Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

Options
1286287289291292315

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Russian lies about everything to do with the war, including the reasons for the invasion. It covers up atrocities. There is propaganda on both sides, but anyone paying attention can tell the difference between the extent of Russian lies and the intent behind it. And Ukraine's attempts at military deception and to gain advantage on the battlefield. Saying there is propaganda on both sides is a cop out answer to avoid engaging with the reality.

    You have been completely unable to provide independent sources for the falsehoods in your previous posts about casualties.

    You have ignored the points to you that Ukraine was invaded by Russia. Russia is using those shells. Russia is the one endangering nuclear plants. Ukraine had no say in any of that. The only war mongering going on is by Russia.

    Your representation of some parallel Irish history bears no relation to what actually happened between Russia and Ukraine. It is without merit or foundation.

    The myths about this supposed peace deal were already discussed on the thread.

    The article you have linked is not a "pretty good article". It is a gross misrepresentation of half truths and lies. It was already discussed and discredited on the thread - see below.

    There was no real peace deal. Russia already violated Budapest, this would have been no different. Ukraine knew this which is why they didn't go for it.

    It was never a tangible peace deal, it would have just been Budapest Mark #2 or a repeat of Russia's bad faith with Minsk. Something along the lines of Russia retains Crimea and Donbas, Ukraine never in NATO and Ukraine back to relying on nebulous 'security guarantees'.

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/120154841/#Comment_120154841

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The "both sides" argument. Just because both sides engage in propaganda doesn't mean it's in any way equal. The Kremlin produces an eye-watering amount of BS, and has done so for a long time. Based on your posts you seem to be swallowing a considerable portion of it.

    This war is not a "territorial dispute". One nation is 24/7 attacking and invading the other and has never legitimately proposed peace. The only options available to the defender are to attempt to reward their invader with land, but that has never stopped them before, leaving the only option which is to fight or completely give up. The Ukrainians have chosen to fight. Which has disgusted Putin apologists the world over. Much of the civilized free world has supported Ukraine, which has disgusted them even more.

    The individuals who claim that Ukraine should be rewarding Putin with land in the hopes that he will stop are a) utterly insane and b) want Putin to prevail. By a remarkable and stunning coincidence these individuals often blame the West for everything as much as the Kremlin does.

    Stop the war☮️

    Your slogan really means: "Give Putin what he wants, he'll definitely stop then"



  • Registered Users Posts: 507 ✭✭✭Antipathetic


    ##Mod Note##

    Antipathetic Threadbanned.


    ** Threadban Lifted following discussion**

    Post edited by Quin_Dub on

    Don't let the terrorists in Israel win. Please donate to UNRWA now!

    https://donate.unrwa.org/-landing-page/en_EN



  • Registered Users Posts: 478 ✭✭Run Forest Run


    Ultimately, a diplomatic solution will be the only way forward. Regardless of what the warmongers in the west say. Although, it's looking increasingly likely that this might come from the Chinese rather than any western powers.

    Ukraine is not winning this war. Russia is bound by it's constitution to defend these new territories indefinitely, just the same as if they were Moscow or St Petersburg. So there is zero chance that they are ever going to walk away from this war regardless of what happens. And regardless of who is in charge. Putin could walk away tomorrow, and Russia will still fight to defend these territories. For Ukraine, continuing to fight and die with no real hope of succeeding is simply suicidal.

    The west - and the American imperialists in particular of course - do not want to acknowledge the reality of the situation - or perhaps simply do not care about the fate of the Ukrainian people/nation, compared with their hunger to defeat Russia. This was their golden opportunity to get Russia, but it has failed spectacularly. Now they are faced with the stark geopolitical landscape of a resurgent Eurasian block, that is highly motivated to topple them at all costs - and most worryingly of all the sanctions have driven popular opinion towards dumping the petro-dollar.

    The Biden administration literally could not have screwed up any worse within a single presidential term if they had tried...



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The only warmongers are in Russia who forced this war onto Ukraine despite such agreements as Budapest. An absolutely absurd proposition that you reserve the word warmongers for those in the West and never for those who actually started the war. The moral and intellectual bankruptcy of your position is plain for all to see.

    As for Russia's constitution, yeah sure they are "bound" to do that. That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence and if you think the average Russian cares for the 'annexed' territories the way they do Moscow or St Petersburg you are in fantasy land.

    Your understanding of the Biden administration is in similar fantasy territory, an assertion without merit or foundation.

