Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Development Pathways

«1345

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That's not the context of how I used it; but I can give you chapter and verse in terms of stats if you want to show how Leinster have a far better track record of backing their younger players in these situations if you'd like?

    Here's the actual comment:

    What Munster should be asking themselves is why Tony Butler has only made 1 appearance total - off the bench against Wasps when two thirds of the team had COVID, in the past 2 seasons. Charlie Tector (less than 1 month older) has played 6 times for Leinster over the same period, while Sam Prendergast has more minutes for Leinster than Butler has for Munster.

    It's an entirely fair statement.

    Once again here, with a player injured, the proposal is to go and sign an "Alby Mathewson" type, rather than backing the two academy scrum halves you have, plus Neil Cronin who is still there on a senior contract.

    Banging on about having the least number of NIQ players is a bit much too - Munster have 2 at present, Leinster have 3 (I'm not including either Healy or Abdaladze), Ulster have 4, Connacht have 4.

    It's a fairly recent thing as well - last year Leinster had 1, while Munster have 4.

    You already have an NIQ centre coming in, which takes you level with Leinster, and if you sign the NIQ front rower, OH and now SH you want, it would be an almost unprecedented number of NIQ players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Wouldn’t the answer to that be that Munster usually need to win all their games (at the onset of each game) and can’t afford to carry a tector level player for most of their games?

    Like Prendergast got two caps because they were throw away games. Also, Munster have had pretty good OH depth and young depth.

    The big difference between munster and leinster to me, is that flannery and healy level players don’t leave leinster. Healy is a special case obviously but munster can’t as easily sell waiting their turn as leinster can.

    Also, Nankivell will put them at 2 NIQ next year right? That’s not crazy even if you added two more total.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,981 ✭✭✭✭phog


    So hard to keep up here, same poster, almost polar opposite arguments about the same injury

    "and the fact that they will now need to spend money on a replacement in all likelihood"

    "Once again here, with a player injured, the proposal is to go and sign an "Alby Mathewson" type, rather than backing the two academy scrum halves you have, plus Neil Cronin who is still there on a senior contract."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Is Cronin on a contract for next year? If so, it would make sense just to use him.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Leinster don't just get minutes into academy players in throwaway games, and have a far better track record than the other provinces of actually seeing their academy players play meaningful minutes so to evaluate them, and not ending up with guys sitting on the senior squad who've almost never played for them.

    Contrast that with Tony Butler who is going into Year 3 of the Academy and his only time on the field has been 7 minutes off the bench in the COVID Armageddon game back in December '21, and now, Munster fans are clamouring again to sign another NIQ 10.

    The differences are pretty stark in Academy player utilisation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    I mean they are clamouring to sign an NIQ 10 because they lose the 10s they develop unlike leinster and that’s not anywhere near entirely their fault. Leinster can sell guys on being way down depth charts because you can make the ireland squad more reliably like that at leinster.

    They had 3 young tens who needed minutes last year, and a **** ton of must win games this year.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The best players make Irish squads, regardless of where they sit on depth charts. This has been proven time and time again now.

    Leinster have way more guys in Irish squads because Leinster are way better than the other provinces at this moment in time.

    And, Jack Crowley made an Irish squad and got capped at a time when he'd done exactly nothing at a senior level in rugby, so not sure that argument stacks up. Ben Healy had plenty of minutes and opportunities, he just wasn't rated that highly by the Irish mgmt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    How does that contradict what I said?

    They lost a Flannery level player (he was on the EI tour) and Leinster don’t lose Flannery level players pretty much ever.

    Also, again they played three young tens last year and had a ton of must win games this year.

    Doesn’t Healy getting tons of minutes and opportunity by 23 also refute the whole ‘they don’t play young players thing’?

    Your argument seems so disjointed to me. Do Munster not have good players or they don’t develop them? If they don’t have good players, why would you care if they are being developed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Leinster lost Hawkshaw, who based on senior appearances is a couple of steps above a Flannery type player. Munster lost Flannery because at the time he had the Second Choice Irish OH in front of him and Healy and Crowley ahead of him too. While at Ulster there was Burns a regularly injured Madigan and little else. How many appearances did Flannery have for Munster?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You said:

    Leinster can sell guys on being way down depth charts because you can make the ireland squad more reliably like that at leinster.

    Which implies Leinster players are getting picked for Ireland undeservedly, or just because they're Leinster players. This patently isn't the case, and if it was, it's highly unlikely Ireland would be the #1 team in the world at present and Grand Slam champions.

