Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Liverpool FC Team Talk, Gossip, Rumours 2024/25

19439449469489491605

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,042 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    I've not mentioned any players, so i'd say that's a discussion you can have with other people. I'd be hoping they'll move for next season's version of Enzo, whoever that may be - someone right on the cusp of kicking up a major level, but who is not yet a household name.

    Think VVD has dropped behind Konate as our key CB these days - if Konate is there, we look better than with any combo without him. For midfield I'd also say it's Thiago is the important one now. We look a lot better with him on the pitch than with Fabinho - but with his continuous injuries, Fabinho's collapse, Milner and Hendo getting older, and Naby and Ox leaving, the money just obviously needs to be spread around a few midfield additions. There's no way around it. If we have 300 million to spend, then great, get Bellingham and a few others. If we only have ~150m to spend, well, that makes the decision for us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭hawaii501


    Would take Lavia off the saints when they go down in a heartbeat and also maybe Dewsbury-Hall and Maddison off Leicester for cheap if they were to go down, otherwise leave them 2 be as they'd cost too much.

    Would like another proper top class cm but not sure who's available and could nearly pick anyone these days to fill that cm void.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,199 ✭✭✭Talisman


    Klopp has spoken out about the need to buy midfielders multiple times. But when the push comes to the shove, he is then told to reel it back in and act all happy with what he has got, and when he gets a cheaper alternative instead.

    Klopp was very arrogant in his treatment of the journalists that dared to question his decision not to sign a midfielder two years ago. That wasn't the club telling him there was no money to spend, he didn't want a player.

    The same thing happened when Tchouameni decided to join Madrid last May. According to Watzke, Klopp used to sulk if he couldn't get the player he wanted but the other members of the Dortmund transfer committee used to talk him around. Deciding not to make a signing last summer with a view to a splurge on Bellingham in 2023 strikes me as a Klopp decision. That is exactly what he wanted to do in the hope of signing Julian Brandt, when Edwards was making the case for Salah.

    I've said it previously and I'll say it again - Klopp should not be trusted on transfers, he has repeatedly made the decision to stick with what he has rather than bring in a new player. The team has stagnated because of the manager's decisions, we are now in a situation that goes against what FSG were about when they took control of the club.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,489 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Would be crazy to see Southampton, Everton, and Leicester go down, 3 big clubs, but that's the way the cookie is crumbling currently. Out of last 20 games between them, there was one victory, for Everton



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    Last summer was our opportunity to renew midfield, for some unknown reasons nothing was done, the club were asleep at the wheel and I'm not too sure they've woken up yet.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,394 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Ok so let's say we spent the Nunez and Gakpo money on midfield then we would have had no one bar Salah for the vast majority of this season and you'd have lads saying we should have prioritised FWs first.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,694 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Q: Can you name the worst Leicester player on the pitch against City?

    A: Yes, Ndidi!


    Can't believe he was mentioned earlier in the thread. A mid table sicknote and exactly what we don't need.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,197 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Theres nothing unknown about it. Klopp asked for Nunez and we spend 90m on him, putting off upgrading the midfield with the understanding that Bellingham would be available the following season as the main midfield upgrade, helped out with contracts ending for other lads like ox and Keita.

    Ive said it before, but nobody was expecting this sort of dropoff this season, so between what the manager wanted and what the status of our targets were it was an ok strategy.

    But because we’ve had this massive dropoff there’s this narrative that the club has been sitting on their arse and FSG aren’t spending any money, which is nonsense. We’ve spent, the strategy has backfired, but I fully expect us to spend again this summer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,145 ✭✭✭Augme



    While no one was expecting this drop off. The midfield options are Fabinho, Thiago, Henderson, Milner, Elliot, Jones, Kieta, Ox and Bajcetic.


    Fabinho dropped can absolutely be deemed as unexpected. No one expected Bajcetic to do as well as he did. But how are the others such a big surprise? Did people think 52 year old Jame Milner was going to be our midfield lynch pin for the next three seasons? The rest of midfielders have done exactly what was expect of them, spent most of the season injured or just be too old to be good enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,394 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Liverpool didn't spend 90m on Nunez. The deal was £60/65m with £15/20m in add ons. It was also reported at the time that the fee was payable over three years.

    There's a huge difference in £90m in player spending in the accounts and £26.7m.

    It was also reported that Liverpool had fully paid off all purchases bar Jota, Konate and Diaz. This was all pointing to a large amount of funds available for this summer and if we hadn't seen the collapse of our midfielders (especially Fabhino) then I still think the money would have been made available for Bellingham but now we need more than one player.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,197 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Generally being nowhere near top 4 was unexpected with the midfield available to us, which Fabinho forgetting how to play football has been a big part of.