    Ukraine know far better than any of us the stakes. They fight on. Why sign another sham peace treaty like Budapest with Russia, which Russia will break at will - next time Ukraine may not have the huge military, diplomatic, financial support from the EU and US and other allies. The only true lasting secure peace for Ukraine is in NATO membership. Finland and Sweden likewise making that same decision.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,665 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Russia is bound by it's constitution to defend these new territories indefinitely

    This is wrong on many levels. Putin is not bound by anything as he has ably demonstrated over the years. And Russia has already withdrawn from Kherson so this is verifiable nonsense.

    Also, after the Russians retreated from their "sovereign land" in Kherson the Ukrainians found this. Shockingly, countries tend not to be too content to allow foreign invaders to come in and systemically torture their citizens.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/16/alleged-russian-torture-room-uncovered-in-liberated-kherson



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    This isn't a territorial dispute.

    No one wants war except for Putin. It was his decision to invade the sovereign territory of Ukraine from day 1, which he has done 24/7 with no sign of letting up. He can turn around at any time and end all this. He hasn't made any other offer to the Ukrainian people except death and occupation down the barrel of a gun.

    Demanding Ukraine negotiate is asking the rape victim to negotiate with their rapist, it's perverse.

    Demanding Ukraine to give their land as a reward to their invader to buy some temporary "peace" is perverse.

    Yet this is the "solution" offered by these individuals who claim they want peace. A peace that, coincidentally, always involves Putin prevailing. Individuals who, coincidentally, speak the same language as the invader, blaming other countries, blaming NATO, blaming the defender.

    If Ukraine is to negotiate it will only ever be on their terms, they are pushing Russia back and holding them there, they are grinding down Russia's military machine with their lives, they are expending their blood defending Europe, they'll make that decision themselves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 507 ✭✭✭Antipathetic


    Comparing Ukraine to a rape victim is deeply offensive to those who have been raped.

    Why does everyone keep insisting that Ukraine did nothing to provoke the invasion, it's been well documented about their army attacking civilians in the Donbass for years killing thousands of predominantly ethnic Russians, I'm surprised the Russians didn't respond sooner. Plus there is the whole issue around NATO membership.

    Ask yourself honestly would the UK, France or USA tolerate Ireland not only joining a foreign military alliance that has been openly hostile to them for decades but also host military bases and equipment for said alliance?

    Don't let the terrorists in Israel win. Please donate to UNRWA now!

    https://donate.unrwa.org/-landing-page/en_EN



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,665 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Comparing Ukraine to a rape victim is deeply offensive to those who have been raped.

    Like the thousands of men, women and children that the Russians have quite literally raped in Ukraine?

    I would think they'd find the comparison apt.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    More lies and Russian propaganda ,

    You have no argument here your posting the same nonsense that got you banned and straight back at it ,

    Russia invaded ukraine in 2014 and again in 2022 this is fact,it wasn't invaded to protect Russian citizens that was well and truly debunked along time ago, several previous low level or recently registered posters repeatedly make the same claim and it lies ,

    Warcrimes ,Massacres in Bucha, Mariupol theater, Mariupol mass Graves,the bombing of hospitals , schools , creches , maternity hospitals , bombing of civilian energy and heating infrastructure,the blockading of grain shipments the mass theft of Ukrainan grain and agricultural equipment,



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    There are thousands of documented cases of Ukrainians being raped and murdered by Russian troops.

    Putin proxy invaded S East Ukraine (Donbas) in 2014. The Ukrainians defended their sovereign territory, as a result people died on both sides, which was 100% a result Putin's decision to proxy invade.

    The Kremlin puts that through it's reality distortion machine, chooses only the victims in Donbas, and blames that on the defenders, spits that out. Putin apologists and indirect supporters lap it up and repeat it online. Rinse, repeat.



  • Registered Users Posts: 507 ✭✭✭Antipathetic


    My apologies @Gatling I've put you on ignore. I'm tired of listening to your pro US bull you can do nothing but falsely accuse me of being pro russian when all I want is peace. And yes, sometime that does involve compromising with an enemy.

    People with your attitude make me sick you sing happy that the war is continuing rather than explore the possibility of peace.

    Also, I need to remind you that according to the UN they have been not that many civilian deaths. Certainly when compared to the US adventures overseas in the likes of Iraq or Afghanistan. The US are experts when it comes to killing civilians so they have no right to criticise any other nation.

