Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Yellowstone - Paramount *Spoilers*

123457

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,624 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers



    Its all very negative though. If people hate it so much just find something else.

    The series has been entertaining for 5 seasons, with some excellent characters and dialogue and is probably a victim of its own success and guilty of going one season to far.

    one bad episode isnt going to turn me off it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,713 ✭✭✭OmegaGene


    It’s been more than one bad episode, the first half of the last series has gone nowhere

    who said they hated it ?

    dont be so offended or even worried about other peoples opinions

    The internet isn’t for everyone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,624 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Ive no worry about others opinions, never had, but the last few pages of the thread is akin to people tasting a 9v battery.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,868 ✭✭✭Pentecost


    I don't hate it really. It's just been boring, and a bit annoying at times of late.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,676 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Matthew McConaughey's Yellowstone spin off is moving forward



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,000 ✭✭✭Nigzcurran


    I absolutely loved 1883 and 1923 so hopefully this is as good



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 24,017 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    Of all the "franchise" shows I like the Yellowstone universe, at this stage I'd say the original series is the least interesting so happy to get more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭squonk


    i was disappointed with the spin-offs. 1883 was episode after episode of sheer misery. It got really monotonous after a while.

    The ranch stuff on 1923 went nowhere very slowly. Arguably Jake Dutton brought the whole mess on himself. The story with Spencer was the saving grace. I’d watch the hell out of a show with him and the wife travelling around. It’ll just get dull once he gets back home.

    Main Yellowstone seems to be suffering from its own success now as well. Previous seasons were more focused and tighter but it’s spread out now to get a 2 part season. Wish they hadn’t messed with the formula.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,230 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    1883 was a bit goofy with the daughter going native/. 1923 is better but the ranch stuff is too reminiscence of the original yellowstone in that the Duttons are just willing to kill anyone to keep their ranch. The Spencer stuff is definitely the highlight with a number of locations outside of America being interesting. The original Yellowstone should try to end on ahigh, it has been too meandering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭squonk


    Definitely, sure half the first part of tge season on Yellowstone was about that 6666 ranch which is there before Sheridan bought it. I know he’s doing a 6666 spin-off show but he really should just keep the focus on Montana in Yellowstone.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,256 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    I watched episode 5 of season 3 and earlier - flashbacks reveal why Beth hates Jamie and I am now on her side whereas along I thought I thought he was the victim.

    I’m curious about the clinic’s policy of sterilisation. I knew this was something done to Native American women in 1960s/1970s but as late as the 90s (I’m guessing the flashback is then).

    When was it actually stopped? The receptionist has no qualms telling Jamie but did the people on the reservations and the public at large know about it?

    I tried Google but can’t seem to find when it ended.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 24,017 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    I remember looking it up at the time and it was a common enough practise in the 70s but not really when the scene was based, but they weren't going for too much accuracy don't forget Beth was able to just walk home after a fairly serious operation and was able to hide the recovery from her father



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 24,017 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,256 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    I don’t understand how the US government continue to get away with things like this. Nor how it’s citizens think America is shining light to the world.

    In regards to the show it is disappointing that they used this horrible occurrence so inaccurately - it wasn’t done anymore and the fact Beth was up and about a few hours later.

    Surely a much better version is Jamie sought out an illegal clinic and something went wrong. And use the sterilisation as a storyline in one the other shows sent in the past.

    Still though Reilly, Bentley and Costner are fantastic in that storyline.

    It is fascinating how quickly Yellowstone turned into a franchise and how well it has been received as such.

    I don’t want spoilers but opening this page I did notice mention that season 5 is a season too many. Do people think the show should have ended with season 4 ?

    I thought it would most likely run for another few years but did expect Costner would not be involved for as long as that.

    John is a terrible father but an awesome grandfather :D



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,256 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    Am I mistaken or is there very very little interaction with each other in the Dutton family?

    I watched the episode where Beth tells her father what Jamie did and the final scene is the first time (I think) that Jamie and Kacey have been in a scene together since being at the dinner table very early in season 2.

    I don’t think Monica and Jamie have even met :p



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,676 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    It seems Costner is gone after S5



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 24,017 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    I said the same thing earlier in the thread, it's clear that they are rarely in the same place, the story arcs are so seperate at this stage that there aren't many scenes where they are all needed, the amount of over the shoulder conversation angles where it's clearly a standin is very anoying as well. For a lot of Costner's scenes in in 1 of 3 places so it's clear he's just doing a load of shoots in a day, the difference in his lighting for other actors is amazing as well, especially with the Governor, she's always in the shadow. It's really annoying when you spot it, Castle was the worst offender back in the day but there was clear reasons for that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,256 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    Entertainment Tonight have the “exclusive” story but no where in the article does it quote someone in the know. It is just a history of the rumour.

