their alumni network.

    Glenstal and Clongowes are directly comparable - both are smaller schools, that charge nearly €20k a year in fees. Clongowes has churned out internationals (Dan Sheehan, Will Connors, Tadhg Beirne, Dave Kearney in the past 10 years), Glenstal's solitary international rugby player over that time period is Ben Healy. So what's the excuse reason there then? Surely there's plenty of affluence in the Glenstal alumni network that they could be digging deeper if they chose to?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Had posted this before I saw the mod note above.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    But also, for what it's worth; I was making a bigger point than a comment claiming I'm just listing "reams of players produced by Michaels and Blackrock", and it's unfair to suggest otherwise.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Paragraph 1: Do you know how much Munster have spent on development in recent years?

    Paragraph 2: All noise until I see the rugby budgets and the backing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,873 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    I think what some people may be missing is that there is a group that put up a couple of million or so each season to enable Munster to sign a couple of world class players. I would be shocked if that group would hand over that money for Munster to not sign anyone but instead say they want to use that money for developing players that may or may not be good enough to make a difference in the next decade or so.

    De Allende and Snyman, Snyman and Fekitoa, Snyman and Nankivell.

    So realistically, why shouldn’t the IRFU be funding at least one good foreign player for Munster?

    I wouldn’t sign an NIQ 10 (all we need is a serviceable 10 to fill in as 3rd choice, an IQ player such as Conor Fitzgerald), but I think we could really use a ball carrying front row, like a big bruising pacific islander at hooker especially or a better tight-head prop instead of resigning Archer next season.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,117 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Team named. Crowley starts at 10 again, this time with Murray. Snyman too, and Kendellen at 7. No Carbery in the 23.

    Good to see Loughman back and Knox in the 23 again too.

    Munster: Mike Haley; Calvin Nash, Antoine Frisch, Malakai Fekitoa, Shane Daly; Jack Crowley, Conor Murray; Jeremy Loughman, Diarmuid Barron, Stephen Archer; Jean Kleyn, RG Snyman; Peter O’Mahony (C), Alex Kendellen, Gavin Coombes.

    Replacements: Scott Buckley, Josh Wycherley, Keynan Knox, Fineen Wycherley, Jack O’Donoghue, Craig Casey, Ben Healy, Keith Earls.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 803 ✭✭✭jcon1913


    im genuinely sad not to see Carbery - but not surprised. Hopefully Crowley will kick on now.

    please God Barron doesn’t get pinged for doing a dummy throw before the real thing. Such a shocker that wasn’t coached out of his game a long time ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,286 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    DHL Stormers: 15 Damian Willemse, 14 Suleiman Hartzenberg, 13 Ruhan Nel, 12 Dan du Plessis, 11 Seabelo Seabelo, 10 Manie Libbok, 9 Paul de Wet, 8 Hacjivah Dayimani, 7 Ben-Jason Dixon, 6 Willie Engelbrecht, 5 Marvin Orie, 4 Ruben van Heerden, 3 Frans Malherbe, 2 Joseph Dweba, 1 Steven Kitshoff (captain).

    Replacements: 16 JJ Kotze, 17 Ali Vermaak, 18 Neethling Fouche, 19 Ernst van Rhyn, 20 Marcel Theunissen, 21 Evan Roos, 22 Herschel Jantjies, 23 Clayton Blommetjies.​

    yikes...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 760 ✭✭✭durthacht


    Is Carbery injured? I thought he had been playing at a level worth a place in the squad, if not a guaranteed starter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,721 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Presumably just in reserve for next weekend. Whatever about Crowley, it's highly unlikely he's slipped behind Ben Healy.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,117 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    He started the season poorly, went well after the AI’s but slipped back again the last while, is my view of his form.

    So much so that Crowley was preferred to start ahead of him for the Champions Cup knockout game vs the Sharks.

    It could just be a case of keeping the squad fresh tho; Munster played well but faded badly in both games in SA last season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 803 ✭✭✭jcon1913


    True enough - Carbery is surely still ahead of Healy



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Shame it seems to be a game too early for Edogbo - would have thought he was a significant power upgrade over Wycherley.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,493 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    Healy would be better suited to what we need now than both Crowley and joey ….but third choice because he is off at end season ….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 760 ✭✭✭durthacht




  • Advertisement
Advertisement