    Don't let the terrorists in Israel win. Please donate to UNRWA now!

    https://donate.unrwa.org/-landing-page/en_EN



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,665 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    There will be no peace for those left under occupation by murderous Russian forces.

    Even the former Israeli PM who was the source of the comments on a "peace deal" being possible last year commented that it was utterly dead in the water after Bucha.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    You are attempting to validate some of Putin's actions using the tired old trope of reaching into the past and cherry-picking some other country's history. It's the equivalent of saying a murder is okay because someone was murdered in the past. The equivalent of claiming e.g. Scholz is a hypocrite for his stance on Ukraine because "Germany" killed many people in the past. It's just plain idiotic. Countries aren't people.

    When we refer to Russia, we're referring to Putin's Russia. Not Stalin, not Yeltsin. Putin's Russia is invading Ukraine today, and digging into reductionist history from the past doesn't validate that. It's whataboutery. It's also part of Kremlin propaganda (there it is again)



  • Registered Users Posts: 56 ✭✭maxflinn




  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    It's based on an opinion piece in a blog, which seems to have some information completely wrong. For example the "7 to 1" claim, the Pentagon leaks indicate that more Russian troops have died (or been wounded) than Ukraine troops

    Also the "talks" held by Russia at the beginning of the invasion were widely seen as a sham, likely for propaganda purposes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Also doubtful if the figures included pro Russian militua or Wagner merecenaries... the main point being if there is anything like a X to 1 ratio it is in Ukraines favour.

    And when challenged no real evidence was provides to support the claim of 7 to 1 in Russias favour. There are some badly doctored images on the internet that really shouldnt be fooling anyone in 2023.

    This is a claim of 7 to 1 in Ukraines favour for one specific battle / campaign


    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Oh look a zombie account that suddenly awakens ,

    The figure is based off doctored images of the recent US intelligence leak's which the Kremlin used to try hid their loses

    Post edited by Gatling on


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,444 ✭✭✭jmreire


    And I'm pretty sure that Gatling is very happy that you are ignoring him,, because that way he does not have to reply to your pro Russian/ Putin anti -US / EU drivel. I was talking to an Afghan friend and colleague earlier today, and guess what? He, like thousands of his countrymen are deeply lamenting the departure of the US, and praying for their return. And that is the true picture of the relationship between the US and Afghanistan. What Country ever invaded another, and spent literally trillions of their own money to help the invaded Country? Because, that is what the US did in Afghanistan. They brought it into the 20 century. They also helped Japan and Germany to become economic powerhouses after their defeat in ww2. through the Marshall plan. All Putin has brought to the world is death and destruction. He is the embodiment of pure evil.



  • Registered Users Posts: 923 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    What peace did Czechoslovakia achieve in 1939 by compromising with their enemy?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,665 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Czechoslovakia didn't even compromise with the enemy, other people did it for them. Which just reinforces the point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭grumpyperson


    Doesn't sound like things are going great for civilians still in Ukraine.

    Compare and contrast with Sy Hersh articles on the leaders of the fight against Russia

    One estimate by analysts from the Central Intelligence Agency put the embezzled funds at $400 million last year

    Maybe if Ireland was a voice for peace but judging by the voices here not gonna happen. I think the extremists have an oversized influence on policy. The war is horrifying and it seems there have been very few cool heads like Sabine Higgins. It feels like it's too late now. Tens of thousands more to die for an eventual ceasefire for what?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,444 ✭✭✭jmreire


    The sole cause of all the murder and mayhem and destruction in Ukraine is all down to one man, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, and to him alone. Blaming the Ukrainian's for defending themselves from Putin's aggression, and any Country helping Ukraine to defend themselves, is putting the blame in the wrong place. You do realize that Ukraine is defending the EU as well, don't you? Because they are the only ones stopping Putin from attacking the EU, as he has said he will.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,418 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Ukrainian civilians have seen what happens to them under Russian 'peace'... mass graves, torture, illegal detention, executions...

    I don't remember seeing any posts from you condemning unequivocally such Russian atrocities?

    Yet you get strangely worked up about this. Move on from one discredited pro-Russian propaganda piece to the next.

    The war is horrifying, so is Russian occupation and the ever present threat of Russian invasion. That is why Ukraine fights on.

    Still waiting on any proof of your previous claims about 7 to 1 casualties in favour of Russia.

    So your claims have no credibility and Seymour Hersh has been conspiracy theory crank for the last 15 years or so.