    If he was staying they would have put that rumour to rest ages ago so he obviously is but why do these websites always claim they have “news” when they don’t?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,256 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    I haven’t noticed any of that but I just find it curious that there is so little interaction between the siblings (other than Beth and Jamie of course) and also Monica and Tate when they all live in the same house and that there was so little impact from the death of the eldest son.

    It is sad that Costner is leaving but he has other projects he wants to work on and I’m looking forward to the Horizon trilogy.

    Hard to imagine the show without him especially with so little done in the siblings relationship in the series so far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,256 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    I think I have to stay out of the thread now. Been lucky to get no spoilers so I won’t push it but I have a two questions.

    Is it best to watch 1883 before or after season 4 ? I know there is an 1883 flashback episode in season 4 but don’t know if it a prequel or sequel to 1883. And should I watch 1923 before or after season 5 part 1 ? Or does it make no difference.

    Is the 6666 or the 1944 spin-offs the McConaughey (had to copy and paste that :P) series or is it something else.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 24,017 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    I don't think it makes a huge difference, there's a few flashbacks but doesn't ruin anything, personally I didn't watch 1883 until well after I'd watched Yellowstone and there wasn't any spoilers that ruined anything for me (that I can remember)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,668 ✭✭✭corkie


    Yellowstone's end is confirmed along with announcement of new spin-off sequel

    A brand new spin-off series is coming.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,713 ✭✭✭OmegaGene


    More spin offs than a yo-yo competition

    The internet isn’t for everyone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,676 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    It's a franchise verse 😁 so which Duttons will head to the spin off, more Beth vs. Jamie



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭squonk


    Why bother with a sequel spin off. Let Costner leave if he wants. Just do series 6 with the kids fighting it out after John dies. I think they’re starting to take the piss at this stage with the spin offs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,868 ✭✭✭Pentecost


    It's time to wrap it up. Rewrite the rest of this season to tie it up if need be but it doesn't have another season in it. Five seasons is plenty and very respectable for a drama series these days.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭squonk


    Definitely. Especially as feck all has really happened in the first half of this season because they spent half of it setting up a new spin off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,256 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    This is a very strange undertaking.

    As squonk said why not just carry on the series without Costner?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,713 ✭✭✭OmegaGene


    it is all about the money i suspect, rumours are costner might not even return for filming


    While Paramount Network is likely unhappy about cancelling the channel’s biggest show, there is an upside for the Paramount+ streaming service. The original Yellowstone series streams on the Peacock streaming service, thanks to a 2020 deal that execs at Paramount now regret. The new series will stream on Paramount+, joining the other shows in the Yellowstone franchise.

    The internet isn’t for everyone



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭squonk


    They makes sense. Kill the main show to kill associated contracts and start with a wholly controlled sequel. While it makes sense though it’s also the problem with the show and franchise at this stage. Sheridan seems to have mad a lot of money off of it and has branched out into his own production and ranch empire, all the time using the show as a sales front for whatever he’s into at the time. That’s fine if it worked but tge quality of the show has declined and it feels like any main show now, be it Yellowstone or the sequel will probably exist to launch more spin-offs and publicise whatever ranch or business he gets in bed with next.

    The spin-offs aren’t of high value either imho. 1883 was a death March where they didn’t get very far initially but suddenly warped to Wyoming. 1923 was just the usual Duttons fighting a big bad except, again, not much actually happened. If it wasn’t for the spencer story it’d have been as dead a duck as 1883. IMHONtgeres a great show in a renegade from a rancher family travelling the world gave hunting with his aristocratic bride in tow. Trouble is once he makes it back to Yellowstone we’ll just have more of the same shîte we’ve seen a few times already. I particularly hated that the 1923 ranch storyline essentially stopped with Helen mirren telling Timothy dalton “Oh you just wait til my other nephew gets here. You’ll be sorry then!” Da-da-daahhhh!

    Alone and initially Yellowstone was great. Kind of a breath of fresh air but now we’ve seen it all before so no point in rehashing the same story over and over again getting progressively slower paced at each iteration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,713 ✭✭✭OmegaGene


    hmm i havent watched 1923 yet, guess i dont have to bother now i know the ending lol

    maybe keep the conversation and spoilers to yellowstone

    The internet isn’t for everyone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,676 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Yes the ranch is part of the story so just kill off John and the original show can continue, a few characters could go also, reboot the storylines refresh

    I've grown tired if I'm honest of Beth and Jamie fighting



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭Bawnmore


    Wrapped up all of the Yellowstone franchise here and need a cowboy fix - have seen Deadwood mentioned not long ago - assuming it's worth a watch?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,256 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    I watched the episode where the Yellowstone cowboys killed the Morrow’s for attacking Teeter and Colby.

    I get why the two of them are branded afterwards but why was Ryan? He was supposed to get the brand for helping avenge Jimmy’s grandfather in season 2 and I thought because he was branded he was involved in the rescue of Tate.

    The older Morrow looks like he walked of an old John Wayne Western. Floyd too.

    Costner should put them in his western trilogy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,256 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    I’m going to watch 1883 next and make myself wait to see the outcome of the attack on the Duttons.