    Leinster don't lose players like Flannery because they at the very least get minutes into them and give them an opportunity. Jake Flannery left Munster at 22 having played 4 times for them. Leinster have 7 Academy players this season alone who have played more for Leinster than that.

    Do Munster not have good players or they don’t develop them?

    We have no idea how good guys like Tony Butler, Ethan Coughlan, Jack Oliver etc are, because of the scarcity of opportunities they get. We'll have even fewer if NIQ players are added into the mix in front of them, at the very time when they should be getting trusted to step up and take more minutes.

    They are not as good at developing players. It's improved in recent times without question, but they still find themselves where the last 20 cap Irish international they produced is the 31 year old Niall Scannell.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    You are holding two separate thoughts in your head that clash.

    If you believe that

    A. leinster players get picked from way down the depth chart because they are better than players in other provinces

    then wouldn’t the most logical explanation for other provinces not playing guys as young be

    B. Leinster players are better so they play younger

    I don’t see how you can believe A and not believe B. Playing a few URC games doesn’t make an average player into a good player.

    So, again why would you care if they don’t play Butler that much? Doesn’t that just indicate that either he isn’t that good or they had other good reasons not to play him?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    He wasn’t on the EI squad so i’d say no he’s not considered on the same level.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    For a guy who has twice now accused me of making a confusing argument, I've literally no idea what point you're trying to make in the first piece there as the sentence seems to just fall off a cliff.

    Leinster seem to recognise better than the other provinces that it's a squad game, and therefore you need to expand your playing pool and get more minutes into more players. You have a better sense of what they're about, and see how they're able for the next level. It's very hard to make that call on a guy who literally never gets the chance.

    It would be a phenomenal coincidence if it just happened that all these guys who wither and die in academies without gametime were actually all just not up to it.

    These guys come through similar underage player pathways, and shine at underage levels.

    When they get into the academy, where the actual coaching and development is supposed to take place, they stall.

    James French is a perfect example of this - you've a guy who was an Irish U20 prop in 2018. He's 6ft 1, and 120kg. He was an All Ireland schoolboy shotput champion, so he's clearly got a good level of athleticism and power.

    He goes three years through the Munster academy, without getting a sniff of minutes (despite Munster fans consistently complaining about the quality of their scrum over the same period). He gets one appearance, the same COVID game against Wasps when the bulk of the squad is missing, and then never plays again.

    He washes out this year early from his contract, despite signing a 2 year extension in Jan 2022, at the age of 24. It's the job of coaches to turn raw athletes like this guy into players, but for too long Munster have a poor return in this respect. He's supposedly signing for Ulster for next season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    If you can’t understand that very **** simple point, its because you find it hard to refute it.

    Leinster have better players but that’s not the reason they play younger apparently. Actually Munster are letting a ton of elite guys die on the vine through lack of development. Rowntree is in practices and deciding not to play good players because they are too young.

    You are concern trolling.

    Edit: Leinster dominate every underage squad. That’s BEFORE they are in the leinster academy usually. But the reason their players play young is unrelated to the quality of their players? Make it make sense.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It’s genuinely difficult to follow your childish stream of consciousness posting style.

    Of course I think Leinster have excellent talent in their academy, but in scenarios where Leinster are caught in a particular position, like hooker this season, they back the academy player to fill the gap, like John McKee, who has played multiple times this year for Leinster in Europe and the league.

    When Munster find themselves similarly tight, like next season at both half back positions it seems, the immediate response from Munster fans on here is to call for an NIQ player, no suggestion that Butler or Oliver or Coughlan could step up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Source on them calling for an NIQ player? You’ve said that a few times. Munster have like two NIQs. It doesn’t seem they are doing much calling for NIQ players.

    Yes, talented players would play earlier. Well done for understanding that.

    When Munster have been down in their depth chart due to injuries this year, they have played young players. They were more than happy to play Edogbo when fit for example.

    On the French thing, we sign a decent amount of speculative players. I like that policy but i wouldn’t expect him to stick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,429 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    How come Aitzol King has only made a single URC appearance while Patrick Campbell, who is a month younger, has already made multiple champions cup appearances and is already in double digit appearances for Munster?

    How come Edwin Edogbo has become a mainstay in the Munster team and would likely be double-digit capped this year barring injury - when players like O'Tughernaigh and Mangan are only given throwaway appearances in South Africa when its time to bring out the D team?

