Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Gangland Shootings part 4 - Read OP before posting - updated 30/12/23

Options
1589590592594595722

Comments

  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    First that claim was never made. The claim was made to blow your brains out and put a hole in your skull and have someone find and clean that up, is selfish. Plenty of ways to kill yourself without inflicting that trauma. However, in this case he has a wife and children, so yeah anyone who kills themselves is making a fundamentally selfish **** move there, sure maybe their mind isn't in its right state and clouded by a lot of things, but they still inflicted a life of trauma on those they're meant to love and protect. We don't apply the logic of having mental issues absolving you of your blame from your actions devestating other peoples lives in any other facet, so it seems illogical here.


    I have significantly more sympathy for those who didn't make a decision, but have to deal with the life changing consequences of it, than I do the person who makes a decision and doesn't.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Title of the day from RTE:

    Was Gerard Hutch a Patsy for the Regency?

    https://www.rte.ie/news/2023/0422/1378381-regency-gerard-hutch-patsy-hutch/



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,894 ✭✭✭Augme



    Never heard the term not guilt by reason of insanity or diminished responsibility?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    Ah it would be no bother to them to lose the phone

    Wasn't there a load of top Garda phones lost before during that lady chiefs tenure



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm talking morality not legality here. By the legal standard Daniel Kinahan is a legit businessman and Gerry Hutch is an innocent man in terms of the regency. Anyways I think this has divulged to philosophy so I'll leave it here.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,247 ✭✭✭evolvingtipperary101


    This is amazing.

    JD: "They (the cops) came in (to Patsy's house)… and they seen a bleeding Ford key right, so whatever cop put it down asked about the key, went out to the avenue checked every van, car the whole lot in the avenue for this Ford f**kin key, nothing was there for it."

    GH: "He's thinking that could be off the f**kin Ford van."

    JD: "Off the main van Transit right, so they f**ked off but they came back on the Thursday say."

    GH: "And they had to prove what the car, and they went to the key technicians and they told them the Reg did they."

    JD: "No. They never took the key, forgot to take the key, this is how stupid they are."

    GH: "Ah for f**ks sake."

    JD: "Right so then they went back to Pat's, went in looking for the key, raided the gaff again, we're here for the key where's the key, he says I don't know what key you're talking about. He had a big box of bleeding keys."



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,247 ✭✭✭evolvingtipperary101


    No doubt.

    I'd say Patsy's five or six phones are a gold mine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,848 ✭✭✭billyhead


    Why or more specifically what was speculated as the reason that Colm Fox killed himself?



  • Registered Users Posts: 249 ✭✭Spencer101


    He interfered with the identification process re Patrick Hutch trial. Had he lived the full issues at play there would have come out in court. Trial likely collapsed he’s then still a serving guard. But serving guard at high risk of disciplinary action, possibly in to leaving the job earlier than expected with financial consequences for family.



  • Registered Users Posts: 322 ✭✭pjcb


    Post edited by pjcb on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,103 ✭✭✭Odhinn




  • Registered Users Posts: 481 ✭✭notsocutehoor


    These lads have $5m bounties on their heads, they have their molls, kids, extended family members, business associates and 'friends' hanging around, must be at least 100 all told, they must be living a 'normal' life to some extent (schools, hospitals etc), and the cream of our investigative journalism don't appear to have a clue where they are, they seem to come up with some new country every second week. Surely it can't be that hard to do a reccie on them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 322 ✭✭pjcb



    quite a contrast between that and what the judge said

    "In fact, a reasonable possibility arises on the evidence that the Regency was planned by Patsy Hutch and that ...the judge said.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,103 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Indeed. But the trial that collapsed was concerning another Patrick Hutch - would this be the "patsy" hutch he was referring to?



  • Registered Users Posts: 654 ✭✭✭dashdoll


    Great article from rte today in fairness.



  • Registered Users Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    These state job merchants usually need to be dragged kicking and screaming before they are forced to resign

    Holding their hands up?

    admitting to anything?

    I don’t believe any of this farce



  • Registered Users Posts: 322 ✭✭pjcb


    erm I though it was 'Patsy' Hutch Snr and Patrick Hutch Jnr.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,103 ✭✭✭Odhinn




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,130 ✭✭✭lmao10


    How can you trust the guards at all in this country. Rotten to the core it seems.



  • Registered Users Posts: 249 ✭✭Spencer101


    Prior to the recent trial he was a carpet fitter who essentially as the lawyers say was of good character. There was some chat on this board in last year another poster was of the belief he did some modest time inside due in 80s to a charge re small fraud. Whether that was said to be on remand or he was convicted don’t recall.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    He wouldn't be the first Garda to have his evidence hosed by a Senior Counsel on the stand, and many have survived and thrived professionally afterwards. He basically made a procedural error which likely would have fatally undermined the State's case.

    Who knows how emotionally invested he was in the case or indeed any other troubles he might have had. I think some of the speculation that he was a corrupt cop is off-colour. I haven't seen anything credibly pointing to that. Easy to malign the dead when they can't answer back.



