Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings and threadbans - updated 11/5/24*

Options
1132133135137138899

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    They talk about corruption in these countries. Think we should start looking at our own here and within europe as a whole. Theres something rotten at the core here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,463 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    For someone looking to rent or buy a house seek medical care its certainly harder . You obviously are not one of them

    . Ukranians return I admire your optimism .Expected costs for Ukranians 2.5 billion in the future .

    Direct Provision costs for asylum seekers 356,554,0000 . The costs which are escalating could go twords housing and medical care for citizens andtaxpayers .


    Post edited by rgossip30 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 172 ✭✭Honesty Policy


    Makes for unpleasant reading and contributing to an increase in crime figures that we just don't need in this country.

    Also only 3 Mass Brawl figures my back side...You mean 3 in the last week alone.

    Glad a TD went looking for these figures.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41117017.html



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭NattyO


    I suppose you can show me where I claimed they were?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,581 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Well, where are these African countries getting the weaponry to blast each other to bits. Then we say they are migrating due to climate change.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,618 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The *entire* population is putting pressure on housing and the health service, not just refugees, all five million of us. If we were to go down this route, you could claim there are too many OAPs in the country, too many culchies in Dublin, too many sick people, too many drug addicts, too many poor people living on benefits etc etc.

    As for costs, the exchequer is currently operating a surplus of several billion Euros. I'm not sure Ireland announcing to the rest of the world 'we simply cannot afford to house refugees' would wash with anyone.



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭NattyO


    I always find this aspect of the open borders supporters argument funny (in a disingenuous sort of way) - it is the same as the "Irish people commit crimes too" argument, and is just as ridiculous.

    The OAP's, Culchies, sick people, drug addicts and poor people are our OAP's, Culchies, sick people, drug addicts and poor people. They are citizens of Ireland, part of what we are as a country. Unless you suggest we start exporting or executing them, then they are here to stay.

    Immigrants, whether they be refugees or not, aren't. It is within our remit to decide whether we take them or not, and how many we do take.

    The pressure on housing, healthcare etc. from our own people can't be helped, it's what housing and healthcare is for. There is no reason, ethically, morally, or legally, that we have to add additional load on those services beyond what they can take just so a certain political demographic can feel good about themselves while their less well off neighbours suffer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,618 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    And this is where the refugee argument starts straying into racism and discrimination. By even saying that refugees who live in Ireland are not part of "our own" (even though it is a fact that they are here and will remain here), you are openly encouraging discrimination against them, by suggesting they are not part of the Irish population and don't belong here.

    Also, people from ethnic minorities who were born here hear these arguments from the likes of your good self and will wonder if they belong here either. Many of our charming friends on social media don't even make any distinction between refugees and local black people / Muslims etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭NattyO


    You know well that's an utterly dishonest take, but let's break it down anyway;

    racism and discrimination - utterly idiotic statement - there is no element of racism or discrimination in limiting immigration, nearly every country in the world has limits, other than Ireland.

    By even saying that refugees who live in Ireland are not part of "our own" - aside from the fact that they clearly aren't (the clue is in the name), as you well know I was arguing about limits on incoming immigrants, not those already here.

    people from ethnic minorities who were born here hear these arguments from the likes of your good self and will wonder if they belong here either - again, a dishonest argument against something I never said - see above.

    Many of our charming friends on social media don't even make any distinction between refugees and local black people / Muslims etc. - yet again, nothing to do with my post, and just brought in as a "wook at the tewwible wacism" silliness.

    If you don't have an argument against what I said (as you appear not to) then don't try your strawman rubbish on me, thank you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,463 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    305,000 applied for pps numbers only 69,000 were Irish n 2022 so its not just refugees or asylum seekers . The cycle we need more to cater for those that came is like a road to nowhere ..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 349 ✭✭slay55




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Is leftist politics basically students that never grew up ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,618 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Did you not say that all immigrants, whether refugees or not, are not a part of this country or "our own people" and do not belong here?



  • Registered Users Posts: 116 ✭✭Kyokushin Grappler




  • Registered Users Posts: 41,065 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    We have been through all this before with @Yurt2 pointing out exactly the nonsense about bringing in pps numbers

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,861 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    The default wailing about racism is tiresome. You and others seem to think it's a means to immediately discredit or dismiss any points you don't like, but it's an extremely transparent and meaningless accusation.

    I'll say it for you - they're NOT part of "our own". Genuine (mostly Ukranian) refugees are here temporarily until the situation back home is resolved, or until they regularise their status through legal means. Any other "refugee" who arrived here without documentation or illegally in the back of a container from a safe country like France etc has no right to be here and should be sent back to where they came from.

    Just because they are here does NOT automatically mean that they are our long term/indefinite responsibiility - ESPECIALLY if they arrived here through dishonest or illegal methods.


    As for those born here of minorities - if their parents arrived here legally and/or have regularised their status then no issue ... well, aside from McEntee and co handing out Irish Citizenship like cereal packet prizes to anyone - including those in the second group above who've "served their time" on the waiting list. But those born to illegals is no different than the "anchor baby" issue that was closed previously (but which certain corners are trying to undo of late).


    I've said it before.. come here legally with skills to offer, the ability to support yourself and contribute positively - welcome!!!

    Come here chancing your arm, "fleeing" a safe country in the process, or without doumentation, or commit serious crimes against your hosts, or with a sob story that really is just an attempt to bypass the normal channels for entering, living and working legally here - no sympathy! Back where you came from.


    We have more than enough problems of our own, and genuine people that we can't support as it is (natives, migrants and genuine refugees alike) without accepting the chancers on top of it. You may save your "racist" accusations for someone who cares. I'm far more concerned with how we address these problems that are only getting worse so that those who genuinely DESERVE the (finite!) supports actually get them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 715 ✭✭✭Mac_Lad71


    Have you checked our national debt lately?

    192 billion..and we're spending billions on people which we've no obligation to just to look good.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,618 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    But anyone who is not a 'genuine refugee' will not be granted asylum in Ireland (a person must be able to establish that they left their home country because they feared for their personal safety or security or health or whatever). So where is the problem then? We are probably talking about a low number of people in the thousands who seek to claim asylum under bogus circumstances every year (perhaps 3k-4k max currently and much lower in previous years) - and they won't even be granted asylum anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,577 ✭✭✭Hamachi


    Can provide a breakdown of where you arrived at a figure of 3K-4K bogus asylum seekers for last year? Even a very high level overview of how you arrived at this number will suffice. Please then provide evidence that the figure is ‘probably’ much lower in previous years.

    When you’re finished doing that, please follow up with evidence that those bogus asylum seekers leave Ireland when their claims are refused. I’d like you to explicitly prove the efficacy of the self-deport policy pursued by this government.

    You wouldn’t be spinning yarns now would you, repeating your increasingly outlandish half-truths? Of course not, so looking forward to you linking to hard data..

    Post edited by Hamachi on


  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭NattyO


    But anyone who is not a 'genuine refugee' will not be granted asylum in Ireland

    😂😂😂

    Riiiiiight.......

    Said "proof" consisting of a declaration by said "refugee" that they are afraid for their life if they return to [insert country applicant is pretending to hail from].

    Not that the declaration, nor the supposed country of origin matter - even if the claim fails, the chances of deportation are practically nil.

    In Ireland, what matters is that one claims international protection - the hows and whys are merely incidental. There's a whole host of NGO's that have your back once you decide that Ireland is the place for you. A large number of those being assessed for asylum shouldn't qualify based on the fact that they are travelling from a safe third country (which nearly all applicants in Ireland do), yet here we are.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 34,145 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    And some people think it's a Pension crisis we have as we spend Billions already



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,618 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Certainly. A freedom of information request to the UK Home Office in mid March established that 60% of channel crossings in 2022 were made by genuine refugees fleeing war zones (Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, Somalia etc). The same people have been demonised by their right wing press (and readers) as 'economic migrants'.

    No reason to believe that the breakdown of asylum seekers coming to Ireland would be that much different - perhaps 60% genuine refugees and 40% bogus claims. So in terms of bogus claims we're probably look at around 3k-4k (and much lower than that in the last decade).

    There's not a shred of evidence that people who are not genuine refugees and not from a dangerous country are being granted asylum here. The issue of deportation of irregular migrants living in Ireland is a completely different one. Not only would this involve failed asylum seekers, but people who have overstayed their work visa, overstayed their student visa, people who entered the country without going through immigration, people who entered on a tourist visa only, people working in the black economy etc etc (not entirely dissimilar to the undocumented Irish in the US).



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭NattyO


    Good lord, I've seen some fair oul guff on here, but this is right up there.

    "No reason to believe that the breakdown of asylum seekers coming to Ireland would be that much different" - why not? those figures are for people arriving by boat in to the UK, what makes it an automatic assumption that different people arriving by plane in a different country would be the same? And how does one flee from "Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, Somalia etc" and arrive on the coast of England in a small boat? Seems to me like its far more likely they were fleeing war-torn France.....

    "in terms of bogus claims we're probably look at around 3k-4k (and much lower than that in the last decade)" - a completely and utterly made-up number, pulled straight out of your arse, based on a spurious percentage of a number that has nothing to do with arrivals in Ireland!

    "There's not a shred of evidence that people who are not genuine refugees and not from a dangerous country are being granted asylum here" - a barefaced lie, we have thousands of "asylum seekers" in Ireland from Georgia and Albania, not to mention South Africa, Zimbabwe, etc. In 2021 the acceptance rate for "asylum seekers" from Georgia was 17.5%, Albania 24.7%, South Africa 34%, and Zimbabwe 54.7%. I have been to all four of these countries, and it is a joke to claim they are dangerous countries - you could book a holiday to any of the four right now and not worry about your safety any more than you would on a trip to Dublin, London, or Paris.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,804 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    I find it astonishing you are using the words not a shred of evidence in a post with figures made up without a shred of evidence to back up anything you say.

    You claim to have no skin in the game, yet you are here daily making up things like above, posting lies on occasions and disingenuous in a lot of posts.

    Why anyone would without any skin in the game do this is a head scratcher for me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,577 ✭✭✭Hamachi


    You've not provided one shred of evidence to substantiate any of that nonsense. Not one.

    Again, I'm asking you to link to hard data confirming that the majority of asylum claims in Ireland are legitimate. Provide the evidence. A throwaway reference to a nebulous FOI request in the UK (to which you haven't linked) is tantamount to precisely nothing.

    Frankly, there is "no reason to believe" anything you emit, when you are either unwilling or incapable of supporting any of your utterances with actual data.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,463 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    You got figures for the exact numbers that remain here apart from Ukrainian refugees a deduction of 10 k is madewhich was his arguement ? There are those who apply living abroad to obtain wills or those born to Irish parents .These numbers would not be substantial.You could explain why its nonsense .



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Yeah but that's a very, very narrow way of defining what constitutes danger for a person fleeing. I mean, you only have to consider how statistically safe it has pretty much always been for people to travel to Northern Ireland — this does not negate the dangers faced by people who fled their burned out homes in Belfast or had to escape other threats to their lives / wellbeing.

    Applying a threshold of 'oh well, if you went there on holiday you'd be fine' is a distinctly unrealistic and illogical standard for determining the justification of individuals fleeing violence or persecution there.

    Furthermore, I've also been to South Africa and have family there. Saying that it's comparable to Dublin in terms of safety is, to put it lightly, a really strange view. Just because a relatively wealthy Westerner might be able to go there in relative safety does not negate the fact that there are people there facing very dangerous circumstances.

    Even at that, the figure of 34% needs to be read against the fact that 382 people apparently fled South Africa in 2021. From what I can see there were something between 118 to 148 applications to Ireland and 34% of them were accepted. The stats also seem to suggest that the majority of them are from outside South Africa, and violent and even deadly attacks on migrants in South Africa (places like Diepsloot) have been a problem there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭NattyO


    Define it how you like, but if any of those four countries are so dangerous that one has to flee in terror, then it is likely that one would flee parts of Ireland in terror too.

    Refugee status, under your definition, should be available to people living in many parts of Dublin. While it would be wonderful in theory if everybody lived in utopia, unfortunately that is not possible, and accepting refugees from countries where the "danger" is mugging or being called a nasty name makes a mockery of the asylum system, and takes up places that could go to people fleeing real mortal danger.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,911 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Can anyone post the full link , I don't have a subscription. Seems fine Gael not all singing off the same hymn sheet. (Much to the indos disdain, chief cheerleaders as they are.)

    https://www.independent.ie/opinion/comment/leo-varadkars-weak-leadership-laid-bare-as-sinn-fein-shows-way-on-dissent-over-refugee-housing-42435065.html



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,618 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I could throw the same question right back at you. Where is your evidence that the Irish Department of Justice is granting asylum to people who are not genuine refugees and who are not fleeing war zones, famine hit areas, oppressive regimes etc?

    The nationalities of those being granted asylum here sound remarkably like they must be real refugees:




Advertisement