    It just feels a bit revisionist to say this outcome was obvious. I think an upgrade in midfield would have been considered ideal but with Mane leaving we also needed to get a new forward in.

    It has been a disaster but I don’t think it’s down to inaction from the club.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,197 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I agree, think if we finished in the CL spots we would have been prepared to go way over 100m to land Bellingham. But the landscape has changed, we will still likely spend over 100 million but on 2/3 players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,615 ✭✭✭atilladehun


    Klopp is definitely going to back fabinho to come good again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 971 ✭✭✭AdrianG08


    Looks like Ryan Gravenberch for 25million.

    Good move if it's true, bags of talent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,875 ✭✭✭hynesie08


    Gravenberch, Mount, tielmens and 1 other for the price of a Bellingham would be a very good transfer window, if the one happened to be mccallister I'd be ecstatic, I'd gladly take nunes as well.

    In reality, Milners getting a 7 year extension isn't he.....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,394 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    He was linked to us last summer. He hasn't settled in Bayern but that can happen with young players moving to new clubs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,374 ✭✭✭robwen


    Could struggle to get the full fee for Sadio

    Liverpool agreed to a fee of £27.4m with an additional £5.1m based on appearances and £2.6m based on individual and team achievements.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    It's not revisionist though, I and many others pointed to our midfield being an obvious weak area last summer requiring reinforcements, Fabinho apart most felt there was a question mark over the other midfielders, ranging from age, ( Milner too old, Elliot and Carvalho too young) sicknotes ( Keita, Ox and Thiago) Henderson showing signs of decline and Jones not good enough. Most weren't even aware of Bajcetic at the time. Most still expected us to get CL football, but, things actually turned out much worse than expected. Whatever way you look at it the strategy was wrong last summer ( compounded by not doing anything about it in January), the fact the club effectively wrote off a season waiting for a player they have now ended their interest in only shows how foolish that strategy was,.The panic loan signing of Arthur was an admission they got it wrong, but it was way too late at that stage and we ended up with a crooked player who wasn't even fit when signed. How anyone could say last summers strategy was OK at the time, beggars belief



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,106 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Tielemens is someone I would really not be happy with. Can't run



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,592 ✭✭✭brevity


    Some comments in the Reddit thread that Gravenberch's work rate hasn't been the best in the past.

    Supposedly a promising player though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 225 ✭✭Summitatem


    Add ons are likely unlikely to be payable anyway, unfortunately.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,803 ✭✭✭Benzino


    Absolutely this. I've been of the opinion we needed a new midfielder since Gini left, as he was a guaranteed 7/10 performance and was always available.

    Henderson has had a noticeable drop in level starting last season and yet we are still relying on him and a Thiago who always seems to miss games when we most need him. Fab's drop in form is unexpected, sure, but we also have zero competition there which doesn't help.

    The club has really failed in succession planning for our midfield, which is arguably the most important position.

    And it's not an FSG issue, it's an Klopp and transfer committee issue. We have signed 3 attackers in the last 3 windows, the money is there.

    What's frustrating about the Bellingham deal is not that we are out, it was always going to be tough to land him, but that the club thought he could be got for 80m and thus waited a year. Either they are deluded or that's PR BS to save face, as he was never going for less than 100m unless he got injured or had an awful season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,503 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    This.

    I swear it’s like half the players people clamour for are ones they’ve never even seen play.

    Tielemans couldn’t be a worse candidate to solve our midfield issues, he has everything we don’t need and nothing that we do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,395 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    True, although would be cheap which would please FSG.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭Zak Flaps


    I'm convinced most of the Bellingham fans have never seen him play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭Zak Flaps


    Gavi, Pedri, Musiala...

    I suppose time will tell if Jude become world class. But it won't be with Liverpool.

    Maybe he's the next Dele Alli, Michael Johnson, Jermaine Pennant, Jack Rodwell or David Bentley.



  • Registered Users Posts: 648 ✭✭✭jeff bingham


    Im convinced most of the people who say “most of the Bellingham fans haven't seen him play” also haven't seen him play.

    Theres a reason he will go for 150m and 300k a week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,694 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Yes - hype and potential.

    The lad is only 19 but he's not Messi. There's no guarantees what way he'll develop from here but he has the possibility of being something incredible, hence the fee (which is also a symptom of everything wrong in the days of petrostate football).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭Tilikum17


    Go and watch

    England vs France

    England vs USA

    Dortmund vs Bayern (recently)

    Chelsea vs dortmund.

    completely ineffective in those games.