  • Registered Users Posts: 249 ✭✭Spencer101


    He was a Detective Superintendant in his 50s who was leading the investigation; explain how allowing for his experience it was a 'procedural' error. The reports at the time:

    ' In a voir dire, or preliminary examination, Det Gda Fergal O'Flaherty and Det Gda Jonathan Brady said they had identified Patrick Hutch as the man in the wig. The method of that identification came under intense scrutiny. The gardai said Det Sgt Patrick O'Toole had brought them to a room at Ballymun Garda Station, which was manned by Gda Michael Ryan.

    All four said detectives O'Flaherty and Brady named Mr Hutch separately, while the defence claimed there was evidence they did so in each other's presence, which could have compromised their identifications.Ultimately, the court ruled - on February 2 last year - the identification was admissible.

    Mr Justice Tony Hunt said the court was satisfied detectives O'Flaherty and Brady had separately identified the person in the photo as Mr Hutch, and there was "no basis of contamination by nomination".

    However, before the trial could resume, the defence sought disclosure of emails between the gardai.

    "This is all very mysterious and elliptical," Judge Hunt remarked at the time.

    Michael O'Higgins, defending, explained that an issue had arisen in relation to garda statements, matters that were omitted and new statements that came together and "hit every single note on the scale".He had made a case in legal argument that the statements were a "blatant and obvious cog from one to the other", which was not accepted by the prosecution.

    Mr O'Higgins said he was looking for material in relation to "contact they may have had with regard to those statements".

    Three days later, on Saturday, February 10 last year, Det Supt Colm Fox was found dead at Ballymun Garda Station.



  • Registered Users Posts: 249 ✭✭Spencer101


    Don't basically disagree but would it be as many as 100- might it more so be a group of 25-50 ? Point I have never understood is how the father who has a fairly extensive criminal record in Ireland and Belgium (and perhaps elsewhere) is allowed in Dubai. When his social media/ linkedin accounts were posted last year he was ' Christopher Vincent.' He's either a heavy convicted criminal in Dubai, under his own name, or he is 'Christopher Vincent' - with Vincent as surname and seemingly hiding his criminal record. Aside from road traffic offences the two sons have no criminal records.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    That's a procedural error. A bit of a howler given his experience granted, but implicating him in some sort of of conspiracy on the basis of the above is more than unfair.

    As Napolean once said: Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence



  • Registered Users Posts: 249 ✭✭Spencer101


    Don’t claim some big complicated conspiracy. This was ‘ corrupt for the job’ / noble cause corruption. The ends were seen to justify the means to secure convictions in a gangland murder. Wasn’t a ‘howler’ when identification process contaminated - likely was thought it would not come out. This wasn’t someone who was a probationer- they knew what they were doing. It’s absurd to suggest otherwise.

    Post edited by Spencer101 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    they all knew what they were doing when they contaminate d the identification process

    Yeah, that's a conspiracy theory right there I'm afraid.



  • Registered Users Posts: 249 ✭✭Spencer101


    Sorry its not. A conspiracy theory by definition is an explanation for an event or situation that asserts the existence of a conspiracy by a powerful/sinister groups when other explanations are more probable. There is not a more probable explanation than it was known what was being doing on a 'just cause' basis. You seem to prefer the improbable view that the Irish version of Inspector Clouseau/ someone straight out of Templemore made a 'procedural' error. There are basic tenants of criminal law and key stages in an investigation which cause trials to collapse. If you were experienced you plainly know that. It seems to be corruption not as some of the conspiracy theorists out there would believe where there were meetings between Fox and Hutch/Kinahans in dark laneways, where Fox and/or others were bribed/ blackmailed- it was 'corrupt for the job' corruption.

    Post edited by Spencer101 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    "A conspiracy theory by definition is an explanation for an event or situation that asserts the existence of a conspiracy by a powerful/sinister groups"

    The allegation that Fox along with other senior investigating officers conspired to taint evidence because they were on the take from a well-known and well resourced criminal cartel meets your own definition of what a conspiracy theory is.

    There's no evidence for it. And you'll doubtless turn around and say somone else in the force or State apparatus is covering it up, thus doubling-down on your conspiracy theory.



  • Registered Users Posts: 249 ✭✭Spencer101


    Read what you are trying to discredit. I have acknowledged there are stories claiming meetings down dark lane ways. Discount that completely. Clearly said seems incidence of ‘corrupt for the job’ also known as just cause corruption. No more / no less. Don’t believe any of the nonsense about Fox or others meeting Hutches/ Byrnes/ Kinahans. Merely acknowledged there are some fabulists out there that have discussed this and offered wacky narratives. This was an age old issue with all police forces officers in all forces exist last 100 years who were ‘ corrupt for the job’. Lots of reports in USA, Australia, England & Hong Kong. Why would Ireland be immune to this ? For avoidance of doubt that’s not getting an envelope full of €50s- it’s suborning/ contaminating an investigation to ensure a conviction as the ‘ ends justify the means’

    Post edited by Spencer101 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 322 ✭✭pjcb


    yeah but they also often said in the papers that Eddie Hutch wasn't involved in organised crime except .... 'A bank account containing €160,000 in Eddie Hutch’s name was found and seized by CAB' https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/who-are-the-hutches-a-profile-of-the-dublin-family-1.2527930



Advertisement