Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

Of course its to do with the tabloid press. Piers Morgan started the hole 17 lies thing (which started out as 17 lies and unprovables) and became just 17 lies.

I'd be interested to know what your top 5 lies are that she seemingly told in the Oprah interview.

I see where Simon Case, now Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service (William's former Private Secretary who was handling Meghan's bullying charges) is now in hot water himself over discrimination and racism. This isn't making the headlines in the tabloids.

By the way, I'm sure you are aware that Case made the complaint about Meghan's bullying without the consent of the people involved and they made Case withdraw the charge and hence no report published as to what happened.

Seriously, what are you going on about? As far as I know Catholics are the only ones who are prohibited from marrying into the Royal Family. Muslims are fine. They even get on with all the Christian churches and are usually present at all State ceremonies. There are a couple of million Muslims living in England. Is this racism or bigotry you think is fine?

I wonder did anyone wonder how tampongate would have upset both Charles & Camilla's children. They all seem to have gotten over it from what I see now.

Well I disagree with you. The Met accepts payment for services. They have a way of accepting payment. Harry is still a member of the Royal Family, no matter what and they get protection whether they are working or not. This ''working royal'' is whole load of nonsense as an excuse.

While we are on the finances of the Royals - according to the Guardian today, who have been doing a series on the royal family, Charles' personal fortune is approx. £1.8 billion. Everything is left to Charles/heir to avoid paying inheritance tax (in an arrangement negotiated between QEII and John Major when he was prime minister). Thats why all the royals have to go cap in hand to Charles for a handout - to avoid paying tax.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/07/british-royal-family-wealth-finances-cost-of-the-crown-summary

The paparazzi didn’t kill Diana. A drunk driver, plus the lack of wearing a seatbelt, did. I was personally so sad that her life ended in such a tragic way. But please stop trying to divert away, just as H&M do, from the real cause.

Read my post again. I didn't mention who was to blame for the accident, I blamed them for being despicable to continue taking photos of her dying not doing anything to help her. Not one of them. All they wanted to do was take photos of her dying.

Do you think that is ok for them to do that. I don't.

What sort of a comparison is that to make? Diana was Princess consort (just like Camilla and Kate Midleton are). She was never going to be Queen or Head of the Church of England. She would be of similar status to Jemima Goldsmith who married Imram Khan. If she could do it, so could Diana. And I'm pretty sure that Muslims can be racists just as well as the royal family.

Oh I do love a good bitchy comment and this one’s delicious

Camillas son speaks out on her behalf against Harry’s book and his comments about her- just shows why the Queens “never complain never explain” approach is always the better option, but these type of articles give so much joy for us soap opera watchers 🤪

Name one Muslim royal woman dating a non-Muslim? Any at all?

Interesting question. I don’t think so. He would have remained “single” but Camila would have featured in some way; obviously not as an official Queen but she would have been there in the background.

Reason being, I think since the year dot, Charles was programmed to be king- I don’t think any one or any thing would stop that from happening in his mind.

It was an affair she had to flee. I don’t like the royal family but to complain that they are racist is a bit rich when most are.

So many questions so little time 😛

If they haven’t fallen out and about to divorce which I don’t think has occurred, yet, then I think she was just giving him the space for the exposure he required to market and sell his book. That’s essentially now come to an end so I reckon she’s about to launch something herself- you can get over-exposed very quickly so I reckon she’s simply laying low and will likely launch some new podcast or something right around the time of Charles coronation

Oooo look at you with your royalty knowledge 😂 😛😉

Another bloody letter. After Oprah wrote back to Charles pointing out unconcious bias, both acknowledging the alleged comment was not made in malice but didn't get a satisfactory response and so won't be going to the Coronation. According to a "source" so take from that what you can. The drama. The drama. 🙄

I am thinking the whole thing is predicated on Harry thinking he caught Camilla in a gotcha after she roasted Harry (Ginger Afro...lol) and after consulting with Meghan thought he could go and throw them all under a bus with Camilla being blamed and likely ostracised because she is this dangerous villain he needed to get back at for..I dunno...turning his childhood bedroom into her dressing room.

Also why letters couldn't be exchanged privately before even doing Oprah which was what prompted the exchange. Could have been done at any time over the previous few years since it happened but in my opinion it was something kept deliberately so that it could be weaponised. Particularly nasty when it all happens while they are preparing for an impending death in the family. Lovely timing. Maybe given the circumstances an understandably curt or antagonistic reply may have been given, a reply which would serve as validation, could be weaponised itself in turn.

They went from being the most popular royals to being grey rocked, ostracised and mocked with them now depending on regurgitated PR to actually remain relevant.