    Any game I’ve him play when he’s playing against a team that’s on par or better than the team he’s on. He’s not in the game.

    He was great against Iran, Senegal and in that awful German league.

    Maybe he will go on and be a world beater, but at the moment for me, he’s done nothing near being worth 150m.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,106 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    To be fair, FSG don't tend to buy players who don't suit the team just because they are cheap. They buy cheaper alternatives, yes, but they don't buy cheap for the sake of being cheap and worrying about the playing style after.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,394 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Bellingham 2024 here we go 😁


    Michael Edwards was in a garden centre when he took the call telling him that Liverpool would have to break a world transfer record for Virgil van Dijk. He was businesslike, not wanting the person ringing on behalf of Southampton to know his true feelings, but was silently punching the air, standing there amid the birdseed and potted plants.

    That was Edwards at the top of his game. Liverpool’s former sporting director possessed detailed reports on 30 centre backs and had analysed the market. He knew that Van Dijk, by a distance, was the best Liverpool could sign and a price of £70 million plus £4 million add-ons, although unprecedented for a defender, would soon be regarded as a bargain.

    So it proved. Joining on the first day of 2017-18’s winter transfer window, Van Dijk became the colossus Jürgen Klopp constructed a great team around. Before long, Manchester United would be paying £80 million for Harry Maguire.

    Van Dijk’s home debut was the same game in which Trent Alexander-Arnold began his run as Liverpool’s first-choice right back. That was Klopp at the top of his game, re-imagining a youngster who played in the midfield for Liverpool’s under-18s as a buccaneer who would spring forward from his back four.

    To return to where they want to be, Liverpool need to return to what they were. Which, for a time, was the smartest club in football. Never the richest but the smartest, whose ability to add value in recruitment and coaching won them every prize in a cycle that began in that 2017-18 season and ended with defeat in the Champions League final last May.

    The club have not been portrayed as smart since Tuesday evening, when The Times’s Paul Joyce broke news of them withdrawing from the chase for Jude Bellingham. Supporters took it bitterly. Bellingham is that very rare commodity, a player whose ceiling is simply higher than the rest, giving him potential to transform any team. One imagines that in Liverpool red, he could have been Steven Gerrard-plus.

    Aborting the Bellingham chase makes sense in the here and now but in macro terms the decision cannot be dressed up as anything other than a failure of strategy. While it is a misconception that Liverpool’s midfield rebuilding plans only ever revolved around Bellingham (they were close to signing Aurélien Tchouaméni last summer), it is true that Bellingham was near the top of their list for at least 18 months, and their understanding, earlier in the season, was that Borussia Dortmund would sell this summer for about £80 million plus add-ons.

    However, Bellingham’s rapid development during a campaign in which he has become the Dortmund captain and starred at a World Cup — at a tender 19 — has redrawn his value and two clubs of a higher spending power, Manchester City and Real Madrid, are now strongly in the fray.

    With Manchester United interested and Paris Saint-Germain (despite reports) also considered to be keen, Dortmund can anticipate an auction. Bellingham has no buyout clause and his price is expected to be north of £130 million once fees are factored in. However, his destination will be Bellingham’s choice, not his club’s. It is understood that he would rather stay at Dortmund and reassess in 2024 than be pushed towards a move that’s not absolutely right for him.

    In further contrast to perceptions, there was never any indication that he preferred Liverpool. His father, Mark, is a Liverpool fan, but the player and his family have plotted his career to date flawlessly by taking all factors other than what is best for his development out of the equation. So, with no special levers to make the deal happen, Liverpool pulled out to avoid the risk of allocating a huge chunk of their budget and summer to a bidding war they were not favourites to win.

    Doing so offers a good chance of delivering what Klopp wants: several signings that arrive near the start of the window. That’s the decision dictated by common sense, but would Edwards, with his knack for the market, have stopped Liverpool getting to this position?

    We’ll never know. Much of the expertise that made Liverpool such good recruiters remains. A new sporting director is being sought but the outgoing Julian Ward (formerly Edwards’s right-hand man) is contracted until the end of the season and continues making plans.

    On Tuesday, as the Bellingham news was emerging, a representative from Liverpool was arriving in Amsterdam for a meeting with Ryan Gravenberch’s father. Gravenberch, 20, is under serious consideration. An athletic and elegant midfielder, he can play at No 6, No 10 or even as a left-sided No 8.

