Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Limerick - Nenagh - Ballybrophy railway

11011121416

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,867 ✭✭✭lisasimpson


    Whats the numbers like since it reopened. Must take a wander into limerick on it someday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Anecdotally it has improved recently. But with the current and the new timetable from December 11th there is only so far it can go. Huge support from people along the line who want a better service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 637 ✭✭✭feargantae


    I see B. Uí Bhróithe/Ballybrophy has some shiny new bilingual signs. The ones with the green TFI stripe where the Gaeilge is easier to see than the Béarla!

    Nice to see given how many times the station's closure was said to be imminent!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,730 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    CIE painted every station on the West Cork the summer before shutting it down (allegedly)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,057 ✭✭✭The_Wanderer


    All stations on the Cork route have got them. Thurles to Portarlington inclusive certainly have. I do like the font and style of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Just took trip on the Nenagh line. The recent improvements in running times are very underwhelming to say the least. There are loads and loads of ' 30mph restrictions , presumably near user-worked crossings. I can# unterstand why such crossings are passed at much higher speeds on other lines.

    Post edited by Economics101 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,864 ✭✭✭Poxyshamrock


    No great changes have been made to line speeds and it still takes over 50 mins to get from Nenagh to Limerick.

    Hopefully with the recruitment drive, we may see an additional service in the next timetable due to take effect in December.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Recruiting more dirvers will not necessarily enable extra services. You will need a second shift of signallers, crossing keepers and other staff, or at least a lot of money spent on automated crossings and signalling.

    Post edited by Economics101 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,034 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    You have to look at this as a work in progress, and a step in the right direction for the line. It’s a long term project.

    The local group had to make a Herculean political effort to get the line relaid in its entirety with CWR. They should be praised for that.

    The next target is an additional middle of the day train. This requires approval from the NTA - there are apparently staff and rolling stock available to do it.

    Following that, the removal or automation of the level crossings and accommodation crossings to allow higher speeds will then be on the agenda, as the LMATS does now envisage increasing frequency on the line.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 69 ✭✭Drifter100


    How many accommodation crossings are there on this line ? I`m guessing a god=od few.

    I usually travel on the Dublin Sligo route and because of the signal failure 2 weeks ago it gave a chance to see them all as the trains were crawling. I counted 9 between Mullingar and Edgeworthstown asides from the LC`s that are automated



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,034 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Just to add that the journey time improvement in December was between Ballybrophy and Nenagh, where the service was accelerated by 15 minutes.

    It had already been accelerated by 10 minutes between Limerick and Nenagh.

    People need to bear in mind that this started off from a very low base, and frankly Iarnród Éireann did everything in their power to close the line, and it was down to local lobbying that the risk of closure was reversed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭Economics101


    My rough impression is that there are about a dozen unattended accommodation corssings (i.e leading to one or more houses). These appear to be the main hzard, especially as I saw at least two with gates left open. Then there are farm crossings, probably well over 100. Farmers will keep gates closed if they have livestock, for obviious reasons. For others, the restricted speeds apply at lots of farm (field only) crossings. Eliminating these would seem to be impossible.

    The price we pay for extreme risk aversion driven by the legal liability laws.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Irish Rails response to a recent parliamentary query on automating the 12 remaining gate keeper crossings on the line was quite negative and definitive.

    Highly unlikely any government would put €58 million into the line any time soon. See screenshot attached.


    Problem with the gate keepers is we cant have public holiday services or more than one service on Sundays.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,034 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Iarnród Éireann have been quite definitive about a lot of things over the years, but that doesn’t mean that things won’t happen.

    They also have a habit of gold plating the investments required.

    At the end of the day, what happens will be down to political pressure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,771 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    I don't think political pressue will work to secure full automation and signilling upgrades on this line. Very different to second hand rail replacement...

    I can't see the cost been overly imflated in this case either when it would also include the new  Train Protection System (TPS).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Yes, difficult to know how to proceed the campaign for improvements to the line. I dont see why it all has to be bundled into one massive project of automation and resignalling. Automating individual gate keeper crossings over a period of 5 to 10 years and then looking at resignalling once the 12 crossings have been automated would be a more realistic approach in relation to securing funding.

    There is no government going to pump €58 million into the line in one go. That's completely unrealistic.

    Automating the gate keeper crossings is not just about speed of trains. It makes it easier to introduce additional services to the timetable. Particularly on Sundays and public holidays.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Yes, when I first read that response it felt very much dismissive of the PQ.

    The group are still campaigning away, planning to regroup soon and find new approaches to improving the services on the line. At the end of the day the gate keeper crossings need to be dealt with sooner rather than later if the line is to have any real chance of improving.


    The line has the support from all political stakeholders in the area. But it is difficult to get a commitment to make a plan for how to upgrade the line over the next 5, 10, 20 years



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭Economics101


    But as far as I can see the real cause for such slow speeds is not so much the public manned crossings, but the unmanned accommodation and farm crossings. They could start by prosecuting people who leave gates open, except that some judge will fall for some cock-and-bull type excuse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,771 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    It would actually make more sense for the line to be re-signalled first because that is the main reason for the speed limits. Limerick J-Waterford is I think max 40mph because of the signalling as well.