    You can cherry pick examples of players like French who aren't good enough from any province. How come Mark Hernan, a guy who started openside in every (I believe) U20 6N game that year, didn't flourish and become a great player under the incredible tutilege of the Leinster Academy?

    That's a terrible arguement ofcourse, but so is the French one. You've mentioned him before in this thread (or someone did anyways, but I believe it was yourself), and both times it's been called out as a deranged take.

    If Leinster love backing young players so much, why did they sign Ngatai ahead of Osborne? Or Jenkins ahead of Deeny? Or Alalatoa instead of Boyle - one of the hottest U20 prospects we've had in years?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Yea the most realistic reason why a guy doesn’t play is that they aren’t good or have one glaring weakness. Why would we assume otherwise?

    Its also as simple as if leinster had as many must win games as munster this year, would they have played young guys as much. The answer is no and its obviously no.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Flannery was only on the tour due to Frawley being injured. It was a case of who is left to send. For both Leinster and Connacht Hawkshaw has made more appearances 12/10. Than Flannery has 6/4. Which would suggest he was higher rated by both provinces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    It would suggest he isn’t as highly rated by the irfu.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,185 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Munster 100% need an emergency signing at 9. They will be out their two first choice 9s for several weeks and their third choice is now injured.

    There is a time to rely on your academy to step up, but that is different from being completely dependent on them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,981 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I think you'll find it was you that mentioned buying in cover.

    "and the fact that they will now need to spend money on a replacement in all likelihood."

    Munster have two home produced scrumhalfs heading to the RWC, it's a bit rich to be lectured by fans from other provinces about our lack of success in bringing froward players especially when it's a scrumhalf cover we're currently discussing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    You're right! It is fair. They should be backing Coughlin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Leinster gave Tector a little time. He's going to be pushing for more come autumn. Prendergast will play some more next year too. At not adding much to the budget! Savings sir? "YES PLEASE". Ka ching.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Who at Munster said they should sign like 3 more NIQs? Even then that would be 5, which is one more than connacht and ulster.

    So, its like he just made something up and the thing he made up is not even that crazy lol. Oh no, 5 NIQS!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Dubinusa




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Its going to be interesting to see what happens there. I feel like Tector will prob be odd man out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    I think with Butler there were very few games from the outside where munster didn’t need a result. Last year, there might be an argument.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    You do realize that C. O. T isn't in the academy yet. As far as King goes there's a lad ahead of him that scored 10 tries this year. King's time will come. Hernan retired through injury and Mangan is injured these past 2 months.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Dubinusa




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Tector doesn't look polished or a natural. He kinda grew on me as his u20's season went on. He's definitely got a chance. Harry B is an injury machine and with the world cup in September, Tector may get minutes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    If Harry Byrne could get some extended injury free run, he could end up being the number 1 guy though too. He’s so talented .



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,117 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I can give you chapter and verse in terms of stats if you want to show how Leinster have a far better track record of backing their younger players

    I've never disputed this. But just because Munster don't produce from their academy to the same level as Leinster, doesn't mean their academy output is poor. Leinster are the outlier here. Leisnter are pretty much the outlier in world rugby.

    For the record, Munster promoted 9 players from the academy at the start of last season. Can you tell me the last time another academy promoted as many players? And I'm pretty sure guys like Crowley would be in year 3 academy but for being promoted early.

    You already have an NIQ centre coming in, which takes you level with Leinster

    That's simply not true, because he's replacing the NIQ centre who's leaving.

    and if you sign the NIQ front rower, OH and now SH you want...

    Again that's not true; I've never said I want us to sign a NIQ in all those position. What I've said from the outset is that, because we have the lowest number of NIQ players, I think we have scope for another. I don't think it'll be in the front-row. I think it could be at 9 or 10 tho.

    With regards Tector:

    • Yes he had 6 appearances. That amounted to 50 minutes. It's hardly an enormous number.
    • 19 points; that was the average lead Leinster had when he was introduced across those 6 games. Munster, or any province, don't have that luxury.
    • 9 points; that was the minimum lead Leinster had, vs Ulster, when he was introduced. Tector got 1 solitary minute. See the trend?

    With regards Prendergast, well, it was literally days after he made his debut, in a game of no consequence to Leinster.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,117 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    It would be a phenomenal coincidence if it just happened that all these guys who wither and die in academies without gametime were actually all just not up to it.