    Frustrated by a lack of game time since joining Bayern Munich from Ajax last June, he is valued at about £25 million and would leave Liverpool scope to pursue other targets, including Mason Mount, for whom Chelsea are likely to want about £70 million.

    Liverpool are also now linked with both Alexis Mac Allister and Moisés Caicedo, both thought to be valued at about £80 million by Brighton & Hove Albion, and cheaper options such as Wolves’ Matheus Nunes and Chelsea’s Conor Gallagher.

    Klopp is thought to be sanguine about the budget allocated for new players and though away form remains feeble, the fire of the old Liverpool has flickered at Anfield since victory in the Merseyside derby on February 13. That came after a week in which those close to Klopp saw him regather his energy, and he has cut a different, more optimistic, steelier figure since.

    His buoyancy coincides with the return to day-to-day club involvement of the cerebral Mike Gordon, the president of the owners, Fenway Sports Group. Gordon and Klopp is the key relationship at the club, the one that underpinned the era of success. The news gives cause to think that renewed dynamism with decision-making is in store.

    There is value for Klopp to add on the coaching side too. He and his assistant, Pep Ljinders, have a saying that “training is our transfer” and it’s time to show it with regard to Darwin Núñez, who seems no less rough a diamond than when signed last summer for £64 million rising to £85 million.

    Erling Haaland scored more Premier League goals in August than Núñez has all season, and Klopp declined to start him against Arsenal last Sunday — just like in both league games with Manchester City and against Chelsea back in January. Moved to the left after appearing to struggle with the pressing work Klopp requires of his central forward, the Uruguay international’s future in a rebuilt Liverpool team is surely back in the middle, but Klopp faces either changing his attacking style to accommodate a striker who wants to gallop in behind, or adapting Núñez to one who can come towards the ball. Or a bit of both — like Pep Guardiola with Haaland.

    The long-awaited return of Luis Díaz against Leeds tomorrow should be a starting point in the redesign. On top of the penetration and unpredictability he provides with the ball, the speed and aggression of Díaz’s pressing hauls team-mates up the pitch by making them go quicker and harder to keep up with him. Díaz is pivotal to a revamped Liverpool’s game. With Salah on one side and Díaz back on the other, Klopp can audition candidates to start in the middle of his front three next season, whether that is Núñez, Diogo Jota or Cody Gakpo.

    It is time to reimagine Alexander-Arnold. After six seasons in defence he is still to develop basic elements of defending such as sensing danger and body positioning, and perhaps it is time to accept he never will. However, in possession he is more important to Liverpool’s game than ever. Per 90 minutes he has the most touches of the ball for the club and he still produces moments of magic, such as his nutmeg on Oleksandr Zinchenko and cross to Roberto Firmino for the equaliser against Arsenal

    However, there is a shift in Alexander-Arnold this season. He has fewer touches in the attacking third than in any campaign since 2018-19, and more of his work is done in deeper areas (see graphic). This seems partly an effort by Klopp to use his long passing. In possession against Arsenal, Liverpool switched to a “box” midfield with Alexander-Arnold as a playmaking pivot alongside Fabinho.

    One key signing has already been made in Jonathan Power, the new club doctor. Addressing the worst injury record in the Premier League this season is key to a rebuild and the hope is that with a fitter team, stalwarts like Andy Robertson and Van Dijk will find their old form. Just maybe, Liverpool can do the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,145 ✭✭✭Augme



    Not many on the list. But if Gavi or Pedri were available for £100m this summer would people say we shouldn't sign them? I doubt it. But then again Gavi, Pedri and Musiala might end up like Jermaine Pennant and Jack Rodwell. 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,510 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    The midfield issue was stated here ad nauseam in the summer. It's not a case of "I was right" blah blah either. It was a universal opinion among posters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,510 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    "Erling Haaland scored more Premier League goals in August than Núñez has all season"

    Jaysus that's some stat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,197 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I’m not saying everybody thought our midfield was grand, and it did(and obviously does) require new players, just that I could see the logic in waiting a season to get a player they thought could upgrade the team for years, because most people would still think we would at least get a CL spot with the options we had anyway.

    We aren’t going to be in a position to continually add new first team upgrades in the same way as Man City because it doesn’t matter to them if they don’t work out, we are going to have to pick and choose our moments and I do think that means looking 2 or 3 years down the road most of the time. Numerous reasons have caused this to backfire and have put us back a bit, but it hasn’t been inaction or negligence.