    What do you think the level of embezzlement is in Russia? And what does that mean for anyone left under their occupation?

    A ceasefire would be pointless. It would just be Budapest mark 2. You had no answer last time either when this was put to you.

    The only lasting peace for Ukraine is with secure borders and on track for NATO membership.

    Ukraine knows better than we do what the stakes are, what they can handle.

    Nobody in the West is forcing them to fight - it is Russia that forces them to fight.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Correct, we need cool heads.

    However, it's easy to rub hands together and plead for peace 3,000km from the front-lines of a war with a clear invading force, that was intent on toppling the current government. And by all accounts, in the first days of the war it seemed like precisely that would happen. The slow Western response was precisely because everyone - including Russia and its forces who packed dress uniforms for Parades - thought Kyiv was about to be taken.

    This isn't the Balkans conflict and the tragic culmination of decades of that problematic and conflicting ethno-nationalist minefield; this is a clear Invader-Defender conflict, despite some narratives attempting to reframe it as ethnicity-driven. While deflection over "corruption" isn't going to curry favour or be taken seriously, given it only reads as a tedious attempt to draw Ukraine/Kyiv as some corrupt tinpot country that probably deserved to be invaded. Cos that's the inference being made here, right? It's never clear how "corruption in Ukraine" is supposed to sit as some ... I dunno, attempted abstraction towards drawing the war as anything except what it clearly is.

    Oh yes, Ukraine was provably corrupt - but its attempts to combat said corruption is also quite provable - however neither exist as a credible stepping-stone towards invasion. And even if it did, given the country invading Ukraine is itself notably corrupt - more-so, according to international indices - why does Ukraine still deserve such remonstrations? If they want into the EU the first thing they'll have to do, and are doing, is sort out their corruption. Whither Russia's attempts?

    Russia unilaterally invaded Ukraine, and if peace is the ultimate goal the very first port of call should be Moscow to ask the demonstrable aggressor to halt offensives. As a start & some deference towards goodwill, they could halt the daily attacks on civilian targets - funny how that little wrinkle is consistently ignored. But yes, let's tut over Ukrainian Corruption.



  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭grumpyperson


    Moscow laid out its red lines. No to NATO and implement the Minsk 2 agreement.

    The ceasefire violations increased massively in Feb 2022 as recorded by OSCE and Moscow launched what it called a SMO. The April talks (no to NATO) failed after Johnson paid Zelenksy a visit (https://www.commondreams.org/news/2022/05/06/boris-johnson-pressured-zelenskyy-ditch-peace-talks-russia-ukrainian-paper) and Russia has since laid claim to the four oblasts in Eastern Ukraine.

    Russia has killed an estimated 150,000 Ukrainian soldiers.

    How does this war benefit Ukraine? I just do not see how they can win. If they cannot win then negotiations are better. Zelensky has refused to talk with Putin. To me, Ukraine has lost the four oblasts and Crimea. Maybe in ten - twenty years they will get them back if the Russian state collapses but the fighting is not helping them get them back, it's turning Ukraine into a failed state. All that is written here is that the Russian's cannot be negotiated with when in fact history shows otherwise.

    You can hate Russia or whatever you want. You can insist that the sun should not come up. However, objectively Ukraine is being annihilated. It will be even worse if the Uranium depleted shells are brought into the war. That is surely a good case for negotiations as Sabine Higgins put forward.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    No to NATO

    Countries, like Finland, join NATO because Putin's Russia is highly aggressive. As recently demonstrated. If Ukraine was in NATO, none of this would have happened. Countries join defensive alliances for that reason. Russia has aggressive plans for countries, e.g. invading them, therefore it's really not keen on them joining a defensive alliance.

    It was the same with Hitler. He was highly aggressive, countries therefore joined defensive alliances, he claimed the defensive alliance was "encircling" Germany. Sound familiar? Putin adopted the same twisted logic.

    Minsk 2 agreement.

    Yes, the agreement that only existed because Russia proxy invaded Donbas, which Putin declared null because, surprise, surprise he was invading the entirety of Ukraine.

    The April talks

    Any "talks" conducted by Moscow have so far been a sham for propaganda purposes, similar to their "referendums". Putin's Russia has been invading Ukraine 24/7 since Feb 2022 with zero intention of peace. There's zero reason to believe that the "talks" they offered in April were any different.

    As mentioned countless times, this isn't some dispute. One country is relentlessly trying to subjugate and take-over another, it will only stop doing that when it can't do that. Only then, and maybe then, will talks happen.