    I had thought that season 4 has a whole episode as a sequel to 1883 - but is that wrong? Are the 1883 flashbacks just a part of an episode or is there a series of flashbacks across the season?

    I'm wondering because on the TV app the thumbnail for the next episode is clearly not set in present day.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,559 ✭✭✭✭yabadabado




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,466 ✭✭✭Homelander


    I just binged Season 1 through 5 in about two or three weeks. I had watched 1883 first which I thought was spectacular and then 1923 which I enjoyed a lot but definitely felt it wasn't as good.

    Firstly, I really enjoy Yellowstone overall. The scenery is breath-taking and the cast are mostly great, and those little moments that focus on ranching life and rural Montana living are excellent. Even the characters that are badly written have some great moments and the entertainment value is high.

    My biggest issue having watched it all back to back is that somewhere around S3 or S4 almost all of the main characters stopped growing and just seemed to get caught in loops or were sidelined, like the writers hadn't a clue what to actually do with them.

    Kaycee and Jamie are prime examples of this, but the Beth/Jamie thing is just beyond absurd at this point. They are walking in circles for several seasons now, it's almost comical how many "Jamie turns on the family/Beth pledges to destroy him" sagas they've gone through at this stage.

    The thing for me is that since the very first episode of the show, Jamie has been treated with disdain and mistrust by basically everyone in a weird vacuum where common sense and logic doesn't exist and no-one ever seems to stand up for him.

    It's bad writing and it only got worse in the later seasons. I like the character of John Dutton but he's been nothing but a POS to Jamie since the start. I can't quite work out how the writers haven't at least had a somewhat neutral party like Kaycee point that out, or at least attempt to counter Beth's unrelenting "Jamie is evil" campaign ongoing since the first episode.

    And what the hell happened to Kaycee? The last two seasons he's just pushing random, mostly meaningless filler in between other barely-relevant plot points. He and Monica add nothing to the show anymore, which is a shame because they were such good characters earlier on.

    The only character with a surprisingly solid and meaningful arc that plays out on-screen is Jimmy at this point. So anyway, I still really like the show and the individual scenes and moments are still fantastic, but the overall narrative and the plot beats have gone really downhill.

    I don't know what's coming down the line for the second half of season 5, but I sincerely hope Beth gets the chopping block or at least taken down many, many pegs. The actress is terrific but the character is an utterly wretched psychopath that is never held to account.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,974 ✭✭✭cdgalwegian


    I thought Yellowstone had been great up until end of season 3, but was starting to lose its luster by then. I gave up on it at the start of season 4 last year. It was just getting drawn out and silly.

    i went on to 1883, which I finished recently; it is, as you say spectacular - achingly spectacular. There is another thread for that, but

    Elsa, despite her slightly off-putting voice-over, broke my heart.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,256 ✭✭✭Spon Farmer


    I’m at the midway of season 4 and in the last episode I watched Rainwater and Monica are talking about Tate killing one of the attackers on the ranch.

    I thought Tate just shot him (traumatic enough for the kid which is what I thought upset him) because I’m positive the guy was still moving and Lloyd was the one who killed him because there was gunshot from the house as Monica and Tate ran for the bunkhouse. As far as I can remember no one ever mentions Tate killing him until Rainwater and Monica talk about it.

    Were these episodes filmed during CoVid restrictions? It is very strange that there is no scenes between John and Tate in the aftermath of all that especially since they are so close.

    Season 4 has been a bit of a disappointment. We see Beth’s scars from the explosion but no one is talking about it, John not showing any emotion that Tate isn’t around, Jaime missing for entire episodes, and the spending so much time on Jimmy who is a supporting character and not even in the same state anymore.

    Obviously this meant to set up the supposed 6666 spin off but I don’t see how - almost all the characters there are clearly played by people who are not professional actors. It has t shown me any reason to look forward to it.

    Very frustrating. I wonder if this contributed to Costner wanting to leave the show?

    Post edited by Spon Farmer on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,668 ✭✭✭corkie


    What??!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,676 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Yellowstone Spinoffs 1944 and 2024 Officially Ordered at Paramount



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭squonk


    Ah for god’s sake! Just concentrate in one or two shows and do them well. Now nothing is being done week with ask these spinoff shows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,735 ✭✭✭golfball37


    Season one of deadwood is up there with anything that I’ve ever seen. It’s excellent



  • Registered Users Posts: 60 ✭✭quidel7


    Is Kevin Costner coming back to see out the show or what? It’s fairly dragging out at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,937 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,195 ✭✭✭nachouser


    Seems like there's a lot to unpack re why it was delayed, but in other good news, it looks like Costner has his own set of Western films coming out. Horizon has an amazing cast.

    https://www.avclub.com/kevin-costner-speaks-about-yellowstone-and-horizon-1851474445



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,937 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    The final part of the final season returns November 10th



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,374 ✭✭✭robwen




  • Advertisement
Advertisement