What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

So his plan is just end homelessness by building tent cities uhm

and where do all the doctors and psychologists come from? Post pandemic there are no doctors and psychologists to spare if they aren’t burnt out or early retired they’re booked already.

All the hallmarks of campaign bullshit. Not anything to be taken as a serious or effective policy matter. Before you even get into the legal challenges of forcing relocation on the homeless to glorified internment camps.

how does this bullshit policy proposal affect you

Go back a page or two.

You said to forget you and just consider the post.

How does this proposed homeless policy affect Europe.

That’s a very tenuous and nebulous linkage to homelessness though. Happy to acknowledge Trump is an america first windbag but he will find any excuse not to help Europe/help Russia etc. no matter what the fiscal reality. It’s really not as if a bill to address homelessness would be tied to provisions to defund the Ukraine war. Even when Ukraine was happily funded and congress was sending them weapons, again, Trump ordered a freeze on the weapon deliveries then immediately got on a call with Zelensky to strong arm him into capitulating to helping Trump out with some election interference against Biden if he wanted the missiles in so many words. Not a jot to do with canceling those missiles to tent the homeless.

His lies alone about a "stolen election" should be enough to abandon all "neutrality". The fat lump of shit has openly and continually spread an egregious lie, and he knows it to be a lie. A lie which led to Jan 6th and people being killed. A lie which he still peddles today and one which will form the basis of his next presidency bid.

One cannot be "neutral" about that.

But, let's be honest here. Anyone saying they are "neutral" about Trump is probably just spoofing at this stage. Being neutral about such a character is impossible because of the actions of said character. More than likely, a person saying they're "neutral" is just afraid to say that they are in "favour". Because if they say they're in favour, they'll have to answer a lot of questions about the state of their own character.

The Chair (seen in clip, risibly pissed at being schooled on the rules) is reportedly still fuming at Marjorie Taylor Greene following this utterly derailing and embarrassing display during one of their own hearings. Reportedly the chair would prefer McCarthy boot her off his cmte if he cannot guarantee his chihuahua can compose herself.

You say you "don't care", but you're on a thread about Trump and also trying to promote a video you found in a positive way. However, in the space of a few pages, you've been given reasons to care by other posters.

I don't care about baking, which is why you won't find me on threads about baking.

Trump may spout a lot of shit about the homeless and isolationism, etc. But his past has proven that what he says doesn't translate into action. You may not know it, as you've said you're ignorant of such matters, but he tried to position himself as the man of the poor before in his previous Presidential bid. And did fuck all for poor people when he got in.

With that in mind, do you REALLY think he's going to do anything, anything at all, for the homeless in America if he gets in again.

As for his isolationist drivel, America has its hands in too many pies to ever be truly isolationist. That type of guff is said to appeal to redneck idiots who have no idea just how far flung America's influence on the world truly is. America first fantasists have no idea just how difficult it would be for America to pull out of every nation it has its paws in. And into the bargain, America Inc doesn't want to to do that and that includes Donald Trump.

You may have been self admittedly ignorant about the guy before, but how's that "neutrality" going now after hearing people here?

By focusing on autonomy. By developing an alternative 'nato without the u.s.' defense.

Havent budged an inch, zero fuks about him either way.

Its a shame you cant see outside your obsession. Theres life outside your two-teams nonsense.

I disagree.

Well over 1 million active military personnel in the EU. And over 3 million reserves. A combined defense budget forecast to reach over 300bn.

EU beats Russia (its only real threat) on practically all stats. (Especially now). Whats lacking is a well integrated command. Nato has proven that this can be achieved. So EU is developing its own backup mechanism to act like nato. (European defense agency, csdp, pesco).

And as we see, its needed. We need more of it. Because US can easily go America first.

Macron is right, strategic autonomy is a must.

Couldnt Biden just turn around and go isolationist?

The risk exists in either case. And if not during one administration then why not the next.

I know what does hold water .. some of the craniums in here.

And as for Mike Lindell, he's just been ordered to pay up the $5m bounty he offered to "prove Mike Wrong" an Arbitration Panel agreed with a computer forensics expert that "not only did not prove voter fraud, it had no connection to the 2020 election. He was the only expert who submitted a claim, arbitration records show."

Lindell really is a massive **** show.

Full article https://archive.ph/KQHLk