    No one trusts Putin's Russia because they break treaties like it's going out of fashion, when their lips are moving they are lying, and they have been annexing and invading Ukraine since 2014.

    However, objectively Ukraine is being annihilated.

    Apparently the Ukrainians would rather be "annihilated" than live under an authoritarian jackboot, lose their freedoms, lose their identity, lose their culture, their children forced to speak Russian, be arbitrarily liquidated and all the horrific stuff that is going on in occupied Ukraine.

    Sabine Higgins

    Is an actress with fringe political views. Her "peace plan" involves rewarding the invader with Ukrainian land. Which a) doesn't work and b) doesn't make any sense.

    By another stunning, remarkable coincidence she's also another one of these quacks who repeatedly tries to blame other countries or make "both sides" excuses for Putin's actions.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,665 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The ceasefire violations increased massively in Feb 2022

    I'll bloody well say. Obtuse way of describing a full blown invasion with the intention of toppling the government, but I guess technically accurate.

    How does this war benefit Ukraine?

    It doesn't, that's why they didn't start it 🙄

    To me, Ukraine has lost the four oblasts

    They hadn't even lost them all completely at the fullest extent of Russian occupation. They have since recaptured significant portions of them and hopefully will continue to do so.

    Let me turn it back on you and ask some more sensible questions. How does this war benefit Russia? I just do not see how they can win.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    So we're back to the same old rhetoric and soundbites: first it was corruption; now it's Ukraine's fault for "Minsk 2 violations"; and why fight, when you can't win etc. etc. The latter one is especially interesting given Ukraine still stands, despite evidence to the contrary 1+ years ago. It's especially hard to stomach as a credible argument given we're in this exact scenario because Moscow chose to tear up this vaunted Agreement and decide to invade further into Ukraine. Ah but yes - that's the other talking point you're winking at. That insinuation Ukraine started all this because of "ceasefire violations".

    This doesn't remotely pass the smell test beyond Concern Trolling at best. Only one side's leader has written with faux profundity that Ukraine is a fallen brother of Historical Russia, the state a hostile anti-Russian entity with no credibility; everything else is just fudge to get to an end result of furthering Russian control of Ukraine. You started talking about peace, acted aghast at "corruption", now you're dictating what Ukraine should do, like their own sense of sovereignty or self-determination has no value in this discussion. Presumably you're quite against them becoming part of NATO - being part of Russia simply a more organic outcome it seems? Perhaps Ukraine should be allowed whatever path Ukraine's people decides is right for them.

    Peace is a useful abstract to cling to when the application of that concept often doesn't seem as peaceful. Vietnamese, Afghans and Iraqis might have a word on that front. And something tells me if Ukraine submitted, again, to Russia's demands and Moscow comes back another 8 years later claiming violations and anti-Russian actions ... we'll have the same rhetoric all over. Just give Russia what it wants; why fight?

    The irony is you're talking to someone who has aged into a stance of being aggressively anti-Nation-State; they're archaic, the lingering genetic link to tribalism and petty geography, and not fit for purpose in the world we live in. But the forcible redrawing of borders, the rationalisation of viable states by invasion?

    No, that is not the path, and if Ukraine has problems, they're not solved by a hostile army, literally populated by criminals, destroying the country one town at a time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭grumpyperson


    In case you missed it, the ceasefire violations prior to the war increased massively in the week prior to the invasion. The autonomous region and Ukraine were having something of a mini war.

    The two Russian-backed, self-proclaimed republics in Ukraine's Donetsk and Luhansk regions were hit by more than 1,400 explosions on Friday, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) said. And almost 2,000 ceasefire violations were registered in the area by OSCE monitors on Saturday, a diplomatic source told Reuters

    To me it looks very similar to what I what imagine would have happened if the Irish army started bombing NI. This is not to say that Ukraine should not have attempted to retake Donbas/ Crimea.

    You say the Russian's do not negotiate in earnest but Ukraine Pravda also seemed to disappointed by the collapse of talks following Johnson visit.

    I see no point in throwing thousands more Ukrainian and Russian soldiers into a slaughter pit. From where I am sitting, I think the best we can do is to petition for peace. As it stand it looks to me like Moscow is well armed, has a big army and is not going to lose.

    If you think Ukraine can win then I guess that explains your position. For me it seems Russia has taken the territory and the continuing war is just making the Ukrainian position worse.



Advertisement