    It just feels to easy to look at where we are now and say it was obvious this was going to happen. It was clear we needed upgrades in midfield but it certainly wasn’t clear we would be struggling mid table for the season.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,489 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Mr Five Touches, he'll win every individual honour, while City won't win a thing with him in the side.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 33,272 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    It certainly is.

    However, I wonder how many other players would this be true for also.

    Might give a little perspective.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,489 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Ronaldo had more work rate at United , than Haaland has at City .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,068 ✭✭✭jones


    I don't know, I think they'll most likely win the champions League this season finally and possibly the league too. Pep seems to have found a set up that's clicked with playing haaland.

    Mad that they only paid 50m for him (insert wink wink here)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,510 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    True but I can understand the comparison.

    Top two teams in the country, at the time, both go out and spend massively on a frontman.

    We need alot more goals in any case.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭hawaii501


    Sancho looked world class at Dortmund too and look how he's turned out. I know different players but Dele Alli was also looking like world class player who would go on for a decade at the top level.

    Only proper annoying thing is that the club basically put all their eggs in one basket by not signing a cm at the start of the season to wait for Bellingham and now nmvery unlikely to sign. Granted Fabinho's form was unexpected but we were always going to need a new cm last season as all others are injury prone to go with Bellingham 'this summer'.

    Still haven't replaced Gini which was 3 years ago who played nearly every game which the blame is on Klopp included.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,296 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    One has a functioning team behind him the other has a team that has had a massive drop off, that may also have a factor

    ******



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    You say "it was clear we needed upgrades in midfield " last summer, yet the club didn't reinforced midfield then and even when it was blatantly obvious to the dogs on the street that our midfield wasn't up it it, they did nothing in January to try to improve things, that was negligent, signing Gapko is fine, but I think the team would have benefited much more by signing a midfielder, that's not to say Gapko won't go on to be a success, hopefully he will, but, midfield should have been the priority. Thaigo is the last midfielder we have signed, that's close to 3 seasons ago. We are probably the only top club in Europe who don't have any midfielder in their mid twenties ( Ox and Keita are permanent sicknotes and both out of contract this summer), a really unusual situation we have found ourselves in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,645 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    Is yer man Artur close to fitness yet? Was leaked out during the recent international break he was, only for him to disappear again.

    Worst signing ever? Probably, certainly of the FSG era.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    He was on the bench before the international break, couldn't play against Madrid as he wasn't in the registered squad for the CL, he's going back to Juve in the summer, with Thiago back from injury, I doubt we'll see much of him. An absolute disaster of a signing, wouldn't blame the player himself, I'd blame whoever sanctioned signing an unfit player with a poor injury record, the writing was on the wall before he signed, but we still signed him. Personally if he's fit I'd play him if only just to give players who are likely to be here next season a break.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,510 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    We can only only hope. Though he's also been part of the problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,489 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    No player is worth 100m in reality, unless we're talking once in a generation players, like Messi, Ronaldo, Mbappe. Jude in reality is a 35m pound player, like Gakpo was.

    Grealish cost 100m, Gakpo 35m, and in his few appearances has 4 goals, Grealish in 80 appearances for City has 11, and 5 from 40 appearances this season, Gakpo has 4 from 17.

    It's all about the squad in reality, we need 6 x 35m pound players.

    Again PL need to get on and relegate City , over 100 charges over 9 years, they've ruined football, and make a mockery of fair play rules. If on the back of these charges they pluck 150m out of thin air for Bellingham then it's two fingers up to the PL. At least in La Liga they apply the rules, even to the mighty Barca and Real



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,197 ✭✭✭McFly85


    PSG broke the player economy with the Neymar signing. We managed to benefit from it(or more accurately from Barcelonas horrendous transfer strategy), and since then City have normalised the 100m+ player by signing Grealish without really knowing if they needed him or not. Now all sorts of merely good players are being sold for absolute nonsense money.

    As long as City go unpunished they will be able to dictate the prices of the player market which will ultimately make football more expensive for fans to participate in, which is why I think the charges against them are huge for football in general. They get away lightly and that’s really the end of the league as a credible sporting event.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,197 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Obvious to the dog in the street that our midfield wasn’t up to it - up to what exactly? Competing with City? Yes, without midfield reinforcements we were never likely to go for another 90+ point season and compete on all fronts.

    But ending up with a 60 point season, nobody saw that coming.

    I do agree though that something should have been done in January when it had been known for months that the team was underperforming.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,503 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    I think it’s unfair to say that Nunez is part of the problem.

    He just isn’t part of the solution.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement