Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Is it time to join Nato

Options
1113114116118119152

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 510 ✭✭✭AerLingus747


    everyone thinks the 2% GDP needs to be a cash handover to NATO from Ireland, like a subscription fee.... it doesn't and can be re-cooped for equivalence in various ways..

    The fact Iceland is a full member and they have at most a lightly armed coastguard, with zero air defence capability is an example of what is required (or not) to gain entry.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It's 2% we have to spend on our own defense capabilities,

    We're not giving NATO 10 billion euro every year,it's us spending on our own defense while then transporting men , equipment and supplies for training and standardization,

    Every other country does it except us while the same people saying don't worry someone else will spend money on protecting us ,

    It will be exactly the same if the EU army ever gets exists in the next few decades we will still need to spend and spend regularly to increase our capabilities to join said EU military forces



  • Registered Users Posts: 34 FrattonFred


    Isn’t there a magic money tree in Brussels that takes care of all that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Who remembers the bailout,

    You know when it was reported the economy crashed because we were all swigging bottles of champagne while eating our dinners,

    We will end up paying huge sums to the eu and get little or nothing in return military wise



  • Registered Users Posts: 473 ✭✭Ramasun


    The Muscovites are saying that the EU is the same as NATO now.

    That's a declaration of hostilities against Ireland and Austria.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 473 ✭✭Ramasun


    There's one in Dublin, to the tune of 26bn this year.

    Not enough personnel to crew the ships.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    "Irish Military Intelligence works closely with the British Security Service (MI5) and Secret Intelligence Service (SIS/MI6), American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and National Security Agency (NSA), and is understood to have a relationship with Israeli Mossad.

    Ireland is reported to be a member of the ECHELON SIGINT (signals intelligence) network, sharing and receiving information with its members (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States)."

    - Wiki.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directorate_of_Military_Intelligence_(Ireland)

    So we're very likely to see any major threat long in advance. Especially in these years where Russia's security infrastructure is more infiltrated, pre-occupied, chaotic and divided than ever.

    To that you can add co-operation from all fellow EU member states' security services, who have interests in maintaining order within the EU, as well as maintaining their own national interests in Ireland (citizens, investments and diplomatic alliances).

    This would equally apply to certain non-EU countries, Ukraine for example, with many Ukrainians in Ireland and given Ukraine's present relationship with Russia, we would almost certainly receive any relevant information from such a strong source engaged in a full on information war with Russia.

    Then there are sort of marginal systems of which Ireland is a member which could happen to catch wind of any Russian plans, such as Europol, and frontex. True they don't work in that particular field, but surveillance and intel information flows through them. Anything big can send ripples down those channels. *(Frontex in particular makes use of satellite based signal detection, space and aviation based surveillance, and has access to European space agency resources).

    And I would suspect that non-state entities such as Anonymous would side with neutral, peaceful Ireland over the nation which is presently being the worlds biggest A-hole.

    tl;dr: solid odds we would easily see anything of any significant scale coming from Russia to harm us well in advance.

    Edit for grammatical error, to add wiki link, and to reference to frontex's equipment. No reference to '5 eyes' was made, or inferred.

    Post edited by greencap on


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    If/when SF are in power they'd just take Ireland back out anyway, or prevent Ireland from joining in the first place. Joining nato would cause too much division on the island.



  • Registered Users Posts: 34 FrattonFred




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    This may surprise you, but Islamic terrorists don't exactly care if a country is in NATO or not.

    Austria, Sweden and Finland have all had fatal Islamic terrorist incidents over the last decade and beyond.

    The only reason we haven't had a major incident is down to sheer luck.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    To join nato would mean to form an alliance with an authoritarian, anti-democratic Turkey (Turkiye). A highly corrupt country which disregards human rights and laws. A country whos regime is influenced in its elections and decisions by extreme Islamist political interests.

    The same country is still causing territorial disputes with our fellow EU members Greece and Cyprus.

    We cant be associated with such a dangerous rogue state.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    The same would come to our assistance as a member of Nato,

    I'm sure you will complains about the British,the Germans in relation to ww2 , France, Spain and Portugal, Italy??



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Simplicistic nonsense.

    No organisation has done more to manage the complex and delicate relationship with Turkey than NATO. And the relationship is utterly unmanageable without the American contribution.

    Without Turkey in the NATO fold, there would almost certainly have been a major war with Greece many times over.

    Turkey is nobody's idea of a perfect democracy, but it is a lynchpin state for the security of Europe and the Black Sea bordering states in Europe, and the Middle East beyond our immediate concerns. We have to play ball with them.

    Your post illustrates perfectly the thoughtless wolly-headed nature of reflective anti-NATO sentiment. You simply don't want a Europe or world with Turkey going-off on a mad one independent of NATO's leash.

    It's also increasingly likely that Erogan is on his last legs politically by the way. The looming election could see the opposition candidate take the reigns.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    Joining nato may cause costly legal complications as to join may be argued to be against our constitution. No doubt the legal industry would find issues and milk the tax-payer. A costly and divisive referendum is also a possibility.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Read the constitution. No referendum is necessary. It only requires the assent of the Oireachtas. There's not even a legal controversy around that.

    "May be argued"

    You can argue for that position from a legal standpoint, but it would be arguing from a place of profound legal ignorance, because the wording in Bunreacht na hÉireann is crystal clear.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    The money and contracts involved in rapidly bringing our forces up to nato standard would no doubt result in a tsunami of self serving gombeenism and influence peddling by our homegrown chancers, as well as those from abroad. Have they not shafted us enough already.


    Oooh youll be needing a nuclear reactor for that too, wouldnt you agree Bertie.

    - eh eh eh yes Mr Raytheon, in fact I think we'll need 2.

    What. Eh eh I mean 3.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    On the run from the Irish Constitution I see.

    There is not a thing in the world committing us to additional defence expenditure should we admit ourselves to NATO. It's entirely at the option of our Government how much or how little we spend.

    We need to spend more in any case, but that's the hard legal reality.

    And nobody knows what you're talking about nuclear reactors for. If you want to be taken seriously, post seriously.

    Next item of misinformation plz...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    If we had previously joined nato, then a couple of years ago we'd have been part of a military alliance run by Trump, Erdogan and Bojo. Think about that.

    Thats just begging for problems. I think if you overlap the Trump, Erdo, and Bojo cicrles as a chart, then the bit you get in the middle is Joe Exotic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Joe Exotic... right. Convincing.

    Anything else?



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Trump is gone, Erdogan had a heart attack yesterday hopefully he's doesn't survive ,

    Next



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Worried about bad leaders of democratic countries that get flushed out by democratic processes, and silent on fascists in the Kremlin.

    I think we all know what's going on here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    If we were to join nato now we'd be allied with the 'Tory' party.

    It was only recently that one of the top tories (Patel) was threatening to cut Ireland off from food supply routes.

    The term 'Tory' comes from an Irish word roughly meaning 'one who mugs you'.

    Could this be whats known in the business as "foreshadowing".

    hmmm. 🤔



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    I think that's a full bingo card right there. From fake constitutional clauses to Joe Exotic. The weird, wild, and wonderful imagination of the Tankie in all its splendour.

    Where the security of Europe is an excercise in whataboutery and moral purity, except when it comes to autocratic states in opposition to Europe - we pretend like they don't exist and aren't doing what they're doing. And they can't help it in any case the craythurs.

    Where deterrance is frowned upon as "geopolitical gameplaying" and diplomacy above all else is exalted. Except diplomacy with Turkey, which we "should have nothing to do with". So wait, no to diplomacy either.

    And no hook ups of any kind with the UK, because of the Conservative Party.

    Oh shakey ground? Throw in the protagonist of a gonzo Netflix documentary in the mix. Yes, Joe Exotic, that'll do.

    So no to security, no to deterrance, no to diplomacy, definitely no to the US - every man for himself and glory Russia.

    Tankieland: Nice to visit in the same way a hall of mirrors at a funfair might be, but you wouldn't want to get stuck there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    Does joining nato require a referendum? Some would say no.

    Would the Irish public demand a referendum, yes.

    Polls show most Irish people want to maintain our militarily neutral status.

    So just a waste of time and money to pursue the question.

    Spend that money on our debt or health service instead.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    "Does joining nato require a referendum? Some would say no."

    It absolutely and verifiably doesn't require a referendum. The constitution is clear that it fully empowers the Oireachtas on matters of defence. It's not "some would say", it's a hard legal fact.

    We don't do democracy via Sunday newspaper poll by the way. We empower the Oireachtas via ballot to act in our interests, even on topics that don't tend to get an airing on the hustings at election time.

    And at that, there are conflicting polls over the last year or so which has displayed a definitive shift from Irish people on collective security.

    So here's the rub from your post: not only are you opposed to collective security (your right), you're actually fully opposed to having the discussion in the first place (not your right at all). Be it via the Oireachtas, via Citizens Assembly or via referendum. You're seeking a total shutdown on the matter. You won't get it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    Natos top dog is USA, and the top dog in the USA is corporations. Who wants to go fight, and kill, and die for Halliburtons shareholders.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    2003 just called, it wants it's Socialist Workers Party pamphlet back.

    Will I tell him your out at the shops or should I give him a message?



Advertisement