    Automation of crossings now would require staff locally to lower them. Open to correction but no operational way to link them to control center while local signalling is in place.

    Both could be done in sections together starting out from Limerick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,034 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    For the record, I wasn’t remotely suggesting that the investment should happen all at once, but if we are to make public transport a viable alternative across the country, develop regional commuter services and make an effort to meet our climate emission targets, it will have to happen eventually.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,836 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    For my own information, how many lines in Ireland still have staff-operated level crossings?

    Is this common in FE, DE, UK, etc?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    The main reasons the local group were requesting the gate keeper crossings are dealt with first is that they have been told the reason there is only one service on Sundays and no public holiday services is down to the gate keeper staff.


    It will also save €1.4 million in annual running costs once the gates have been automated. This money could then be put towards other line improvements. Signalling, closing accommodation crossings, additional services etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Sorry,, but this is quite wrong. THere are loads of 30 and 40 mph restrictions on the line whihc have nothing to do with the signalling: they are not anywhere near block posts but are near unsignalled crossings. The line limit on Limerick Junction-Waterford is 50, not 40. However it is punctuated by loads of lower limits for much the same reasons as the Nenagh Lline.

    Autometed crossings should be capable of being monitored and controlled by existing signalling centres. This operation is independent of normal CTC signalling and the same should apply to lines with ETS-related signalling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,771 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    There are farm crossings on most lines and very few very low limits for trains so unless there is awful visibility comapred to other lines one might ask are all these restrictions justified.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭Economics101




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    The Kilmastulla valley on the section between Nenagh and Birdhill stations has a few different issues. 4 accommodation gates on (very minor) public roads. Always left open.

    The track follows the course of the Kilmastulla river for a section here so it's not close to being straight. So it is understandable that this section would be particularly limited speed wise. Then between Birdhill and Castleconnell you have the majority of the gate keeper crossings. I think 9 of the 12 gate keeper crossings are all on that section of the track so I assume there are time penalties for each of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,771 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Right so its public roads. Firstly we know IE don't like to prosecute miss use so not a surprise. Before anyone says I know its not as simple.

    The new warning light system been rolled out would probably work here and not massively expensive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,086 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Another approach could be to seek closure of existing automatic crossings by provision of bridges, there are locations where a single bridge and a bit of ancillary road could see the closure of multiple crossings. This would free up the automatic equipment for use at gate keeper crossings, doubling the benefits and more bang for your buck. There may be broader support for a bridge as it also benefits those with no interest in the rail service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    A bridge would certainly be the preferred option but the terrain and density of some of the crossings makes it unfeasible. Would probably also make it financially unviable.

    As you can see in the attached screenshot the vast majority of these (9/12) manned level crossings are densely located between Castlesconell Station and Killonan junction.

    The other 3 are East of Cloughjordan, 1 just after Cloughjordan, 1 just after Roscrea and one maybe halfway between Roscrea and Ballybrophy.

    I think it's a reasonable and sensible argument that the next phase of rehabilitating this line is to deman these crossings and automation of the 12 level crossings.

    This would reduce running costs, simplify management of the line, allow for a more flexible approach from NTA and Irish Rail when discussing additional services. On weekends and public holidays in particular.

    It's going to have to happen sooner or later if the line is to have any hope of being useful to people.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,086 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Looking at the LC on the R445, it should be straightforward enough to build a bridge on the northern side of the track. You could also connect up local roads to close the LCs either side of that one. That's three LCs closed and equipment freed up to automate others. That would be a big improvement to that section. Yes it would be expensive but would likely be better value than automating a couple of manual crossings (not exactly cheap either) and leaving other LCs as they are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,607 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Can I play devils advocate for a minute ..

    Why go to all the trouble ? I know theyve just replaced the track ,

    but they could have more cheaply put 4 or so coaches on the route - it'd been quicker whizzing up the motorway , cheaper to run , no crossing to worry about ..

    And could have had stops in more convenient places in nenagh and limerick

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    I dont disagree with you at all. The problem is that Irish Rail or the NTA dont seem to be interested in doing anything at the moment. After all the recent works the line is basically as it was beforehand. Some time savings but the exact same number of services using the line. Not exactly sweating the asset.


    Attached a recent pic of the line from just West of Cloughjordan looking towards Nenagh. Keeper Hill in the background.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    because nothing would be achieved apart from creating more road transport, more cars as the rail users are unlikely to transfer to the 4 coaches and higher carbon fines.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 312 ✭✭ohographite


    The bus wouldn't offer a quicker alternative to every journey you can make on the railway.

    For example, it is quicker to travel from Dublin to Roscrea by train than it is to travel by bus. The bus route I'm referring to is JJ Kavanagh route 735, which takes at least 1 hour 50 minutes to get from the city centre of Dublin to Roscrea(it sometimes takes 2 hours or more) The train takes 1 hour and 22 minutes, so even though Heuston station isn't in the city centre of Dublin, it would still work out as quicker than the bus to get the train from Roscrea to Heuston station and then get a bus or a luas to the centre of Dublin.