    Ok, can you give a few examples of a guy who Munster didn't back who ended up proving them wrong elsewhere after leaving Munster?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,981 ✭✭✭✭phog


    When or who was the last scrum half to regularly play for Ireland that was home produced by Leinster.

    I think we've had Stringer, Redden, TOL, Murray and now Casey. Throw in Boss & JGP and that's basically our scrumhalfs in the last 22 years

    If pathways to professional rugby was as easy as giving game time no province would need NIQ or project players.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,429 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Didn't realise Hernan had been injury enforced. Had presumed he just wasn't up to standard.

    Disregard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Dubinusa




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think you'll find I didn't.

    The post you're quoting was from me at 2:18pm:

    Whereas, you'd already posted this at 2:13pm, which is the first mention of recruiting to cover this absence.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Source on them calling for an NIQ player?

    The post directly above this one, was the first one where the very first instinct is to fill a gap with a signing rather than look to the academy.

    Yeah, it's almost like I made something up 🙄:

    and the two pages of posts following that, which are making the argument for a NIQ 10.

    There are more going further back on calls for NIQ tight heads and hookers as well.

    So maybe do some actual reading before accusing me of making something up.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,117 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Just because some posters call for NIQ signings doesn’t mean Munster don’t back their academy.

    I’m pretty sure Crowley, Buckley and Kendellen are 3 guys who would still be in the academy this season but for being promoted early.

    Between them they have nearly 2000 minutes.

    That’s pretty much the definition of backing your academy.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,117 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    We have no idea how good guys like Tony Butler, Ethan Coughlan, Jack Oliver etc are, because of the scarcity of opportunities they get.

    You give Tector as an example of a guy Leinster back because, at the time, he had 6 appearances.

    This amounted to 50 minutes.

    You give Coughlan as an example of a guy Munster don’t back. He has 2 appearances.

    This amounts to 55 minutes.

    Can you see the issue there?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Munster's academy production issues aren't due to what they're doing now - which is good. Its from what they did 3-8 years ago. They almost had an entire generation of non-production after Murray/POM/Earls



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,117 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    That’s a completely fair comment.

    I just don’t see how anyone can hold the opinion that Munster still don’t back their academy, based on what we’ve seen over the past 2-3 seasons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Agree with this. Lots of players fast tracked. Kendellan, Casey, Hodnett all got playing time. Quinn has played too!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,981 ✭✭✭✭phog


    This is correct by timing but you did in fact mention buying in cover, then you went polar opposites for some reason.

    Anyone that followed rugby will know why Munster brought in Alby Mathewson and we're not a hundred miles from a similar situation again. We're sending 2 homegrown scrumhalves to the RWC, our 3rd choice just picked up a long term injury so we may need to consider cover.

    Our pathways for scrumhalf has been more than decent compared to other provinces, of the 12 that been in RWC squads since 1999 seven have started rugby at Munster.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah, I think this is a fair comment on balance.

    I looked at the stats comparing the two academies over the past 10 seasons (would do similar for Ulster or Connacht if they had the data clearly located somewhere), and while Leinster are far more productive overall, there is evidence that Munster have been more productive and giving more opportunities in recent seasons.

    If you exclude this year's intake (2022/23) for both teams, then Munster have had 71 players in their academy from 2012/13-2021/22, and Leinster have had 75 over the same period. 29 of those 71 are still with Munster, and 41 of Leinster's intake are still with Leinster.

    Leinster's academy graduates played 2,737 times for Leinster, versus 1,397 for Munster's players. Leinster's academy garnered 501 Irish caps versus 23 for Munster.

    12 of Leinster's 75 players never played a senior game for Leinster (and some interesting names in there: Gavin Thornbury, Billy Dardis, Harrison Brewer) + some unfortunate injury retirements (Charlie Ryan, Mark Hernan).

    26 of Munster's 71 players never played a senior game for Munster.

    39 of Munster's 71 played 5 or fewer games, 19 of Munster's players played 20 or more games.

    24 of Leinster's 75 played 5 or fewer games, 38 of Leinster's 75 played 20 games or more.

    2 Munster players made over 100 appearances, 9 Leinster players made over 100 appearances.

    8 Munster players were internationally capped. 24 Leinster players were capped internationally.


    Comparing class by class every season, every single year the Leinster group garnered more Leinster caps than their equivalent class did Munster caps.

    The international caps are higher for Leinster in every year bar 2013/14 (3 for Munster to 1 for Leinster) and 2020/21 (3 for Munster to 1 for Leinster), and the median number of club appearances is higher for Leinster in every year except 2020/21.