    The same bus also stops in Nenagh, but it also takes more time to get from Dublin to Nenagh than the train does. The bus takes at least 2 hours and 40 minutes, and sometimes 3 hours, but the train takes 1 hour 55 minutes.

    I also think that the train journey is more scenic than the road journey.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,607 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    So why does anyone bother with the jj kavanaghs coach ?

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    presumably the same reason why anyone bothers with any bus service?

    or train service?

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,337 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    during bustitutions for rail work it has been the case for years that buses have to wait at stations to match the rail timetable. The Roscrea northbound timetable, having only a short part of the Branch to traverse, is hardly representative of the service competitiveness as a whole.



  • Registered Users Posts: 312 ✭✭ohographite


    I don't mean to be rude, but I don't see why that stops my point from standing. My point was that if the Limerick-Nenagh-Ballybrophy railway was replaced with a bus service, it would not give a quicker alternative to every journey you can make on the railway. I know that some journeys would be quicker by bus, but not all of them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,034 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Frankly that is irrelevant, given the previous low speeds on the railway.

    Since the recent changes, the railway is now faster than all of the local bus services along the railway line, namely the Bus Éireann 72, 323 and JJ Kavanagh 735 for any trip.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,607 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    And if you'd spent a fraction of the track investment , and a fraction of the annual subvention, you could probably offer a far faster coach service for free ,

    I'm glad that the line speed is increasing , I'd hope they can speed it up further and possibly include new stops in limerick ( nearer to UL ,industrial areas or at least bus intersections ) ,

    ultimately , Rail is about mass transit , not just providing an alternative to a coach travel , especially when there's a motorway shadowing the railway line ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,229 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    the fact is the anual subvention and track upgrades are over all cheaper across the long term, due to the need to cut the use of road transport and increase the usage of rail, and avoid crippling carbon fines which are coming our way and will be felt by us all and they will be crippling, no doubt about it.

    if there is demand for more bus services along the corridor the existing operators will provide them and there is no reason they and the rail line can't co-exist, they will ultimately as usage across both methods increase.

    your constant want to replace rail with more coaches that would already be provided if people want them, and the use of coaches to get out of providing rail where it is needed, just is not workable in the modern era where ireland is facing crippling carbon fines.

    we are going to have to invest more in the existing network and engage in some reopenings where possible whether people want it or not, as just chucking more road transport at the problem and simply burying heads in the sand is no longer tennable.

    both road and rail services on corridors is the only option available, crippling carbon fines is not an option.

    Post edited by end of the road on

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 312 ✭✭ohographite


    If the existing bus services don't already offer a faster alternative to every journey you can make on the railway, I don't see how you could get a bus service that does.

    I often hear people say that rail is about mass transit, but trains can have advantages over buses other than higher capacity, such as a more scenic journey, which I think this railway has, and higher speed, which this railway has in some cases. I know that a railway is more expensive to run than a bus service, but I think it is worth this expense, even if the amount of people who use it could theoretically fit on a bus, if the railway has advantages over a bus, because it almost certainly means that plenty of people would prefer it.

    This might mean that some people who leave their cars for the train would not leave their cars for a bus, and while I concede that I have no evidence that suggests that is the case, I haven't seen any evidence suggesting it isn’t the case either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,034 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The line has been completely been relaid with CWR now following a lot of pressure from local people, press and politicians, so that argument is moot, and there is now demand from local people for more services. The railway won’t be closing.

    LMATS envisages the rail service developing over time to a more realistic level.

    And with due respect, you are far more likely to attract people out of their cars onto a rail service than a coach service, so the challenge now is to develop the service on the railway line.



  • Registered Users Posts: 312 ✭✭ohographite


    I also wouldn't advocate retaining a railway if the largest amount of people who can be encouraged to use it is just 100 people a day, but I am fully certain that plenty more people than that could be encouraged to use this railway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,607 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    You're right about it's not going to just disappear , because money has been spent on relaying the track ..

    Rail that isn't mass transit isnt better for the environment than road .. it's probably much worse ..

    More than future speed increases and manned crossing closures, I think they should be focusing on increasing journey generators , extra stations in limerick , and linking those stations with public transport / bike lanes to get to places in city once you' re there , it'd be a pisser to pass near plassy on the train have to get off in Colbert and have to trek back through the city to get to through the eastern side of town again ...

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,034 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I’d refer you again to LMATS which deals with the plans for the region.



  • Registered Users Posts: 312 ✭✭ohographite


    If the service on the railway is improved, and very small trains are still run on it, I'd say that running the train would be better for the environment than everyone on the train travelling by car.

    It probably is worse with the current amount of people using it, but like I've said lots of times, I reckon that can change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,607 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    A lot of them could travel by express coach , and coaches are a lot more flexible than trains ,

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,607 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Although to work well coaches too need infrastructure .. decent stops in the right areas , bus lanes where appropriate..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Advertisement
Advertisement