    Munster have only 2 years where the median number of caps by their academy players is in double digits - (52 caps is the median for the class of 2016/17 which contained Gavin Coombes, Shane Daly, Calvin Nash, Fineen Wycherley) and (34 is the median for the class of 2020/21 (Crowley, Buckley, Kendellen). Munster have 4 years where the median number of caps is zero. The average median (if that makes sense) number of caps in any given academy class for Munster is 9.6 (skewed highly by the class of 2016/17).

    Leinster by contrast have only 2 years where the median number of caps is in single digits - 2015/16 (5 cap median) and 2021/22 (3 caps median). Just like Munster's most productive ever class was 2016/17, so was Leinster's. That group gained 548 total caps (72 median) plus 182 international caps (this was Connors, Deegan, Keenan, J O'Brien, Porter, Ryan, Larmour). The average median (once again, hope this makes sense) number of caps in any given academy class for Leinster is 30.

    The overall median number of caps for Munster over the period is 3, whereas for Leinster it is 20.

    EDIT: For the sake of completeness, I excluded this year's class because you wouldn't expect these guys to have international caps etc yet, but had I included them, it would have been a continuation of the same trend - Leinster have awarded 19 caps to their current Year 1 class, versus 4 for Munster).

    If you look at the last three intakes (so including class of 2022/23), Munster's 17 players have played for Munster 133 times, versus Leinster's 23 players who've played for Leinster 164 times, so some indication of a greater willingness to back youth in recent times. Contrast this with the period 2012-15 where 22 Munster players across three intakes earned 551 caps, while the 22 Leinster recruits earned 1,358 caps.

    A lot of numbers in that, and denser than I'd hoped, but hopefully makes sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    Are you being serious? You are saying there is something wrong with a provincial system based on people on boards.ie saying they would like to see an NIQ 10?

    What’s happening dude. You are flailing.

    The fact is they have two not counting Healy and as of now will have two next year.

    The idea that Leinster players are better because they get playing time earlier is obviously flawed. Its more likely they get playing time earlier because they are better players or they come in to the academy more developed.

    Mix in the fact that Leinster have many more low leverage minutes than other provinces available… and it explains itself.

    If you stuck any other provincial system on top of the dublin school system (especially blackrock and st michaels who have 7/8 (!) of the recent academy intake) you would see similar numbers. Not identical but much more similar.

    Leinster generally are not playing guys who are not ready to play. There is a reason why they can play their C team and be generally competitive with bad teams.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I've no interest in going round and round on this with you.

    You're asking "who was calling for NIQ signings" and I highlight a number of fans calling for it. Clearly I was referring to fans on Boards here, as opposed to Graham Rowntree out calling for the signings ffs.

    You keep highlighting this point around Leinster having "low leverage" minutes, but Leinster intersperse their young players into their squads all through the year, not just in garbage time games at the end. At any point this season Leinster would have given substantially more minutes to academy players than peers.

    The production line in Leinster is unquestionably better than the other three Irish provinces, and has been for 10 years + now, but in addition to that, I think the coaching and development has been considerably better in Leinster too.

    There are countless examples of players who have visibly improved to a significant degree after they join the Leinster system - look at guys like Josh van der Flier, Hugo Keenan or Dan Sheehan - all relatively unheralded underage prospects who absolutely nobody would have seen as being amongst the very best players on the planet within a couple of years.

    To take your viewpoint on this as factual would reduce the role of Head Coach / Director of Rugby down to nothing more than simply identifying the best players, picking them and setting out the tactics. There's a lot more to it than that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭ulsteru20s


    I didn’t say coaching and development wasn’t good in Leinster. I’m saying the obvious reason why players would play earlier is that they have near pro level schools providing much more developed players. If one or two schools produce that many players, then that should be the starting point of the logic chain. It would be different if these guys played early and really showed hard growing pains. Often they look quite good right away. That suggests to me that they are playing because they are ready.

    I don’t think any of those examples really support your argument. Dan Sheehan didn’t play a game at Leinster before his first senior contract. If Keenan did three years in the academy, he did 17 minutes total before his third year. It was trickier with JdF but it looks like he got all of his academy minutes in his last year of the academy which i believe was his third year.

    All three of those had the type of development path that you criticize other provinces for. I personally think that’s basically the standard route except for freaks/some graduates of professional level secondary schools.

    Post edited by ulsteru20s on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Dubinusa




  • Advertisement
Advertisement